Optimizing the Use of Antibacterial Agents in the Neonatal Period

Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Correct Management to Reduce Sepsis in NICU Settings

The discovery of antimicrobial drugs has led to a significant increase in survival from infections; however, they are very often prescribed and administered, even when their use is not necessary and appropriate. Newborns are particularly exposed to infections due to the poor effectiveness and the immaturity of their immune systems. For this reason, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), the use of antimicrobial drugs is often decisive and life-saving, and it must be started promptly to ensure its effectiveness in consideration of the possible rapid evolution of the infection towards sepsis. Nevertheless, the misuse of antibiotics in the neonatal period leads not only to an increase in the development and wide spreading of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but it is also associated with various short-term (e.g., alterations of the microbiota) and long-term (e.g., increased risk of allergic disease and obesity) effects. It appears fundamental to use antibiotics only when strictly necessary; specific decision-making algorithms and electronic calculators can help limit the use of unnecessary antibiotic drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the right balance between the risks and benefits of antimicrobial therapy in NICUs; for this purpose, specific Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in neonatal care and the creation of a specific antimicrobial stewardship team are requested.

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-Incidence and Strategies for Prevention

The second most prevalent healthcare-associated infection in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This review aims to update the knowledge regarding the incidence of neonatal VAP and to summarize possible strategies for prevention. The VAP incidence ranges from 1.4 to 7 episodes per 1000 ventilator days in developed countries and from 16.1 to 89 episodes per 1000 ventilator days in developing countries. This nosocomial infection is linked to higher rates of illness, death, and longer hospital stays, which imposes a substantial financial burden on both the healthcare system and families. Due to the complex nature of the pathophysiology of VAP, various approaches for its prevention in the neonatal intensive care unit have been suggested. There are two main categories of preventative measures: those that attempt to reduce infections in general (such as decontamination and hand hygiene) and those that target VAP in particular (such as VAP care bundles, head of bed elevation, and early extubation). Some of the interventions, including practicing good hand hygiene and feeding regimens, are easy to implement and have a significant impact. One of the measures that seems very promising and encompasses a lot of the preventive measures for VAP are the bundles. Some preventive measures still need to be studied.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations of Antibiotic Use in Neonates

The selection of an appropriate dose of a given antibiotic for a neonate not only requires knowledge of the drug's basic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties but also the profound effects that organ development might have on the volume of distribution and clearance, both of which may affect the PK/PD of a drug. Interest has grown in alternative antibiotic dosing strategies that are better aligned with the antibiotic's PK and PD properties. These strategies should be used in conjunction with minimum inhibitory concentration measurements and therapeutic drug monitoring to measure their potential success. They can also guide the clinician in tailoring the delivery of antibiotics to suit an individual patient's needs. Model-informed precision dosing, such as Bayesian forecasting dosing software (which incorporates PK/PD population models), may be utilized to optimize antibiotic exposure in neonatal populations. Consequently, optimizing the antibiotic dose and exposure in each newborn requires expertise in different fields. It drives the collaboration of physicians together with lab technicians and quantitative clinical pharmacologists.

[Update Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Neonatology]

This narrative review discusses basic principles of the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in premature and at term newborns and refers to some particularities concerning the indication and dosing issues. Although this is a vulnerable patient population, the spectrum of activity should not be unnecessarily broad and the regular PAP must not be prolonged beyond 24 hours.

Prognostic accuracy of Neonatal SOFA score versus SIRS criteria in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis

Neonatal SOFA score was reported as an accurate predictor of mortality while the prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria is unknown. The aim was to compare neonatal SOFA and SIRS criteria for the prediction of late onset sepsis-related mortality in preterm newborns. Newborns ≤ 32 weeks with late onset sepsis were retrospectively studied. Neonatal SOFA and SIRS criteria were calculated at onset of sepsis (T0), and after 6 ± 1 (T1), 12 ± 3 (T2) and 24 ± 3 h (T3). Outcome was death during antibiotic treatment for late onset sepsis. We studied 112 newborns with gestational age 26.9 ± 2.3 weeks; 11% met the study outcome. Neonatal SOFA was significantly higher in non-survivors vs. survivors at all time intervals; SIRS criteria were significantly higher in non-survivors vs. survivors at T1, T2 and T3. Neonatal SOFA increased over time in non-survivors (p = 0.003). At T0, the area under receiver operating characteristics curve was significantly higher for neonatal SOFA score than SIRS criteria (0.950 vs. 0.569; p = 0.0002), and the best calculated cut-off for T0 neonatal SOFA score was 4. In multivariate analysis T0 and T1 neonatal SOFA were predictors of late onset sepsis-related mortality (p = 0.048 and p < 0.001).  Conclusion: Neonatal SOFA score showed greater discriminatory capacity for mortality than SIRS criteria and might be helpful to plan management for patients at higher risk of death. What is Known: • Neonatal SOFA score may be an accurate prognostic tool. • No prognostic score has been fully standardized for septic newborns in NICU. What is New: • Neonatal SOFA score outperformed SIRS criteria for the prediction of prognosis in preterm infants with late onset sepsis. • Neonatal SOFA score assessed at onset of sepsis and 6 hrs later is a predictor of mortality.

Safety and Efficacy of Nafcillin for Empiric Therapy of Late-Onset Sepsis in the NICU

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In 2014 at Nationwide Children's Hospital, the Neonatal Antimicrobial Stewardship Program recommended nafcillin over vancomycin for empirical therapy of possible late-onset sepsis (LOS) in infants without a history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection. We report our experience with this guideline and assess its safety.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all infants who received nafcillin or vancomycin for empirical treatment of possible LOS at 3 NICUs before (January 2013-May 2014) and after (January 2017-March 2019) implementation of a vancomycin reduction guideline. Safety measures included duration of blood culture positivity, recurrence of infection with the same previously identified pathogen in the 14 days after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy, and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 366 infants who received a first antibiotic course for possible LOS, 84% (95 of 113) and 25% (62 of 253) received empirical therapy with vancomycin before and after the guideline implementation, respectively, representing a 70% reduction. Nafcillin use increased by 368%. Duration of blood culture positivity did not differ before and after the guidance. In 2 infants, antibiotic therapy was restarted within 14 days of discontinuation of the initial therapy for recurrence of the same infection; both had received empirical vancomycin. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10%, and there was no difference before (9%) and after (10%) implementation of the vancomycin reduction guidance (odds ratio, 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Nafcillin can be a safe alternative to vancomycin for empirical therapy of LOS among NICU infants who do not have a history of methicillin-resistant S aureus infection or colonization.

Remote Stewardship for Medically Underserved Nurseries: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Antibiotic overuse is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Many medically underserved centers lack pediatric antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) support. Telestewardship may mitigate this disparity. Authors of this study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of a nursery-specific ASP delivered remotely.

METHODS

Remote ASP was implemented in 8 medically underserved newborn nurseries using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized design over 3 years. This included a 15-month baseline period, a 9-month "step-in" period using random nursery order, and a 12-month postintervention period. The program consisted of education, audit, and feedback; and 24/7 infectious diseases provider-to-provider phone consultation availability. Outcomes included each center's volume of antibiotic use and the proportion of infants exposed to any antibiotics. Safety measures included length of stay, transfer to another facility, sepsis, and mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 9277 infants born (4586 preintervention, 4691 postintervention). Infants exposed to antibiotics declined from 6.2% pre-ASP to 4.2% post-ASP (relative risk 0.68 [95% confidence interval, 0.63% to 0.75%]). Total antibiotic use declined from 117 to 84.1 days of therapy per 1000 patient-days (-28% [95% confidence interval -22% to -34%]. No safety signals were observed. Most provider-to-provider consultations were <5 minutes in duration and occurred during normal business hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of infants exposed to antibiotics and total antibiotic use declined in medically underserved nurseries after implementing a remote ASP. No adverse safety events were seen, and the remote ASP time demands were manageable. Remote stewardship may be a safe and effective strategy for optimizing antibiotic use in medically underserved newborn nurseries.

Vancomycin-induced ototoxicity in very-low-birthweight infants

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is an extensively used anti-infective drug in neonatal ICUs. However, exposure-toxicity relationships have not been clearly defined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk profile for hearing deficits in vancomycin-exposed very-low-birthweight infants (VLBWI).

METHODS

In a large cohort study of the German Neonatal Network (GNN; n = 16 967 VLBWI) we assessed the association of vancomycin treatment and pathological hearing tests at discharge and at 5 year follow-up. We performed audits on vancomycin exposure, drug levels, dose adjustments and exposure to other ototoxic drugs in a subgroup of 1042 vancomycin-treated VLBWI.

RESULTS

In the GNN cohort, 28% (n = 4739) were exposed to IV vancomycin therapy. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, vancomycin exposure proved to be independently associated with pathological hearing test at discharge (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34, P = 0.016). Among vancomycin-treated infants, a cumulative vancomycin dose above the upper quartile (>314 mg/kg bodyweight) was associated with pathological hearing test at discharge (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.21-3.64, P = 0.009), whereas a vancomycin cumulative dose below the upper quartile was associated with a reduced risk of pathological tone audiometry results at 5 years of age (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, P = 0.02, n = 147).

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin exposure in VLBWI is associated with an increased, dose-dependent risk of pathological hearing test results at discharge and at 5 years of age. Prospective studies on long-term hearing impairment are needed.

Antibiotic Stewardship for the Neonatologist and Perinatologist

Antibiotic use is common in the neonatal intensive care unit. The density and heterogeneity of antibiotic prescribing suggests inappropriate and overuse of these agents. Potential antibiotic stewardship targets include sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and perioperative prophylaxis. Diagnostic stewardship principles, including appropriately obtained cultures, may be leveraged to decrease unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Strategies including guideline development, prospective audit and feedback, and formulary restriction have been successfully deployed in the neonatal intensive care unit to improve the quality of antibiotic prescribing. Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in the neonatal intensive care unit requires multidisciplinary collaboration between neonatologists, surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, pharmacists, and nurses.

[Infection prevention in neonatal intensive care units]

In diesem Beitrag werden einige Besonderheiten der Infektionsprävention bei intensivmedizinisch behandelten Früh und Neugeborenen dargestellt. Ergänzend finden sich Hinweise zum krankenhaushygienischen Management der SARS-CoV-2(„severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“)-Pandemie und zur Antibiotic Stewardship in der neonatologischen Intensivmedizin.

A global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use in neonatal intensive care units: The no-more-antibiotics and resistance (NO-MAS-R) study

BACKGROUND

Global assessment of antimicrobial agents prescribed to infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

METHODS

We conducted a one-day global point prevalence study of all antimicrobials provided to NICU infants. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were obtained including NICU level, census, birth weight, gestational/chronologic age, diagnoses, antimicrobial therapy (reason for use; length of therapy), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), and 30-day in-hospital mortality.

FINDINGS

On July 1, 2019, 26% of infants (580/2,265; range, 0-100%; median gestational age, 33 weeks; median birth weight, 1800 g) in 84 NICUs (51, high-income; 33, low-to-middle income) from 29 countries (14, high-income; 15, low-to-middle income) in five continents received ≥1 antimicrobial agent (92%, antibacterial; 19%, antifungal; 4%, antiviral). The most common reasons for antibiotic therapy were "rule-out" sepsis (32%) and "culture-negative" sepsis (16%) with ampicillin (40%), gentamicin (35%), amikacin (19%), vancomycin (15%), and meropenem (9%) used most frequently. For definitive treatment of presumed/confirmed infection, vancomycin (26%), amikacin (20%), and meropenem (16%) were the most prescribed agents. Length of therapy for culture-positive and "culture-negative" infections was 12 days (median; IQR, 8-14) and 7 days (median; IQR, 5-10), respectively. Mortality was 6% (42%, infection-related). An NICU ASP was associated with lower rate of antibiotic utilization (p = 0·02).

INTERPRETATION

Global NICU antibiotic use was frequent and prolonged regardless of culture results. NICU-specific ASPs were associated with lower antibiotic utilization rates, suggesting the need for their implementation worldwide.

FUNDING

Merck & Co.; The Ohio State University College of Medicine Barnes Medical Student Research Scholarship.

Antibiotic Utilization and Infection Among Infants with Abdominal Wall Defects

BACKGROUND

Neonates with abdominal wall defects are at an increased infection risk because of the defect itself and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays. Antibiotic prophylaxis until closure of the defect is common. However, infection risk and antibiotic use have not been well quantified in these infants.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of infants with abdominal wall defects (gastroschisis and omphalocele) admitted to a single-center NICU from 2007 to 2018. Demographic and clinical information, including microbiologic studies, antibiotic dosing and surgical care, were collected. Antibiotic use was quantified using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Sepsis was defined as culture of a pathogen from a normally sterile site.

RESULTS

Seventy-four infants were included; 64 (86%) with gastroschisis and 10 (14%) with omphalocele. Median day of closure was 8 days [interquartile range (IQR) 6-10, range 0-31]. All infants received ≥1 course of antibiotics; median antibiotic DOT/infant was 24.5 (IQR 18-36) for an average of 416.5 DOT per 1000 patient-days. Most antibiotic use was preclosure prophylaxis (44%) and treatment of small intestinal bowel overgrowth (24%). Suspected and proven infection accounted for 26% of all antibiotic use. Skin and soft tissue infection (13/74, 18%) and late-onset sepsis (11/74, 15%) were the most common infections; 2 infants had sepsis while on antibiotic prophylaxis. All infants survived to discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Most antibiotic use among infants with abdominal wall defects was prophylactic. Infection on prophylaxis was rare, but 35% of infants had infection after prophylaxis. Improved stewardship strategies are needed for these high-risk infants.

Common bacterial infections and their treatment in hospitalized pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Common bacterial infections in pediatric patients that the hospital pharmacist may encounter are reviewed, and guidance on the safe and effective use of antibiotics to treat those infections is provided.

SUMMARY

Pharmacists play a key role in evaluating and creating antibiotic treatment plans for patients with infections. Bacterial infections are a common reason for hospital admission in pediatric patients, and pharmacists working in hospitals may be consulted to provide treatment and monitoring recommendations. It is important for pharmacists to be aware of similarities and differences in adult and pediatric populations with regard to presenting signs and symptoms of bacterial infections, common causative pathogens, and antibiotic selection, dosing, and monitoring. This article reviews current approaches to treatment of common bacterial infections in pediatric patients and also provides general suggestions for antibiotic use.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists have an opportunity to positively impact the care of pediatric patients with bacterial infections. Especially at facilities where pediatric patients are not regularly treated, pharmacists can potentially improve care through provision of recommendations for optimal antibiotic selection, dosing, and monitoring.

UPLC/MS/MS assay for the simultaneous determination of seven antibiotics in human serum-Application to pediatric studies

A rapid and highly sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay was developed for quantification of 7 antibiotics in low sample volumes (50 μL): amoxicillin, azithromycin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, metronidazole and piperacillin, for both routine monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies. After protein precipitation by acetonitrile, the antibiotics were separated on an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (run time, 4 min). The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of (A) ammonium acetate (pH 2.4; 5 mM) and (B) acetonitrile acidified with 0.1% formic acid, delivered at 500 μl/min in a gradient elution mode. Total time run was 2.75 min. Ions were detected in the turbo-ion-spray-positive and multiple-reaction-monitoring modes. The assay was accurate and reproductible for the quantification of the seven antibiotics in serum samples over large concentration ranges.

Strategies to improve antibiotic use in the neonatal ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neonates are at a high risk of infection and may have nonspecific signs of sepsis. Accordingly, they are heavily exposed to antimicrobials. Neonates are also uniquely at risk of both short-term and long-term complications from antibiotic exposure. This review discusses advances in antibiotic stewardship in the neonatal population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antimicrobial utilization is highly variable among NICUs in excess of case-mix variation. Rates of early-onset sepsis because of Group B Streptococcus have decreased substantially with the introduction of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Recent epidemiologic studies have created evidence-based tools to more accurately estimate a newborn's risk of early-onset sepsis. Antibiotic selection and duration for late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis are variable among centers, with inadequate evidence to guide practice. Novel diagnostic methods and biomarkers are increasingly used to assist with diagnosing infection, but inadequate specificity in many cases may result in excess antibiotic exposure. Published antimicrobial stewardship experiences in the neonatal inpatient setting have largely been successful and well tolerated.

SUMMARY

Recent publications have identified many ways to safely reduce antimicrobial exposure and developed strategies to implement antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal inpatient setting. However, new approaches are needed to further improve antibiotic use and to implement these interventions more universally in NICUs.

Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator

Neonatal early-onset sepsis is a serious health concern for term and late preterm infants. Screening for early-onset sepsis is often challenging due to variation in practice, nonspecific laboratory markers, and clinical findings that mimic immaturity. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for the effectiveness of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator (EOScalc) as a screening tool to appropriately identify neonatal early-onset sepsis and the ability to decrease unnecessary antibiotic use in late preterm and term infants. A comprehensive search of retrospective cohort and retrospective case-control studies was conducted using 5 databases. Studies were included if they evaluated the EOScalc within the defined parameters of use and excluded if they were not published. Six studies were identified and included from 2014 to 2017. Study comparisons varied on the basis of differing clinical practice and use of the EOScalc. Findings included in this review suggest that utilization of the EOScalc can reduce empiric antibiotic therapy, unnecessary laboratory testing, and separation of infants and mothers without increasing infant mortality.

[Research advances in rational use of antibiotics in neonates]

Antibiotics are commonly used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), but unnecessary or long-time exposure to antibiotics early after birth can increase the risk of poor prognosis of neonates. Antibiotic treatment in the NICU often begins with empiric therapy, but no uniform standards have been established for the initiation and course of empiric therapy. In neonates with negative bacterial culture results and stable clinical manifestations, empiric antibiotic therapy should be terminated in a timely manner. There are significant differences in the use of antibiotics in different NICUs. A targeted antimicrobial stewardship program is an effective way for optimizing the use of antibiotics in the NICU.

Empiric Antibiotic Use and Susceptibility in Infants With Bacterial Infections: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess hospital differences in empirical antibiotic use, bacterial epidemiology, and antimicrobial susceptibility for common antibiotic regimens among young infants with urinary tract infection (UTI), bacteremia, or bacterial meningitis.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records from infants <90 days old presenting to 8 US children's hospitals with UTI, bacteremia, or meningitis. We used the Pediatric Health Information System database to identify cases and empirical antibiotic use and medical record review to determine infection, pathogen, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. We compared hospital-level differences in antimicrobial use, pathogen, infection site, and antimicrobial susceptibility.

RESULTS

We identified 470 infants with bacterial infections: 362 (77%) with UTI alone and 108 (23%) with meningitis or bacteremia. Infection type did not differ across hospitals (P = .85). Empirical antibiotic use varied across hospitals (P < .01), although antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for common empirical regimens were similar. A third-generation cephalosporin would have empirically treated 90% of all ages, 89% in 7- to 28-day-olds, and 91% in 29- to 89-day-olds. The addition of ampicillin would have improved coverage in only 4 cases of bacteremia and meningitis. Ampicillin plus gentamicin would have treated 95%, 89%, and 97% in these age groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical antibiotic use differed across regionally diverse US children's hospitals in infants <90 days old with UTI, bacteremia, or meningitis. Antimicrobial susceptibility to common antibiotic regimens was similar across hospitals, and adding ampicillin to a third-generation cephalosporin minimally improves coverage. Our findings support incorporating empirical antibiotic recommendations into national guidelines for infants with suspected bacterial infection.

Antibiotic Exposure and Risk for Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

We assessed the association between antibiotic exposure in the first 2 weeks of life and development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a cohort of very low birth weight infants. After controlling for the severity of illness, each additional day of antibiotic therapy was associated with both an increased risk for and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.