DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Vaccine (Vaxelis®): A Review of its Use in Primary and Booster Vaccination

A Randomized Trial Assessing the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Two Hexavalent Infant Vaccines Concomitantly Administered With Group B Meningococcal Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Three hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB) vaccines are licensed in Europe, only one of which (Vaxelis, Hex-V), uses a meningococcal outer membrane protein complex as a carrier protein for Hemophilus influenza type b (Hib), creating potential interactions with the meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB.

METHODS

In this single-center open-label randomized trial, infants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Hex-V or an alternative hexavalent vaccine (Infanrix-Hexa, Hex-IH) at 2, 3, and 4 months with 4CMenB (2, 4, and 12 months) in the UK routine immunization schedule. The primary outcome was noninferiority of geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-PRP (Hib) IgG at 5 months of age. Secondary outcomes included safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of other administered vaccines measured at 5 and 13 months of age.

RESULTS

Of the 194 participants enrolled, 96 received Hex-V and 98 Hex-IH. Noninferiority of anti-PRP IgG GMCs at 5 months of age in participants receiving Hex-V was established; GMCs were 23-times higher following three doses of Hex-V than three doses of Hex-IH (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 23.25; one-sided 95% CI 16.21, -). 78/85 (92%) of Hex-V recipients and 43/87 (49%) of Hex-IH recipients had anti-PRP antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL. At 5 months of age serum, bactericidal activity titers against MenB strain 5/99 were higher following Hex-V than Hex-IH (GMR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.14). The reactogenicity profile was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support flexibility in the use of either Hex-IH or Hex-V in infant immunization schedules containing 4CMenB, with the possibility that Hex-V may enhance protection against Hib.

Organisational and Structural Drivers of Childhood Immunisation in the European Region: A Systematic Review

Despite the implementation of widespread vaccination programs, the European Health Systems continue to experience care challenges attributable to organizational and structural issues. This study aimed to review the available data on aspects within the organizational and structural domains that might impact vaccination coverage. We searched a comprehensive range of databases from 1 January 2007 to 6 July 2021 for studies that reported quantitative or qualitative research on interventions to raise childhood vaccine coverage. Outcome assessments comprised organizational and structural factors that contribute to vaccine concern among pediatric parents, as well as data reported influencing the willingness to vaccinate. To analyze the risk of bias, the Ottawa, JBI's (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal tool, and Amstar quality assessment were used accordingly. The inclusion criteria were met by 205 studies across 21 articles. The majority of the studies were conducted in the United Kingdom (6), the European Union (3), and Italy (3). A range of interventions studied in primary healthcare settings has been revealed to improve vaccination coverage rates including parental engagement and personalization, mandatory vaccination policies, program redesign, supply chain design, administering multiple/combination vaccines, improved vaccination timing and intervals, parental education and reminders, surveillance tools and Supplemental Immunisation Activity (SIA), and information model.

Safety evaluation of the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine: a review

INTRODUCTION

The DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine is the most recently approved combination hexavalent vaccine. In Europe, it is licensed since 2016 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers above the age of 6 weeks to provide active immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B. In the US, DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB is approved since 2018 in children 6 weeks through 4 years of age. Its safety profile has been extensively documented in infants and children born at term, and also data in preterm infants are made available.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we conducted a safety evaluation of the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine in infants and toddlers considering evidence from clinical trials and post-marketing use, also with regard to data on special populations e.g. preterm infants.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the available data, the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine has demonstrated a good safety profile, similar to that of other approved penta- and hexavalent vaccines. Rather, post-marketing data are limited and are frequently reported in combination with other hexavalent vaccines or are not adjusted for shares of vaccines use. Neither relevant interferences with other co-administered pediatric vaccines nor safety issues in premature infants have been shown.

Hexavalent vaccines: What can we learn from head-to-head studies?

BACKGROUND

Three hexavalent vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) are licensed in Europe: Infanrix hexa (DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib), Hexyon (DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib) and Vaxelis (DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in various electronic databases to identify published peer-reviewed head-to-head studies comparing any licensed hexavalent vaccine to another.

RESULTS

Predefined inclusion criteria were met by 12 articles. Individual studies concluded that the 3 hexavalent vaccines have acceptable safety profiles although some significant differences were observed in their reactogenicity profiles. The immunogenicity of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib and DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib was non-inferior versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib. Some differences in immune responses to common antigens were observed, but their clinical relevance was not established. Anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) from pertussis and anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) from Hib antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV and anti-pertussis toxin (PT) from pertussis antibody concentrations lower in DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccinees. Anti-PT and post-primary anti-PRP antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV, anti-FHA, anti-pertactin from pertussis and post-booster anti-PRP antibody concentrations lower in DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib recipients. Slightly lower immune responses towards most vaccine antigens were observed with 2 + 1 versus 3 + 1 schedules post-primary vaccination, suggesting that 2 + 1 schedules should only be considered in countries with very high vaccination coverage.

CONCLUSION

Although the licensed hexavalent vaccines are generally considered similar, analyses of immunogenicity data from head-to-head trials highlighted differences that could be related to differences in composition and formulation. In addition, the demonstrated non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the more recent vaccines versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib does not allow a full bridging to similar efficacy, effectiveness and safety. The availability of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib over > 20 years allowed to collect a wealth of data on its long-term immunogenicity, safety and effectiveness in clinical and post-marketing studies, and makes it a key pillar of pediatric immunization.

Evolving pharmacovigilance requirements with novel vaccines and vaccine components

This paper explores the pipeline of new and upcoming vaccines as it relates to monitoring their safety. Compared with most currently available vaccines, that are constituted of live attenuated organisms or inactive products, future vaccines will also be based on new technologies. Several products that include such technologies are either already licensed or at an advanced stage of clinical development. Those include viral vectors, genetically attenuated live organisms, nucleic acid vaccines, novel adjuvants, increased number of antigens present in a single vaccine, novel mode of vaccine administration and thermostabilisation. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) monitors novel vaccines, from the time they become available for large scale use. GACVS maintains their safety profile as evidence emerges from post-licensure surveillance and observational studies. Vaccines and vaccine formulations produced with novel technologies will have different safety profiles that will require adapting pharmacovigilance approaches. For example, GACVS now considers viral vector templates developed on the model proposed by Brighton Collaboration. The characteristics of those novel products will also have implications for the risk management plans (RMPs). Questions related to the duration of active monitoring for genetic material, presence of adventitious agents more easily detected with enhanced biological screening, or physiological mechanisms of novel adjuvants are all considerations that will belong to the preparation of RMPs. In addition to assessing those novel products and advising experts, GACVS will also consider how to more broadly communicate about risk assessment, so vaccine users can also benefit from the committee’s advice.

Vaccines against antimicrobial resistance: a promising escape route for multidrug resistance

Antibiotic resistance has become a global health problem requiring urgent intervention. The pace of development and frequency of transmission of antimicrobial resistance have tremendously surpassed the number of antibiotics developed in the past few decades. Emergence and transmission of multidrug-resistant genes, for example, mcr-1 and mcr-5.3, against the last resort of antibiotics has challenged the treatment options. Vaccination is a promising approach with no instance of antimicrobial resistance generation or transmission reported so far. The time required for developing a vaccine, extensive pre- and post-licensure studies and the financial constraints for the R&D has hampered vaccine development over the past few decades. Vaccine can prove to be an effective future strategy for combating antimicrobial resistance.

Anti-Contamination Strategies for Yeast Fermentations

Yeasts are very useful microorganisms that are used in many industrial fermentation processes such as food and alcohol production. Microbial contamination of such processes is inevitable, since most of the fermentation substrates are not sterile. Contamination can cause a reduction of the final product concentration and render industrial yeast strains unable to be reused. Alternative approaches to controlling contamination, including the use of antibiotics, have been developed and proposed as solutions. However, more efficient and industry-friendly approaches are needed for use in industrial applications. This review covers: (i) general information about industrial uses of yeast fermentation, (ii) microbial contamination and its effects on yeast fermentation, and (iii) currently used and suggested approaches/strategies for controlling microbial contamination at the industrial and/or laboratory scale.

DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib pediatric hexavalent combination vaccine for use in children from 6 weeks through to 4 years of age

Introduction: Combination vaccines reduce the number of injections received by children, hence improving timeliness and coverage, and general acceptability among caregivers and health-care providers. The most recent hexavalent vaccine, DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib, has been also approved by the FDA.Areas covered: DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib has demonstrated good immunogenic and safety profiles, not inferior to other hexavalent vaccines already in use in the European market. Either (2p+1/3p+1) immunization schedules can be used with no significant differences. A low incidence of severe adverse events has been shown, similar to other combination vaccines. No issues have arisen when concomitantly administered with other vaccines.Expert opinion: The inclusion of two additional acellular pertussis components (FIM2 and FIM3) might yield better protection against the disease, but this remains to be clinically proven. The new vaccine uses Hib with unique protein carrier (PRP-OMPC) which elicits higher earlier immune response without compromising safety. Compliance with the immunization schedules is expected to increase by decreasing the number of injections needed in combined vaccines for a single visit. In addition, the improvements on the ease-of-use by its liquid-formulation, makes the vaccine preparation more acceptable for use in clinics and may reduce the odds of administration errors.

DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib Vaccine (Hexyon®): An Updated Review of its Use in Primary and Booster Vaccination

Hexyon^® is a fully-liquid, ready-to-use, hexavalent vaccine approved in the EU since 2013 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers from age 6 weeks against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B (HB), poliomyelitis, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). While the source of HB antigen in Hexyon^® is different from other vaccines, the rest of its valences have been extensively used in other approved vaccines. Hexyon^® is highly immunogenic for all its component toxoids/antigens when used as primary and booster vaccine in infants and toddlers, irrespective of vaccination schedule. It provides durable protection against hepatitis B. Hexyon^® can be used for a mixed primary series of hexavalent-pentavalent-hexavalent vaccines or as a booster in infants primed with Infanrix hexa™ or pentavalent (whole-cell or acellular pertussis) vaccines. Coadministration of Hexyon^® with other common childhood vaccines did not affect immune response to any vaccines. Hexyon^® has a good reactogenicity/safety profile. The immunogenicity and safety profile of Hexyon^® was similar to that of several approved vaccines, including Infanrix hexa™. However, Hexyon^® offers the convenience of full-liquid, ready-to-use formulation, which may minimize vaccination errors and preparation time. Thus, Hexyon^® is a convenient, useful option for vaccination against childhood diseases caused by six major pathogens.

New perspectives for hexavalent vaccines

With the increase in the number of routine vaccinations the development of pentavalent and hexavalent combination vaccines fitting the routine vaccination schedules became a necessity. In this respect, Europe has taken the lead in comparison with other world regions, and routine vaccination with pentavalent and hexavalent combinations including DTPa, Hib, HepB and IPV has been on European vaccination programs for >15years. Since the marketing authorization of Hexavac® and Infanrix Hexa® in 2000, immunization schedules in most European countries have included hexavalent vaccines. In the last years, two new hexavalent vaccines have been licensed and commercialized worldwide. This paper presents a review of the pharmaceutical profiles of the three hexavalent vaccines currently available. In addition, we aim to review safety, co-administration, tolerability and other practical concerns of their use.