Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Therapy for Paediatric Crohn's Disease: Improved Benefits Through Treatment Optimisation, Deeper Understanding of Its Risks, and Reduced Costs due to Biosimilar Availability

Role of Cross-Sectional Imaging in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The association between radiological remission and natural history of disease in children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is poorly known.

AIMS

(i) To assess the correlation between cross-sectional imaging (CSI) (ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging) and clinical, biomarker and endoscopic disease activity; (ii) to evaluate the impact of radiological activity on the occurrence of complications in pediatric patients with IBD.

METHODS

A retrospective study including pediatric patients with IBD and radiological follow-up of at least one year was conducted between 2003 and 2019 at the Nancy University Hospital.

RESULTS

In total, 118 patients (66 Crohn's disease (CD) and 52 ulcerative colitis (UC)) were included. Median follow-up duration was 5.2 years (range: 1.1-15.4). Seventeen (25.8%) patients with CD and 7 (13.5%) patients with UC achieved and maintained radiological remission until last follow-up. No IBD patient achieving radiological remission experienced complications or relapse. In patients not achieving radiologic remission, complications and surgery occurred in 13/49 (26.5%) and 8/49 (16.3%) patients with CD and in 5/45 (11.1%) and 5 (11.1%) subjects with UC. Among patients with CD, the association for remission status between radiological and endoscopic assessment was excellent (Cramer's V test (V) = 0.50), and moderate between radiological and either clinical (V = 0.30) or biochemical (V = 0.33) assessments. In UC, the association for remission status between radiological and either endoscopic or clinical assessments were weak (V = 0.19 and V = 0.20 respectively), and moderate (V = 0.23) between radiological and biochemical assessments.

CONCLUSION

CSI may replace endoscopic monitoring in pediatric CD. Radiological remission status predicts long-term disease outcomes.

Adalimumab vs Infliximab in Pediatric Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score Analysis and Predictors of Treatment Escalation

INTRODUCTION

Two antitumor necrosis factor therapies (infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA]) have been approved for the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and IFX by propensity score matching in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with luminal CD and at least a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

Among 100 patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria, and 62 were matched by propensity score. We evaluated time to treatment escalation as the primary outcome and primary nonresponse, predictors of treatment escalation and relapse, serious adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and effect of concomitant immunomodulators as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no difference between ADA and IFX in time to treatment escalation (HR = 0.63 [95% CI 0.31-1.28] P = 0.20), primary nonresponse (P = 0.95), or serious adverse events. The median (interquartile range) trough levels at the primary outcome were 14.05 (10.88-15.40) and 6.15 (2.08-6.58) µg/mL in the ADA and IFX groups, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the combination of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity was a strong independent predictor of treatment escalation (HR 5.19, [95% CI 2.41-11.18], P < 0.0001). The simple endoscopic score for CD, L3 disease phenotype, and use of concomitant immunomodulators for at least the first 6 months revealed a trend toward significance on a univariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Propensity score matching did not reveal substantial differences in efficacy or safety between ADA and IFX. The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity combination is a strong predictor of treatment escalation.

Efficacy of Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha therapy in paediatric Crohn's disease patients with perianal lesions: a systematic review

Introduction: Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy, primarily infliximab and adalimumab, are now increasingly used to induce and maintain disease remission in the pediatric perianal Crohn's disease (CD) population, however, their optimal use has not yet been defined in the pediatric setting.Areas covered: In accordance with a published protocol (PROSPERO no. CRD42019118838), we systematically and critically evaluated all published evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α in children with perianal CD, in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and clinicalTrials.gov databases until October, 18^th, 2018. We included in our systematic review 29 articles yielding a total of 565 perianal CD patients aged between 9 months to 18 years.Expert opinion: According to low-quality evidence from small, uncontrolled and heterogeneous descriptive studies, and very few randomized controlled trial, nearly three-fifths children with perianal CD achieved remission with anti-TNF-α treatment and in approximately 40% remission was maintained after 12 months, with practically low discontinuation rate due to serious adverse events. More than half of the patients achieved complete fistula closure. There is still a need for more robust evidence adequately assessing the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pediatric perianal CD, as well as in comparison with other therapies.

Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab in Pediatric Crohn Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Crohn disease is an inflammatory bowel disease with intermittent symptoms relating to damage to the gastrointestinal tract. Compared with adult-onset Crohn disease, the childhood-onset form is more likely to be severe. Infliximab has shown efficacy in adult patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab in pediatric Crohn disease, by means of a systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and regulatory documents were searched from inception to December 2017. Clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and reference lists were searched to March 2018.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with active control were included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently performed screening, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of endoscopic remission and severe adverse effects.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three eligible RCTs comparing different dose regimens, 16 prospective cohort studies comparing infliximab with other therapies (adalimumab, exclusive enteral nutrition, or standard of care), and 3 prospective cohort studies comparing different infliximab regimens were identified. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed no significant difference between infliximab every 8 weeks compared with longer intervals for maintenance of clinical remission (risk ratio [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-3.19). Meta-analyses of the prospective cohort studies showed no significant differences between infliximab and adalimumab for maintenance of endoscopic remission (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60-1.92), between infliximab and exclusive enteral nutrition for induction of clinical remission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.45), or between infliximab and standard of care for maintenance of clinical remission at 6 and 12 months (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.17, and RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.84-1.84, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggested comparable efficacy for infliximab and other therapies; however, the available literature was limited by risk of bias and small sample size. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this drug in pediatric Crohn disease.