1
|
Bonfiglioli KR, da Mota LMH, de Medeiros Ribeiro AC, Kakehasi AM, Laurindo IMM, Giorgi RDN, Duarte ALBP, Reis APMG, Ubirajara E Silva de Souza MPG, Brenol CV, da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro G, de Albuquerque CP, de Moura Castro CH, Pinto GLB, Verztman JF, Muniz LF, Bertolo MB, da Costa Pinto MR, Louzada Júnior P, Cruz VA, Pereira IA, de Freitas MVC, Cruz BA, Paiva E, Monticielo O, Provenza JR, Xavier RM. Recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the use of JAK inhibitors in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Rheumatol 2021; 61:70. [PMID: 34819172 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-021-00228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease that can cause irreversible joint deformities, with increased morbidity and mortality and a significant impact on the quality of life of the affected individual. The main objective of RA treatment is to achieve sustained clinical remission or low disease activity. However, up to 40% of patients do not respond to available treatments, including bDMARDs. New therapeutic targets for RA are emerging, such as Janus kinases (JAKs). These are essential for intracellular signaling (via JAK-STAT) in response to many cytokines involved in RA immunopathogenesis. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have established themselves as a highly effective treatment, gaining increasing space in the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of RA. The current recommendations aim to present a review of the main aspects related to the efficacy and safety of JAKis in RA patients, and to update the recommendations and treatment algorithm proposed by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Rossi Bonfiglioli
- Disciplina Reumatologia do Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 - 3° andar - Reumatologia, São Paulo, SP, CEP, 01246-903, Brasil.
| | | | - Ana Cristina de Medeiros Ribeiro
- Disciplina Reumatologia do Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 - 3° andar - Reumatologia, São Paulo, SP, CEP, 01246-903, Brasil
| | - Adriana Maria Kakehasi
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Rina Dalva Neubarth Giorgi
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE-IAMSPE), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Claiton Viegas Brenol
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (HCPA/UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Manoel Barros Bertolo
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo Louzada Júnior
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP-RP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Vitor Alves Cruz
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| | - Ivanio Alves Pereira
- Serviço de Reumatologia do Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina-UFSC, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | | | | | - Eduardo Paiva
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Odirlei Monticielo
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (HCPA/UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - José Roberto Provenza
- Disciplina de Reumatologia da Pontificia, Universidade Católica de Campinas, PUC-Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Machado Xavier
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (HCPA/UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palominos PE, Lineburger IB, Xavier RM. Emerging protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2021; 26:303-321. [PMID: 34365877 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2021.1964472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors are emergent drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); they block the signal transduction in immune cells preventing the production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. AREAS COVERED The current research aims to review the role of Janus, Bruton's and spleen kinase inhibitors for the treatment of RA. Mechanism of action, rationale for usage, and the main efficacy and safety outcomes in phase II and III clinical trials are described. EXPERT OPINION In RA, the development of Bruton kinase inhibitors was interrupted because they failed to demonstrate superiority versus placebo. The spleen kinase inhibitors had their development deprioritized because their risk/benefit profile was unfavorable compared to janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). JAKi proved to be effective in treatment naïve patients and in those with previous failure to methotrexate and/or biological therapy. There still remain important points about JAKi that need more studies: the clinical importance of JAKi selectivity should be further evaluated in head-to-head trials and the safety profile of JAKi, mainly regarding the risk of malignancy and thromboembolic events, must be analyzed in long-term real-life studies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Aksan A, Beales ILP, Baxter G, de Arellano AR, Gavata S, Valentine WJ, Hunt B. Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Iron Formulations for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the UK. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 13:541-552. [PMID: 34168471 PMCID: PMC8216635 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s306823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) can impair quality of life and increase healthcare costs. Treatment options for IDA-associated IBD include oral iron and intravenous iron formulations (such as ferric carboxymaltose [FCM], ferric derisomaltose [FD, previously known as iron isomaltoside 1000], and iron sucrose [IS]). The present analysis compared the cost-effectiveness of FCM versus FD, IS, and oral iron sulfate in terms of additional cost per additional responder in the UK setting. Methods Cost-effectiveness was calculated for FCM versus FD, IS, and oral iron individually in terms of the additional cost per additional responder, defined as haemoglobin normalisation or an increase of ≥2 g/dL in haemoglobin levels, in a model developed in Microsoft Excel. Relative efficacy inputs were taken from a previously published network meta-analysis, since there is currently no single head-to-head trial evidence comparing all therapy options. Costs were calculated in 2020 pounds sterling (GBP) capturing the costs of iron preparations, healthcare professional time, and consumables. Results The analysis suggested that FCM may be the most effective intervention, with 81% of patients achieving a response. Response rates with FD, IS, and oral iron were 74%, 75%, and 69%, respectively. Total costs with FCM, FD, IS, and oral iron were GBP 296, GBP 312, GBP 503, and GBP 56, respectively. FCM was found to be more effective and less costly than both FD and IS, and therefore was considered dominant. Compared with oral iron, FCM was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GBP 2045 per additional responder. Conclusions FCM is likely to be the least costly and most effective IV iron therapy in the UK setting. Compared with oral iron, healthcare payers must decide whether the superior treatment efficacy of FCM is worth the additional cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysegül Aksan
- Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre, Rhein-main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Institute of Nutritional Science, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ian L P Beales
- Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Simona Gavata
- Vifor Pharma Group, Market Access, Glattbrugg, Switzerland
| | | | - Barnaby Hunt
- Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aksan A, Schoepfer A, Juillerat P, Vavricka S, Bettencourt M, Ramirez de Arellano A, Gavata S, Morin N, Valentine WJ, Hunt B. Iron Formulations for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Switzerland. Adv Ther 2021; 38:660-677. [PMID: 33216324 PMCID: PMC7854431 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01553-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can result in reduced quality of life and increased healthcare costs. IDA is treated with iron supplementation, either with oral iron therapy (OI) or intravenous iron formulations, including ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), iron isomaltoside 1000 (IIM), and iron sucrose (IS). This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness of FCM versus IIM, IS, and OI in terms of additional cost per additional responder in Switzerland. METHODS A health economic model was developed to assess the additional cost per additional responder, defined as normalization or an increase of at least 2 g/dL in hemoglobin levels, for FCM versus IIM, IS, and OI. To date, no single head-to-head trial comparing all therapies is available, and therefore relative efficacy data were taken from a published network meta-analysis. Costs of treatment were calculated in 2020 Swiss francs (CHF) using a microcosting approach, and included the costs of iron, healthcare professional time, and consumables. Costs are also presented in euros (EUR) based on an exchange rate of CHF 1 = EUR 0.94. RESULTS Response rates with FCM, IIM, IS, and OI were 81%, 74%, 75%, and 69%, respectively, with FCM projected to be the most effective treatment. FCM was associated with cost savings of CHF 24 (EUR 23) versus IIM and of CHF 147 (EUR 138) versus IS, and increased costs by CHF 345 (EUR 324) versus OI. Therefore FCM was considered dominant versus both IIM and IS, improving clinical outcomes with cost savings. FCM was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 2970 (EUR 2792) per additional responder versus OI. CONCLUSIONS FCM was projected to be the most cost-effective intravenous iron therapy in Switzerland, increasing the number of responders and leading to cost savings for healthcare payers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Angelini J, Talotta R, Roncato R, Fornasier G, Barbiero G, Dal Cin L, Brancati S, Scaglione F. JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future. Biomolecules 2020; 10:E1002. [PMID: 32635659 PMCID: PMC7408575 DOI: 10.3390/biom10071002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) belong to a new class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs which have recently revolutionized the therapeutic panorama of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated diseases, placing alongside or even replacing conventional and biological drugs. JAKi are characterized by a novel mechanism of action, consisting of the intracellular interruption of the JAK-STAT pathway crucially involved in the immune response. The aim of this narrative review is to globally report the most relevant pharmacological features and clinical outcomes of the developed and incoming JAKi for RA, based on the available preclinical and clinical evidence. A total of 219 papers, including narrative and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, guidelines, and drug factsheets, were selected. The efficacy and safety profile of both the first generation JAKi (baricitinib and tofacitinib) and the second generation JAKi (upadacitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib and itacitinib) were compared and discussed. Results from RCTs and real-life data are encouraging and outline a rapid onset of the pharmacologic effects, which are maintained during the time. Their efficacy and safety profile are comparable or superior to those of biologic agents and JAKi proved to be efficacious when given as monotherapy. Finally, the manufacturing of JAKi is relatively easier and cheaper than that of biologics, thus increasing the number of compounds being formulated and tested for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Angelini
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Rossella Talotta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Gaetano Martino”, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Rossana Roncato
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pordenone, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Giulia Fornasier
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
- Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo di Trieste, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Barbiero
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Lisa Dal Cin
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Serena Brancati
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesco Scaglione
- Head of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Director of Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|