1
|
Qureshi S, Latif A, Condon L, Akyea RK, Kai J, Qureshi N. Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis. Pharmacogenomics 2022; 23:135-154. [PMID: 34911350 PMCID: PMC8759425 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacogenomic testing can indicate which drugs may have limited therapeutic action or lead to adverse effects, hence guiding rational and safe prescribing. However, in the UK and other countries, there are still significant barriers to implementation of testing in primary care. Objective: This systematic review presents the barriers and enablers to the implementation of pharmacogenomics in primary care setting. Materials & methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched through to July 2020 for studies that reported primary qualitative data of primary care professionals and patient views. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, data synthesis was undertaken using meta-aggregation based on the theoretical domain's framework (TDF). Confidence in the synthesized findings relating to credibility and dependability was established using CONQual. Eligible papers were categorized into six TDF domains - knowledge; social and professional roles; behavioral regulation; beliefs and consequences; environmental context and resources; and social influences. Results: From 1669 citations, eighteen eligible studies were identified across seven countries, with a sample size of 504 participants including both primary care professionals and patients. From the data, 15 synthesized statements, all with moderate CONQual rating emerged. These categories range from knowledge, awareness among Primary Care Physicians and patients, professional relationships, negative impact of PGx, belief that PGx can reduce adverse drug reactions, clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, informatics, reporting issues and social issues. Conclusion: Through use of TDF, fifteen synthesized statements provide policymakers with valuable recommendations for the implementation of pharmacogenomics in primary care. In preparation, policymakers need to consider the introduction of effective educational strategies for both PCPs and patients to raise knowledge, awareness, and engagement. The actual introduction of PGx will require reorganization with decision support tools to aid use of PGx in primary care, with a clear delegation of roles and responsibilities between general professionals and pharmacists supplemented by a local pool of experts. Furthermore, policy makers need to address the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics and having appropriate infrastructure supporting testing and interpretation including informatic solutions for utilizing pharmacogenomic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaf Qureshi
- NHS Derby & Derbyshire Clinical Commissioning Group, Medicines Management,10 Nottingham Road, Derby, DE1 3QT, UK,Author for correspondence:
| | - Asam Latif
- School of Health Sciences, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK
| | - Laura Condon
- Primary Care Stratified Medicine Research Group (PRISM), School of Medicine, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK
| | - Ralph K Akyea
- Primary Care Stratified Medicine Research Group (PRISM), School of Medicine, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK
| | - Joe Kai
- Primary Care Stratified Medicine Research Group (PRISM), School of Medicine, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK
| | - Nadeem Qureshi
- Primary Care Stratified Medicine Research Group (PRISM), School of Medicine, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG2 7RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care. Eur J Med Genet 2021; 65:104384. [PMID: 34768014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers' challenges and potential solutions for managing secondary findings. Providers were recruited in two groups. Group 1 providers had a patient in their practice who received secondary findings and all potential group 1 providers were invited to participate. Group 2 providers were provided with the secondary findings of a hypothetical patient and were purposefully sampled for maximal variation in sex, practice setting, and geographic location. Providers were interviewed about their challenges and solutions managing secondary findings from a patient in their practice or a hypothetical patient. Using interpretive description methodology, transcripts were analysed thematically complemented by constant comparison. Out of the fifty-five providers invited, 15 family physicians participated across community and academic settings in Ontario, Canada (range 6-40 years in practice; 10/15 female). Providers described a responsibility to manage secondary findings, but limited capacity for this, describing practice, knowledge, and technical challenges. Providers expressed concern that compared to other incidental findings, secondary genomic findings might be reported directly to patients and result in longer-term anxiety. Potential solutions were a structured letter with categorized results and summary tables highlighting key secondary findings with follow-up recommendations and resources, as well as electronic medical records (EMRs) that store and integrate genomic information for prescribing or referrals. These solutions were deemed essential to address knowledge and technical challenges faced by primary care physicians and ultimately promote clinical utility of secondary findings.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sharma Y, Cox L, Kruger L, Channamsetty V, Haga SB. Evaluating Primary Care Providers' Readiness for Delivering Genetic and Genomic Services to Underserved Populations. Public Health Genomics 2021; 25:1-10. [PMID: 34515218 DOI: 10.1159/000518415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased genomics knowledge and access are advancing precision medicine and care delivery. With the translation of precision medicine across health care, genetics and genomics will play a greater role in primary care services. Health disparities and inadequate representation of racial and ethnically diverse groups threaten equitable access for those historically underserved. Health provider awareness, knowledge, and perceived importance are important determinants of the utilization of genomic applications. METHODS We evaluated the readiness of primary care providers at a Federally Qualified Health Center, the Community Health Center, Inc. (CHCI) for delivering genetic and genomic testing to underserved populations. Online survey questions focused on providers' education and training in basic and clinical genetics, familiarity with current genetic tests, and needs for incorporating genetics and genomics into their current practice. RESULTS Fifty of 77 (65%) primary care providers responded to the survey. Less than half received any training in basic or clinical genetics (40%), were familiar with specific genetic tests (36%), or felt confident with collecting family health history (44%), and 70% believed patients would benefit from genetic testing. CONCLUSION Despite knowledge gaps, respondents recognized the value and need to bring these services to their patients, though would like more education on applying genetics and genomics into their practice, and more training about discussing risk factors associated with race or ethnicity. We provide further evidence of the need for educational resources and standardized guidelines for providers caring for underserved populations to optimize appropriate use and referral of genetic and genomic services and to reduce disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yashoda Sharma
- Weitzman Institute, Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Livia Cox
- Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lucie Kruger
- Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Veena Channamsetty
- Weitzman Institute, Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susanne B Haga
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dive L, Archibald AD, Newson AJ. Ethical considerations in gene selection for reproductive carrier screening. Hum Genet 2021; 141:1003-1012. [PMID: 34426854 PMCID: PMC9160090 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02341-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Genetic carrier screening for reproductive purposes has existed for half a century. It was originally offered to particular ethnic groups with a higher prevalence of certain severe recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, or (as carrier testing) to those with a family history of a particular genetic condition. Commercial providers are increasingly offering carrier screening on a user-pays basis. Some countries are also trialing or offering public reproductive genetic carrier screening with whole populations, rather than only to those known to have a higher chance of having a child with an inherited genetic condition. Such programs broaden the ethical and practical challenges that arise in clinical carrier testing. In this paper we consider three aspects of selecting genes for population reproductive genetic carrier screening panels that give rise to important ethical considerations: severity, variable penetrance and expressivity, and scalability; we also draw on three exemplar genes to illustrate the ethical issues raised: CFTR, GALT and SERPINA1. We argue that such issues are important to attend to at the point of gene selection for RGCS. These factors warrant a cautious approach to screening panel design, one that takes into account the likely value of the information generated by screening and the feasibility of implementation in large and diverse populations. Given the highly complex and uncertain nature of some genetic variants, careful consideration needs to be given to the balance between delivering potentially burdensome or harmful information, and providing valuable information to inform reproductive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Dive
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Alison Dalton Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Almomani BA, Al-Sawalha NA, Al-Keilani MS, Aman HA. The difference in knowledge and concerns between healthcare professionals and patients about genetic-related issues: A questionnaire-based study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235001. [PMID: 32559245 PMCID: PMC7304621 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Effective adoption of genetics in clinical practice requires the support of and interaction between the different partners of healthcare system; healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. The study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge, factors affecting the knowledge, and concerns of HCPs and patients regarding genetic-related issues such as lack of knowledge about genetics and genetic conditions, awareness of the importance of genetics in clinical practice and genetic services and resources deficits. A cross sectional study was conducted in different areas of Jordan using a convenient sampling approach. An English questionnaire was self-administered to HCPs. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients in Arabic by trained researcher. A total of 1000 HCPs and 1448 patients were recruited. There was a significant difference (p<0.001) in the knowledge between HCPs and patients. Among HCPs, physicians (OR = 2.278, 95%CI = 1.410–3.680, p = 0.001) and pharmacists (OR = 2.163, 95%CI = 1.362–3.436, p = 0.001) were more knowledgeable than nurses. In addition, females were more knowledgeable than males (OR = 1.717, 95%CI = 1.203–2.451, p = 0.003). Among patients, participants who had a bachelor degree (OR = 1.579, 95%CI = 1.231–2.025, p<0.001) were more knowledgeable compared to those who only had school education. HCPs appeared to have more concerns than patients (p<0.001) regarding all genetic-related issues. These findings suggested a positive association between education and genetic knowledge as well as concerns; as HCPs were more knowledgeable and concerned than patients. Appropriate integration and expansion of basic genetic knowledge courses and clinical genetic training in the curriculum should be adopted to prepare HCPs to enhance the integration of genetic information in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basima A. Almomani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
- * E-mail:
| | - Nour A. Al-Sawalha
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Maha S. Al-Keilani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Hatem A. Aman
- Department of Applied Biological Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson KB, Clayton EW, Starren J, Peterson J. The Implementation Chasm Hindering Genome-informed Health Care. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:119-125. [PMID: 32342791 PMCID: PMC7395963 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520916999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The promises of precision medicine are often heralded in the medical and lay literature, but routine integration of genomics in clinical practice is still limited. While the "last mile' infrastructure to bring genomics to the bedside has been demonstrated in some healthcare settings, a number of challenges remain - both in the receptivity of today's health system and in its technical and educational readiness to respond to this evolution in care. To improve the impact of genomics on health and disease management, we will need to integrate both new knowledge and new care processes into existing workflows. This change will be onerous and time-consuming, but hopefully valuable to the provision of high quality, economically feasible care worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B Johnson
- Kevin B. Johnson, M.D., M.S., is Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor and Chair of Biomedical Informatics, with a joint appointment in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and his M.S. in Medical Informatics from Stanford University in 1992. Ellen Wright Clayton, M.D., J.D., is the Craig-Weaver Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Health Policy in the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University. She has been studying the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics research and its translation to the clinic for many years. She is currently a PI of LawSeq as well as GetPreCiSe, a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research focused on genetic privacy and identity, and has been an investigator in the eMERGE Network since its inception. Justin Starren, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., is Professor of Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences and Chief of the Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He received his M.D. and M.S. in Immunogenetics from Washington University in St. Louis in 1987, and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Informatics from Columbia University in 1997. Josh Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Vanderbilt University in 1997 and his M.P.H. from Harvard University School of Public Health in 2002
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Kevin B. Johnson, M.D., M.S., is Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor and Chair of Biomedical Informatics, with a joint appointment in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and his M.S. in Medical Informatics from Stanford University in 1992. Ellen Wright Clayton, M.D., J.D., is the Craig-Weaver Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Health Policy in the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University. She has been studying the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics research and its translation to the clinic for many years. She is currently a PI of LawSeq as well as GetPreCiSe, a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research focused on genetic privacy and identity, and has been an investigator in the eMERGE Network since its inception. Justin Starren, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., is Professor of Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences and Chief of the Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He received his M.D. and M.S. in Immunogenetics from Washington University in St. Louis in 1987, and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Informatics from Columbia University in 1997. Josh Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Vanderbilt University in 1997 and his M.P.H. from Harvard University School of Public Health in 2002
| | - Justin Starren
- Kevin B. Johnson, M.D., M.S., is Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor and Chair of Biomedical Informatics, with a joint appointment in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and his M.S. in Medical Informatics from Stanford University in 1992. Ellen Wright Clayton, M.D., J.D., is the Craig-Weaver Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Health Policy in the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University. She has been studying the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics research and its translation to the clinic for many years. She is currently a PI of LawSeq as well as GetPreCiSe, a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research focused on genetic privacy and identity, and has been an investigator in the eMERGE Network since its inception. Justin Starren, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., is Professor of Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences and Chief of the Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He received his M.D. and M.S. in Immunogenetics from Washington University in St. Louis in 1987, and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Informatics from Columbia University in 1997. Josh Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Vanderbilt University in 1997 and his M.P.H. from Harvard University School of Public Health in 2002
| | - Josh Peterson
- Kevin B. Johnson, M.D., M.S., is Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor and Chair of Biomedical Informatics, with a joint appointment in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and his M.S. in Medical Informatics from Stanford University in 1992. Ellen Wright Clayton, M.D., J.D., is the Craig-Weaver Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Health Policy in the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University. She has been studying the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics research and its translation to the clinic for many years. She is currently a PI of LawSeq as well as GetPreCiSe, a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research focused on genetic privacy and identity, and has been an investigator in the eMERGE Network since its inception. Justin Starren, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., is Professor of Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences and Chief of the Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. He received his M.D. and M.S. in Immunogenetics from Washington University in St. Louis in 1987, and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Informatics from Columbia University in 1997. Josh Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He received his M.D. from Vanderbilt University in 1997 and his M.P.H. from Harvard University School of Public Health in 2002
| |
Collapse
|