Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluoride PET and PET/CT in patients with bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis update

Intra-individual comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride PET-CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy with SPECT in patients with prostate cancer or breast cancer at high risk for skeletal metastases (MITNEC-A1): a multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer or breast cancer remains a major clinical challenge. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (^99mTc-MDP) single-photon emission CT (SPECT) and ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) PET-CT for the detection of osseous metastases in patients with high-risk prostate or breast cancer.

METHODS

MITNEC-A1 was a prospective, multicentre, single-cohort, phase 3 trial conducted in ten hospitals across Canada. Patients aged 18 years or older with breast or prostate cancer with a WHO performance status of 0-2 and with high risk or clinical suspicion for bone metastasis, but without previously documented bone involvement, were eligible. ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT and ^99mTc-MDP SPECT were done within 14 days of each other for each participant. Two independent reviewers interpreted each modality without knowledge of other imaging findings. The primary endpoint was the overall accuracy of ^99mTc-MDP SPECT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT scans for the detection of bone metastases in the per-protocol population. A combination of histopathological, clinical, and imaging follow-up for up to 24 months was used as the reference standard to assess the imaging results. Safety was assessed in all enrolled participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01930812, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between July 11, 2014, and March 3, 2017, 290 patients were screened, 288 of whom were enrolled (64 participants with breast cancer and 224 with prostate cancer). 261 participants underwent both ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT and ^99mTc-MDP SPECT and completed the required follow-up for statistical analysis. Median follow-up was 735 days (IQR 727-750). Based on the reference methods used, 109 (42%) of 261 patients had bone metastases. In the patient-based analysis, ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT was more accurate than ^99mTc-MDP SPECT (84·3% [95% CI 79·9-88·7] vs 77·4% [72·3-82·5], difference 6·9% [95% CI 1·3-12·5]; p=0·016). No adverse events were reported for the 288 patients recruited.

INTERPRETATION

¹⁸F-NaF has the potential to displace ^99mTc-MDP as the bone imaging radiopharmaceutical of choice in patients with high-risk prostate or breast cancer.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Prospective study of Na[18F]F PET/CT for cancer staging in morbidly obese patients compared with [99mTc]Tc-MDP whole-body planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT

PURPOSE

This prospective study aims to assess the diagnostic test characteristics of Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT for the skeletal staging of cancer in morbidly obese patients compared with ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP), whole-body planar (WBS), SPECT, and SPECT/CT acquisitions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred seventeen obese patients (BMI 46.5 ± 6.1 kg/m² and mean age, 59.0 years; range 32-89 years) with BMI > 40 kg/m² were prospectively enrolled and underwent [^99mTc]Tc-MDP WBS, SPECT, SPECT/CT, and Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT within two weeks for the osseous staging of a malignancy. Images were assessed qualitatively using a 3-point scale. Patient and lesion-based diagnostic test characteristics were estimated using an optimistic and pessimistic dichotomization method.

RESULTS

Bone metastases were confirmed in 44 patients. Patient-based optimistic diagnostic test characteristics were (sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy): Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT (95.5%, 95.9%, 95.7%), [^99mTc]Tc-MDP WBS (52.3%, 71.2%, 64.1%), SPECT (61.4%, 80.8%, 73.5%) and SPECT/CT (65.9%, 91.8%, 82.1%). Lesion-based optimistic diagnostic test characteristics were: Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT (97.7%, 97.9%, 97.7%), [^99mTc]Tc-MDP WBS (39%, 67%, 48.9%), SPECT (52.9%, 93.6%, 67.3%) and SPECT/CT (65.9%, 91.8%, 82.1%). There was no significant difference in the specificity of Na[¹⁸F]F and SPECT/CT. All other pairwise comparisons were significant (p<.001). ROC curve analysis showed a high overall accuracy of Na[¹⁸F]F with significantly higher AUCs for Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT compared to [^99mTc]Tc-MDP WBS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT on both patient and lesion-based analysis (p<.001). Moreover, Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT changed patient management in 38% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Na[¹⁸F]F PET/CT may be the preferred imaging modality for skeletal staging in morbidly obese patients. The technique provides excellent diagnostic test characteristics superior to [^99mTc]Tc-MDP bone scan (including SPECT/CT), impacts patient management, has an acceptable radiation exposure profile, and is well-tolerated. Further cost-effectiveness evaluations are warranted.

Bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in cancer care in the past decade: a systematic review and meta-analysis as well as recommendations for further work

Skeletal whole-body scintigraphy (WBS), although widely used as a sensitive tool for detecting metastatic bone disease in oncology cases, has relatively low specificity. Indeterminate bone lesions (IBLs) detected by WBS cause a diagnostic dilemma, which hampers further management plans. In the advent of hybrid imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has been gaining popularity as a tool to improve the characterisation of IBLs detected by WBS. As yet, there has not been a systematic review to objectively evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of SPECT/CT in this area. We conducted a systematic review of relevant electronic databases up to 30 August 2020. The outcomes of interest were the reporting of SPECT/CT to identify benign and malignant IBLs and the calculation of the sensitivity and specificity of the index test, based on histopathological examination or clinical and imaging follow-up as the reference standard. After the risk of bias and eligibility assessment, 12 articles were identified and synthesised in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT/CT for diagnosing IBLs are 93.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-0.95] and 96.0% (95% CI 0.94-0.97), respectively. There was heterogeneity of the articles due to variable imaging protocols, duration of follow-up and scoring methods for interpreting the SPECT/CT results. The heterogeneity poses a challenge for accurate interpretation of the true diagnostic capability of SPECT/CT. In conclusion, targeted SPECT/CT improves the specificity of diagnosing bone metastases, but efforts need to be made to standardise the thresholds for SPECT/CT, methodology, as well as harmonising the reporting and interpretation criteria. We also make some recommendations for future works.

Relationship between lower lumbar spine shape and patient bone metabolic activity as characterised by 18F NaF bio-markers

Chronic lower lumbar pain has been associated with elevated bone metabolic activity in the spine. Diagnosis of bone metabolic activity is currently through integrating Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with Sodium Fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) biomarkers. It has been reported that numerous observable pathologies including lumbar fusion, disc abnormalities and scoliosis have often been associated with increased ¹⁸F-NaF uptake. The aim of this study was to identify what features of lower lumbar shape most strongly correlate with ¹⁸F-NaF uptake. Following a principal component analysis of 23 patients who presented with lumbar pain and underwent ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT, it was revealed that three modes interpreted as (i) sacral tilt, (ii) vertebral disc spacing and (iii) spine size were the three characteristics that described 88.7% of spine shape in our study population. ¹⁸F-NaF was described by two modes including ¹⁸F-NaF intensity and spatial variation (anterior-inferior to posterior-superior). ¹⁸F-NaF was most sensitive to sacral tilt followed by vertebral disc spacing. A predictive model derived from that spine population was able to predict ¹⁸F-NaF 'hot-spot' locations with 85 ± 5% accuracy and with 71 ± 3% accuracy for the ¹⁸F-NaF magnitude. These results suggest that patients reporting with lower lumbar pain and who present with increased sacral tilt profiles and/or reduced disc spacing are good candidates for further ¹⁸F-NaF PET-CT imaging, evidenced by the high association between those shape profiles and ¹⁸F-NaF uptake.

A Prospective Study Comparing 99mTc-Hydroxyethylene-Diphosphonate Planar Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body SPECT/CT with 18F-Fluoride PET/CT and 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI for Diagnosing Bone Metastases

We prospectively evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of ^99mTc-hydroxyethylene-diphosphonate (^99mTc-HDP) planar bone scintigraphy (pBS), ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT, and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/MRI for the detection of bone metastases. Methods: One hundred seventeen patients with histologically proven malignancy referred for clinical pBS were prospectively enrolled. pBS and whole-body SPECT/CT were performed followed by ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT within 9 d. ¹⁸F-NaF PET/MRI was also performed in 46 patients. Results: Bone metastases were confirmed in 16 patients and excluded in 101, which was lower than expected. The number of equivocal scans was significantly higher for pBS than for SPECT/CT and PET/CT (18 vs. 5 and 6, respectively; P = 0.004 and 0.01, respectively). When equivocal readings were excluded, no statistically significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or overall accuracy were found when comparing the different imaging techniques. In the per-patient analysis, equivocal scans were either assumed positive for metastases ("pessimistic analysis") or assumed negative for metastases ("optimistic analysis"). The percentages of misdiagnosed patients for the pessimistic analysis were 21%, 15%, 9%, and 7% for pBS, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI, respectively. Corresponding figures for the optimistic analysis were 9%, 12%, 5%, and 7%. In those patients identified as having bone metastases according to the reference standard, SPECT/CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT, and PET/MRI detected additional lesions compared with pBS in 31%, 63%, and 71%, respectively. Conclusion:¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT and whole-body SPECT/CT resulted in a significant reduction of equivocal readings compared with pBS, which implies an improved diagnostic confidence. However, the clinical benefit of using, for example, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT or PET/MRI as compared with SPECT/CT and pBS in this patient population with a relatively low prevalence of bone metastases (14%) is likely limited. This conclusion is influenced by the low prevalence of patients with osseous metastases. There may well be significant differences in the sensitivity of SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI compared with pBS, but a larger patient population or a patient population with a higher prevalence of bone metastases would have to be studied to demonstrate this.

Appropriate use of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of oncology patients

Positron emission tomography (PET) was developed in the mid-1970, and its initial applications were for heart and brain imaging research. Nowadays, this technology is aimed mainly at staging or restaging tumours as it allows the assessment of biochemical processes that are either specific or associated with tumour biology. The full appreciation of PET potentials and limitations among general practitioners and internists cannot be considered achieved and the appropriate use of PET especially when coupled to X-ray computed tomography (CT) is still suboptimal. The majority of PET studies rely on the use of fluorodeoxyglucose labelled with fluorine-18 (FDG), which is a radiopharmaceutical specific for glucose transport and metabolism. PET with FDG is amenable for studying most type of tumours, including those of the head and neck, lung, oesophagus, colo-rectal, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, pancreas, some types of lymphomas and melanoma, whereas in some tumours, including those of the reproductive system, brain, breast and bones, there is a limited role for PET and there is no substantial role for FDG-PET for the bronchoalveolar, hepatocellular, urinary system, testicular, neuroendocrine, carcinoids and adrenal tumours, differentiated thyroid cancers, and several subtypes of malignant lymphoma. Thus, the limits of FDG have stimulated the use and development of other radiopharmaceuticals. These tracers represent the opportunity for expanding the use of PET to other areas in oncology in the near future.