wbMRI to detect bone metastases: critical review on diagnostic accuracy and comparison to other imaging modalities

The Role of Whole-Body MRI in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Oncology: Current Concepts and Clinical Applications

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has gained importance in the field of musculoskeletal oncology over the last decades, consisting in a one-stop imaging method that allows a wide coverage assessment of both bone and soft tissue involvement. WB-MRI is valuable for diagnosis, staging, and follow-up in many oncologic diseases and is especially advantageous for the pediatric population since it avoids redundant examinations and exposure to ionizing radiation in patients who often undergo long-term surveillance. Its clinical application has been studied in many pediatric neoplasms, such as cancer predisposition syndromes, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, lymphoma, sarcomas, and neuroblastoma. The addition of diffusion-weighted sequences allows functional evaluation of neoplastic lesions, which is helpful in the assessment of viable tumor and response to treatment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. WB-MRI is an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in oncologic children, with comparable accuracy and the convenience of being radiation-free, fast to perform, and available at a similar cost. The development of new techniques and protocols makes WB-MRI increasingly faster, safer, and more accessible, and it is important for referring physicians and radiologists to recognize the role of this imaging method in pediatric oncology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI for Response Assessment of Bone Metastases

Recent developments in hybrid SPECT/CT systems and the use of cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors have improved the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy. These advancements have paved the way for novel quantitative approaches to accurate and reproducible treatment monitoring of bone metastases. PET/CT imaging using [18F]F-FDG and [18F]F-NaF have shown promising clinical utility in bone metastases assessment and monitoring response to therapy and prediction of treatment response in a broad range of malignancies. Additionally, specific tumor-targeting tracers like [99mTc]Tc-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, or [11C]C- or [18F]F-Choline revealed high diagnostic performance for early assessment and prognostication of bone metastases, particularly in prostate cancer. PET/MRI appears highly accurate imaging modality, but has associated limitations notably, limited availability, more complex logistics and high installation costs. Advances in artificial intelligence (Al) seem to improve the accuracy of imaging modalities and provide an assistant role in the evaluation of treatment response of bone metastases.

Assessing the Feasibility of Simplifying the Scanning Protocol for Spinal Metastases With Vertebral Compression Fractures Using Only the Dixon T2-Weighted Sequence

OBJECTIVE

Conventional imaging protocols, including sagittal T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and water-only T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), are time consuming when screening for spinal metastases with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of using only the Dixon T2-weighted sequence in the diagnosis of spinal metastases with VCFs to determine its suitability as a simplified protocol for this task.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 patients diagnosed with spinal metastases and VCFs. Qualitative analysis was performed separately by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who independently performed diagnostic evaluations of each vertebra using both conventional and simplified protocols. McNemar's test was then used to compare the differences in diagnostic results, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess interobserver and interprotocol agreement. Diagnostic performance values for both protocols, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve, were then determined based on the reference standard. Quantitative image analysis was performed randomly for 30 metastases on T1WI and fat-only T2WI to measure the signal intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of VCFs by both radiologists was in full agreement with the reference standard. The classification of spinal metastases and diagnostic performance values determined by both radiologists were not significantly different between the two protocols (all P > 0.05), and the consistency between observers and protocols was excellent (κ = 0.973-0.991). The contrast-to-noise ratio of fat-only T2WI was significantly higher than that of T1WI (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Dixon T2-weighted sequence alone performed well in diagnosing spinal metastases with VCFs, performing no worse than the conventional protocol (T1WI and water-only T2WI). This suggests that the Dixon T2-weighted sequence alone can serve as a simplified protocol for the diagnosis of spinal metastases with VCFs, thereby avoiding the need for more intricate scanning procedures.

Whole-Body MRI in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Comprehensive Review with Recommendations

Whole-body (WB) MRI has emerged as an attractive method for oncologic evaluation, potentially replacing conventional imaging modalities and providing a one-step wide-coverage assessment of both the skeleton and soft tissues. In addition to providing anatomic information, WB MRI may also yield a functional analysis with the inclusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI translates microstructural changes, resulting in an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. WB MRI (with DWI) offers comparable accuracy to PET/CT and has the advantage of avoiding ionizing radiation. Technological advances and the development of faster protocols have prompted greater accessibility of WB MRI, with growing applications in routine practice for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer. This review discusses the technical considerations, clinical applications, and accuracy of WB MRI in musculoskeletal oncology. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Skeletal-Axial, Skeletal-Appendicular, Soft Tissues/Skin, Bone Marrow, Extremities, Oncology, Musculoskeletal Imaging © RSNA, 2023.

Update in Imaging Evaluation of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

A evolução na avaliação por imagens dos sarcomas musculoesqueléticos contribuiu para melhora significativa no prognóstico e na sobrevida dos portadores destas neoplasias. A caracterização precisa destas lesões, mediante utilização das modalidades de imagem mais adequadas a cada condição clínica apresentada, é de suma importância no delineamento da abordagem terapêutica a ser instituída, com impacto direto sobre os desfechos clínicos. O presente artigo busca atualizar o leitor a propósito das metodologias de imagem no contexto da avaliação local e sistêmica dos sarcomas ósseos e das partes moles.

Shortening the acquisition time of whole-body MRI: 3D T1 gradient echo Dixon vs fast spin echo for metastatic screening in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare 3D T1-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) and 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (GE) mDixon as morphologic sequences to complement diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the metastatic screening in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty PCa patients at high risk of metastases prospectively underwent both a 3D T1 FSE (14 min) and a rapid 3D T1 GE^mDixon (1 min 20 s) sequences within a WB-MRI protocol. Two readers assessed the diagnostic performance of the FSE/Fat/in-phase (IP)/IP+Fat sequences in detecting bone and node metastases. The reference standard was established by a panel of four physicians on the basis of all baseline and follow-up imaging, biological and clinical information. The reproducibility of readings, predictive accuracy (Acc) from ROC curves analysis, and contrast-to-reference ratio (CRR) in lesions were assessed for each sequence.

RESULTS

In bone and lymph nodes (per-region analysis), reproducibility was at least good for all sequences/readers, except for nodes in the common iliac/inguinal regions. In bone (per-organ analysis), Acc of FSE was superior to that of mDixon (difference + 4%, p < 0.0083). In nodes (per-organ analysis), Acc of Fat was superior to that of other sequences (difference + 4% to + 6% depending on reader, p < 0.0083). In the per-patient analysis, Acc of FSE was superior to that of mDixon (difference + 4% to + 6% depending on sequence, p < 0.0083). Fat images had higher CRR compared with FSE in the thoracic spine, the bony pelvis and lymph node metastases (p < 0.025).

CONCLUSION

3D T1 GE^mDixon may replace 3D T1 FSE to complement DWI in WB-MRI for metastatic screening in PCa. It demonstrates an Acc ranging from + 4% to + 6% (nodes) to - 4% to - 6% (bone and patient staging) compared with FSE and considerably reduces the examination time, offering the perspective of acquiring WB-MRI examinations in less than 20 min.

KEY POINTS

• The replacement of 3D T1 FSE by the 3D T1 GE mDixon as morphologic sequence to complement DWI drastically reduces the acquisition time of WB-MRI studies. • The 3D T1 GE mDixon sequence offers similar reproducibility of image readings compared with that of the 3D T1 FSE. • Differences in diagnostic accuracy are limited (+ 4%/+ 6% in favor of mDixon to detect node metastases; + 4%/+ 6% in favor of FSE to detect bone metastases/metastatic disease in a patient).

MRI and Bone Scintigraphy for Breast Cancer Bone Metastase: A Meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance image (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases.

Methods

Searching in the databases including PubMed, Embase about the comparative study of MRI and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases during 2000~2018. After we screened further, the extracted effective data were calculated by Meta-Disc 1.4 software.

Results

We obtained 4 articles. The pooled estimates for sensitivity of MRI, BS were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.93 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.97]) respectively; For specificity were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.86 (95% CI, [0.79, 0.92]) respectively. The AUC of SROC curve for MRI and BS were 0.9948 and 0.9675 respectively.

Conclusion

MRI remains to be a satisfactory method for the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases and should first be considered for patients.

Whole-body MRI to assess bone involvement in prostate cancer and multiple myeloma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the T1, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and high b-values diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body T1, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and sequence combinations to detect bone involvement in prostate cancer (PCa) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 50 consecutive patients with PCa at high risk for metastasis and 47 consecutive patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of MM who received whole-body MRI at two institutions from January to December 2015. Coronal T1, STIR, and reconstructed coronal high b-values DWI were obtained for all patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists read individual sequences, pairs of sequences (T1-DWI, T1-STIR, and STIR-DWI), and all combined (T1-STIR-DWI) to detect bone involvement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance according to a "best valuable comparator" combining baseline and 6-month imaging and clinical and biological data. Interobserver agreement was calculated.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement for individual and combined MRI sequences was very good in the PCa group and ranged from good to very good in the MM group (0.76-1.00). In PCa patients, T1-DWI, T1-STIR, and T1-STIR-DWI showed the highest performance (sensitivity = 100% [95% CI = 90.5-100%], specificity = 100% [75.3-100%]). In MM patients, the highest performance was achieved by T1-STIR-DWI (sensitivity = 100% [88.4-100%], specificity = 94.1% [71.3-100%]). T1-STIR-DWI significantly outperformed all sequences (p < 0.05) except T1-DWI (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

In PCa patients, a combination of either T1-DWI or T1-STIR sequences is not inferior to a combination of three sequences to detect bone metastases. In MM, T1-STIR-DWI and T1-DWI had the highest diagnostic performance for detecting bone involvement.

KEY POINTS

• The sequences used in Whole Body MRI studies to detect bone involvement in prostate cancer and myeloma were evaluated. • In prostate cancer, any pairwise combinations of T1, STIR, and DWI have high diagnostic value. • In myeloma, the combinations T1-STIR-DWI or T1-DWI sequences should be used.

Whole Body MRI and oncology: recent major advances

MRI is a very attractive approach for tumour detection and oncological staging with its absence of ionizing radiation, high soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution. Less than 10 years ago the use of Whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) protocols was uncommon due to many limitations, such as the forbidding acquisition times and limited availability. This decade has marked substantial progress in WB-MRI protocols. This very promising technique is rapidly arising from the research world and is becoming a commonly used examination for tumour detection due to recent technological developments and validation of WB-MRI by multiple studies and consensus papers. As a result, WB-MRI is progressively proposed by radiologists as an efficient examination for an expanding range of indications. As the spectrum of its uses becomes wider, radiologists will soon be confronted with the challenges of this technique and be urged to be trained in order to accurately read and report these examinations. The aim of this review is to summarize the validated indications of WB-MRI and present an overview of its most recent advances. This paper will briefly discuss how this examination is performed and which are the recommended sequences along with the future perspectives in the field.

Bone Marrow Metastases: T2-weighted Dixon Spin-Echo Fat Images Can Replace T1-weighted Spin-Echo Images

Purpose To test the potential of Dixon T2-weighted fat-only sequences to replace T1-weighted sequences for the detection of bone metastases, with the hypothesis that diagnostic performance with an alternative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol (sagittal spin-echo Dixon T2-weighted fat-only and water-only imaging) would not be inferior to that with the standard protocol (sagittal spin-echo T1-weighted and spin-echo Dixon T2-weighted water-only imaging). Materials and Methods A total of 121 consecutive whole-spine MR imaging examinations (63 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 61.4 years ± 11.8) performed for suspected vertebral bone metastases were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Quantitative image analysis was performed for 30 randomly selected spine levels. Qualitative analysis was performed separately by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who registered the number of metastases for each spine level. Areas under the curve with the protocols were compared on the basis of nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimations by using a noninferiority test on paired data, with a best valuable comparator as a reference. Interobserver and interprotocol agreement was assessed by using κ statistics. Results Contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher on the alternative protocol images than on the standard protocol images (181.1 [95% confidence interval: 140.4, 221.7] vs 84.7 [95% confidence interval: 66.3, 103.1] respectively; P < .001). Diagnostic performance was not significantly inferior with the alternative protocol than with the standard protocol for both readers in a per-patient analysis (sensitivity, 97.9%-98.9% vs 93.6%-97.9%; specificity, 85.2%-92.6% vs 92.6%-96.3%; area under the curve, 0.92-0.96 vs 0.95, respectively; all P ≤ .02) and a per-spine level analysis (all P < .01). Interobserver and interprotocol agreement was good to very good (κ = 0.70-0.81). Conclusion Dixon T2-weighted fat-only and water-only imaging provide, in one sequence, diagnostic performance similar to that of the standard combination of morphologic sequences for the detection of probable spinal bone metastases, thereby providing an opportunity to reduce imaging time by eliminating the need to perform T1 sequences. ^© RSNA, 2017 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on November 6, 2017.

Optimising TNM Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using WB-MRI

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) is the current standard of reference for the local staging of prostate cancer (PCa). On the other hand, despite the low sensitivity and specificity of Technetium Bone Scanning (BS) for the detection of bone metastases (BM) and of Body Computed Tomography CT for the detection of lymph node metastases (LNM), these techniques are routinely used, in the current clinical practice. Nevertheless, whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET-CT) are emerging as robust tools for the staging of oncologic patients, including those with (PCa).

The available techniques (BS, WB-MRI, PET, CT) for the detection of BM in oncologic patients were compared and showed striking center differences in terms of anatomic sequences and planes used. This heterogeneity and the long acquisition time of WB-MRI protocols – due to the addition of multiple anatomic sequences in different planes – questioned whether a single three dimensional (3D) sequence could replace the multiple anatomic sequences used for node and bone staging of PCa. We demonstrated that WB-MRI is a credible tool for the detection of bone and node metastasis.

The second question addressed the possibility to obtain a complete TNM staging of PCa in a single MRI session. A WB-MRI protocol was developed to enable complete, T (local), N (regional) and M (distant) staging of PCa in a single session, in less than an hour. This ‘all-in-one’ protocol proved to be as efficient as the sum of exams currently in use for the staging of PCa (ie: mp-MRI of the prostate for ‘T’ staging, Thoraco-abdominal CT for ‘N’ staging and bone scintigraphy for ‘M’ staging).