The role of PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The evolution of PET imaging in renal, bladder, upper urinary tract urothelial, testicular and penile carcinoma - Today's impact, tomorrow's potential

INTRODUCTION

The advancement of hybrid PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging for non-prostate genitourinary cancers has not experienced the rapid progress of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, these neoplasms are aggressive and reliable imaging plays a pivotal role in enhancing patients' quality of life and prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

the main evidence regarding [18F]FDG and non-[18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in non-prostate uro-oncological malignancies are summarized and discussed. Moreover, potential future directions concerning PET imaging in these neoplasms are debated, with the aim to stimulate future research projects covering these fields.

EXPERT OPINION

In Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), [18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates varying efficacy in staging, restaging, and prognostic stratification, but PSMA PET/CT is emerging as a potential game-changer, particularly in advanced, high-grade aggressive clear cell RCC. [18F]FDG PET/CT may see an increased use in N and M-staging of bladder cancer, as well as for detecting recurrence and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Preliminary data regarding [68Ga]-FAPI also looks promising in this context. [18F]FDG PET/MRI could be useful for the T-staging of bladder cancer, while upper tract urothelial carcinoma still lacks of molecular imaging literature reports. In testicular and penile cancer [18F]FDG PET/CT has demonstrated its usefulness in several clinical settings, although experiences with non-[18F]FDG radiotracers are lacking.

Performance of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for lymph node staging in bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review

Objective: To evaluate the current literature on the accuracy of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in urothelial carcinoma (UC), as robust evidence on the value of this technology in UC is still lacking.

Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE)/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible studies. We included all original studies evaluating FDG PET-CT in bladder or upper tract UC. The search results were restricted to the English language, and included prospective and retrospective studies without time restriction. We included only studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET-CT in detecting UC LN metastases.

Results: We identified 23 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. In the preoperative setting, the sensitivity of FDG PET-CT for detecting LN metastases in patients with bladder cancer was widely variable ranging from 23% to 89%; the specificity ranged from 81% to 100%; and the overall accuracy ranged from 65% to 89%. During bladder cancer monitoring the sensitivity for detecting LN metastases ranged from 75% to 92% and the specificity ranged from 60% to 92%. The sensitivity for LN staging in upper tract UC ranged between 82% and 95%, with a specificity of 84–91%.

Conclusion: Despite the inconsistencies in sensitivity between the reports, FDG PET-CT seems to have a high specificity for LN staging in patients with UC. Future prospective, well-designed studies are necessary to evaluate the role of FDG PET-CT in UC management.

Abbreviations: FDG: fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses; PSMA: prostate-specific membrane antigen; (N)(P)PV: (negative) (positive) predictive value; QUADAS-2: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; SUV_max: maximum standard uptake value; (UT)UC: (upper urinary tract) urothelial carcinoma