Psychotropic Medication in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Patterns of Use and Recommendations for Monitoring Effects

Psychotropic Medication Use and Polypharmacy Among Children and Adolescents Initiating Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Severe Challenging Behavior

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence, trends, and factors associated with psychotropic medication use and polypharmacy among children and adolescents initiating intensive behavioral therapy for severe challenging behavior over a 10-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective observational study, we examined data from caregiver interviews and patient medical records on the number and types of psychotropic medications prescribed to patients initiating intensive behavioral therapy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends in medication use and polypharmacy across the 10-year period were analyzed using regression analysis, while differences in demographics and clinical factors for patients with use and polypharmacy were analyzed using nonparametric statistical analysis with odds ratios presented for significant factors.

RESULTS

Data from all 302 pediatric patients initiating intensive behavioral therapy across the 10-year period were analyzed. Among all patients and all years, 83.8% were taking at least 1 psychotropic medication and 68.2% experienced polypharmacy. There were no changes in the prevalence of use, mean number of medications taken, or polypharmacy across the 10-year period. Patients diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or anxiety disorder, as well as those exhibiting self-injurious behavior had higher use of psychotropic medication and polypharmacy and were taking more medications overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychotropic medication use and polypharmacy were extremely high for children and adolescents with severe challenging behavior, but use and polypharmacy did not change over the 10-year period of data collection. Further research is needed to establish the generality of these findings to other regions of the US.

Long-term functional stability of problem behavior exposed to psychotropic medications

Psychopharmacological and behavioral interventions are often combined in the treatment of problem behavior in people with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD). However, little is known about the interaction between medication pharmacodynamics and behavior function. A better understanding of these mechanisms could serve as the conceptual foundation for combined interventions. The current analysis is a systematic replication of Valdovinos et al. (2009). We conducted continuous functional analyses within analogue reversal and parametric analyses monitoring the impact of various dosages of primarily antipsychotic medications on problem behavior and its function. Four individuals with IDD and problem behavior who were also receiving psychotropic medications participated. Medication adjustments produced small to negligible decreases in problem behavior, and behavior function remained largely unchanged through the 14 medication adjustments evaluated. The continuous functional analysis helped to identify what could be delayed medication effects on problem behavior. The clinical and methodological implications of this replication are discussed.

Effects of clonidine on progressive ratio schedule performance in Fmr1 knockout mice

RATIONALE

Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most prevalent genetic form of intellectual disability, is characterized by intellectual impairment, impaired sociability, aggression, self-injury, hyperactivity, and attention deficits. A consequence of the hyperactivity and attention deficits is that individuals with FXS are frequently diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and treated with medications approved for ADHD (e.g., the α₂-agonist clonidine). The pharmacotherapy of FXS is often accompanied with behavioral therapies that rely on positive reinforcement and other operant principles. Despite the commonplace mixture of drug and behavioral therapy, little attention has been paid to the observation that clonidine or other psychotropic drugs may alter operant processes.

OBJECTIVES

In the present progressive ratio study, we used a knockout mouse model to test the effects of the fragile X genotype, the α₂-agonist clonidine, and the fragile X genotype and clonidine together on operant processes in a positive reinforcement task.

RESULTS

We found that clonidine decreased the progressive ratio breakpoint, increased the length of post-reinforcement pauses, and slowed the run rate. None of these effects varied by genotype. The effect on breakpoint suggests that clonidine alters motivation, but analysis using mathematical principles of reinforcement (MPR) did not rule out motor parameters as a contributor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that clonidine alters operant behavior and serve as a caution for combining clonidine with behavioral therapies that rely on positive reinforcement. Further research using different murine behaviors (e.g., touchscreen tasks) or different animal models (e.g., knockout rats) is needed to explore the interaction between pharmaco- and behavioral therapy.

Do we need to go beyond a purely behavioral approach? A response to Woodcock and Blackwell

: In their recent review, 'Psychological treatment strategies for challenging behaviours in neurodevelopmental disorders: what lies beyond a purely behavioural approach?' Woodcock and Blackwell discuss supposed deficiencies in applied behavior analysis (ABA) and positive behavior support (PBS) to address challenging behavior. This commentary highlights problems with Woodcock and Blackwell's critique based on substantial evidence that behavioral approaches including ABA and PBS are often the best available solution for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders who display challenging behavior.