Hepatic vein transit time of second-generation ultrasound contrast agent: new tool in the assessment of portal hypertension

Altered liver hemodynamics in patients with COVID-19: a cross sectional study

AIMS

Abnormalities in liver biochemistry are common in COVID-19 patients. Hepatic vein Doppler waveform, typically triphasic, may become biphasic or monophasic in cirrhosis, correlating with liver dysfunction, fibrosis, inflammation, and portal hypertension. This study investigates liver ultrasound (US) features in COVID-19 patients, correlating hepatic vein Doppler waveform and portal vein velocity (PVV) with inflammatory indexes and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection participated in a crosssectional study. Bedside upper abdomen US evaluations, including B-mode and Doppler, were conducted using a convex probe. Hepatic vein Doppler waveforms were classified as triphasic, biphasic, or monophasic, and the hepatic vein waveform index (HVWI) was calculated. PVV was measured over three cardiac cycles. Tracings were blindly analyzed by three operators to ensure consistency.

RESULTS

Low HVWI and high PVV correlated with elevated LDH, ALT, D-dimer, and ferritin (p < 0.05). HVWI showed significant negative correlations with ferritin, D-dimer, and ALT (p < 0.05). D-Dimer and ferritin were higher in patients with biphasic/monophasic waveforms (p < 0.05). High PVV and larger spleen diameters predicted worse respiratory outcomes, including CPAP and tracheal intubation (p < 0.05). Optimal cut-off values for PVV (21.7 cm/s) and spleen diameter (9.84 cm) maximized sensitivity and specificity for predicting these outcomes. FIB-4 scores did not correlate with respiratory outcomes or hepatic hemodynamics (p > 0.05). Hemodynamic alterations were not significantly influenced by the presence of SLD (Steatotic Liver Disease).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 patients exhibit altered intrahepatic hemodynamics, with hepatic vein waveform abnormalities potentially reflecting liver inflammation and fibrosis. PVV and spleen diameter may serve as non-invasive predictors of respiratory outcomes.

Demonstration of Hepatic Vein Abnormalities Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in Liver Diseases

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is now widely used to observe the hemodynamics of the liver. The CEUS diagnosis mainly consists of evaluating hepatic artery and portal vein flow changes in liver diseases, but it has not been widely used for the diagnosis of hepatic venous (HV) abnormalities in the clinical setting. For this background, this review tried to reconsider this problem. In short, observing HV CEUS findings, especially HV transit time, serves to largely narrow the differential diagnosis and increase the diagnostic confidence of the CEUS. However, diagnosing HV CEUS diagnosis in a wide range of liver diseases requires understanding of vascular anatomy of the upper abdomen and vascular structure of each disease. Additionally, interpreting CEUS findings of HCC should be prudent, because its drainage vessels change according to the histological progression, from the HV to the portal vein. Thus, the most important way of making use of the CEUS information is interpreting it in conjunction with the clinical data.

Diagnostic accuracy of hepatic vein arrival time performed with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for HCV liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has increased considerably the use of ultrasound for hemodynamical analyses and quantification. Bolus injection of microbubble agents is used to evaluate transit times. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of arrival time (seconds) to the hepatic artery (HAAT), hepatic vein (HVAT), and portal vein (PVAT), based on CEUS used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, and to correlate these arrival times with the liver stiffness and disease severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated 29 HCV cirrhotic and 19 chronic hepatitis C patients. History, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, abdominal ultrasonography, point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and CEUS were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean liver stiffness increased significantly in cirrhotic versus chronic HCV (22.7 versus 5.1; p-value < 0.001). The mean HAAT (p-value = 0.001), PVAT (p-value = 0.002), and HVAT values (p-value: 0.001) were significantly prolonged in cirrhotic compared with chronic HCV. The HVAT cut-off point of cirrhotic patients was 18 s with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96.6%, 63.2%, and 83.3%, respectively (area under curve: 0.801). Significant positive correlation was found between liver stiffness (kPa) and HVAT (s) (r = 0.585; p-value = 0.005). No significant correlation was detected between HVAT (s) and the severity of liver disease, as assessed by the Child or MELD scores in cirrhotic patients.

CONCLUSION

Measuring HVAT by CEUS yielded high-accuracy and correlation outcomes for cirrhosis detection. It could be a valuable noninvasive method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Spleen Transient Elastography and Damping Index Identify a Subgroup of Patients Without an Acute or Chronic Response to Beta-Blockers

Background and Aims

Monitoring of acute or chronic response to beta-blockers in patients with liver cirrhosis is based on the measurement of the HVPG. Our aim was to evaluate the response to beta-blockers with non-invasive techniques.

Patients and Methods

This is a prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with an indication of primary or secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding who did not meet exclusion criteria were included. Acute response and chronic response were evaluated. Baseline and after acute and chronic response hepatosplenic measurements of TE and ARFI were obtained. Contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound was performed before and after acute and chronic responses.

Results

From June 2015 to May 2018, 55 patients (14 with exclusion criteria) were included. We analyzed 41 patients, mean age 57 (SD: 8), 82.9% men, alcohol 43.9%, children A/B/C 78%/17.1%/4.9%, and 87.8% on primary prophylaxis. In all, the acute response was performed and was positive in 68.3% (CI 95: 55-85%). The chronic response was performed in 30 (73.2%) and was positive in 36.7% (CI 95: 18-55%). Basal measurements significantly related to acute response were spleen TE [responders 58.4 (SD: 23.0) KPa vs. non-responders 75 (SD: 0) KPa; p = 0.02] and damping index [non-responders 0.96 (0.8) vs. responders 0.44 (0.4), p = 0.01], and with chronic response, the spleen TE [responders 58.1 (SD: 21.4) KPa vs. non-responders 73.2 (SD: 5.5) KPa; p = 0.02], and damping index [non-chronic responders 0.8 (0.7) vs. chronic responders 0.4 (0.4), p = 0.04]. A spleen TE ≥ 74 KPa had a high sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 60% and a high NPV100% for predicting poor acute response to beta-blockers. The damping index > 0.6 showed moderate sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 69% with a high NPV of 82% for predicting poor acute response to beta-blockers. The combination of both measurements for predicting poor acute response to beta-blockers had an AUC of 0.8 (CI 95: 0.5-0.9). A spleen TE ≥ 74 KPa had a high sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 71% with a high NPV of 71% for predicting poor chronic response to beta-blockers. A damping index > 0.6 had moderate sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 82%, and NPV of 56% for predicting poor chronic response to beta-blockers. The combination of both measurements for predicting poor chronic response to beta-blockers had an AUC of 0.8 (CI 95: 0.7-0.9).

Conclusion

Spleen TE and damping index can identify a subgroup of patients with poor acute or chronic response to beta-blockers.

Application of Hepatic Transit Time and Shear Wave Velocity in Assessing Portal Pressure in Patients with Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

The aim of the study described here was to explore the value of hepatic transit time (HTT) and shear wave velocity (SWV) in diagnosing cirrhotic portal hypertension. Fifty-seven patients had undergone esophagogastric varicose vein embolization (group OBS) and 50 healthy controls (group CON) were retrospectively compared with respect to HTT (arterial-hepatic vein [HA-HVTT], portal vein-hepatic vein [PV-HVTT], liver parenchyma-hepatic vein [PA-HVTT]) and SWV to analyze their efficacy in diagnosing cirrhotic portal hypertension. The correlations between SWV/HTT and free portal pressure (FPP) in group OBS were also analyzed. Compared with group CON, group OBS had a shorter HTT and faster SWV. The area under the curve (AUC) of PV-HVTT (0.93) was higher than those of HA-HVTT (0.75) and PA-HVTT (0.64), the AUCs of PV-HVTT (0.93, threshold 7.9 s) and SWV (0.91, threshold 2.0 cm/s) did not statistically differ (z = 0.35, p = 0.73). HTT and FPP in group OBS had a negative correlation. In conclusion, HTT and SWV can be used to diagnose cirrhotic portal hypertension without difference in diagnostic efficacy, and HTT is more meaningful for assessing the changes in portal pressure.

Correlation between portal vein diameter and craniocaudal length of the spleen

Objective

To determine the correlation between portal vein diameter and spleen size (craniocaudal).

Methodology

The study was conducted at the University Ultrasound Clinic, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan from 1^st January to 1^st July 2013. All the individuals who referred for abdominal sonographic examination, including male, female, older and younger were conveniently included in the study, voluntarily, irrespective of the disease state. Ultrasonographic measurements of the caudocranial length of the spleen and portal vein were carried out on all of the one thousand subjects. The subject position for spleen was supine or right posterior oblique during suspended inspiration and right anterior oblique position for portal vein diameter with quiet respiration. The correlation between the splenic length and portal vein diameter was evaluated.

Result

A total of 1000 subjects; 36.9% females and 63.1% males aged from 4 to 79 years. The mean splenic length was 10.29 ± 1.89 cm. The mean portal vein diameter was 10.27 ± 1.78 mm. A statistically significant correlation was found between the spleen size and portal vein diameter; the Pearson correlation was significant at the 0.01 level.

Conclusion

Portal vein diameter is directly correlated to splenic caudocranial length. A regression formula was developed to measure the splenic length from the calculation of portal vein diameter.

Application of the Hepatic Transit Time (HTT) in Evaluation of Portal Vein Pressure in Gastroesophageal Varices Patients

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical significance of using hepatic transit time (HTT) to evaluate portal vein pressure in gastroesophageal varices patients.

METHODS

For the observation group, we enrolled 50 gastroesophageal varices patients who had received esophagogastric variceal embolization in our hospital between January 2015 and February 2018. Patients without liver disease populated the control group and were recruited during the same time period. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced sonography. In the observation group, free portal pressure (FPP) was detected during esophagogastric variceal embolization with ultrasound guidance. Differences in hepatic artery-hepatic vein transit time (HA-HVTT), portal vein-hepatic vein transit time (PV-HVTT), and parenchyma-hepatic vein transit time (PA-HVTT) were compared between groups. Correlations between HA-HVTT, PV-HVTT, PA-HVTT, and FPP in the observation group were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

HA-HVTT (t = 5.078; P < .001), PV-HVTT (t = 12.163; P < .001), and PA-HVTT (t = 2.649; P = .009) within the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The areas under the curve of HTT were 0.771 (HA-HVTT), 0.951 (PV-HVTT), and 0.652 (PA-HVTT), and the sensitivity and specificity of PV-HVTT at 7.99 seconds were 86.0% and 88.0%, respectively. The HA-HVTT (r = -0.799; P < .001), PV-HVTT (r = -0.554; P < .001), and PA-HVTT (r = -0.735; P < .001) negatively correlated to FPP in the observation group. Linear regression analysis showed y = -0.410x + 7.254 (HA-HVTT and FPP), y = -0.335x + 4.983 (PV-HVTT and FPP), and y = -0.566x + 4.997 (PA-HVTT and FPP) in the observation group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the control patients, the HTT of patients with portal hypertension-esophagogastric varices was significantly shorter, and showed an inverse relationship with FPP.

Hepatic arterialization can predict the development of collateral veins in patients with HCV-related liver disease

Purpose

Arrival time parametric imaging (At-PI) using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a procedure for evaluating liver disease progression in chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC). We investigated At-PI diagnostic efficacy in predicting development of collateral veins.

Methods

In total, 171 CHC patients underwent CEUS and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy before liver biopsy. Conventional US was performed before CEUS to identify paraumbilical veins (PV) or splenorenal shunts (SRS). After intravenous perflubutane, contrast dynamics of liver segments 5–6 and the right kidney were saved as raw data. At-PI image ratio of red (ROR) pixels to the entire liver was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to investigate the utility of At-PI for collateral vein identification.

Results

Conventional US revealed PV in two patients and SRS in five patients; UGI endoscopy detected esophageal varices (EV) in eight patients. Diagnostic capability of At-PI for detecting PV, SRS, and EV was satisfactory, and high for PV and SRS [PV; area under the ROC curve (AUROC) 0.929, cutoff value 77.9%, SRS; AUROC 0.970, cutoff value 82.0%, EV; AUROC 0.883, cutoff value 66.9%].

Conclusions

Evaluation of hepatic arterialization by At-PI was useful for predicting collateral vein development in CHC patients.