The bone anabolic therapy

Cardiovascular safety of calcium, magnesium and strontium: what does the evidence say?

Calcium, magnesium and strontium have all been implicated in both musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health and disease. However, despite these three elements being closely chemically related, there is marked heterogeneity of their characteristics in relation to cardiovascular outcomes. In this narrative review, we describe the relevant evidential landscape, focusing on clinical trials where possible and incorporating findings from observational and causal analyses, to discern the relative roles of these elements in musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health. We conclude that calcium supplementation (for bone health) is most appropriately used in combination with vitamin D supplementation and targeted to those who are deficient in these nutrients, or in combination with antiosteoporosis medications. Whilst calcium supplementation is associated with gastrointestinal side effects and a small increased risk of renal stones, purported links with cardiovascular outcomes remain unconvincing. In normal physiology, no mechanism for an association has been elucidated and other considerations such as dose response and temporal relationships do not support a causal relationship. There is little evidence to support routine magnesium supplementation for musculoskeletal outcomes; greater dietary intake and serum concentrations appear protective against cardiovascular events. Strontium ranelate, which is now available again as a generic medication, has clear anti-fracture efficacy but is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic disease. Whilst a signal for increased risk of myocardial infarction has been detected in some studies, this is not supported by wider analyses. Strontium ranelate, under its current licence, thus provides a useful therapeutic option for severe osteoporosis in those who do not have cardiovascular risk factors.

The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing : An expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF)

The place of calcium supplementation, with or without concomitant vitamin D supplementation, has been much debated in terms of both efficacy and safety. There have been numerous trials and meta-analyses of supplementation for fracture reduction, and associations with risk of myocardial infarction have been suggested in recent years. In this report, the product of an expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF), we review the evidence for the value of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D supplementation, for healthy musculoskeletal ageing. We conclude that (1) calcium and vitamin D supplementation leads to a modest reduction in fracture risk, although population-level intervention has not been shown to be an effective public health strategy; (2) supplementation with calcium alone for fracture reduction is not supported by the literature; (3) side effects of calcium supplementation include renal stones and gastrointestinal symptoms; (4) vitamin D supplementation, rather than calcium supplementation, may reduce falls risk; and (5) assertions of increased cardiovascular risk consequent to calcium supplementation are not convincingly supported by current evidence. In conclusion, we recommend, on the basis of the current evidence, that calcium supplementation, with concomitant vitamin D supplementation, is supported for patients at high risk of calcium and vitamin D insufficiency, and in those who are receiving treatment for osteoporosis.

Local pulsatile PTH delivery regenerates bone defects via enhanced bone remodeling in a cell-free scaffold

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is currently the only FDA-approved anabolic drug to treat osteoporosis, and is systemically administered through daily injections. A new local pulsatile PTH delivery device was developed from biodegradable polymers to expand the application of PTH from systemic treatment to spatially controlled local bone defect regeneration in this work. This is the first time that local pulsatile PTH delivery has been demonstrated to promote bone regeneration via enhanced bone remodeling. The biodegradable delivery device was designed to locally deliver PTH in a preprogrammed pulsatile manner. The PTH delivery was utilized to facilitate the regeneration of a bone defect spatially defined with a cell-free biomimetic nanofibrous (NF) scaffold. The local pulsatile PTH delivery (daily pulse for 21 days) not only promoted the regeneration of a critical-sized bone defect with negligible systemic side effects in a mouse model, but also advantageously achieved higher quality regenerated bone than the standard systemic PTH injection. These results demonstrate a promising and novel pulsatile PTH delivery device for spatially defined local bone regeneration.

Inflammation, fracture and bone repair

The reconstitution of lost bone is a subject that is germane to many orthopedic conditions including fractures and non-unions, infection, inflammatory arthritis, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, metabolic bone disease, tumors, and periprosthetic particle-associated osteolysis. In this regard, the processes of acute and chronic inflammation play an integral role. Acute inflammation is initiated by endogenous or exogenous adverse stimuli, and can become chronic in nature if not resolved by normal homeostatic mechanisms. Dysregulated inflammation leads to increased bone resorption and suppressed bone formation. Crosstalk among inflammatory cells (polymorphonuclear leukocytes and cells of the monocyte-macrophage-osteoclast lineage) and cells related to bone healing (cells of the mesenchymal stem cell-osteoblast lineage and vascular lineage) is essential to the formation, repair and remodeling of bone. In this review, the authors provide a comprehensive summary of the literature related to inflammation and bone repair. Special emphasis is placed on the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms, and potential interventions that can favorably modulate the outcome of clinical conditions that involve bone repair.

Atypical femur fractures in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy: etiology and management

Osteoporosis is a growing problem that is projected to affect more than 50% of American adults by 2020. Bisphosphonate therapy is currently the primary mode of treating osteoporosis in this population. While bisphosphonate therapy has been successful in increasing bone mineral density, data has shown an increased risk of atypical femur fractures with prolonged therapy. Atypical femur fractures are characterized by low-energy or atraumatic injuries that occur in the subtrochanteric region. They originate on the medial cortex, travel transversely, and typically have little or no comminution. Conservative therapy is indicated for patients with incomplete fractures without prodromal symptoms. Patients with incomplete fractures and significant prodromal symptoms or visible fracture line on radiographs, those who have failed conservative management, and those with complete fractures should be treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Evaluation should involve imaging of the contralateral femur. Teriparatide therapy may be considered for patients without contraindications. While the incidence of these fractures is low, it is likely that these rates will increase with the aging population and increased prevalence of patients being treated with bisphosphonate therapy.