Mason type II and III radial head fracture in patients older than 65: is there still a place for radial head resection?

The Long-Term Effects of Radial Head Excision for Mason Type 3 Radial Head Fracture

Background: Radial head fractures with comminution and displacement present challenges in achieving optimal treatment outcomes in the long term. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of radial head excision (RHE) in patients with Mason type 3 fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with a Mason type 3 radial head fracture who underwent primary RHE between January 2010 and January 2020. The primary outcome was the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Additionally, joint stability and arthritis, and the carrying angle were recorded for each patient. Results: In total, 61 patients (21; 34% female) with a follow-up range of 3-13 years were examined. The mean (SD) total MEPS was 91.8 (9.2). The results were excellent for 46, good for 12 and fair for 3 patients. A model of total MEPS adjusted for sex, age and follow-up time showed a significant effect of patient age on treatment success (p < 0.001). Thirteen patients (21%) showed elbow instability. Six individuals had increased valgus laxity. The mean carrying angle was 19° (range: 11°-27°) on the injured side and 9° (4°-15°) on the uninjured side, t(120) = 12.608, p < 0.001. Overall, 37 patients had degenerative changes in the operative elbow. Conclusions: Benefits of RHE persist for a long time with predominantly excellent elbow function and minimal complications. An increase in the carrying angle, joint instability and degenerative changes are to be expected. Patient age at the time of the surgery can affect treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Management of Elderly Elbow Fractures

Background

Elbow fractures are common in elderly patients with osteoporotic bones, typically resulting from falls on the elbow. Common fracture types include distal humerus, olecranon, and radial head fractures. Occasionally, a combination of these fractures occurs, creating complex injuries such as terrible triad injuries. Accurate evaluation using X-rays and CT scans is essential for optimal treatment planning. Careful preoperative planning, including the decision between non-operative and operative treatment and selecting appropriate surgical implants, is critical for achieving successful outcomes.

Objective

This chapter focuses on common elbow fractures in elderly patients and explores the available treatment options. Given the lack of clear consensus on managing elbow fractures in osteoporotic bones, we address the associated complications and highlight various treatment approaches.

Current Knowledge

Numerous treatment methods have been proposed for osteoporotic elbow fractures, including various fixation techniques, arthroplasty, and excisions. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, no method has emerged as superior. Each method has distinct advantages and disadvantages. This chapter aims to compile and compare these options, outlining their respective pros and cons.

Conclusions

Elbow fractures in osteoporotic bones present significant challenges for surgeons. Although elderly patients with osteoporotic bones generally have lower functional demands compared to younger individuals, they still require adequate, pain-free elbow function for daily activities. Advances in surgical techniques and implant technology have expanded treatment options for these fractures. Achieving successful outcomes requires selecting the appropriate implant, meticulous preoperative planning, and expert surgical execution tailored to the specific fracture characteristics.

Management of Geriatric Elbow Injury

Approximately 4.1% of all fractures in the elderly involve the elbow. Most elbow injuries in geriatric patients occur as the result of low-energy mechanisms such as falls from standing height. Elbow injuries in elderly patients present complex challenges because of insufficient bone quality, comminution, articular fragmentation, and preexisting conditions, such as arthritis. Medical comorbidities and baseline level of function must be heavily considered in surgical decision making.

Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture-Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?

OBJECTIVE

Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture-dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture-dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability.

RESULTS

The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSION

Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion-extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment.

Reliability of dynamic fluoroscopy for medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection

Background

The aim of this study was to examine whether dynamic fluoroscopy is reliable for assessment of medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection and different stages of medial collateral ligament (MCL) dissection in a cadaveric elbow model.

Materials and methods

Six intact elbow specimens were measured for joint angulation while applying valgus stress in four examination conditions (Examiner 1, Examiner 2, 1 Nm, 2 Nm) in four different elbow positions (fully pronated or supinated at 0° of elbow extension and 30° of elbow flexion). The elbow specimens were examined for valgus stress in three stages: (1) intact, (2) after radial head resection, and (3) after subsequent dissection of the complete MCL. Anteroposterior radiographs of the elbow were made at each stage to determine joint angulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

Results

In intact elbows, mean joint angulation ranged from 2.2° ± 2.0 (1 Nm) to 5.2° ± 2.3 (Examiner 1). Radial head resection did not increase joint angulation during valgus stress, regardless of joint position and examination condition (Examiner 1: 5.5°; Examiner 2: 5.0°; 1 Nm: 2.6°, 2 Nm: 3.9°). Additional dissection of the MCL led to significantly higher joint angulation during measurements with the standardized torques (1 Nm: 12.4°; 2 Nm: 23.3°). Very good to excellent ICCs for joint angulation between Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 (0.861 to 0.959) were found.

Conclusion

Dynamic fluoroscopy is a reliable diagnostic tool for determining medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection and different stages of MCL dissection.

Open reduction and internal fixation for Mason type III radial head fractures: Is it different from that for Mason type II fractures?

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the outcomes of Mason type III radial head fractures (RHFs) treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were comparable to those of Mason type II RHFs treated by ORIF.

METHODS

A total of 87 surgically treated RHF patients were reviewed. Their fractures were Mason type II in 39 patients (all treated by ORIF) and Mason type III in 48 patients (40 treated by ORIF, 7 by radial head arthroplasty, and 1 by resection). Although ORIF was preferred for Mason type III RHFs in our series, an arthroplasty was performed when the fracture accompanied severe associated injuries or multiple traumas. Radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

When Mason type II and Mason type III in general were compared, QuickDASH score, a shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and forearm rotation were significantly worse in Mason type III. However, when comparing Mason type II and Mason type III treated by ORIF in which the proportion of associated injuries were not significantly different, there was no significant difference in QuickDASH score, range of extension/flexion, or complication rate. Forearm rotations were significantly more limited in Mason type III treated by ORIF (7° for pronation and 7° for supination), and Mason type had an independent effect on forearm rotations in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

ORIF for Mason type III fractures with low level of associated injury can be as good as that for Mason type II fractures, except for less forearm rotation.

Therapeutic Effect of Resection, Prosthetic Replacement and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Treatment of Mason Type III Radial Head Fracture

Aim of the Study: Mason type III radial head fractures are a source of concern due to the severe injury and poor recovery. At present, radial head resection, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and prosthetic replacement are three common treatment methods for these fractures. The clinical efficacy and postoperative complications are controversial, which makes it difficult for physicians to determine the most appropriate regimen. Herein, this present prospective, non-randomized, parallel-controlled study was conducted to compare the therapeutic effects and identify the most effective treatment method for Mason type III radial head fracture. Materials and Methods: We assessed patients with Mason type III radial head fracture treated with resection, prosthetic replacement, and ORIF to compare preoperative and postoperative pain condition, elbow joint function, curative effect, and complication rate. A visual analog scale was used to score pain. The elbow joint function was observed using the Broberg-Morrey elbow joint score. Results: No significant differences were found in patient demographics among the resection, prosthetic replacement, and ORIF groups. The prosthetic replacement and ORIF procedures were more complex and had higher technical requirements. Prosthetic replacement and ORIF enabled higher elbow joint scores and lower pain scores than resection. Excellent and good ratings were highest and complication rates were lowest in the prosthetic replacement group, followed by the ORIF group. Conclusion: Our results showed that prosthetic replacement is more effective than ORIF and radial head resection in relieving pain, functional recovery and reducing complications in the treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures.

Complex radial head and neck fractures treated with modern locking plate fixation

BACKGROUND

Internal fixation of complex radial head and neck (CRHN) fractures is difficult, and postoperative complications are common. This study evaluated elbow function and patient clinical status after internal fixation of CRHN fractures with modern locking plates.

METHODS

We included 40 patients with 41 fractures (1 bilateral lesion). In 25 patients (61%), a concomitant injury was found. Patients were an average age of 46 years (range, 22-70 years). The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range, 2-70 months). Postoperative assessments included evaluation of range of motion, functional scores, and radiologic findings. We assessed fracture healing, surgical complications, revision surgery, and the need for metal removal.

RESULTS

Of the 34 fractures available for follow-up, 33 (97%) healed well. The mean extension deficit was 6° (range, 0°-30°). The average elbow flexion was 134° (range, 90°-160°), pronation was 70° (range, 30°-90°), and supination was 64° (range, 20°-90°). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score showed a mean of 90 points (range, 65-100 points). We observed no "poor" results. The mean Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 16.5 (range, 2.5-58.3; n = 29). All patients continued activity without daily analgesics. There were 12 (34%) complications. In 11 (32%) patients, the plate was removed.

CONCLUSIONS

CRHN fractures fixed with modern locking plates and treated as an osseoligamentous lesion exhibited promising midterm results. The new fixation devices represent an improvement in the treatment of this difficult and common fracture while reducing the need for joint replacement or radial head resection. Diagnosis and treatment of concomitant injuries should be emphasized.

Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review

Unrepairable comminuted fractures of the radial head Mason type III or type IV have poor outcomes when treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Radial head resection has been proposed as good option for surgical treatment, while in the last decades, the development of technology and design in radial head prosthesis has increased efficacy in prosthetic replacement. The present review was conducted to determine the best surgical treatment for comminuted radial head when ORIF is not possible. Better outcomes are reported for radial head arthroplasty in terms of elbow stability, range of motion, pain, and fewer complications compared to radial head excision. Nevertheless, radial head resection still can be considered an option of treatment in isolated radial head fractures with no associated ligament injuries lesion of ligaments or in case of older patients with low demanding function.

The impact of varus angulation on proximal fractures of the ulna

Background

We studied anteromedial varus angulation (VA) in the proximal third of the ulna. The importance of restoration of the anatomical orientation of the ulnar after a proximal fracture is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of minimal proximal ulna malunion on elbow function after a proximal ulna fracture.

Methods

We reviewed the follow-up of 60 patients who had undergone open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of a proximal fracture of the ulna. Patients were divided into two groups, defined as either more or less than 5° of the difference between the VA of the fractured and contralateral ulna. The range of motion(ROM)of elbow flexion, extension and forearm rotation on both sides, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were measured.

Results

The average postoperative time was 3.1 years (1–5 years). Mean VA of the fractured arm was different from the normal side (7.8 ± 3.0 vs 12.7 ± 3.0). Compared to the unfractured arm there was a loss in mean elbow flexion (14.2 ± 4.9 vs 18.0 ± 5.9), extension ROM (7.1 ± 2.5 vs 9.3 ± 1.9, p < 0.05) and forearm rotation ROM (15.6 ± 8.6 vs 21.8 ± 9.5) that were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the MEPS and VAS score results between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The function of the elbow and forearm was restricted after VA malunion in the proximal ulna, but the quality of life of these patients had not been significantly affected. We suggest that orthopedic surgeons should assess whether the specialized structures of the proximal ulna are damaged or not before surgery. If the anatomy of the fractured bone cannot be restored through manipulation of the connected end directly, it is better to image the anatomical structure of the healthy side from using an elbow X-ray before surgery, and then reset using a pre-shaped plate to prevent malunion.

Radial shortening osteotomy reduces radiocapitellar contact pressures while preserving valgus stability of the elbow

PURPOSE

Shortening osteotomy of the proximal radius might represent a potential salvage procedure in symptomatic radiocapitellar osteoarthritis, which could decrease radiocapitellar load while preserving the native radial head. In an in-vitro biomechanical investigation, we sought to determine whether shortening osteotomy of the proximal radius (1) decreases the radiocapitellar joint pressure upon axial loading and (2) retains valgus stability of the elbow. In addition, the anatomic configuration of the lesser sigmoid notch was evaluated to assess possible contraindications.

METHODS

Axial loading (0-400 N) and valgus torque (7.5 N m) over the full range of motion were applied to 14 fresh-frozen specimens before and after shortening osteotomy of the proximal radius by 2.5 mm. Radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral load distribution during axial compression was evaluated using a digital pressure mapping sensor. Valgus displacement was analyzed with a 3D camera system. The inclination angle (α) of the lesser sigmoid notch was assessed via 50 CT scans.

RESULTS

Up to axial loading of 250 N, shortening osteotomy caused a significant decrease in radiocapitellar contact pressures (p < 0.041). Valgus stability of specimens did not differ before and after shortening osteotomy (n.s.). The mean inclination angle (α) of the lesser sigmoid notch was 11.3° ± 6.3°. 46% had an inclination angle of ≤ 10° (type I). 46% had an inclination angle of 11°-20° (type II). In 8%, the inclination angle was >20° (type III).

CONCLUSION

Shortening osteotomy of the proximal radius can decrease radiocapitellar contact pressures during axial loading of up to 250 N. Primary valgus stability is not relevantly influenced by this procedure. In few patients, shortening osteotomy may cause radioulnar impingement of the radial head at the distal edge of the lesser sigmoid notch due to an inclination angle of >20°. Shortening osteotomy might be a promising treatment option to decrease pain levels in case of isolated radiocapitellar osteoarthritis.

A comparison of the open reduction-internal fixation and resection arthroplasty techniques in treatment of Mason Type 3 radial head fractures

Objective

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare a series of patients surgically treated with ORIF or early resection arthroplasty due to isolated comminuted radial head fractures.

Methods

Between the years 2009 and 2013, 34 patients with isolated comminuted fractures of the radial head (Mason Type 3) had been operated (ORIF in 19 patients, resection arthroplasty in 15 patients). The mean age of the patients in the ORIF group was 38.5 years and 54 years in the resection group. The carrying angle (CA) and ulnar variance were measured bilaterally, and radiographs were reviewed for degenerative elbow arthritis. The Mayo elbow performance score, Turkish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH-T) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical results.

Results

The mean follow-up period in the ORIF group was 40.2 months and 44.4 months in the resection group. In the ORIF group, 11 patients were clinically rated excellent, six good, and two fair. In the resection group, seven patients had excellent, five had good, and two had fair scores. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the ORIF and resection groups regarding the clinical and radiological outcomes.

Conclusion

With these short-term results, resection arthroplasty may be considered an effective method in the treatment of isolated comminuted radial head fractures, as it is less technically demanding and it also allows for early postoperative motion. However, the patients should be evaluated in detail, regarding ligamentous injuries prior to resection arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

Level III, Therapeutic study.

Surgical Outcomes and Complications in Treatment of Terrible Triad of the Elbow: Comparisons of 3 Surgical Approaches

BACKGROUND This study compared the efficacy of combined lateral and medial approach, lateral approach, and anterior medial approach in treatment of terrible triad of the elbow (TTE). MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-eight TTE patients hospitalized in our center were retrospectively analyzed, among which 14 patients were arranged for combined lateral and medial approach, 12 for lateral approach, and 12 for anterior medial approach. All included patients underwent open reduction, collateral ligament repair, and postoperative function exercise. Follow-up was conducted for 13~22 months. The elbow motion, excellent and good rate, healing time, and complication rate were recorded and compared. RESULTS These 3 approaches significantly improved the postoperative elbow motion, MEPS, VAS, excellent and good rate, and open reduction (all P<0.05). The VAS score for lateral approach was evidently higher than that for combined lateral and medial approach (P<0.05). Combined lateral and medial approach and anterior medial approach had better performance on elbow motion, MEPS, and excellent and good rate than lateral approach (both P<0.05). Lateral approach and anterior medial approach had a significantly reduced healing time compared with combined lateral and medial approach (both P<0.05), while anterior medial approach had a higher complication rate compared with anterior medial approach and lateral approach (both P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lateral combined medial surgery approach contributes to wide surgical exposure, facture stability, and decreased complication rate, and thus has superior efficacy than the other 2 surgical approaches.

Results of screw fixation in Mason type II radial head fractures

PURPOSE

The treatment of Mason type II fractures is controversial, and the aim of our study is to define the outcome of surgical treatment with screw fixation in the Mason type II radial head fracture.

METHODS

The study was carried out between 2011 and 2015, and included 14 men and 9 women, with isolated Mason type II radial head fractures which were treated operatively with screw fixation. Cases involving the additional ligament injury or fractures in other areas, or having a follow-up period which is greater than 11 months were excluded. The clinical and radiological results of our patients were assessed, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

RESULTS

The average MEPS was 95.86 points. 100 degree arcs of motion were attained by a total of 21 patients (91 %) for both flexion-extension and pronation-supination. Nevertheless, 2 patients (9 %) did not recover the 100 degree arcs for the flexion-extension.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical reduction of type II radial head fractures through open surgery and fixation with screws can have favorable results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective design.