1
|
Crocker TF, Lam N, Ensor J, Jordão M, Bajpai R, Bond M, Forster A, Riley RD, Andre D, Brundle C, Ellwood A, Green J, Hale M, Morgan J, Patetsini E, Prescott M, Ramiz R, Todd O, Walford R, Gladman J, Clegg A. Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-194. [PMID: 39252602 PMCID: PMC11403382 DOI: 10.3310/hnrp2514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Sustaining independence is important for older people, but there is insufficient guidance about which community health and care services to implement. Objectives To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community services to sustain independence for older people grouped according to their intervention components, and to examine if frailty moderates the effect. Review design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eligibility criteria Studies: Randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised controlled trials. Participants: Older people (mean age 65+) living at home. Interventions: community-based complex interventions for sustaining independence. Comparators: usual care, placebo or another complex intervention. Main outcomes Living at home, instrumental activities of daily living, personal activities of daily living, care-home placement and service/economic outcomes at 1 year. Data sources We searched MEDLINE (1946-), Embase (1947-), CINAHL (1972-), PsycINFO (1806-), CENTRAL and trial registries from inception to August 2021, without restrictions, and scanned reference lists. Review methods Interventions were coded, summarised and grouped. Study populations were classified by frailty. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used. We assessed trial-result risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 2), network meta-analysis inconsistency and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis). Results We included 129 studies (74,946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including 'multifactorial-action' (multidomain assessment and management/individualised care planning), were identified in 63 combinations. The following results were of low certainty unless otherwise stated. For living at home, compared to no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured: multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty) multifactorial-action with medication-review (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 10.60) cognitive training, medication-review, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 4.77) and activities of daily living training, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 4.76). Four intervention combinations may reduce living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured exercise, multifactorial-action and review with medication-review and self-management (standardised mean difference 0.16, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to 0.82). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured the addition of multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.88). Care-home placement and service/economic findings were inconclusive. Limitations High risk of bias in most results and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. Studies were diverse; findings may not apply to all contexts. Conclusions Findings for the many intervention combinations evaluated were largely small and uncertain. However, the combinations most likely to sustain independence include multifactorial-action, medication-review and ongoing review of patients. Some combinations may reduce independence. Future work Further research is required to explore mechanisms of action and interaction with context. Different methods for evidence synthesis may illuminate further. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019162195. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128862) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 48. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Frederick Crocker
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Natalie Lam
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Joie Ensor
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Magda Jordão
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ram Bajpai
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Matthew Bond
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Deirdre Andre
- Research Support Team, Leeds University Library, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Caroline Brundle
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Alison Ellwood
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - John Green
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Hale
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Jessica Morgan
- Geriatric Medicine, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Eleftheria Patetsini
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Prescott
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ridha Ramiz
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Rebecca Walford
- Geriatric Medicine, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Centre for Rehabilitation & Ageing Research, Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham and Health Care of Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helgesen AK, Nome CM, Stenbjerg JK, Arnesen MH, Aardalen TR, Dilles T, Grøndahl VA. Pharmaceutical Care in Primary Healthcare-A Study of Nurses', Pharmacists', and Physicians' Experiences of Interprofessional Collaboration. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1100. [PMID: 38891175 PMCID: PMC11171861 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Implementation of pharmaceutical care for the benefit of patients and health services has been highlighted worldwide. Interprofessional collaboration between nurses, pharmacists, and physicians may contribute to raising awareness of pharmacological challenges, increasing quality, and minimising errors in pharmaceutical care. This study aimed to investigate how nurses, pharmacists, and physicians experience interprofessional collaboration in pharmaceutical care within community healthcare in Norway. The study had an explorative and descriptive design with a qualitative approach. Individual interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare personnel with key roles in pharmaceutical care within community healthcare services. The data were analysed using systematic text condensation. The results revealed three categories and four subcategories: The category "Professional challenges" contained the subcategories "Blurred responsibilities" and "The importance of trust and continuity". The category "Organisational barriers" contained the subcategories "Lack of information exchange and suitable communications channels" and "Lack of time and meeting places". The third category was "Nurses-the important link". This study reveals challenges to and factors of success in increasing high-quality and safe pharmaceutical care, knowledge that can be used in quality work in the community health services and as input in curriculum development for the three professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Karin Helgesen
- Faculty of Health, Welfare, and Organisation, Østfold University College, P.O. Box 700, NO-1757 Halden, Østfold, Norway;
| | - Carina Marie Nome
- Haugvoll Nursing Home, Sarpsborg Kommune, Myrvollveien 25, NO-1743 Klavestadhaugen, Sarpsborg, Norway
| | - Julie Kjølhede Stenbjerg
- Emergency Room, Fredrikstad Kommune, Jens Wilhelmsens Gate 1, NO-1671 Kråkerøy, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | - Marie Helen Arnesen
- Home Nursing Care Centre, Fredrikstad Kommune, Faunsvei 3-6, NO-1654 Sellebakk, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | | | - Tinne Dilles
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl
- Faculty of Health, Welfare, and Organisation, Østfold University College, P.O. Box 700, NO-1757 Halden, Østfold, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Björkstedt E, Voutilainen A, Auvinen K, Hyttinen V, Jyrkkä J, Mäntyselkä P, Lönnroos E. The role of functioning in predicting nursing home placement or death among older home care patients. Scand J Prim Health Care 2023; 41:478-485. [PMID: 37916677 PMCID: PMC11001308 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2274333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There have been few studies predicting institutionalization or death in home care settings. We examined risk factors for nursing home placement (NHP) and death among home care patients. DESIGN A prospective one-year follow-up study. SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS Persons aged ≥65 years living in Eastern Finland and receiving regular home care services (n = 293). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Risk factors for NHP or death were investigated using Cox proportional hazards model. Explanatory variables included demographics, health status (Charlson Comorbidity Index, CCI), physical (Timed Up and Go, TUG), and cognitive (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE) functioning, Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (BADL, IADL) and mood (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS-15). RESULTS Of the 293 patients (mean age 82.6 years, 70.6% women), 27 (9.2%) moved to a nursing home and 25 (6.9%) died during the follow-up (mean 350 days). The combined outcome of NHP or death was predicted by BADL (HR 0.73, CI 95% 0.62-0.86), IADL (0.75, 0.65-0.87) MMSE (0.92, 0.87-0.96), and TUG (1.02, 1.01-1.03). NHP alone was predicted by BADL (0.62, 0.50-0.78), IADL (0.57, 0.45-0.73), and MMSE (0.88, 0.82-0.94) and mortality by TUG (1.02, 1.01-1.03). CONCLUSION Basic measures of functioning can be used to identify high-risk patients in home care. Decreasing BADL, IADL and MMSE predict NHP and longer TUG-times death within a year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Björkstedt
- Department of Primary Health Care, Wellbeing Services County of South Savo, Mikkeli, Finland
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ari Voutilainen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kati Auvinen
- Department of Primary Health Care, Wellbeing Services County of South Savo, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Virva Hyttinen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Johanna Jyrkkä
- Information and Development Services Unit, Finnish Medicines Agency FIMEA, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Pekka Mäntyselkä
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Clinical Research and Trials Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eija Lönnroos
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lexow M, Wernecke K, Sultzer R, Bertsche T, Schiek S. Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:307. [PMID: 35397527 PMCID: PMC8994296 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03025-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Medication reviews contribute to protecting long-term care (LTC) residents from drug related problems (DRPs). However, few controlled studies have examined the impact on patient-relevant outcomes so far.
Objective
We examined the impact of a one-time, pharmacist-led medication review on medication changes (primary endpoint) including discontinued medication, the number of chronic medications, hospital admissions, falls, and deaths (secondary endpoints).
Methods
A prospective, controlled intervention study was performed in three LTC facilities. In the intervention group (IG), after performing a medication review, a pharmacist gave recommendations for resolving DRPs to physicians, nurses and community pharmacists. The control group (CG) received usual care without a medication review. (i) We assessed the number of medication changes and the secondary endpoints in both groups before (t0) and after (t1, t2) the intervention. (ii) Additionally, the medication review was evaluated in the IG with regard to identified DRPs, the healthcare professional’s feedback on the forwarded pharmacist recommendations and whether DRPs were finally resolved.
Results
107 (IG) and 104 (CG) residents were enrolled. (i) More medication changes were identified in the IG than in the CG at t1 (p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was identified at t2 (p = 0.680). Mainly, medication was discontinued in those medication changes. Chronic medications increased in the CG (p = 0.005) at t2 while hospital admissions, falls, and deaths showed no differences. (ii) Overall, 1252 DRPs (median: 10; minimum-maximum: 2–39) were identified. Recommendations for 82% of relevant DRPs were forwarded to healthcare professionals, of which 61% were accepted or clarified. 22% were not accepted, 12% required further review and 6% remained without feedback. 51% of forwarded DRPs were finally resolved.
Conclusions
We found more medication changes in the IG compared to controls. Mostly, medication was discontinued. This suggests that our intervention was successful in discontinuing unnecessary medication. Other clinical outcomes such as falls, hospitalisations, and deaths were not improved due to the one-time intervention. The medication review further identified a high prevalence of DRPs in the IG, half of which were finally resolved.
Trial registration
German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00026120 (www.drks.de, retrospectively registered 07/09/2021).
Collapse
|
5
|
Tahvanainen H, Kuitunen S, Holmström AR, Airaksinen M. Integrating medication risk management interventions into regular automated dose dispensing service of older home care clients - a systems approach. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:663. [PMID: 34814848 PMCID: PMC8609790 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02607-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated dose dispensing (ADD) services have been implemented in many health care systems internationally. However, the ADD service itself is a logistic process that requires integration with medication risk management interventions to ensure safe and appropriate medication use. National policies and regulations guiding ADD in Finland have recommended medication reconciliation, review, and follow-up for suitable risk management interventions. This implementation study aimed to develop a medication management process integrating these recommended risk management interventions into a regular ADD service for older home care clients. METHODS This study applied an action research method and was carried out in a home care setting, part of primary care in the City of Lahti, Finland. The systems-approach to risk management was applied as a theoretical framework. RESULTS The outcome of the systems-based development process was a comprehensive medication management procedure. The medication risk management interventions of medication reconciliation, review and follow-up were integrated into the medication management process while implementing the ADD service. The tasks and responsibilities of each health care professional involved in the care team became more explicitly defined, and available resources were utilized more effectively. In particular, the hospital pharmacists became members of the care team where collaboration between physicians, pharmacists, and nurses shifted from parallel working towards close collaboration. More efforts are needed to integrate community pharmacists into the care team. CONCLUSION The transition to the ADD service allows implementation of the effective medication risk management interventions within regular home care practice. These systemic defenses should be considered when national ADD guidelines are implemented locally. The same applies to situations in which public home care organizations responsible for services e.g., municipalities, purchase ADD services from private service providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Tahvanainen
- Doctoral Programme in Drug Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sini Kuitunen
- Doctoral Programme in Drug Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna-Riia Holmström
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marja Airaksinen
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen MJ, Kao FH. The Role of Pharmacists in Home Health Care: A Study Set in a Regional Hospital in Taipei City. HOME HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/10848223211016416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In response to population aging, there is an increase in demand for the coverage of and the necessary services provided by home health care and home care for socially vulnerable groups. This study explored whether the instructions and recommendations offered by pharmacists during their home visits play a key role in the factors that influence a patient’s prognosis. A home health care database was analyzed in this study. The subjects received home visits from pharmacists. There were 262 subjects following the exclusion of closed cases that were not due to improved outcomes or death. To validate the research framework, multiple regression analysis was employed for model validation. The level of consciousness and Barthel Index score mediated the effects of multimorbidities, and these mediating effects significantly affected patient outcomes (improvement or death). The medication-related knowledge and instructions for correct medication use provided by pharmacists did not exhibit significant moderating effects on the influence of a patient’s level of consciousness and Barthel Index score on their improved outcomes. However, the pharmacists’ provision of instructions and recommendations for patient self-care had significant moderating effects on the path by which patients with multimorbidities experienced improved outcomes through higher total Barthel Index scores. In comparison with physician home visits, which merely cover the treatments for diseases, pharmacists also play a vital role in home health care. Pharmacists provide patients with medication-related knowledge and instructions for correct medication use. This study addressed aspects that have not been considered in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Ju Chen
- Heping Fuyou Branch of Taipei City Hospital, Taipei
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science, Taipei
| | - Feng-Hsia Kao
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Auvinen K, Voutilainen A, Jyrkkä J, Lönnroos E, Mäntyselkä P. Interprofessional medication assessment among home care patients: any impact on functioning? Results from a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:390. [PMID: 33023497 PMCID: PMC7539372 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01796-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multimorbidity and polypharmacy are related to the use of potentially inappropriate medicines and negative clinical outcomes including drug-related adverse events and functional declines. Home care clients are a vulnerable patient group often exposed to these risks. The aim of this study was to examine whether an interprofessional medication assessment can influence the functioning of home care patients. Methods The FIMA study was a randomised controlled intervention study comparing a general practitioner-led interprofessional medication assessment conducted at the baseline of the study with usual care with a six-month follow-up. We used linear mixed models (LMM) with a random subject effect to detect differences between the usual care and intervention groups in the following outcome measures; Katz index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Lawton and Brody scale of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Timed up and go-test (TUG), Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale and the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Results Home care patients (n = 512) had major disease burdens and functional limitations. Regarding TUG times, the LMM detected a one second improvement in the FIMA group and 2.4 s worsening in the usual care group. However, the result was not statistically significant. The ADL revealed an interaction across time, treatment and sex (p = 0.026). The ADL score decreased in both groups; the decline being the steepest among women in the intervention group. Conclusions In general, medication assessments may have limited impact on functioning of older people. Nonetheless, the FIMA intervention may prevent worsening of mobility among older home care patients. Trial registration The Interprofessional Medication Assessment for Older Patients, Clinical Trials.gov. NCT02398812. First registration, 26 March 2015. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Auvinen
- The East Savo Hospital District, BOX 111, FI-57101, Savonlinna, Finland. .,Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - A Voutilainen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - J Jyrkkä
- Assessment of Pharmacotherapies, Finnish Medicines Agency, Kuopio, Finland
| | - E Lönnroos
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - P Mäntyselkä
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Kuopio University Hospital, Primary Heath Care Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Auvinen KJ, Räisänen J, Voutilainen A, Jyrkkä J, Mäntyselkä P, Lönnroos E. Interprofessional Medication Assessment has Effects on the Quality of Medication Among Home Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Intervention Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:74-81. [PMID: 32893136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, especially in vulnerable home care patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether interprofessional medication assessment has an effect on medication quality among home care patients. DESIGN The FIMA (Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment) study was a randomized, controlled study comparing physician-led interprofessional medication assessment and usual care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The FIMA study was conducted in home care settings in Finland. The participants were ≥65-year-old home care patients with ≥6 drugs daily, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, or a recent fall. METHODS Primary outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up were number of drugs, drug-drug-interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) examined by SFINX, RENBASE, PHARAO, and Meds75+ databases. The databases classified information as follows: A (no known pharmacologic or clinical basis for an increased risk), B (evidence not available/uncertain), C (moderately increased risk which may have clinical relevance), and D (high risk, best to avoid). Logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline level of the outcome measure served as statistical methods. RESULTS The mean number of all drugs for home care patients (n = 512) was 15. The odds of drug-induced impairment of renal function (RENBASE D, P = .020) and medication-related risk loads for bleeding (PHARAO D, P = .001), anticholinergic effects (PHARAO D, P = .009), and constipation (PHARAO D, P = .003) decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced the odds of using PIMs (Meds75+ D, P = .005). There were no significant changes in drug-drug-interactions or number of drugs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FIMA intervention improved the medication quality of home care patients. Risks for renal failure, anticholinergic effects, bleeding, constipation, and the use of PIMs were reduced significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kati J Auvinen
- The East Savo Hospital District, Savonlinna, Finland; Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Johanna Räisänen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ari Voutilainen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Johanna Jyrkkä
- Assessment of Pharmacotherapies, Finnish Medicines Agency, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Pekka Mäntyselkä
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Kuopio University Hospital, Primary Health Care Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eija Lönnroos
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|