Feasibility of a tailored ERAS programme in octogenarian patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer

Analyzing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review enhanced by artificial intelligence

Introduction

Colorectal cancer stands as a predominant cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite progressive strides in surgical methodologies, the specter of postoperative complications is very large, significantly impacting both morbidity and mortality rates. This review aims to meticulously examine existing scholarly works to gauge the prevalence, severity, and therapeutic approaches to postoperative complications arising from colorectal cancer surgeries.

Methods

Employing a systematic approach, this study reviewed 135 peer-reviewed publications from the period of 2000-2023. The corpus was organized into categories reflective of the postoperative complications discussed: anastomotic leakage, port-site metastases, small bowel adhesions and obstructions, thrombosis, ileus, postoperative infections, urinary dysfunctions, and cardiovascular dysfunctions. Advanced artificial intelligence tools were leveraged for in-depth literature searches and semantic analyses to pinpoint research lacunae.

Results

The analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections garnered the majority of academic focus, representing 35% and 25% of the studies, respectively. Conversely, port-site metastases and cardiovascular dysfunctions were less frequently examined, accounting for merely 5% and 3% of the literature. The reviewed studies indicate a disparity in the reported prevalence rates of each complication, oscillating between 3% and 20%. Furthermore, the review identified a dearth of evidence-based management protocols, underscored by a pronounced heterogeneity in treatment guidelines.

Conclusions

The literature is replete with analyses on anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections; however, there exists a glaring scarcity of exhaustive research on other postoperative complications. This review emphasizes the pressing need for uniform treatment guidelines and spotlights areas in dire need of further research, aiming at the comprehensive enhancement of patient outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery.

Long-term outcomes in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer within an ERAS protocol: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

The number of elderly patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. Considering short life expectancy and multiple comorbidities, surgery may not always be the best treatment option.

METHODS

We included all consecutive patients aged 80 years and older who underwent elective resection for CRC following Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol between January 2011 and May 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoints were 30-day morbidity, and the rate of return to pre-operative living conditions 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included. Mean age was 84.6 ± 3.6 years, 49 patients (52%) were female. Most patients (77.6%) were ASA score ≥ 3. Laparoscopic resections were performed in 85 patients (90.4%), involving 69 (73.4%) colonic and 25 (26.6%) rectal resections. A stoma was constructed in 22 patients (23%), and reversed in 12 (54.5%). Twenty-two patients (23.4%) experienced a Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complication, and 2 patients (2.1%) died. The median length of hospital stay was 8 (interquartiles: 6-15) days. Sixty-six patients (70.2%) were discharged home directly and 26 (27.7%) to rehabilitation or postacute care institutes. At three months after surgery, eighty-two patients (96.5%) returned to their pre-operative living conditions directly or after short-term rehabilitation. Mean follow-up was 53 ± 33 months, estimated 5-year overall survival was 60.3% (95%CI 49.5-71.1%), and disease-free survival was 86.3% (95%CI 78.1-94.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that elderly patients undergoing elective surgery have a high potential to return to preoperative living conditions and good overall- and disease-free survivals, despite significant postoperative morbidity.

Presentation, Molecular Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Older than 80 Years Old

Background: An increasing proportion of the population of patients with cancer presents at an advanced age, increasing the challenges of successful and well-tolerated treatments. In the older spectrum of the geriatric cancer patients, those older than 80 years old, challenges are even higher because of increasing comorbidities and decreasing organ function reserves. Methods: Studies regarding colorectal cancer presentation, treatment, and prognosis in patients older than 80 years old available in the literature were evaluated and were compiled within a narrative review. Molecular attributes of colorectal cancer in the subset of patients older than 80 years old in published genomic cohorts were also reviewed and were compared with similar attributes in younger patients. Results: Characteristics of colorectal cancer in octogenarians are in many aspects similar to younger patients, but patients older than 80 years old present more often with right colon cancers. Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in selected patients over 80 years old is feasible and should be pursued. Adjuvant chemotherapy is under-utilized in this population. Although combination chemotherapy is in most cases not advisable, monotherapy with fluoropyrimidine derivatives is feasible and efficacious. Conclusions: Outcomes of colorectal cancer patients over the age of 80 years old may be optimized with a combination of standard treatments adjusted to the individual patient's functional status and organ reserves. Increased support for the older age group during their colorectal cancer treatment modalities would improve oncologic outcomes with decreasing adverse outcomes of therapies.

Factors Influencing Postoperative Recovery Time of Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore the factors associated with prolonged enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) time in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective of patients with gastric cancer who received ERAS at our hospital between 01/2014 and 01/2022. The outcome was prolonged ERAS time. Factors associated with prolonged ERAS time of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 663 patients, 182 (27.6%) patients had a prolonged ERAS time. The postoperative time to the first flatus time was 2.8 ± 1.2 days. There were 41 (6.2%) patients with intestinal obstruction, 25 (3.8%) with abdominal infection, and four (0.5%) with anastomotic leakage. The multivariable analysis showed that age >80 years (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.31-4.40, P = 0.048), laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.95, P = 0.035), intraoperative jejunostomy (OR = 334.60, 95% CI: 2.81-39,831.90, P = 0.017), postoperative time to the first flatus time (OR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.23-11.68, P = 0.021), total gastrectomy (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.94, P = 0.044), and patient compliance with ERAS (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0-0.09, P < 0.001) were independently associated with prolonged ERAS time.

CONCLUSIONS

Age >80 years, laparoscopic surgery, intraoperative jejunostomy, postoperative time to the first flatus time, total gastrectomy, and patient compliance with ERAS might be factors associated with prolonged ERAS time in gastric cancer patients.

Surgical and non-surgical complications after colorectal cancer surgery in older patients; time-trends and age-specific differences

BACKGROUND

Trends of surgical and non-surgical complications among the old, older and oldest patients after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery could help to identify the best target outcome to further improve postoperative outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients ≥70 years receiving curative elective CRC resection between 2011 and 2019 in The Netherlands were included. Baseline variables and postoperative complications were prospectively collected by the Dutch ColoRectal audit (DCRA). We assessed surgical and non-surgical complications over time and within age categories (70-74, 75-79 and ≥ 80 years) and determined the impact of age on the risk of both types of complications by using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 38648 patients with a median age of 76 years were included. Between 2011 and 2019 the proportion of ASA score ≥3 and laparoscopic surgery increased. Non-surgical complications significantly improved between 2011 (21.8%) and 2019 (17.1%) and surgical complications remained constant (from 17.6% to 16.8%). Surgical complications were stable over time for each age group. Non-surgical complications improved in the oldest two age groups. Increasing age was only associated with non-surgical complications (75-79 years; OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.25), ≥80 years; OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.37-1.55) compared to 70-74 years), not with surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of postoperative complications in the older CRC population was predominantly driven by a decrease in non-surgical complications. Moreover, increasing age was only associated with non-surgical complications and not with surgical complications. Future care developments should focus on non-surgical complications, especially in patients ≥75 years.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Application and Outcomes: Analysis in the "Lazio Network" Database

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ERAS program application in colorectal surgery across hospitals in the Lazio region (central district in Italy) participating in the “Lazio Network” project.

Methods

A multi-institutional database was constructed. All patients included in this study underwent elective colorectal surgery for both malignant and benign disease between January 2019 and December 2020. Emergency procedures were excluded. The population was divided into 2 groups: a pre-COVID-19 group (PG) of patients operated on between February and December 2019 and a COVID-19 group (CG) of patients operated on between February and December 2020, during the first 2 waves of the pandemic in Italy.

Results

The groups included 622 patients in the PG and 615 in the CG treated in 8 hospitals of the network. The mean number of items applied was higher in the PG (65.6% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001) in terms of preoperative items (64.2% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001), intraoperative items (65.0% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), and postoperative items (68.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative recovery was faster in the PG, with a shorter time to first flatus, first stool, autonomous mobilization and discharge (6.82 days vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.021). Postoperative complications, mortality and reoperations were similar among the groups.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the application of ERAS in the centers of the “Lazio Network” study group, with a reduction in adherence to the ERAS protocol in terms of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative items. In addition, in the CG, the patients had worse postoperative outcomes with respect to recovery and discharge.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-022-06694-8.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in octogenarian patients: a propensity score matching analysis on the "Lazio Network" database

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in octogenarian patients undergoing colorectal surgery in 12 Italian high-volume centers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in a consecutive series of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2018. Patients were grouped by age (≥ 80 years vs < 80 years), propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed, and the groups were compared regarding clinical outcomes and the mean number of ERAS items applied.

RESULTS

Out of 1646 patients identified, 310 were octogenarians. PSM identified 2 cohorts of 125 patients for the comparison of postoperative outcomes and ERAS compliance. The 2 groups were homogeneous regarding the clinical variables and mean number of ERAS items applied (11.3 vs 11.9, p-ns); however, the application of intraoperative items was greater in nonelderly patients (p 0.004). The functional recovery was similar between the two groups, as were the rates of postoperative severe complications and 30-day mortality rate. Elderly patients had more overall complications. Furthermore, the mean hospital stay was higher in the elderly group (p 0.027). Multivariable analyses documented that postoperative stay was inversely correlated with the number of ERAS items applied (p < 0.0001), whereas age ≥ 80 years significantly correlated with the overall complication rate (p 0.0419).

CONCLUSION

The ERAS protocol is safe in octogenarian patients, with similar levels of compliance and surgical outcomes. However, octogenarian patients have a higher rate of overall complications and a longer hospital stay than do younger patients.

Nutritional support in surgical oncology: A survey by SICO in collaboration with the Intersociety Italian Working Group for Nutritional Support in Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

Nutritional support is a keystone component in perioperative care in patients undergoing oncological surgery with a direct impact on surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate how nutritional support in the surgical setting is managed and applied in Italian hospitals.

METHODS

A national survey was designed by the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO) and disseminated in early 2021. The results were analyzed for the entire population and for comparing the following different subgroups: northern vs. southern regions; high-volume vs. low-volume centers; and junior vs. senior surgeons.

RESULTS

Out of the 141 responses collected from all Italian regions, 43.2% of the participants worked in a surgical unit where nutritional status evaluations and interventions were not routinely practiced, although the key features (nutritional counseling, oral supplementation, enteral and parenteral nutrition) were available in 77.3% of the hospitals. Among the participating centers, the ERAS protocol was systematically applied in only 29.5% of cases, and in 25.5% of cases, most of the items were followed, although not systematically. Among the surgeons who practiced in compliance with the ERAS pathways, almost half of the participants declared that the protocol was applied only for low-risk patients. No significant differences were documented when comparing Italian regions, high-volume vs. low-volume institutions or junior vs. senior participants.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional support in oncological surgery is frequently neglected in Italian hospitals, regardless of the geographic distribution and volumes of the institutions. A cultural change and an improvement in the availability of nutritional services are needed for widespread implementation.

The Emergency Surgery Frailty Index (EmSFI): development and internal validation of a novel simple bedside risk score for elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery

BACKGROUND

Frailty assessment has acquired an increasing importance in recent years and it has been demonstrated that this vulnerable profile predisposes elderly patients to a worse outcome after surgery. Therefore, it becomes paramount to perform an accurate stratification of surgical risk in elderly undergoing emergency surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

1024 patients older than 65 years who required urgent surgical procedures were prospectively recruited from 38 Italian centers participating to the multicentric FRAILESEL (Frailty and Emergency Surgery in the Elderly) study, between December 2016 and May 2017. A univariate analysis was carried out, with the purpose of developing a frailty index in emergency surgery called "EmSFI". Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was then performed to test the accuracy of our predictive score.

RESULTS

784 elderly patients were consecutively enrolled, constituting the development set and results were validated considering further 240 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures. A logistic regression analysis was performed identifying different EmSFI risk classes. The model exhibited good accuracy as regard to mortality for both the development set (AUC = 0.731 [95% CI 0.654-0.772]; HL test χ² = 6.780; p = 0.238) and the validation set (AUC = 0.762 [95% CI 0.682-0.842]; HL test χ² = 7.238; p = 0.299). As concern morbidity, our model showed a moderate accuracy in the development group, whereas a poor discrimination ability was observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The validated EmSFI represents a reliable and time-sparing tool, despite its discriminative value decreased regarding complications. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate specifically surgical settings, validating the EmSFI prognostic role in assessing the procedure-related morbidity risk.

Enhanced Recovery Program in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Controlled Trial

Background: Most of the evidence for enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery relies on nonrandomized studies with control groups either historical or operated on at different facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate ERP in coeval groups admitted in different wards at the same hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of consecutive patients (n = 100) undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP (ERP group) was compared with patients (n = 100) operated with traditional perioperative care in the same period at the same institution (non-ERP group). The two groups were located in separate wards and shared the same anesthesiologists. The exclusion criteria were: >80 years old, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) IV, metastatic disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS), used as a proxy of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications, readmission rate, mortality, and protocol adherence. Results: The ERP group protocol adherence was 81%. The LoS was significantly reduced in the ERP group (4 versus 7 days). The number of 30-day postoperative complications was lower in the ERP group (P < .001). No increase was found in 30-day readmission or mortality. Conventional perioperative protocol was the only predictor of any postoperative complication and, together with male sex and age 65-74 years old, was the only factor associated with prolonged LoS. Conclusion: Implementing a colorectal ERP is feasible, safe, and efficient for functional recovery, but high protocol adherence is needed. Following traditional perioperative care is associated with more postoperative complications and prolonged LoS.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on the postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2015 and November 2018 were enrolled in the study. They were divided into a traditional treatment group (n=100) and an ERAS group (n=100). The traditional treatment group underwent radical laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and the ERAS group underwent traditional treatment plus the ERAS protocol (preoperative improvement of glucose tolerance, unconventional indwelling stomach and urinary tubes, intraoperative body temperature management, fluid management, postoperative pain management, early oral feeding, and early activities). Clinical data were collected for all patients. NLR levels before and after surgery, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative NLR was significantly lower in the ERAS compared with the traditional treatment group. The incidence of complications, including anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection, and cardiopulmonary dysfunction were also significantly lower in the ERAS group.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced recovery after surgery can reduce the increase in postoperative NLR and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, which results will be of clinical value.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a prospective single center study

BACKGROUND

It is still unknown whether ERAS program is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In addition, the definition of the "old patient" in terms of age varies across the studies and different age cut-off, such as 65, 70, and 75 years have been used worldwide.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing primary, elective colorectal laparoscopic surgery between January 2017 and December 2018 were considered eligible to follow the ERAS protocol according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guidelines. Elderly were defined according three different cut-off values: <65 and ≥65 years, <70 and ≥70 years, <75 and ≥75 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Adherence to protocol did not differ significantly between younger and older patients, for most of the items. Thirty-day mortality was absent. The frequency of postoperative complications globally considered and the frequency of the various single complications did not differ significantly between younger and older patients, independently of the cutoff considered to define the older age. Similarly, the frequency of re-intervention and readmission was similar in younger and older patients. Time to flatus and time to stool were similar in young and older patients, independently of the age cut-off used. Time to oral liquid diet was similar in patients with age <65 and ≥65 years while it was moderately longer in patients ≥70 years (1.5±1.1 days;) than in those <70 years (1.1±0.4 days; P=0.030) as well as in patients ≥75 years with respect to the younger ones (1.2±0.5 vs. 1.6±1.2 days; P=0.045). The time to oral solid feeding was similar in young and old patients, independently of the age cut-off used. Time to bladder catheter removal was significantly longer in older patients, independently of the age cut-off used, although the differences do not seem to be clinically relevant. The length of stay was significantly higher in older patients, when the cutoff of 70 years or 75 years was used, but did not differ significantly when the cut-off of 65 years was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the ERAS protocol is safe, feasible, and effective in elderly patients as in the young ones, undergoing laparoscopic elective colorectal surgery. This suggests that the ERAS program can be applied usefully to elderly patients in the routine clinical practice.