Challenges and facilitators in delivering optimal care at the End of Life for older patients: a scoping review on the clinicians' perspective

Better end-of-life care in surgical patients: Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey - a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

End-of-life care among surgical patients is largely understudied and far fewer studies examine such care from the family perspective. To identify potential opportunities for improvement, we explored responses of family members of veterans who died following surgery using the Veterans Affairs (VAs) Bereaved Family Survey (BFS).

METHODS

We examined data from the BFS open-text responses to explore insights into surgical patient's end-of-life care. Data were analysed iteratively using qualitative content analysis and clustered into domains based on content.

RESULTS

We evaluated 936 open-text responses to the BFS for all decedents who underwent any high-risk surgical procedure across 124 VA medical centres from 2010 to 2019. This report focused on the following domains: patient needs, family/caregiver needs, clinical teams/personnel characteristics and facility/organisational characteristics. Key themes within patient needs included concerns about pain management, preservation of patient dignity and spiritual support. Within the family/caregiver domain, key themes included enhanced communication needs, assistance with logistics and displays of gratitude for the patient's military service. The clinical team's domain included the key themes of professionalism concerns and understaffing. Finally, key themes identified within the facility/organisation domain were the need for more robust support services and discomfort with the physical space.

CONCLUSIONS

Narratives from the family perspective provide valuable insight into end-of-life care among surgical patients. Our data demonstrate the critical need for preserving patient dignity and improved communication, which emphasises family involvement and shared decision-making. In addition, hospital systems can optimise nurse-to-patient ratios and intentionally design physical spaces to help improve end-of-life care for surgical patients.

Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India

INTRODUCTION

Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs.

CONCLUSION

Despite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.

Impact of a prospective feedback loop aimed at reducing non-beneficial treatments in older people admitted to hospital and potentially nearing the end of life. A cluster stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if a prospective feedback loop that flags older patients at risk of death can reduce non-beneficial treatment at end of life.

DESIGN

Prospective stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial with usual care and intervention phases.

SETTING

Three large tertiary public hospitals in south-east Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

14 clinical teams were recruited across the three hospitals. Teams were recruited based on a consistent history of admitting patients aged 75+ years, and needed a nominated lead specialist consultant. Under the care of these teams, there were 4,268 patients (median age 84 years) who were potentially near the end of life and flagged at risk of non-beneficial treatment.

INTERVENTION

The intervention notified clinicians of patients under their care determined as at-risk of non-beneficial treatment. There were two notification flags: a real-time notification and an email sent to clinicians about the at-risk patients at the end of each screening day. The nudge intervention ran for 16-35 weeks across the three hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The secondary outcomes examined times from patients being flagged at-risk.

RESULTS

There was no improvement in the primary outcome of reduced ICU admissions (mean probability difference [intervention minus usual care] = -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.08 to 0.01). There were no differences for the times to death, discharge, or medical emergency call. There was a reduction in the probability of re-admission to hospital during the intervention phase (mean probability difference -0.08, 95% confidence interval -0.13 to -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This nudge intervention was not sufficient to reduce the trial's non-beneficial treatment outcomes in older hospital patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12619000675123 (registered 6 May 2019).

Patient preferences in geriatric wards, a survey of health care professionals' practice, experience and attitudes

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify whether health care professionals (HCP) examine their patient and next-of-kin preferences, and to study whether medical decisions follow these preferences.

METHOD

A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted with multidisciplinary HCP from 12 geriatric wards in the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.

RESULTS

Of the 289 HCPs responding (response rate 61%), mean age 37.8 years (SD 11.3), 235 (81.3%) women, 12.4 (SD 9.6) years of experience and 67 (23.2%) medical doctors, only half report clarifying patients' preferences. The majority reported that they did not inform, involve and treat in line with such preferences. However, 53% believe that HCP, patients and next-of-kin should make clinical decisions together.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate a lack of engagement in conversation and inclusion of patient preferences when providing health interventions in geriatric wards. Measures for change of culture are needed.

Barriers and facilitators to goals of care conversations with Veteran residents of community nursing homes

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that structured goals of care conversations (GoCCs) and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences improve the delivery of goal-concordant care for seriously ill patients, rates of completion remain low among nursing home residents. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) program aims to improve the consistent documentation of LST preferences among Veterans receiving care in veterans affairs (VA)-paid community nursing homes (CNH); however, the barriers and facilitators of completing and documenting GoCCs in this unique context of care have not been described.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with key stakeholders of the VA CNH programs located at six VA Medical Centers between July 2021 and July 2022. With a rapid approach to analysis, interview transcripts were reduced into memo templates using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Disease Checklist and coded and analyzed using qualitative data analysis software.

RESULTS

The 40 participants consisted of nurses (n = 13), social workers (n = 25), and VA physicians (n = 2). Most participants felt confident about conducting GoCC; however, several barriers were identified. At the staff level, our results indicated inconsistent completion of GoCC and documentation due to a lack of training, confusion about roles and responsibilities, and challenging communication within the VA as well as with CNH. At the organizational level, there was a lack of standardization across sites for how LST preferences were documented. At the patient level, we found key barriers related to patient and family readiness and issues finding surrogate decision makers. While COVID-19 brought end-of-life issues to the forefront, lockdowns hindered communication about the goals of care.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this pre-implementation evaluation revealed multi-level barriers in conducting and documenting GoCCs with Veterans receiving VA-paid CNH care, as well as several facilitators that can be used to inform strategies for improvement.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing advance care planning in naïve contexts - where to look when plowing new terrain?

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is a way of applying modern medicine to the principle of patient autonomy and ensuring that patients receive medical care that is consistent with their values, goals and preferences. Robust evidence supports the benefits of ACP, but it remains an underutilized resource in most countries. This paper goes from the naïve point of view, and seeks to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementation in unfamiliarized contexts and in a whole system approach involving the clinical, institutional and policy level to improve the implementation of ACP.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were chosen to enable an explorative, flexible design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 health care professionals and chief physicians in hospitals and in municipalities. The thematic analysis was done following Braun and Clarke's strategy for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The main reported barriers were the lack of time and space, a lack of culture and leadership legitimizing ACP, lack of common communication systems, and unclear responsibility about who should initiate, resulting in missed opportunities and overtreatment. Policy development, public and professional education, and standardization of documentation were reported as key to facilitate ACP and build trust across the health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressively changing the education of health professionals and the clinical culture are major efforts that need to be tackled to implement ACP in unfamiliarized contexts, particularly in contexts where patient's wishes are not legally binding. This will need to be tackled through rectifying the misconception that ACP is only about death, and providing practical training for health professionals, as well as developing policies and legislation on how to include patients and caregivers in the planning of care.

Education, Policy, and Advocacy in Predicting Use of Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Skilled Nursing Facilities

Nurses and social workers are uniquely positioned to advocate for patients' wishes for do-not-hospitalize (DNH) directives. The purpose of the current study was to explore the impact of DNH education, policy, and advocacy on the use of DNH orders by nurses (RNs and licensed practical nurses [LPNs]) and social workers employed in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). This multisite secondary analysis used cross-sectional survey data and analyzed responses of RNs, LPNs, and social workers (N = 354) from 29 urban SNFs. Mixed model regression was used to examine possible predictors of frequency of DNH orders within SNFs while adjusting for random effects. Results showed that having a DNH written policy, education on DNH orders, and having an advanced care planning advocate in the facility were strongly associated with a higher reported frequency of DNH discussions with residents and their families (p < 0.01 for each variable). [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(11), 45-52.].

Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in End-of-Life Care for Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients: Are We Closing the Gap?

Purpose

Socioeconomic disparities in end-of-life care have been reported across underlying diseases, but there is a paucity of information on potential time trends. Thus, we aimed to examine time trends in use of health-care services at the end of life according to socioeconomic position in patients dying from cancer and non-cancer diseases.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a nationwide registry-based study among adults dying from cancer or non-cancer diseases (diabetes, dementia, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, chronic liver disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in Denmark in 2006–2016. We obtained data on patients’ educational level and income level and use of health-care services within three months before death. Use of health-care services according to educational level and income level was plotted by calendar year of death and compared by regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, cohabitation, and municipality.

Results

In both cancer (n = 169,694) and non-cancer patients (n = 180,350), we found limited socioeconomic disparities and no clear temporal trends in use of hospital, intensive care, emergency room, general practice, home care nurse, and hospice. In 2006/2007, one percentage point more cancer patients with high income level compared with low income level were affiliated with hospital-based specialist palliative care (adjusted mean difference: 0.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01; 0.02)), whereas this was 12 percentage points in 2016 (adjusted mean difference: 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09; 0.14)).

Conclusion

Socioeconomic disparities in specialist palliative care tended to increase over time among cancer patients but were limited and without clear time trends in use of other health-care services in both cancer and non-cancer patients.

Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review

Background

Overtreatment in advanced age i.e. aggressive interventions that do not improve survival and are potentially harmful, can impair quality of care near the end of life (EOL). As healthcare provider perspectives on care quality may differ from that of service users, the aim of this study was to explore the views of older patients near EOL or their caregivers about the quality of health care at the EOL based on their lived experience, and to identify healthcare service improvements.

Methods

Medline and backward citation searches were conducted for qualitative or quantitative studies reported on the views of patients and/or informal caregivers about EOL care quality. Thematic analysis was used to summarise qualitative data (primary analysis); narrative and tabulations were used to summarise quantitative data (secondary analysis).

Results

Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. Five main qualitative themes regarding quality care emerged: (1) Effective communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers; (2) Healthcare that values patient preferences and shared decision making; (3) Models of care that support quality of life and death with dignity; (4) Healthcare services that meet patient expectations; and (5) Support for informal caregivers in dealing with EOL challenges. The quantitative articles supported various aspects of the thematic framework.

Conclusion

The findings of this study show that many of the issues highlighted by patients or bereaved relatives have persisted over the past two decades. There is an urgent need for comprehensive evaluation of care across the healthcare system and targeted redesign of existing EOL care pathways to ensure that care aligns with what patients and informal caregivers consider high-quality patient-centred care at the EOL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02680-2.