First Trimester Screening for Pre-eclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction

Early Prediction of Hypertensive Diseases of Pregnancy by Using Combined Screening Methods in a Rural Population

INTRODUCTION

The most frequent medical issue during pregnancy is hypertension, which can complicate up to 10% to 15% of pregnancies worldwide. An estimated 14% of all maternal fatalities worldwide are thought to be caused by hypertensive disease of pregnancy, one of the main causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Despite the fact that maternal mortality is substantially lower in high-income countries than in low- and middle-income countries, hypertension is still one of the leading causes of maternal death globally. Maternal mortality associated with hypertension fluctuated between 0.08 and 0.42 per 100,000 births between 2009 and 2015. In India, the estimated overall pooled prevalence of HDP was determined to be one out of 11 women, or 11% (95% CI, 5%-17%). Despite various government programs, there is still a high prevalence of hypertension, which calls for stakeholders and healthcare professionals to focus on providing both therapeutic and preventive care. The best solution is to concentrate more on the early detection of pregnancy-related hypertension and to guarantee its universal application so that proper care can be carried out to prevent maternal and fetal morbidity.

AIM

To estimate the predictive value of the combination of maternal characteristics, i.e., mean arterial pressure (MAP), biophysical evaluation (uterine artery Doppler), and biochemical markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)), in the first trimester of pregnancy for hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.

METHODOLOGY

It was a prospective observational study of longitudinal variety that took over 18 months in a tertiary care rural hospital. The number of women admitted to the hospital for labor care during 2019 was 5261. A total of 513 were diagnosed with hypertensive illnesses during pregnancy. At a prevalence rate of 10%, we calculated a sample size of 350 to achieve a sensitivity of 85% with an absolute error of 12.5% at a 95% CI. Maternal histories, such as age, education, socio-economic status, gravidity, and BMI, were taken along with three parameters, i.e., MAP, which was significant above 90 mmHg, uterine artery Doppler, which was taken significant above 1.69, and serum PAPP-A, which was significant at less than 0.69 ml/IU.

OBSERVATION AND RESULTS

We have found that the following are associated with the prediction of hypertension: among the maternal characteristics are advanced age >35 years, presence of body edema, and urine proteins along with MAP, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), and PAPP-A are significant. The predictive accuracy of the combination of MAP, UtA-PI, and PAPP-A is also significant. We also found that there is a significant increase in cesarean sections and NICU admissions in hypertensive patients.

CONCLUSION

A combination of screening parameters, including MAP, UtA-PI, and PAPP-A, to predict early hypertensive disease of pregnancy is developed and tested.

Role of first-trimester three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler of placental blood flow and 3D placental volume in early prediction of pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of first-trimester three-dimensional (3D) placental volume as well as 3D power Doppler of placental vascular indices for early prediction of pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

The prospective cohort study included over 2019 women with a singleton pregnancy in their first trimester at 11-13+ weeks of pregnancy. All women were examined by 3D abdominal ultrasound, including Doppler techniques for the placental volume and placental vascular indices. Uterine artery Doppler indices were also assessed. All participants were cared for until delivery for assessment of pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 163 women developed pre-eclampsia while 1856 women remained normotensive. The women with pre-eclampsia had significantly lower placental volume (77.09 ml vs. 99.8 ml, p < 0.001), and placental vascular indices (vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization flow index were 7.41 vs. 9.89, 39.03 vs. 46.63, and 2.77 vs. 4.4, respectively, p < 0.001). In contrast, women with pre-eclampsia had significantly high mean uterine pulsatility index and resistance index (2.02 vs. 1.11, 0.83 vs. 0.64, respectively, p < 0.001) compared with the normotensive women. The placental vascular indices were highly sensitive, whereas the placental volume and the mean uterine pulsatility index and resistance index had higher specificity for the prediction of pre-eclampsia.

CONCLUSION

First-trimester assessment through 3D placental volume and power Doppler of placental vascular indices, especially in combination with uterine artery Doppler assessment, revealed an increase in the accuracy of early detection of women at risk for developing pre-eclampsia.

The need for implementation of first trimester screening for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction in low resource settings

Background: Preeclampsia [PE] and fetal growth restriction [FGR] is a major cause of perinatal morbidity in both developed and developing countries but the disease leaves a severe impact in developing countries, due to the late presentation of cases where prevention and treatment becomes impossible. Routine antenatal ultrasound and health checkups in periphery are usually done in first trimester for dating and viability scan, in midtrimester for anomaly scan and in third trimester for safe confinement. Underlying disorder of deep placentation which is unidentified can lead to increased maternal morbidity and fetal compromise between 26 to 34 weeks of gestation The complications present at an irreversible stage where there is no sufficient time even for referral to tertiary care center. Frequent antenatal visits as suggested by WHO would definitely bring down maternal mortality but this increased surveillance when offered to all might be a huge burden to health care providers in low resource settings. An acceptable screening test should help in triaging the high risk group in first trimester itself targeting about only one third of the population for prophylactic therapy and increased antenatal surveillance.The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance and feasibility of different screening protocols in low resource settings.Methodology: Screening for PE and FGR was done at the 11-14 weeks aneuploidy scan as per FMF guidelines. Group I included 6289 women whose risk prediction was done with maternal characteristics [MC], mean arterial pressure [MAP] and Uterine artery Doppler [UAD]. Group II included 2067 women whose risk was predicted with MC, MAP, UAD and PAPP-A. Group III included 576 women whose risk prediction included all parameters with PLGF.Results: Two thousand five hundred fifty-seven cases were screen positive in group I and 602 were screen positive in group II. In group III which included PLGF, 24 were positive for early onset PE and 36 for late onset PE. The number needed to treat [NNT] was 35.9, 29.1 and 10% in Group I, II and III respectively. The detection rate [DR] for PE and FGR was 60% in Group I and DR for FGR in Group II was 85%. In Group III, for early onset PE the DR was 98% and 68% for late onset PE.Conclusion: Screening for PE with available resources in the periphery needs to be implemented to avoid its grave complications. Traditional screening for PE by NICE guidelines can be adopted but may have a detection rate of only 30-40%. Though screening by ACOG criteria may have good detection rates but more than two thirds of the population would become screen positive which nullifies this approach as a good screening methodology in low resource settings. Multiparametric approach for screening in first trimester serves as a better screening tool to enable higher detection rate of disease with least false positive rates. Uterine artery Doppler when combined with maternal characteristics and mean arterial pressure could achieve a detection rate of about 60% and would still target only one third of the population for increased antenatal surveillance. This requires training healthcare professionals in the periphery for this approach and this should be our prime focus in the current scenario. Inclusion of serum biochemistry would still bring down the target population to 10% and increase the DR and can be considered as an additional test in economically feasible population. In low resource settings a better screening approach to PE would be a combination of maternal history, biophysical or biochemical parameters whichever is feasible considering the economy and availability of resources.