Dowdy A, Peltier C, Tincani M, Schneider WJ, Hantula DA, Travers JC. Meta-analyses and effect sizes in applied behavior analysis: A review and discussion.
J Appl Behav Anal 2021;
54:1317-1340. [PMID:
34219222 DOI:
10.1002/jaba.862]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
For more than four decades, researchers have used meta-analyses to synthesize data from multiple experimental studies often to draw conclusions that are not supported by individual studies. More recently, single-case experimental design (SCED) researchers have adopted meta-analysis techniques to answer research questions with data gleaned from SCED experiments. Meta-analyses enable researchers to answer questions regarding intervention efficacy, generality, and condition boundaries. Here we discuss meta-analysis techniques, the rationale for their adaptation with SCED studies, and current indices used to quantify the effect of SCED data in applied behavior analysis.
Collapse