No Disparity for American Indians in Surgery for Pelvis/Lower Extremity Fractures: a Cohort Study of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)

Does time to angiography affect the survival of trauma patients with embolization to the pelvis? A retrospective study across trauma centers in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic pelvic injuries can result in rapid exsanguination. Bleeding control interventions include stabilization, angiography, and possible embolization. Previous studies yielded conflicting results regarding the benefit of a shorter time to embolization.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of the time to angioembolization on the survival of patients presenting with pelvic injuries using a national database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study that used the National Trauma Data Bank 2017 dataset. Adult patients with pelvic injuries and who received angiography with embolization to the pelvis were included. Univariate and bivariate analyses (survival to hospital discharge yes/no) were done. This was followed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of time to angiography on survival to hospital discharge after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1,057 patients were included. They were predominantly of male gender (69.3 %) with a median age of 50 years (IQR = [31-64]). The mean time to pelvic angiography was 264.0 ± 204.4 min. The overall survival rate at hospital discharge was 72.0 %. Time to angiography was not significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge before and after adjusting for clinically and statistically significant confounders (aOR = 1.000; 95 %CI=[0.999 - 1.001]; p = 0.866).

CONCLUSION

Time to angiography was not associated with survival to hospital discharge of patients with pelvic injuries who required embolization. Further research examining specific patterns of injuries and assessing the impact of early angioembolization is needed.

Racial Disparities in the Operative Management of Orthopedic Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate if race is associated with the likelihood of operative management of acute fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies associated with social disparities and acute orthopedic trauma. Peer-reviewed studies commenting on social disparities and the decision to pursue operative or non-operative management of acute fractures were identified for detailed review. Study characteristics and odds ratios were extracted from each article. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A quality analysis of the data was also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies were identified and 8 were included in the meta-analysis totaling 743,846 fractures. Hip, distal radius, pelvic, tibial plateau, clavicle, femoral neck, and femoral shaft fractures were represented in this patient population. The meta-analysis demonstrated that White race is associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention compared to all other races pooled together (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.47; p < .0001) as well as Black race (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.72; p = .0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-White race and Black race are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving surgical management of acute orthopedic trauma. Surgeons and health systems should be aware of these inequities and consider strategies to mitigate bias and ensure all patients receive appropriate and timely care regardless of race.

Trends in isolated pelvic fracture and 30-day survival over 15 years in Japan: a nationwide observational study from the Japan Trauma Data Bank

BackgroundThe epidemiology and treatment of isolated pelvic fracture is not well understood in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiological trends in isolated pelvic trauma and in-hospital survival rates over 15 years.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank for 2004-2018. Patients of any age with isolated pelvic fracture were grouped according to time period: 2004-2008 (Phase 1), 2009-2013 (Phase 2), and 2014-2018 (Phase 3). The main outcome was 30-day in-hospital survival rate. The data were analyzed using chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mantel-Haenszel trend tests. We analyzed changes in the main outcome over time in a multiple logistic regression analysis fitted with a generalized estimating equation, accounting for the within-cluster association.ResultsIn total, 5348 isolated pelvic fractures occurred during the study period. There was no significant between-phase difference in proportions of patients who underwent resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta or external fixation. The proportion of patients who underwent transcatheter arterial embolization increased year by year (p=0.003). There was a significant increase in the survival rate over time (Phase 1, 77%; Phase 2, 86%; and Phase 3, 91%; p<0.001). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in Phase 3 than in Phase 1 or Phase 2, even after adjustment for hospital clustering and other confounders (p<0.01).ConclusionsThere was an improvement in the 30-day in-hospital survival rate after isolated pelvic fracture over a 15-year period in Japan.

Racial Disparities in Surgical Outcomes After Spine Surgery: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities in postoperative outcomes are unfortunately common. We present data assessing race as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications after spine surgery for Native American (NA) and African American (AA) patients compared with Caucasians (CA).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for spine procedures performed in 2015. Data was subdivided by surgery, demography, comorbidity, and 30-day postoperative outcomes, which were then compared by race. Regression was performed holding race as an independent risk factor.

RESULTS

A total of 4803 patients (4106 CA, 522 AA, 175 NA) were included in this analysis. AA patients experienced longer length of stay (LOS) and operative times (P < .001) excluding lumbar fusion, which was significantly shorter (P = .035). AA patients demonstrated higher comorbidity burden, specifically for diabetes and hypertension (P < .005), while NA individuals were higher tobacco consumers (P < .001). AA race was an independent risk factor associated with longer LOS across all cervical surgeries (β = 1.54, P <.001), lumbar fusion (β = 0.77, P = .009), and decompression laminectomy (β = 1.23, P < .001), longer operative time in cervical fusion (β = 12.21, P = .032), lumbar fusion (β = -24.00, P = .016), and decompression laminectomy (OR = 20.95, P < .001), greater risk for deep vein thrombosis in lumbar fusion (OR = 3.72, P = .017), and increased superficial surgical site infections (OR = 5.22, P = .001) and pulmonary embolism (OR = 5.76, P = .048) in decompression laminectomy. NA race was an independent risk factor for superficial surgical site infections following cervical fusion (OR = 14.58, P = .044) and decompression laminectomy (OR = 4.80, P = .021).

CONCLUSION

AA and NA spine surgery patients exhibit disproportionate comorbidity burden and greater 30-day complications compared with CA patients. AA and NA race were found to independently affect rates of complications, LOS, and operation time.