1
|
Valsecchi AA, Fusco V, Di Maio M, Santini D, Tucci M, De Giorgi U, Dionisio R, Vignani F, Cinieri S. Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in patients with breast and hormone sensitive prostate cancer: AIOM survey. TUMORI JOURNAL 2024; 110:174-185. [PMID: 38462772 DOI: 10.1177/03008916241236279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a side effect of hormonal therapy that can severely affect patients' quality of life. The aim of this survey was to obtain an updated picture of management of bone health in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant hormonal therapy and in patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer according to Italian oncologists. METHODS Our survey was made up of 21 multiple-choice questions: the first part dealt with the respondents' characteristics, while the second with management of bone health in the described setting. An invitation to complete the survey was sent by e-mail to 2336 oncologists, members of Italian Association of Medical Oncology, in October 2022. RESULTS Overall, 121 (5.2%) Italian oncologists completed the survey. In most cases (57%) the oncologist personally took charge of the management of bone health in patients at risk for cancer treatment-induced bone loss. At the beginning of hormonal therapy, most respondents reported to require bone health diagnostic exams, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (89%), repeated with different timing. Main reported reasons (not mutually exclusive) for prescribing antiresorptive drugs were modifying fracture risk (87%), densitometry values (75%) or prognosis (34%). Answers about the management of antiresorptive therapy were heterogeneous. CONCLUSION A heterogeneous approach on the management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in Italy arises from this survey. This scenario highlights the need for a major consensus of the Italian scientific community on the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of cancer treatment-induced bone loss and for a greater awareness of this topic among Italian oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Amela Valsecchi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fusco
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine Translational Medicine Unit, Department of Integration, Research and Innovation, SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- UOC Oncologia A, Policlinico Umberto 1, La Sapienza Università, Roma, Italy
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori, Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Rossana Dionisio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Vignani
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bonaccorsi G, Rizzati M, Salani L, Giganti M. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: risk evaluation and treatment options. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:714-729. [PMID: 34905877 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04896-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic progressive condition characterized by reduced bone mass and impaired bone quality, leading to an increased risk of fragility fractures. Osteoporotic fractures reduce quality of life and are associated with high morbidity, mortality and economic burden. Primary and secondary prevention interventions are always recommended starting from the premenopausal age, in women after menopause, however, it is essential to develop a long-term intervention strategy that allows to identify patients at high risk of fracture and the choice of therapy based on the estimated risk. This narrative review described the tools for layering the management approach in relation to low, high and very high fracture risk. Several medications are now available for the treatment of osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures; the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and additional benefits profile of the individual preparations allows an appropriate choice between the different drugs available and the possibility of adapting the prescription to the lifetime fracture risk spectrum. From the literature it emerges that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), TSEC combination and SERMs can be drugs of choice to counteract postmenopausal bone loss in younger women or at low risk of fracture, while bisphosphonates and denosumab are appropriate for women with high risk or at an older age. Therapy with denosumab and anabolic agents such as teriparatide and romosozumab is particularly indicated for subjects with very high risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Bonaccorsi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Menopause and Osteoporosis Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy - .,University Center for Studies on Gender Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy -
| | - Monica Rizzati
- Department of Translational Medicine, Menopause and Osteoporosis Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lara Salani
- Department of Translational Medicine, Menopause and Osteoporosis Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Melchiore Giganti
- Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Prevention, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feehan J, Tripodi N, Fleischmann M, Zanker J, Duque G. A clinician's guide to the management of geriatric musculoskeletal disease: Part 1 - Osteoporosis. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Grillo CM, Maiolino L, Rapisarda AMC, Caruso G, Palermo G, Caruso S. Effects of hormone therapy containing 2 mg drospirenone and 1 mg 17β-estradiol on postmenopausal exacerbation of Meniere's disease: Preliminary study. Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:1103. [PMID: 34504557 PMCID: PMC8383771 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of 2 mg drospirenone (DRSP) and 1 mg 17β-estradiol (E2) hormone therapy (HT) in combination with rehabilitation therapy for postmenopausal women with Meniere's disease (MD). The combined drug hormone treatment was denoted as DRSP/E2. A total of 65 postmenopausal female patients with MD and severe distress were enrolled in the present prospective study. A total of 31 women comprised the study group (group A), undergoing HT and rehabilitation therapy, whereas 34 women who opted for rehabilitation therapy alone comprised the control group (group B). Vestibular function and distress associated with MD were assessed by stabilometry and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire, respectively. The data were collected at baseline and during the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. The areas of the stabilometric ellipses exhibited a higher reduction in group A compared with group B with regard to the baseline values at both follow-up assessments (P<0.001). At baseline, both groups exhibited severe self-perceived discomfort, with similar DHI scores of 72.3±3.7 (group A) and 70.6±3.9 (group B; P=0.07). At the 3-month follow-up, both groups underwent a gradual improvement, which was significantly higher in group A (47.5±3.7) compared with in group B (64.2±3.3; P<0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, the DHI scores were improved in group A (43.4±3.4) compared with in group B (58.5±3.1; P<0.001). Therefore, DRSP/E2 HT was effective in reducing the fluid overload, which is characteristic of MD. The findings of the present study demonstrated that integrated therapy based on the administration of DRSP/E2 HT and rehabilitation may be more effective compared with rehabilitation alone for the management of postmenopausal exacerbation of MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Maria Grillo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies 'G. Ingrassia', ENT Section, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Luigi Maiolino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies 'G. Ingrassia', ENT Section, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, Research Group for Sexology, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department BIOMETEC, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Gaia Palermo
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, Research Group for Sexology, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Salvatore Caruso
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, Research Group for Sexology, University of Catania, I-95124 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Violi A, Fortunato V, D'Amuri A, Zuliani G, Basili S, Passaro A, Corica B, Raparelli V. Rethinking of osteoporosis through a sex- and gender-informed approach in the COVID-19 era. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:754-769. [PMID: 34328298 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04893-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Standards and models of reference for osteoporosis (OP) have been developed for female individuals as they are more likely to be affected by the disease. Nonetheless, OP is also responsible for one-third of hip fractures in male individuals suggesting that a sexblinded approach to OP may lead to miss opportunities for equity in bone health. OPrelated fractures, especially hip fractures, are a matter of immediate concern as they are associated with limited mobility, chronic disability, loss of independence, and reduced quality of life in both sexes. When it comes to sociocultural gender, the effect of gender domains (i.e., identity, roles, relations, and institutionalized gender) on development and management of OP is largely overlooked despite risk factors or protective conditions are gendered. Clinical trials testing the efficacy and safety of anti-OP drugs as well as non-pharmacological interventions have been conducted mainly in female participants, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The present narrative review deals with the sex and gender-based challenges and drawbacks in OP knowledge and translation to clinical practice, also considering the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Violi
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valeria Fortunato
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Amuri
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giovanni Zuliani
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Stefania Basili
- Internal Medicine Clinic, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelina Passaro
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Bernadette Corica
- Internal Medicine Clinic, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Raparelli
- University Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy - .,Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.,⁴ University Center for Studies on Gender Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Adami G, Arioli G, Bianchi G, Brandi ML, Caffarelli C, Cianferotti L, Gatti D, Girasole G, Gonnelli S, Manfredini M, Muratore M, Quarta E, Quarta L. Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study. Bone 2020; 134:115297. [PMID: 32092480 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effectiveness of the T-score values provided by Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the identification of patients at risk for incident osteoporotic fractures. METHODS A population of Caucasian women (30-90 years), enrolled from 2013 to 2016, underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and REMS scans at axial sites. The incidence of fragility fractures was assessed during a follow-up period up to 5 years. Afterwards, patients with and without incident fractures were stratified in two age-matched groups with a 1: 2 proportion (Group F' and Group NF', respectively). The performance of REMS T-score in discriminating between the two groups was quantitatively assessed and compared with DXA. RESULTS 1516 patients were enrolled and 1370 completed the follow-up (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.8 years; range: 1.9-5.0 years). Fracture incidence was 14.0%. Age-matched groups included 175 fractured patients and 350 non-fractured ones, respectively (median age 70.2 [interquartile range: 61.0-73.3] and 67.3 [65.4-69.8] years, p-value ns). The groups resulted also balanced for height, weight and BMI (p-values ns). As expected, the differences in REMS T-score (for vertebral site, -2.9 [-3.6 to -1.9] in Group F', -2.2 [-2.9 to -1.2] in Group NF') and DXA T-score (-2.8 [-3.3 to -1.9] in Group F', -2.2 [-2.9 to -1.4] in Group NF') were statistically significant (p-value <0.001). Analogous results were obtained for femoral neck. Considering the T-score cut-off of -2.5, REMS identified Group F' patients with a sensitivity of 65.1% and specificity of 57.7% of (OR = 2.6, 95%CI: 1.77-3.76, p < 0.001), whereas DXA showed a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 56.3% (OR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51, p-value = 0.0032). For femoral neck, REMS sensitivity and specificity were 40.2% and 79.9%, respectively, with an OR of 2.81 (95%CI: 1.80-4.39, p < 0.001). DXA, instead, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 42.3% and 79.3%, respectively, with an OR of 2.68 (95%CI: 1.71-4.21, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS REMS T-score resulted an effective predictor for the risk of incident fragility fractures in a population-based sample of female subjects, representing a promising parameter to enhance osteoporosis diagnosis in the clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Adami
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Arioli
- Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, "Carlo Poma" Hospital, ASST-Mantova, Mantova, Italy
| | | | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carla Caffarelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Monica Manfredini
- Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, "Carlo Poma" Hospital, ASST-Mantova, Mantova, Italy
| | - Maurizio Muratore
- O.U. of Rheumatology, "Galateo" Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy.
| | - Eugenio Quarta
- O.U. of Rheumatology, "Galateo" Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy
| | - Laura Quarta
- O.U. of Rheumatology, "Galateo" Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
" Bridging the Gap" Everything that Could Have Been Avoided If We Had Applied Gender Medicine, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Medicine in the Gender-Omics and Sex-Omics Era. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 21:ijms21010296. [PMID: 31906252 PMCID: PMC6982247 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gender medicine is the first step of personalized medicine and patient-centred care, an essential development to achieve the standard goal of a holistic approach to patients and diseases. By addressing the interrelation and integration of biological markers (i.e., sex) with indicators of psychological/cultural behaviour (i.e., gender), gender medicine represents the crucial assumption for achieving the personalized health-care required in the third millennium. However, ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ are often misused as synonyms, leading to frequent misunderstandings in those who are not deeply involved in the field. Overall, we have to face the evidence that biological, genetic, epigenetic, psycho-social, cultural, and environmental factors mutually interact in defining sex/gender differences, and at the same time in establishing potential unwanted sex/gender disparities. Prioritizing the role of sex/gender in physiological and pathological processes is crucial in terms of efficient prevention, clinical signs’ identification, prognosis definition, and therapy optimization. In this regard, the omics-approach has become a powerful tool to identify sex/gender-specific disease markers, with potential benefits also in terms of socio-psychological wellbeing for each individual, and cost-effectiveness for National Healthcare systems. “Being a male or being a female” is indeed important from a health point of view and it is no longer possible to avoid “sex and gender lens” when approaching patients. Accordingly, personalized healthcare must be based on evidence from targeted research studies aimed at understanding how sex and gender influence health across the entire life span. The rapid development of genetic tools in the molecular medicine approaches and their impact in healthcare is an example of highly specialized applications that have moved from specialists to primary care providers (e.g., pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic applications in routine medical practice). Gender medicine needs to follow the same path and become an established medical approach. To face the genetic, molecular and pharmacological bases of the existing sex/gender gap by means of omics approaches will pave the way to the discovery and identification of novel drug-targets/therapeutic protocols, personalized laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures (sex/gender-omics). In this scenario, the aim of the present review is not to simply resume the state-of-the-art in the field, rather an opportunity to gain insights into gender medicine, spanning from molecular up to social and psychological stances. The description and critical discussion of some key selected multidisciplinary topics considered as paradigmatic of sex/gender differences and sex/gender inequalities will allow to draft and design strategies useful to fill the existing gap and move forward.
Collapse
|
8
|
PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ART. JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.15586/jptcp.v26i4.646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|