Macromolecules detected in highly increased serum luteinizing hormone

Macro-GH - a clinical entity causing a diagnostic challenge - a case report

AIM

Presentation of a new case of a patient with macro-GH, that may interfere with different GH assays leading to false-positive results in serum samples.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old female was referred with a pituitary macroadenoma and elevated growth hormone levels The laboratory tests showed increased fasting GH level, measured by a sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON® XL) without suppression on oral glucose tolerance test and normal IGF-1. The patient did not have the typical signs and symptoms of acromegaly. The patient underwent a transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary tumor, showing only α-subunit immunostaining. Postoperative GH levels remained elevated. An interference in the determination of GH level was suspected. GH was analyzed by three different immunoassays, UniCel DxI 600, Cobas e411 and hGH-IRMA. Heterophilic antibodies and rheumatoid factor were not detected in serum sample. GH recovery after precipitation with 25% polyethylene glycol (PEG) was 12%. Size-exclusion chromatography confirmed the presence of macro-GH in serum sample.

CONCLUSION

If results of laboratory tests are not consistent with the clinical findings, the presence of an interference within immunochemical assays could be suspected. To identify interference caused by the macro-GH, the PEG method and size-exclusion chromatography should be used.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) formed a complex with an immunoglobulin G caused abnormally high levels of LH: A case report

We encountered a 30-year-old woman with remarkably elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, as measured by electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA), and no specific symptoms. We performed the following investigations: dilution linearity test, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation test, immunoprecipitation test, protein G addition test, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The linearity of patient's serum was similar to that of a standard LH preparation, and non-specific reactions were not observed. The recovery rate of LH shown by the PEG precipitation test, immunoprecipitation test, and protein G addition test was low. Moreover, an abnormal peak in HPLC was located at a slightly larger molecular weight position than that of IgG. These results showed the presence of macro-LH, LH, and anti-LH-IgG autoantibody complex and suggested that the clearance of LH from the blood was delayed due to IgG binding, and therefore, the LH value was falsely high. We should keep the possibility of macro-LH in mind in cases of unexpectedly high LH values.