Dealing with stuck hemodialysis catheter: state of the art and tips for the nephrologist

Removal of stuck tunnelled dialysis line requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and venous repair

Tunnelled central venous dialysis catheters can usually be removed easily. However, their removal can become rarely complicated requiring more invasive techniques. We report a case in which cardiopulmonary bypass and repair of great veins was required for safe removal. A 38-year-old female with end-stage renal failure and a 3-year-old Hickman line inserted into her right internal jugular vein was referred to our cardiac surgical unit following failed attempts of line removal by local vascular surgical team using open vascular surgical techniques. As a result, an MDT decision was made that it was safer to proceed to a cardiothoracic surgical approach rather than other techniques. Investigations showed significant calcification surrounding the line which was adherent to the venous wall. Removal of the retained catheter required median sternotomy and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass as the great veins had to be opened to free the line and allow complete removal. The line was successfully removed with its encircling calcified sheath, and the veins were closed primarily without needing a patch repair. The integrity of the great veins was maintained to meet the on-going need this young patient has for central venous access. The patient made an uneventful recovery. When other measures fail, sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass provide a safe option for complete removal of stuck central venous catheters with low risk to the patient.

Removal of central venous catheter using Evolution® Rotating Dilator

We experienced the first case of a difficult-to-extract central venous catheter removed with a pacemaker lead removal system: a 14-year-old boy with Hirschsprung's disease who had repeated catheter infections that could not be removed by traction. Because the catheter lumen was occluded, a suture was tied around the end of the catheter and the catheter was removed with a rotating dilator.

The stuck haemodialysis catheter-a case report of a rare but dreaded complication following kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tunnelled cuffed haemodialysis catheters are at increased risk of incarceration or becoming 'stuck' via fibrotic adhesion to the central veins when left in situ for prolonged periods of time. Stuck catheters cannot be removed using standard techniques such as bedside dissection of the cuff. Whilst there are several strategies published for the removal of these incarcerated lines, there is no consensus on the best approach. Here we present a challenging case of a stuck haemodialysis catheter in the acute post transplantation period.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 66-year-old female on haemodialysis presented for kidney transplantation with a tunnelled-cuffed haemodialysis catheter in situ for five years. Following transplantation, removal of the line was unsuccessful despite dissection of the cuff, with traction causing a choking sensation with tracheal movement. Eventually, the line was removed without complications utilising sequential balloon dilatation by interventional radiology and the patient was discharged without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This case serves as a timely reminder of the risks of long-term tunnelled haemodialysis catheters and as a caution towards proceeding with kidney transplantation in those with long-term haemodialysis catheters in situ. Greater nephrologist awareness of interventional radiology techniques for this challenging situation will help to avoid more invasive strategies. The risks of a stuck catheter should be included in the discussions about the optimal vascular access and transplantation suitability for a given patient.

Endovascular tools for vascular access stenosis: Flow-chart proposal

Stenosis represents the most relevant arteriovenous fistula (AVF) pathology and can affects the entire conduit forming the fistula, from afferent artery to central venous vessels. Correction of vascular access stenosis significantly affects the survival and quality of life for end stage renal disease patients (ESRD) dependent on hemodialysis. Guidelines consider the procedure of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) relevant for the primary treatment of these lesions with excellent results in restoring AVF immediately at the end of the procedure. From first AVF angioplasty in 1981 to now, wide scientific innovation has led to development of new devices, composed by different materials and technologies, specific for the site and the type of stenosis to be treated, able to manage resistant stenotic lesion and to reduce stenosis recurrences. International guidelines do not clearly specify all treatment possibilities in the individual case. In this review the authors want to provide specific information on most used devices for stenosis treatment based on literature evidence, showing when and where to use the various tools available with flow-chart treatment proposal.

A novel extra-catheter guide wire technique for in situ exchange of dysfunctional tunnelled central venous hemodialysis catheter

BACKGROUND

Tunneled central venous catheters (tCVC) exchange may be difficult in some situations. We retrospectively report our preliminary experience of a novel extra-catheter guide wire technique for exchange of dysfunctional tCVC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively analyze the demographics, treatment details and outcomes data of 39 patients received tCVC exchange from January 2018 to January 2019. According to whether guide wire could pass through the catheter lumen, patients were divided into in-catheter group and extra-catheter group. The technical successful rate, peri-operative complications, 1-month and 6-month catheter flow rate was recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The final study population consists of 39 patients, including 16 in-catheter group and 23 extra-catheter group. The technical successful rate was 100% in both groups. All patients achieved restoration of line patency and completed at least 1 hemodialysis section. The 1-month (267.69 ± 20.12 vs. 274.13 ± 17.69, p = 0.604) and 6-month (255.81 ± 12.93 vs. 256.97 ± 11.20, p = 0.403) catheter flow rate was comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The novel extra-catheter guide wire technique was helpful for in situ exchange of dysfunctional tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheters, especially when the guide wire could not pass through the catheter lumen.

Spectrum of Interventional Procedures During Hybrid Central Line Placement in Pediatric Intestinal Rehabilitation Patients With End-Stage Vascular Access

Background

Loss of available central vein access sites for parenteral nutrition delivery represents one of the main indications for intestinal transplantation in children with intestinal failure. Placement of central venous catheters can be challenging in advanced loss of patent venous pathways. We recently described the hybrid technique (interventional plus surgical approach) of central line placement in children. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the interventions used during the hybrid procedures regarding feasibility, safety and outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the course of all children in our intestinal rehabilitation program undergoing hybrid central line placement. We evaluated patients' conditions, interventional techniques and surgical peculiarities as well as outcome.

Results

203 children were treated in our intestinal rehabilitation program between 2010 and 2021. Due to loss of venous access, hybrid technique was performed in 53 children during 76 interventions. In 40 cases the same vessel was reused via Seldinger technique. Among the 30 ultrasound-guided new vessel punctures, 12 were performed by puncture of collateral vessels. Extended interventions due to thoracic central venous obstruction and/or thrombosis requiring additional access via a femoral vein for rehabilitation of the vascular system was performed during 29 procedures including catheter extraction (1), angioplasties (18), stent placement (1), revascularization (5) and thrombectomy (4). Placement of a central line was not possible in 6 children which eventually underwent extended thoracic/vascular surgery: in three children the previously placed catheter could not be removed, in one child, placement of a thrombectomy-catheter was not possible because of inferior vena cava occlusion, and in two children, revascularization failed. Intestinal transplantation was considered in one patient because of impending loss of vascular access. Two self-limiting minor extravasations and one intervention-associated pericardial effusion occurred.

Conclusions

Hybrid interventions for central venous catheter placement and vascular rehabilitation enable a high success rate in children with intestinal failure and end-stage vascular access, circumventing the need for intestinal transplantation or advanced surgery. The relevant procedures are complex and require a foresighted and individualized approach with a wide range of interventional techniques. If performed with expertise, this combined interventional/surgical approach is feasible and safe.

Endovascular treatment of the stuck hemodialysis catheter: A report of two cases and literature review

A considerable number of patients present with stuck CVC after long-use of CVC, which is thought to result from the adhesion of the fibrous sheath, formed over the CVC, to the vessel or atrial wall. The removal of these catheters is a difficult and risky procedure. Hong reported a minimally invasive technique through endoluminal balloon dilation, which successfully breaks the adhesions and expands the vein, thus allowing for an easy removal of the CVC. The authors present two cases of a variant method of Hong's technique, and provide a literature review on stuck catheters. Our experience is that balloon angioplasty dilation is a safe and practical option. We highlight the role of experienced interventional nephrologists or radiologists in the management of this complication as endovascular treatment is the first line treatment.

Definition of catheter jamming: A mechanical analysis of catheter fracture tension and fracture strain

BACKGROUND

Catheter jamming is an emerging and possibly underrated complication.

OBJECTIVE

To find the criteria for determining if the catheter cannot be removed through the mechanical analysis of fracture tension and fracture strain (εf) of Peripheral Inserted Central Catheters (PICC).

METHOD

We removed 30 pieces of PICC catheters from patients and recorded the indwelling time. Those with an indwelling time shorter than 12 weeks belonged to the short-term group. Those with an indwelling time longer than 12 weeks belonged to the long-term group. The first half of the same catheter is section A, and the second half is section B. The fraction tension and fracture strain of the catheter were measured, and statistical analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

The fracture tension of catheter in sections A and B were 5.8917 ± 1.0095 and 6.0670 ± 0.8066 Newtons respectively (p= 0.393) and the fracture strain of catheter in sections A and B were 6.0611 ± 1.0810 and 6.2543 ± 0.7187 Newtons respectively (p= 0.343). The fracture tension of catheter in short-term and long-term group were 6.0696 ± 0.9414 and 5.9192 ± 0.8972 Newtons respectively (p= 0.535) and the fracture strain of catheter in short-term and long-term group were 6.0067 ± 0.7227 and 6.2584 ± 1.0212 respectively (p= 0.301).

CONCLUSION

It is objective and consistent to take the catheter fracture tension as the standard. This standard would be able to accurately define the concept of catheter failure and reduce the risk of catheter fracture and the misdiagnosis of catheter failure. The catheter fracture tension and fracture strain was not affected by the catheter indwelling time. It is recommended to set the tensile force as 5 Newtons and carry it out at a speed of 100 mm/min for the catheter drawing of the PICC single-lumen silicone catheter (4.0F) from Budd Company.

Solutions to stuck tunneled cuffed catheters in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To study and discuss treatments for stuck tunneled cuffed catheter in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

METHOD

Retrospectively analyzing clinical data of 13 patients with stuck tunneled cuffed catheter in the Kidney Disease Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University in the period between September 2012 and October 2018. All patients failed to remove hemodialysis catheters by regular technique. The stuck catheters were treated by thoracotomy, endoluminal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with blunt dissection or embedded and left in situ.

RESULTS

In 13 patients, one was successfully treated by thoracotomy, one failed to remove the catheter by regular technique and blunt dissection, and the stump of the catheter was clamped and buried in the subcutaneous fascia of the neck, and the other 11 were treated by endoluminal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with blunt dissection. The average time of catheter removal procedure is 25 min, the overall success rate is 92.3%, and the success rate of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is 100%.

CONCLUSION

Thoracotomy is an efficient way to treat stuck catheter but is limited by its high risk and complications. Leaving part of catheter in situ may increase the risk of central vein stenosis. Comparing to the former two, endoluminal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is a safe, efficient, and practical way for stuck catheters and should be recommended as the first choice.

Totally percutaneous endoluminal ballooning of stuck hemodialysis catheters: One-year experience of a referral center

The stuck catheter is an uncommon but dreaded complication of dialysis line placement. It always finds the operator unaware and often requires procedure modification or reschedule. Hong pioneered the technique of endoballooning to expand a stuck central venous catheter, thus freeing it from wall adhesions. The purpose of the current study was to present a totally percutaneous variation of endoluminal stuck catheters ballooning, along with our experience in terms of safety and feasibility. A major difference presented in respect to previous techniques is that this modification does not require isolation of the distal line stump at the venous entry point by tissue dissection, thus reducing procedural time and difficulty. We presented a case series of five lines that were ballooned by navigating low-profile material directly from the cutaneous exit of the lines, with optimal results (100% success). The findings of this investigation provide additional evidence with respect to the safety and effectiveness of endoluminal ballooning of Tesio lines and offer a new variation of endoluminal ballooning which we found easy to perform, safe, and effective.

High success rate in salvage of catheter-related bloodstream infections due to Staphylococcus aureus, on behalf of project group of Italian society of nephrology

BACKGROUND

Catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus represent one of the most fearful infections in chronic haemodialysis patients with tunnelled central venous catheters. Current guidelines suggest prompt catheter removal in patients with positive blood cultures for S. aureus. This manoeuvre requires inserting a new catheter into the same vein or another one and is not without its risks.

METHODS

A protocol based on early, prompt diagnosis and treatment has been utilized in our renal unit since 2012 in an attempt to salvage infected tunnelled central venous catheters. We prospectively observed 247 tunnelled central venous catheters in 173 haemodialysis patients involving 167,511 catheter days.

RESULTS

We identified 113 catheter-related bloodstream infections (0.67 episodes per 1000 days/tunnelled central venous catheter). Forty were caused by S. aureus, including 19 by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (79% saved) and 21 by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (90% saved), of which 34 (85%) were treated successfully. Eight recurrences occurred and six (75%) were successfully treated. A greater than 12 h time to blood culture positivity for S. aureus was a good prognostic index for successful therapy and tunnelled central venous catheter rescue.

CONCLUSION

Our data lead us to believe that it is possible to successfully treat catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by S. aureus and to avoid removing the tunnelled central venous catheter in many more cases than what has been reported in the literature. On the third day, it is mandatory to decide whether to replace the tunnelled central venous catheter or to carry on with antibiotic therapy. Apyrexia and amelioration of laboratory parameters suggest continuing systemic and antibiotic lock therapy for no less than 4 weeks, otherwise, tunnelled central venous catheter removal is recommended.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Application of Hong's technique for removal of stuck hemodialysis tunneled catheter to pacemaker leads

The term “stuck catheter” refers to situations where a central venous catheter cannot be removed from the central veins or right atrium using standard technique, usually due to development of a fibrin sheath leading to adherence to SVC or right atrial wall. Endoluminal dilatation is an interventional radiology technique that has been previously reported in the removal of stuck hemodialysis catheters, and to the best of our knowledge, this case describes the first application of the technique to remove a hemodialysis catheter that was adherent to SVC wall and transvenous pacemaker leads.

The Removal of a Stuck Catheter: An Alternative to Hong's Technique

The use of the tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) is steadily increasing worldwide as a means of vascular access for hemodialysis. The increased use of these devices, which often outlive the patients, and the extended time they are used are associated with more frequent complications. Among these, one of the emerging complications is that of the “embedded” or stuck catheter. This term refers to when the catheter cannot be removed after detaching the retention cuff. In medical literature, experiences with the removal of stuck catheters are described with the use of several different methods. Currently the most commonly used technique also considered the safest is “endoluminal dilation” also known as Hong's Technique, recently modified by Quaretti and Galli. Below, a new technique using a Vollmar ring is described for removing a stuck catheter as an alternative to Hong's technique, or after a failed attempt at using Hong's technique.

A Modified de novo Insertion Technique for Catheter Replacement in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Clinic Retrospective Analysis

Purpose

For patients who rely on a tunneled cuffed catheter, replacement or catheter removal is typically necessary. We recently performed a modified de novo insertion technique for catheter replacement in our practice. As the technique has not yet been studied comprehensively, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of de novo placed catheter without delay for catheter replacement in elderly hemodialysis patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of 164 elderly patients was conducted during a period of three years. There were 84 patients in study group, as well as 80 patients in a control group, who had catheter replacement by guidewire exchange technique. Clinical follow-up data was collected.

Results

All catheters were placed successfully. The mean survival time per catheter was 641 catheter days (study group) and 485 catheter days (control group). The primary patency rates of 30 days were 97.7% (study group) and 90% (control group), respectively, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). The incidence of catheter infection was not statistically significantly different in both groups (p = 0.586), but the case of catheter dysfunction was significantly lower in study group compared to control group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The de novo placed catheter without delay technique for catheter replacement near the pre-existing venotomy site is safe, and boasts similar infection rates with lower dysfunction rates compared to tunneled catheter insertion by guidewire exchange technique.

Outpatient removal of tunneled dialysis catheters by nephrology fellows in training at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Removal of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) usually occurs in dedicated procedure suites and is performed relatively rarely at the bedside. Scarce evidence exists in the literature to assess the safety and success of this procedure when performed during supervised academic training.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all TDC removals performed on an outpatient basis by nephrology fellows under faculty supervision during a 5-year period at an academic Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, basic laboratory studies, pertinent clinical information and procedure-related variables. We evaluated the safety, success and complication rate of this procedure.

RESULTS

We identified 72 TDC removals that met the above criteria. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years. All patients were male and hypertensive, 68% were diabetic and 69% were African-American. Overall, 88% of procedures were performed in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, while the rest had needed temporary dialysis for acute kidney injury. Notably, 49 patients (68%) were taking one or more of aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin at the time of TDC removal. Overall complication rate was low (<2%). There was no increase in risk of bleeding, even in subjects receiving anti-platelet therapy; only one of the 49 patients (2%) had a minor bleeding complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient TDC removal by trainees was successful and safe in the vast majority of cases (99%). We propose that TDC removal skills should be actively pursued and acquired by all nephrology fellows. This would expand the scope of practice for future general nephrologists and facilitate timely patient care.

The Stuck Catheter: A Hazardous Twist to the Meaning of Permanent Catheters

Introduction

Permanent central venous catheter use is associated with significant complications that often require their timely removal. An uncommon complication is resistant removal of the catheter due to adherence of the catheter to the vessel wall. This occasionally mandates invasive interventions for removal. The aim of this study is to describe the occurrence of this “stuck catheter” phenomenon and its consequences.

Methods

A retrospective review of all the removed tunneled hemodialysis catheters from July 2005 to December 2014 at a single academic-based hemodialysis center to determine the incidence of stuck catheters. Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained computerized vascular access database and verified manually against patient charts.

Results

In our retrospective review of tunneled hemodialysis catheters spanning close to a decade, we found that 19 (0.92%) of catheters were retained, requiring endovascular intervention or open sternotomy. Of these, three could not be removed, with one patient succumbing to catheter-related infection. Longer catheter vintage appeared to be associated with ‘stuck catheter’.

Conclusions

Retention of tunneled central venous catheters is a rare but important complication of prolonged tunneled catheter use that nephrologists should be aware of. Endoluminal balloon dilatation procedures are the initial approach, but surgical intervention may be necessary.