Generalizability of SPRINT-CKD cohort to CKD patients referred to renal clinics

What Is Wrong with the Blood Pressure Target Recommendation of KDIGO 2021 for Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease?

CONTEXT

Eighty-five percent of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have hypertension, and blood pressure (BP) control is the cornerstone in the management of CKD. Although it is widely accepted that BP should be optimized, BP targets in CKD are not known. Subject of Review: Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline for the management of BP in CKD (Kidney Int. 2021 Mar 1;99(3S):S1-87) recommends targeting BP to less than 120 mm Hg systolic for patients with CKD. Second Opinion: KDIGO BP target differs from all other hypertension guidelines. This is also a major change from the previous recommendation which was <140 systolic to all patients with CKD and <130 systolic for those with proteinuria. Targeting systolic BP to less than 120 mm Hg is hard to substantiate based on available data and is based primarily on subgroup analysis of a randomized control trial. Intensive BP lowering as suggested by the guidelines may lead to polypharmacy, added cost burden, and risk of serious harms.

Clinical comparison between trial participants and potentially eligible patients using electronic health record data: A generalizability assessment method

OBJECTIVE

To present a generalizability assessment method that compares baseline clinical characteristics of trial participants (TP) to potentially eligible (PE) patients as presented in their electronic health record (EHR) data while controlling for clinical setting and recruitment period.

METHODS

For each clinical trial, a clinical event was defined to identify patients of interest using available EHR data from one clinical setting during the trial's recruitment timeframe. The trial's eligibility criteria were then applied and patients were separated into two mutually exclusive groups: (1) TP, which were patients that participated in the trial per trial enrollment data; (2) PE, the remaining patients. The primary outcome was standardized differences in clinical characteristics between TP and PE per trial. A standardized difference was considered prominent if its absolute value was greater than or equal to 0.1. The secondary outcome was the difference in mean propensity scores (PS) between TP and PE per trial, in which the PS represented prediction for a patient to be in the trial. Three diverse trials were selected for illustration: one focused on hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients receiving a liver transplantation; one focused on leukemia patients and lymphoma patients; and one focused on appendicitis patients.

RESULTS

For the HCV trial, 43 TP and 83 PE were found, with 61 characteristics evaluated. Prominent differences were found among 69% of characteristics, with a mean PS difference of 0.13. For the leukemia/lymphoma trial, 23 TP and 23 PE were found, with 39 characteristics evaluated. Prominent differences were found among 82% of characteristics, with a mean PS difference of 0.76. For the appendicitis trial, 123 TP and 242 PE were found, with 52 characteristics evaluated. Prominent differences were found among 52% of characteristics, with a mean PS difference of 0.15.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in clinical characteristics were observed between TP and PE among all three trials. In two of the three trials, not all of the differences necessarily compromised trial generalizability and subsets of PE could be considered similar to their corresponding TP. In the remaining trial, lack of generalizability appeared present, but may be a result of other factors such as small sample size or site recruitment strategy. These inconsistent findings suggest eligibility criteria alone are sometimes insufficient in defining a target group to generalize to. With caveats in limited scalability, EHR data quality, and lack of patient perspective on trial participation, this generalizability assessment method that incorporates control for temporality and clinical setting promise to better pinpoint clinical patterns and trial considerations.

Nephroprotection by SGLT2 Inhibition: Back to the Future?

The introduction of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has opened new perspectives for the management of diabetic population at risk of or with chronic kidney disease (CKD). More important, recent, large real-world studies have repositioned the nephroprotective efficacy of SGLT2i emerged from randomized trials within the frame of effectiveness. Furthermore, the salutary effects of these agents may extend to the nondiabetic population according to the positive results of current studies. Nevertheless, the clear benefits of these agents on the prevention of organ damage contrast with their unexpected, limited use in clinical practice. One potential barrier is the acute decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) commonly observed at the beginning of treatment. This phenomenon is reminiscent of the early response to the traditional nephroprotective interventions, namely blood pressure lowering, dietary protein and salt restriction and the inhibition of the renin–angiotensin system. Under this perspective, the “check-mark” sign observed in the GFR trajectory over the first weeks of SGT2i therapy should renew interest on the very basic goal of CKD treatment, i.e., alleviate hyperfiltration in viable nephrons in order to prolong their function.

Cost-analysis of persistent hyperkalaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients under nephrology care in Italy

AIM

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperkalaemia (HK) (potassium level ≥ 5.0 mEq/L) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study provides novel insights by comparing management costs of CKD patients with normokalaemia vs those with persistent HK regularly followed in renal clinics in Italy.

METHODS

To this aim, a Markov model over life-time horizon was developed. Time to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and time to death in CKD patients were derived from an observational multi-centre database including 1665 patients with non-dialysis CKD stage 1-5 under nephrology care in Italy (15 years follow-up). Resource use for CKD and HK management was obtained from the observational database, KDIGO international guidelines, and clinical expert opinion.

RESULTS

Results showed that patients with normokalaemia vs persistent HK brought an average per patient lifetime cost-saving of €16 059 besides delayed onset of ESRD by 2.29 years and increased survival by 1.79 years with increment in total survival and dialysis-free survival in normokalaemia that decreased from early to advanced disease. Cost-saving related to normokalaemia increased at more advanced CKD; however, it was already evident at early stage (3388.97€ at stage 1-3a). OWSA confirmed cost-saving associated with normokalaemia across all parameter variations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This model is the first to simulate the impact of HK in non-dialysis CKD patients on economic and clinical outcomes using real-world data from nephrology clinics. In these patients, persistent HK results into higher lifetime costs, besides poorer clinical outcomes, that are evident since the early stages of CKD. Maintaining normokalaemia should therefore be of main concern in CKD treatment planning to improve long-term economic and clinical outcomes.

Österreichischer Blutdruckkonsens 2019

Erhöhter Blutdruck bleibt eine Hauptursache von kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, Behinderung und frühzeitiger Sterblichkeit in Österreich, wobei die Raten an Diagnose, Behandlung und Kontrolle auch in rezenten Studien suboptimal sind. Das Management von Bluthochdruck ist eine häufige Herausforderung für Ärztinnen und Ärzte vieler Fachrichtungen. In einem Versuch, diagnostische und therapeutische Strategien zu standardisieren und letztendlich die Rate an gut kontrollierten Hypertoniker/innen zu erhöhen und dadurch kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen zu verhindern, haben 13 österreichische medizinische Fachgesellschaften die vorhandene Evidenz zur Prävention, Diagnose, Abklärung, Therapie und Konsequenzen erhöhten Blutdrucks gesichtet. Das hier vorgestellte Ergebnis ist der erste Österreichische Blutdruckkonsens. Die Autoren und die beteiligten Fachgesellschaften sind davon überzeugt, daß es einer gemeinsamen nationalen Anstrengung bedarf, die Blutdruck-assoziierte Morbidität und Mortalität in unserem Land zu verringern.