Atrial fibrillation and associated outcomes in patients with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a 14-year nationwide population-based study

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Is a Red Flag to Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer Failure in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

 Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to be associated with increased surgical morbidity and mortality following cancer ablation surgery. However, evidence of new-onset AF's impact on surgical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor ablation and microvascular free tissue transfer remains scarce. This study aims to evaluate the association between AF and surgical outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

 We enrolled head and neck cancer patients who underwent tumor ablation reconstructed with microvascular free tissue transfer from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Patients were grouped into the following: (1) without AF, (2) new-onset AF, and (3) preexisting AF. The groups were matched by propensity score based on age, gender, cancer stage, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was postoperative complications, whereas all-cause mortality was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

 In total, 26,817 patients were included in this study. After matching, we identified 2,176 (79.24%) patients without AF, 285 (10.37%) with preexisting AF, and 285 (10.37%) with new-onset AF. Our results demonstrated that the free flap failure rate was twofold escalated in patients with new-onset AF (9.8%) compared to those without AF (5.4%) or preexisting AF (5.3%; p = 0.01). However, we did not identify significant differences among other postoperative complications across groups. Additionally, we found that the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly elevated in patients with preexisting AF (p < 0.001) compared to those without AF or new-onset AF.

CONCLUSION

 Our study demonstrated that new-onset AF is associated with an increased risk of flap failure and could serve as a predictor. On the other hand, all-cause mortality in patients with preexisting AF was significantly elevated. Close postoperative monitoring in patients with new-onset and preexisting AF is crucial to identify any potential adverse effects.

The disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L) promotes peritoneal fibrosis through the upregulation and activation of protein tyrosine kinases

The disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L), a specific histone methyltransferase that catalyzed methylation of histone H3 on lysine 79, was associated with the pathogenesis of many diseases, but its role in peritoneal fibrosis remained unexplored. Here, we examined the role of DOT1L in the expression and activation of protein tyrosine kinases and development of peritoneal fibrosis. We found that a significant rise of DOT1L expression in the fibrotic peritoneum tissues from long-term PD patients and mice. Inhibition of DOT1L significantly attenuated the profibrotic phenotypic differentiation of mesothelial cells and macrophages, and alleviated peritoneal fibrosis. Mechanistically, RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis indicated that DOT1L was mainly involved in the processes of protein tyrosine kinase binding and extracellular matrix structural constituent in the peritoneum. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) showed that intranuclear DOT1L guided H3K79me2 to upregulate EGFR in mesothelial cells and JAK3 in macrophages. Immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence showed that extranuclear DOT1L could interact with EGFR and JAK3, and maintain the activated signaling pathways. In summary, DOT1L promoted the expression and activation of tyrosine kinases (EGFR in mesothelial cells and JAK3 in macrophages), promoting cells differentiate into profibrotic phenotype and thus peritoneal fibrosis. We provide the novel mechanism of dialysis-related peritoneal fibrosis (PF) and the new targets for clinical drug development. DOT1L inhibitor had the PF therapeutic potential.

Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Rationale & Objective

The efficacy and safety profile of apixaban remains uncertain in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) despite increasing use in this population. Accordingly, we assessed the pharmacokinetics of apixaban among patients receiving PD.

Study Design

A pharmacokinetics study in a single center. Patients recruited received 1 week of apixaban at 2.5 mg twice a day to reach steady state. Serial blood samples were then taken before and after the last dose for pharmacokinetics analysis of apixaban.

Setting & Participants

Ten stable PD patients with atrial fibrillation in an outpatient setting.

Analytical Approach/Outcomes

Pharmacokinetic parameters including the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours after the last dose of apixaban (AUC0-12), peak concentration, trough level, time to peak apixaban concentration, half-life, and drug clearance were analyzed.

Results

There was a wide variation in the range of apixaban concentration across the 10 patients. The AUC0-12 for the PD group was significantly higher than those reported previously for hemodialysis patients or healthy individuals. Three patients had a supratherapeutic peak concentration whereas 2 patients had a supratherapeutic trough level as compared with the pharmacokinetic parameter in healthy individuals taking equivalent therapeutic dosage.

Limitations

Small sample size with short study duration limits the ability to ascertain the true bleeding risk and to detect any clinical outcomes. Results may be limited to Asian populations only.

Conclusions

A proportion of PD patients had supratherapeutic levels even when the reduced dosage 2.5 mg twice a day was used. Given the large interindividual variation in the drug level, therapeutic drug monitoring should be done if available. Otherwise, one should start the drug at reduced doses with caution and with more frequent clinical monitoring for any signs of bleeding.

Effect of dialysis modalities on risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding

Dialysis patients are at risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding events, while thromboembolism prevention and treatment may confer a risk of major bleeding. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a great concern which can result in high subsequent mortality rates. Our object was to clarify whether hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) confer different incidence of GI bleeding, and further assist individualized decision-making on dialysis modalities. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study which included all incident dialysis patients above 18 years old derived from the National Health Insurance database from 1998 to 2013 in Taiwan. 6296 matched pairs of HD and PD patients were identified. A propensity score matching method was used to minimize the selection bias. The adjusted hazard ratio for GI bleeding was 1.13 times higher in the HD group than in the PD group, and data from the unmatched cohort and the stratified analysis led to similar results. Among subgroup analysis, we found that the use of anticoagulants will induce a much higher incidence of GI bleeding in HD patients as compared to in PD patients. We concluded that PD is associated with a lower GI bleeding risk than HD, and is especially preferred when anticoagulation is needed.

Dialysis Mode and Associated Outcomes in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A 14-Year Nationwide Cohort Study

Background Benefits of patients with end-stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis are unknown. Methods and Results Patients undergoing dialysis were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001 to 2013 and separated into PD or hemodialysis. Primary outcomes were ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). An inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was used to reduce the confounding. The risk of outcomes between PD and hemodialysis was compared using Cox proportional hazard model for fatal outcomes or Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model which considered death a competing risk, respectively. A total of 7916 patients with end-stage renal disease with atrial fibrillation undergoing PD or hemodialysis during 2001 to 2013 were identified. After exclusion criteria, 363 patients receiving PD and 5302 patients receiving hemodialysis were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, the risk of ICH was significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (0.2% versus 0.9%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57). At 3-year follow-up, the risks of major bleeding and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (major bleeding: 1.8% versus 3.2%; SHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87; ICH: 0.5% versus 2%; SHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48). At 5-year follow-up, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (ischemic stroke/systemic embolism: 12.4% versus 17.7%, SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.96; major bleeding: 2.6% versus 4.1%; SHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97; ICH: 0.5% versus 2.6%; SHR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17-0.37). Conclusions In patients with end-stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation, dialytic modalities by PD or hemodialysis impacted these patients differently. There were overall reduced ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH at 5-year follow-up in patients undergoing PD compared with hemodialysis.

Comparative study on the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy

Objective

Diabetic nephropathy is a serious threat to human health, and its incidence is on the rise. End-stage diabetic nephropathy (ESDN) requires extra investigation due to its complexity and severity, as well as serious concurrent diseases. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of ESDN.

Methods

Clinical data of 84 patients with ESDN admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an HD group that received hemodialysis and a PD group that received peritoneal dialysis. Their general conditions, biochemical indicators, residual renal function and incidence of complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

(1) No significant difference in diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, body weight, or urine output was detected between the two groups at the beginning of dialysis (P>0.05). (2) Compared to the PD group, the HD group had significantly lower total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) (P<0.05), and significantly higher total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) after treatment (P<0.05). (3) The two groups also showed significant difference in residual renal function after treatment (P<0.05). (4) The HD group had significantly higher systolic pressure than the PD group after treatment (P<0.05). And more cases of infection were observed in the PD group than the HD group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both HD and PD are used for treatment of ESDN, and can achieve similar calcium and phosphorus control. Compared to HD, PD has less adverse effect on hemodynamics and better preserves residual renal function, but is more likely to cause malnutrition and disorders of lipid metabolism. Therefore, choice of dialysis method should be based on specific conditions of each patient.

Anticoagulation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: Confusion, Concerns and Consequences

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, congestive heart failure and advanced age, along with an increased incidence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), thereby increasing the risk for cerebrovascular accidents. Systemic anticoagulation is therefore recommended in patients with ESRD with AF to reduce the risk and complications from thromboembolism. Paradoxically, these patients are at an increased risk of bleeding due to great degree of platelet dysfunction and impaired interaction between platelet and endothelium. Currently, CHA2DS2-VASc and Hypertension, Abnormal liver/kidney function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol (HAS-BLED) are the recommended models for stroke risk stratification and bleeding risk assessment in patients with AF. There is conflicting data regarding benefits and risks of medications such as antiplatelet agents, warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in ESRD patients with AF. Moreover, there is no randomized controlled trial data to guide the clinical decision making. Hence, a multi-disciplinary approach with annual re-evaluation of treatment goals and risk-benefit assessment has been recommended. In this article, we review the current recommendations with risks and benefits of anticoagulation in patients with ESRD with AF.