2
|
Eculizumab Rescue Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:715-726. [PMID: 37069997 PMCID: PMC10105043 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since 2016, kidney transplantation in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the Netherlands is performed without eculizumab prophylaxis. Eculizumab is given in case of posttransplant aHUS recurrence. Eculizumab therapy is monitored in the CUREiHUS study. Methods All participating kidney transplant patients who received eculizumab therapy for a suspected posttransplant aHUS recurrence were evaluated. Overall recurrence rate was monitored prospectively at Radboud University Medical Center. Results In the period from January 2016 until October 2020, we included 15 (12 females, 3 males; median age 42 years, range 24-66 years) patients with suspected aHUS recurrence after kidney transplantation in this study. The time interval to recurrence showed a bimodal distribution. Seven patients presented early after transplantation (median 3 months, range 0.3-8.8 months), with typical aHUS features: rapid loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eight patients presented late (median 46 months, range 18-69 months) after transplantation. Of these, only 3 patients had systemic TMA, whereas 5 patients presented with slowly deteriorating eGFR without systemic TMA. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in improvement or stabilization of eGFR in 14 patients. Eculizumab discontinuation was tried in 7 patients; however, it was successful only in 3. At the end of the follow-up (median 29 months, range 3-54 months after start of eculizumab), 6 patients had eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Graft loss had occurred in 3 of them. Overall, aHUS recurrence rate without eculizumab prophylaxis was 23%. Conclusions Rescue treatment of posttransplant aHUS recurrence is effective; however, some patients suffer from irreversible loss of kidney function, likely caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment and/or too aggressive discontinuation of eculizumab. Physicians should be aware that recurrence of aHUS can present without evidence of systemic TMA.
Collapse
|
3
|
Complement System as a New Target for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-Related Thrombotic Microangiopathy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15070845. [PMID: 35890144 PMCID: PMC9325021 DOI: 10.3390/ph15070845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a complication that may occur after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is conventionally called transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA). Despite the many efforts made to understand the mechanisms of TA-TMA, its pathogenesis is largely unknown, its diagnosis is challenging and the case-fatality rate remains high. The hallmarks of TA-TMA, as for any TMA, are platelet consumption, hemolysis, and organ dysfunction, particularly the kidney, leading also to hypertension. However, coexisting complications, such as infections and/or immune-mediated injury and/or drug toxicity, together with the heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria, render the diagnosis difficult. During the last 10 years, evidence has been provided on the involvement of the complement system in the pathophysiology of TA-TMA, supported by functional, genetic, and therapeutic data. Complement dysregulation is believed to collaborate with other proinflammatory and procoagulant factors to cause endothelial injury and consequent microvascular thrombosis and tissue damage. However, data on complement activation in TA-TMA are not sufficient to support a systematic use of complement inhibition therapy in all patients. Thus, it seems reasonable to propose complement inhibition therapy only to those patients exhibiting a clear complement activation according to the available biomarkers. Several agents are now available to inhibit complement activity: two drugs have been successfully used in TA-TMA, particularly in pediatric cases (eculizumab and narsoplimab) and others are at different stages of development (ravulizumab, coversin, pegcetacoplan, crovalimab, avacopan, iptacopan, danicopan, BCX9930, and AMY-101).
Collapse
|
4
|
Ardissino G, Cresseri D, Tel F, Giussani A, Salardi S, Sgarbanti M, Strumbo B, Testa S, Capone V, Griffini S, Grovetti E, Cugno M, Belingheri M, Tamburello C, Rodrigues EM, Perrone M, Cardillo M, Corti G, Consonni D, Furian L, Tedeschi S, Messa P, Beretta C. Kidney transplant in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the anti-C5 era: single-center experience with tailored Eculizumab. J Nephrol 2021; 34:2027-2036. [PMID: 33956337 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01045-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE Patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have long been considered ineligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) in several centers due to the high risk of disease recurrence, graft loss and life-threatening complications. The availability of Eculizumab (ECU) has now overcome this problem. However, the best approach towards timing, maintenance schedule, the possibility of discontinuation and patient monitoring has not yet been clearly established. STUDY DESIGN This is a single center case series presenting our experience with KTx in aHUS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This study included 26 patients (16 females) with a diagnosis of aHUS, who spent a median of 5.5 years on kidney replacement therapy before undergoing KTx. We compared the aHUS relapse rate in three groups of patients who underwent KTx: patients who received no prophylaxis, patients who underwent plasma exchange, those who received Eculizumab prophylaxis. Complement factor H-related disease was by far the most frequent etiology (n = 19 patients). RESULTS Untreated patients and patients undergoing pre-KTx plasma exchange prophylaxis had a relapse rate of 0.81 (CI 0.30-1.76) and 3.1 (CI 0.64-9.16) events per 10 years cumulative observation, respectively, as opposed to 0 events among patients receiving Eculizumab prophylaxis. The time between Eculizumab doses was tailored based on classic complement pathway activity (target to < 30%). Using this strategy, 12 patients are currently receiving Eculizumab every 28 days, 5 every 24-25 days, and 3 every 21 days. CONCLUSION Our experience supports the prophylactic use of Eculizumab in patients with a previous history of aHUS undergoing KTx, especially when complement dysregulation is well documented by molecular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluigi Ardissino
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Donata Cresseri
- Nephrology Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Tel
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Antenore Giussani
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Salardi
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Sgarbanti
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Bice Strumbo
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Testa
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Capone
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Griffini
- Internal Medicine, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Grovetti
- Internal Medicine, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Cugno
- Internal Medicine, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirco Belingheri
- Nephrology Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Tamburello
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Evangeline Millicent Rodrigues
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Center for HUS Control, Prevention and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, V. Commenda, 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Perrone
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Cardillo
- North Italian Transplant, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Grazia Corti
- Pharmacy, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Consonni
- Epidemiology Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silvana Tedeschi
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Messa
- Nephrology Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Beretta
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Center for HUS Prevention, Control and Management, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|