Prognostic role of glomerular electron microscopy lesions in IgA nephropathy: "the devil is in the details"

Prognostic role of mesangial IgM deposition in IgA nephropathy: a long-term cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of mesangial immunoglobulin (Ig) M deposition in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has been less explored and remains a topic of debate. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of mesangial IgM deposition in a long-term follow-up cohort of IgAN patients.

METHODS

A unicentric retrospective study was conducted on 93 consecutive IgAN patients (median age 41 years, 68% male, eGFR 48.7 mL/min, proteinuria 1.1 g/g) from 2010 to 2015. They were followed until end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), death, or until the end of the study in January 2021, with a median follow-up of 7 years. An independent pathologist evaluated the IgM immunofluorescence pattern, Oxford MEST-C score, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) lesions following a comprehensive protocol.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 70% had mesangial IgM-positive deposits, while 30% were IgM-negative. Both groups were similar in age, sex, prevalence of arterial hypertension, Charlson comorbidity scores, kidney function (eGFR and proteinuria), pathology findings (Oxford MEST-C score, IgG and C3 immune deposition), and TEM analysis. Treatment with RASI and immunosuppression, and death rates were also comparable. However, 37% of IgM-positive patients progressed to ESKD, significantly higher than the 11% in the IgM-negative group. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses identified lower eGFR, higher Oxford MEST-C score, and mesangial IgM deposits as independent factors associated with shorter kidney survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights mesangial IgM deposition as a potential risk factor for ESKD in patients with advanced IgAN, laying a foundation for further research in this area.

Immunosuppressant Agents as Add-On Therapy Failed to Improve the Outcome of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy with Crescent Score C1

INTRODUCTION

The renoprotective benefits of adding immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid (CS) treatment for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients with less than 25% crescent formation (C1) remain uncertain, warranting further research.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on IgAN patients with crescent C1 lesions confirmed by renal biopsy at Xinqiao Hospital between May 1, 2017, and May 1, 2020. Patients were stratified into either the CS treatment group or the CS combined with an additional immunosuppressant therapy group. Follow-up assessments were conducted within 24 months. Propensity score analysis was used to match patients receiving CS and CS + immunosuppressant drug treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the benefits of different populations. Composite endpoint outcomes comprised a 30% eGFR decrease, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) necessitating dialysis or transplant, or kidney disease-related mortality. Adverse events were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

296 IgAN patients with C1 lesions were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics indicated that IgAN patients in the CS + immunosuppressant group exhibited poorer renal function and higher UACR levels. Propensity score analysis effectively minimized the influence of baseline clinical characteristics, including age, serum creatinine, initial eGFR, UACR, and 24-h proteinuria. Both treatment groups demonstrated continuous eGFR improvement and significant UACR reduction during follow-up, especially at 6 months. However, no significant differences in eGFR and UACR reduction rates were observed between the two groups throughout the entire follow-up period, both before and after matching. Subgroup analysis revealed improved eGFR in both treatment groups, notably among patients with an initial eGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, IgAN patients with C1 lesions and a cellular crescent ratio exceeding 50% treated with CS and immunosuppressant therapy experienced a significant improvement in renal function and a decline in urinary protein creatinine ratio. Composite endpoint outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups, while the incidence of adverse events was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the addition of immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid monotherapy did not confer significant therapeutic advantages in patients with C1 lesions compared to CS monotherapy, although some specific patient populations appeared to derive modest benefits from this combined approach.

Drugs in Development to Treat IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is a common glomerulonephritis consequent to the autoimmune response to aberrant glycosylated immunoglobulin (Ig) A antibodies. Although it has historically been considered a benign disease, it has since become clear that a substantial percentage of patients reach end-stage kidney failure over the years. Several therapeutic attempts have been proposed, with systemic steroids being the most prevalent, albeit burdened by possible serious adverse events. Thanks to the more in-depth knowledge of the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy, new treatment targets have been identified and new drugs developed. In this narrative review, we summarise the molecules under clinical development for the treatment of IgA nephropathy. As a search strategy, we used PubMed, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and abstracts from recent international congresses. TRF budesonide and sparsentan are the two molecules at a more advanced stage, just entering the market. Other promising agents are undergoing phase III clinical development. These include anti-APRIL and anti-BLyS/BAFF antibodies and some complement inhibitors. Other new possible strategies include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-CD40 ligands and anti-CD38 antibodies. In an era increasingly characterised by 'personalised medicine' and 'precision therapy' approaches and considering that the potential therapeutic armamentarium for IgA nephropathy will be very broad in the near future, the identification of biomarkers capable of helping the nephrologist to select the right drug for the right patient should be the focus of future studies.