Pollen-related food allergy: an update

Food allergy - New risks through vegan diet? Overview of new allergen sources and current data on the potential risk of anaphylaxis

A vegan diet is increasingly en vogue, i.e., a diet based on plants, in which animal products are completely avoided, often for health and environmental reasons. The menu is supplemented with pulses (e.g., soy, lentils, peas), nuts (e.g., cashew, macadamia, almond, pecan, para, walnut) and seeds (e.g., chia, flaxseed) or pseudo-grains (quinoa, buckwheat). Indeed, the product range is expanding to include vegan foods such as milk alternatives (e.g., oat, almond, soy drinks) and cheese or meat substitutes (e.g., soy-based). Food allergies are also on the rise, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It is worthy of note that the main allergens of anaphylactic reactions to food in adults are predominantly of plant origin, mainly pulses and nuts - the very foods that form the main source of protein in the vegan diet. In this context, allergies to storage proteins (e.g., Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 from soya beans) can lead to severe anaphylactic reactions, while highly processed substitute products containing plant protein isolates (e.g., pea flour) in concentrated form continue to be of particular concern and may therefore be allergologically problematic. In this article, we aim to provide an overview of allergens and emerging allergen sources in vegan foods and highlight the anaphylaxis risk of the vegan diet.

Nahrungsmittelallergie - Neue Risiken durch vegane Ernährung? Überblick zu neuen Allergenquellen und aktuelle Daten zum Anaphylaxierisiko: Food allergy - New risks through vegan diet? Overview of new allergen sources and current data on the potential risk of anaphylaxis

Zunehmend mehr Menschen ernähren sich aus gesundheitlichen und Umweltaspekten ausschließlich von pflanzlichen Nahrungsmitteln (vegan). Dabei werden vielfach Hülsenfrüchte (wie Soja, Linsen, Erbsen), Schalenfrüchte (Cashew, Macadamia, Mandel, Pekan‐, Para‐ und Walnuss), Samen und Saaten (wie Chia, Leinsamen) oder (Pseudo‐)Getreide (wie Quinoa, Buchweizen) verzehrt. Vegane Milchalternativen sind Hafer‐, Mandel‐ und Sojadrinks, auch Käse‐ sowie Fleischersatzprodukte basieren oft auf einer Sojagrundlage. Gleichzeitig nimmt die Prävalenz von Nahrungsmittelallergien weltweit zu. Pflanzenallergene aus Hülsen‐ und Schalenfrüchten, die in der veganen Ernährung die Hauptproteinquelle ausmachen, zählen zu den häufigsten Auslösern von Nahrungsmittelallergien bei Erwachsenen. Dabei kommt es bei Allergien auf Speicherproteine (wie Gly m 5 und Gly m 6 aus der Sojabohne) zu teils schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt weiter auf hochverarbeiteten Ersatzprodukten, die Pflanzenproteinisolate (zum Beispiel Erbsenmehl) in konzentrierter Form enthalten und damit allergologisch problematisch werden können. In diesem Artikel geben wir einen Überblick über wichtige Allergene und neue Allergenquellen in ausgesuchten veganen Nahrungsmitteln und betrachten die vegane Ernährung unter allergologischen Aspekten.

Management of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: Diagnostic consideration of sensitization to non-frequent pollen allergens

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of pollen allergies is mainly based on test allergens for skin prick testing. In the minimum battery of test inhalant allergens recommended by the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network 10 pollen allergens are included. Complementary other pollen allergens may need to be considered; however, respective awareness may not always be granted. Furthermore, at least in Germany, the situation may be even more complicated by the fact that test allergens need regulatory approval. A decline in commercially available test allergens may result in a diagnostic gap regarding patients with non-frequent allergies. How many patients with non-frequent pollen allergies would be affected by this gap? The data presented here partly answer this question.

METHODS

The study consisted of a descriptive and an analytical part. In the descriptive part, sensitization to frequent pollen allergens (alder, hazel, birch, sweet grasses; according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance) and to respective non-frequent pollen allergens (cypress, Japanese cedar, ash, plane tree, olive, Bermuda grass, wall pellitory, plantain, goosefoot, mugwort, ragweed, and saltwort) was measured in adult patients with physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis from two German federal states, namely North-Rhine Westphalia (n = 360) and Bavaria (n = 339), using skin prick testing and/or ISAC technology. Furthermore, respective regional pollen data were assessed. In the analytical part, sensitization data were correlated with each other and with anamnestic data on symptom periods.

RESULTS

Sensitization to frequent pollen allergens ranged from 45% (sIgE to Aln g 1/Alder, NRW) to 72% (prick test reactivity to birch, NRW). Sensitization to non-frequent pollen allergens ranged from 0% (sIgE to Amb a 1/ragweed, NRW) to 41% (prick test reactivity to olive, Bavaria). Sensitization data partly correlated with each other and in connection with symptom periods showed a partly similar seasonal pattern as pollen data.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitization to non-frequent pollen allergens have to be considered when examining patients with respective seasonal symptoms, and test (and respective therapy) allergens for non-frequent pollen allergies need to be available. Further prerequisites for adequate patient management would be a nationwide pollen monitoring system giving continuous pollen data and a systematic sensitization monitoring at patient level.

Investigation of Sensitization Potential of the Soybean Allergen Gly m 4 by Using Caco-2/Immune Cells Co-Culture Model

The soybean allergen Gly m 4 is known to cause severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis, unlike other Bet v 1 homologues, which induce mainly local allergic reactions. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the food Bet v 1 homologue Gly m 4 can be a sensitizer of the immune system. Susceptibility to gastrointestinal digestion was assessed in vitro. Transport through intestinal epithelium was estimated using the Caco-2 monolayer. Cytokine response of different immunocompetent cells was evaluated by using Caco-2/Immune cells co-culture model. Absolute levels of 48 cytokines were measured by multiplex xMAP technology. It was shown that Gly m 4 can cross the epithelial barrier with a moderate rate and then induce production of IL-4 by mature dendritic cells in vitro. Although Gly m 4 was shown to be susceptible to gastrointestinal enzymes, some of its proteolytic fragments can selectively cross the epithelial barrier and induce production of Th2-polarizing IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13, which may point at the presence of the T-cell epitope among the crossed fragments. Our current data indicate that Gly m 4 can potentially be a sensitizer of the immune system, and intercommunication between immunocompetent and epithelial cells may play a key role in the sensitization process.

[Perspectives for nationwide pollen monitoring in Germany]

Allergenic pollen are natural, biological airborne particles and the main cause of allergic respiratory diseases. The measurement of allergenic pollen is a required measure in preventive healthcare and indicates changes in the pollen spectrum as to be expected in the context of climate change.The only nationwide pollen measuring network in Germany is operated by the Foundation German Pollen Information Service, however, its continuity and further development (a hybrid system with manual and automated pollen traps) are not financially guaranteed. In the summer of 2017, the interdisciplinary working group "National Pollen Monitoring" was formed to exchange corresponding perspectives for Germany.Between November 2017 and June 2018, the working group met for three days of discussions, each with a different topic. The internal protocols for each meeting served as a basis for the position paper, which the working group used to complete their work.Due to the impact of allergenic pollen on human health and the significance of allergic diseases for the health service, the working group is in favour of the nationwide pollen monitoring being included in the catalogue of government responsibilities, which secure the basic supply of essential goods and public services of general interest.Regarding any possible assigned responsibilities within the governmental framework, different options were discussed. Independent from future responsibilities, co-operation between metrological, medical and scientific facilities is essential for adequate preventive healthcare.