Developing Clinician-Educators: a Qualitative Analysis of Structured Reflections from Participatory Teaching in the Final Year in an Integrated Medical School Program

Enhancing educational technology practical course: Designing and validating tools for evaluating knowledge, performance, and satisfaction of public health students

Background

The present study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating questionnaires for evaluating the public health students' knowledge, performance, and satisfaction (KPS) in the course of educational technology.

Methods

The present study was conducted with qualitative-quantitative approach. Qualitative stage was done based on experts' opinion and related articles and questionnaires for developing, designing, and validating the tools. For validating the tools, face validity and content validity was done based on the opinion of the 10 expert panel. In quantitative stage, all initial validated tools were implemented on 50 students of public health for determining the reliability. The reliability of the tools was calculated using the internal consistency method of the items with Cronbach's ⍺ coefficient, and Kuder-Richardson. All analyses were conducted using SPSS-19 software.

Results

In the field of qualitative research, an assessment tool consisting of 20 four-option questions was designed. The content validity of this tool was confirmed based on the opinions of 10 educational experts, with CVI Total = 0.862 and CVR = 0.885. Additionally, the reliability of the tool was validated through testing on 50 public health students, resulting in a reliability coefficient of r = 0.780. Furthermore, for performance evaluation, four assessment tools each comprising 20 questions (totaling 80 questions) were designed. The validity values for these tools in the areas of PowerPoint (CVI = 0.981, CVR = 0.960), pamphlet (CVI = 0.866, CVR = 0.877), poster (CVI = 0.871, CVR = 0.906), role-playing (CVI = 0.871, CVR = 0.980), and the reliability of the tools with Cronbach's ⍺ r > 0.80 were confirmed. In the satisfaction assessment section, a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 18 questions across seven domains was designed, with confirmed content validity (CVI = 0.949, CVR = 0.861) and reliability (r = 0.928).

Conclusions

It seems that this tool can be used to measure the KPS of students from the educational technology course of the health field and similar fields.

Reflective Teaching Journals as an Effective Embedded Formative Assessment Process of Teaching Skill Development Confidence in a Longitudinal Medical Student-as-Teacher Elective

Background

This study focuses on the use of reflective teaching journals by fourth year US allopathic medical school students (MS4) during a longitudinal medical student-as-teacher (SaT) elective, and how MS4s self-assess their perceptions around teacher skill development and individual transitions into resident educators who teach junior learners.

Method

Between September 2020 and December 2020, twelve MS4s in a longitudinal SaT elective completed 21 hours in a clinical bedside student teaching placement with embedded structured reflective teaching journals. Sixty-nine individual reflective teaching journal entries were collected in two distinct stages and analyzed using a phenomenographical lens.

Conclusion

From these data, the author established three thematic categories where reflective teaching journals reveal (a) a framework for pedagogical skill building, (b) provided a sense-making tool to navigate the psychosocial environment, and (c) a framework for educator identity formation. Structured reflective teaching journals with educator feedback support self-reflection and awareness of growth through the SaT elective. Health professions educators can leverage the reflective teaching journal as a formative assessment process to help learners identify transitions and grapple with educator identity confidence and the formation of new teacher skill development to further advance the field of future health professions education.