Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure

Arrhythmogenic mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure patients

Heart failure (HF) affects 23 million people worldwide and results in 300000 annual deaths. It is associated with many comorbidities, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and risk factors for both conditions overlap. Eleven percent of HF patients have OSA and 7.7% of OSA patients have left ventricular ejection fraction <50% with arrhythmias being a significant comorbidity in HF and OSA patients. Forty percent of HF patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) and 30%-50% of deaths from cardiac causes in HF patients are from sudden cardiac death. OSA is prevalent in 32%-49% of patients with AF and there is a dose-dependent relationship between OSA severity and resistance to anti-arrhythmic therapies. HF and OSA lead to various downstream arrhythmogenic mechanisms, including metabolic derangement, remodeling, inflammation, and autonomic imbalance. (1) Metabolic derangement and production of reactive oxidative species increase late Na+ currents, decrease outward K+ currents and downregulate connexin-43 and cell-cell coupling. (2) remodeling also features downregulated K+ currents in addition to decreased Na+/K+ ATPase currents, altered Ca2+ homeostasis, and increased density of If current. (3) Chronic inflammation leads to downregulation of both Nav1.5 channels and K+ channels, altered Ca2+ homeostasis and reduced cellular coupling from alterations of connexin expression. (4) Autonomic imbalance causes arrhythmias by evoking triggered activity through increased Ca2+ transients and reduction of excitation wavefront wavelength. Thus, consideration of these multiple pathophysiological pathways (1-4) will enable the development of novel therapeutic strategies that can be targeted against arrhythmias in the context of complex disease, such as the comorbidities of HF and OSA.

Particularities of Older Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction

Background and objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and heart failure (HF) are increasing in prevalence with a greater impact on the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the particularities of patients with OSAS and HF, focusing on the new class of HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, EF = 40%-49%), and comparing it with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF < 40%) and preserved EF (HFpEF, EF ≥ 50%). Materials and Methods: A total of 143 patients with OSAS and HF were evaluated in three sleep labs of "Victor Babes" Hospital and Cardiovascular Institute, Timisoara, Western Romania. We collected socio-demographic data, anthropometric sleep-related measurements, symptoms through sleep questionnaires and comorbidity-related data. We performed blood tests, cardio-respiratory polygraphy and echocardiographic measurements. Patients were divided into three groups depending on ejection fraction. Results: Patients with HFmrEF were older (p = 0.0358), with higher values of the highest systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (p = 0.0016), higher serum creatinine (p = 0.0013), a lower glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.0003), higher glycemic levels (p = 0.008) and a larger left atrial diameter (p = 0.0002). Regarding comorbidities, data were presented as percentage, HFrEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFpEF. Higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (52.9 vs. 72.7 vs. 40.2, p = 0.006), chronic kidney disease (17.6 vs. 57.6 vs. 21.5, p < 0.001), tricuspid insufficiency (76.5 vs. 84.8 vs.59.1, p = 0.018) and aortic insufficiency (35.3 vs.42.4 vs. 20.4, p = 0.038) were observed in patients with HFmrEF, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) (52.9 vs. 24.2 vs.18.3, p = 0.009), coronary artery disease(CAD) (82.4 vs. 6.7 vs. 49.5, p = 0.026), myocardial infarction (35.3 vs. 24.2 vs. 5.4, p < 0.001) and impaired parietal heart kinetics (70.6 vs. 68.8 vs. 15.2, p < 0.001) were more prevalent in patients with HFrEF. Conclusions: Patients with OSAS and HF with mid-range EF may represent a new group with increased risk of developing life-long chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, tricuspid and aortic insufficiency. COPD, myocardial infarction, impaired parietal kinetics and CAD are most prevalent comorbidities in HFrEF patients but they are closer in prevalence to HFmrEF than HFpEF.

Unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in the therapeutical algorithm of central sleep apnoea in heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure and substantially impairs survival. If optimal cardiac treatment fails, alternative therapeutical options, including positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies, drugs or application of oxygen and carbon dioxide are considered to suppress CSA which interfere with the complex underlying pathophysiology. Most recently, unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) has been studied in these patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to critically evaluate efficacy, potential harm and positioning of PNS in current treatment algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from case series and limited randomized controlled trials demonstrate the feasibility of the invasive approach and acceptable peri-interventional adverse events. PNS reduces CSA by 50%, a figure comparable with continuous PAP or oxygen. However, PNS cannot improve any comorbid upper airways obstruction. A number of fatalities due to malignant cardiac arrhythmias or other cardiac events have been reported, although the association with the therapy is unclear.

SUMMARY

PNS offers an additional option to the therapeutical portfolio. Intervention-related adverse events and noninvasive alternatives need clear discussion with the patient. The excess mortality in the SERVE-HF study has mainly been attributed to sudden cardiac death. Therefore, previous cardiac fatalities under PNS urge close observation in future studies as long-term data are missing.