State-of-the Art in Reconstructive Palatal Surgery Techniques for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Palatal hybrid surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-state-of-the-art annotation of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

BACKGROUND

Surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has changed in concept and technique that transformed from radical excision to functional reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of palatal hybrid surgery in OSA patients.

METHODS

Palatal hybrid surgery is a tissue-specific technique (mucosa-preservation, tonsil-excision, fat-ablation, muscle-relocation/suspension) used in treating OSA patients with velopharyngeal obstruction. The study included 46 consecutive adults OSA patients. The palatal hybrid surgery annotates uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in stereoscopic reconstruction of tonsillar fossa (pharyngoplasty), omni-suspension of the soft palate (palatoplasty) and advancement of uvula (uvuloplasty).

RESULTS

No patient experienced airway compromise, voice change or persistent nasal regurgitation following palatal hybrid surgery. One patient existed postoperative tonsillar fossa bleeding received conservative treatment. Postoperative pain in visual analogue scale (VAS) showed average score of 3, 3, 2, 0 at the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th day, respectively. Perioperative snoring severity (VAS) (8.7 vs 2.6) and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) (11.3 vs 5.5) all improved significantly (p < 0.001). Posterior air space in retropalatal area increased from 8.4 to 11.1 mm (p < 0.001). Home sleep test showed that apnea-hypopnea index significantly reduced from 41.8 to 18.2 event/h and minimal oxygen saturation increased from 72.4 to 81.5% (p < 0.001). The success rate in individual Friedman stage was 100% (stage I), 63% (stage II) and 58% (stage III) with a total success rate of 63%.

CONCLUSION

Palatal hybrid surgery using tissue-specific maneuver annotates UPPP in concept and technique. The results show that palatal hybrid surgery is mini-invasive with low morbid and is effective in improving subjective clinic symptoms, objective sleep parameters and success rate of OSA.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of sleep surgeries preoperatively evaluated with drug-induced sleep endoscopy and Müller's maneuver

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when the procedure was based on the results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) vs. the awake Müller's maneuver (MM). Methods Forty-seven patients with OSA who underwent sleep surgery were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their preoperative upper airway evaluation method. Twenty-five patients received only MM for surgical decision making (MM group), and 22 patients received both MM and DISE (DISE group) for surgical decision making. Results The surgical success rate of the DISE group was higher than that of the MM group (59% vs. 36%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.118). The differences between pre- and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) values in both the MM and DISE group were highly significantly different (p < 0.001). Fifteen patients in the DISE group (68.2%) received multi-level surgery, while in the MM group only 7 patients (28%) received multi-level surgery. Patients with more severe OSA (AHI > 22 or lowest O2 saturation < 81%) had better surgical outcomes when their surgical procedures were based on the findings of DISE, rather than those of MM. Conclusion The results indicate that DISE provides no benefits with respect to surgical outcomes for patients with mild to moderate OSA; however, for patients with more severe OSA surgical procedures based on DISE result in better outcomes.