Traumatic Brain Injury and Grief: Considerations and Practical Strategies for School Psychologists

Exploring the role of perceived vs. observed behavioral outcomes in parental grief reaction following pediatric acquired brain injury

BACKGROUND

Pediatric acquired brain injury may result in a significant gap between the "pre" and "post-injury" child.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to quantitatively explore the mechanism underlying parents' loss experience by examining the mediating role of behavioral outcomes (observed-problems and perceived-change) in the relationship between injury severity and grief.

METHOD

The study employed a cross-sectional retrospective design and comprised 40 parents of children (aged 3-18 years) with moderate-severe brain injury. Data for each parent included an adapted version of the Two-Track Bereavement Questionnaire and Socio-demographics; Data for each child included the child's Information Processing Speed Index; the Child Behavioral Checklist and Parental Perception of Behavioral Changes scale.

RESULTS

Slowed information processing speed was significantly associated with elevated ratings on both measures of behavioral outcomes and with intensified grief. Mediation analyses revealed that parental perceived behavioral change, significantly mediate the relationship between information processing speed and grief; the Child Behavioral Checklist total score also mediated the same relationship but only in 90% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings reveal the adverse impact of behavioral outcomes on grief and suggest parents' loss experience to be stemming primarily from their subjective perception over their "changed-child", rather than the observed problems. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.

Family appraisal of paediatric acquired brain injury: a social work clinical intervention trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a new intervention 'Family Forward' with 'Usual Care' social work practice in optimising family appraisal of a child's acquired brain injury to ensure better adaptation during the inpatient rehabilitation phase of care and early transition home.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Single site, prospective, sequential comparison group design.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Families were recruited on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation service based at a tertiary paediatric hospital. The 'Usual Care' group (n = 22; 29 parents) recruitment, intervention and data collection were completed first (Phase 1), followed by the 'Family Forward' group (n = 25; 43 parents) (Phase 2). Parents/caregivers completed measures: (Impact of Event Scale- Revised: IES-R; Parents Experience of Childhood Illness and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: Brief IPQ) at the time of their child's inpatient rehabilitation admission, inpatient rehabilitation discharge, and 6 weeks post-discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

There were more children with traumatic brain injuries in the Family Forward group (n = 13) than Usual Care (n = 6) and the Family Forward group had a longer hospital admission (days, M = 56.4, SD = 46.1 vs. M = 37.5, SD = 16.4, p = 0.019). No significant group differences were found for family appraisal outcomes at any of the three time-points. Both groups reported reductions in trauma and grief responses, emotional experiences and perceptions of their child's injury at post-intervention and follow-up. Both groups continued to have depleted emotional resources (PECI scale) at 6 weeks post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The study contributes important insights into family appraisal experience in the early stages following paediatric acquired brain injury. In this context, 'Family Forward' needs to incorporate interventions that support and promote ongoing family appraisal as issues related to their child's injury arise over time. Future research is needed to focus on whether the Family Forward approach does sustain family system adaptation (a key aim informing the design of the intervention) over the longer term.