Orthopedic Approach to the Early Management of Pelvic Injuries

Are Pelvic Binders an Effective Prehospital Intervention?

OBJECTIVE

Widespread adoption of prehospital pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCDs) by emergency medical services (EMS) systems has been slow and variable across the United States. We sought to determine the frequency of prehospital PCCD use by EMS providers. Secondarily, we hypothesized that prehospital PCCD use would improve early hemorrhagic shock outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 162 unstable pelvic ring injuries transported directly to our center by EMS from 2011 to 2020. Included patients received a PCCD during their resuscitation (prehospital or emergency department). Prehospital treatment details were obtained from the EMS medical record. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a PCCD by EMS before hospital arrival. Secondarily, we explored factors associated with receiving a prehospital PCCD, and its association with changes in vital signs, blood transfusion, and mortality.

RESULTS

EMS providers documented suspicion of a pelvic ring fracture in 85 (52.8%) patients and 52 patients in the cohort (32.2%) received a prehospital PCCD. Wide variation in prehospital PCCD use was observed based on patient characteristics, geographic location, and EMS provider level. Helicopter flight paramedics applied a prehospital PCCD in 46% of the patients they transported (38/83); in contrast, the EMS organizations geographically closest to our hospital applied a PCCD in ≤5% of cases (2/47). Other predictors associated with receiving a prehospital PCCD included lower body mass index (p = 0.005), longer prehospital duration (p = 0.001) and lower Injury Severity Score (p < 0.05). We were unable to identify any improvements in clinical outcomes associated with prehospital PCCD, including early vital signs, number of blood transfusions within 24 hours, or mortality during admission (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate wide practice variation in the application of prehospital PCCDs. Although disparate PCCD application across the state is likely explained by differences across EMS organizations and provider levels, our study was unable to identify any clinical benefits to the prehospital use of PCCDs. It is possible that the benefits of a prehospital PCCD can only be observed in the most displaced fracture patterns with the greatest early hemodynamic instability.

Circumferential Pelvic Antishock Sheeting

Pelvic ring fractures range from low-energy falls in the elderly to high-energy mechanisms in young patients. These injuries can be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and are frequently associated with additional injuries. Hemorrhage and resultant hemodynamic instability are often associated with high-energy injuries and require prompt management. Circumferential pelvic antishock sheeting is an effective and readily available tool for reducing pelvic volume at the accident scene or in the emergency department, while still allowing access to the abdomen and lower extremities for ongoing resuscitation. This article, and the associated instructional video, reviews the indications and proper technique for placing a pelvic sheet.

[Radiological diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures]

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Traumatic fractures of the pelvic ring are relatively rare, but are associated with increased risk of mortality. Depending on injury mechanism and main vector of energy impact, a distinction is made between anteroposterior compression, lateral compression, and vertical shear (Young and Burgess classification), while the stability-related classification according to Tile distinguishes between type A (stable), type B (rotationally unstable) and type C (completely unstable). A comprehensive modern classification is given by the AO/OTA.

RADIOLOGICAL FRACTURE DIAGNOSIS

Plain pelvis x‑rays lack sufficient sensitivity but are still used to detect highly unstable pelvic fractures. CT has superior sensitivity and specificity. In addition to fracture classification, CT allows reliable assessment of associated vascular and bladder/urethral injuries and large soft tissue hemorrhage. MRI is unparalleled in showing bone marrow edema, cauda and plexus complications, and peripelvic soft tissue damage. MRI may also prove to be a valuable diagnostic tool for pelvic ring injuries in children, adolescents and young women, provided they are hemodynamically stable. Angiography, ultrasonography and bone scintigraphy are additional important diagnostic and therapeutic options.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Knowledge of basic pelvic trauma mechanisms is important to understand the potential severity of traumatic pelvic fractures and to classify them correctly in terms of stability. Being familiar with typical concomitant injuries in pelvic ring fractures allows reliable diagnosis and their communication with the clinician. CT remains the "diagnostic workhorse". In fragile pelvic fractures, the often prolonged course with fracture progression must be taken into account, which is why MRI is of particular importance herein.

[Positioning of external pelvic stabilization devices in patients with multiple injuries : Retrospective computed tomographic evaluation]

BACKGROUND

Severe hemorrhage is a dreaded complication of pelvic fractures. It has a significant impact on early trauma-associated mortality. Hemorrhage that is secondary to pelvic fractures can be reduced by external stabilization devices. Despite the commercial availability of many different systems, they are infrequently used. The aim of this computed tomography (CT) study was to examine the use of external pelvic stabilization devices.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2015 a total of 982 images produced in CT trauma scans at a level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively examined with respect to the presence of external pelvic stabilizers. The type of device applied, its actual position including deviation from optimal position as well as pelvic parameters and complications were determined.

RESULTS

In 67 out of 982 patients (6.82%) with suspected multiple trauma, an external pelvic stabilizer was employed. In 41.8% the devices were not placed in concordance with prevailing scientific knowledge, 53.73% of devices did not comply with the manufacturer's instructions and 51.85% of systems with pneumatic cuffs caused significant malrotation. In one patient the cuff induced hypoperfusion of the leg but without further sequelae.

CONCLUSION

While the prehospital use of pelvic slings is increasing, misplacement is very common. Especially inconsistencies between manufacturers' manuals and current scientific knowledge warrant further improvement. In systems with pneumatic cuffs malrotation of the device is common and clinically relevant. Hypoperfusion of the lower extremities is possible and should be taken into account when employing these devices.