Association Between Baseline Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies and 6-Month Clinical Response Following Abatacept or TNF Inhibitor Treatment: A Real-World Analysis of Biologic-Experienced Patients with RA

Update of the guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the Mexican College of Rheumatology 2023

OBJECTIVE

To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A group of experts representative of different geographical regions and various medical services catering to the Mexican population with RA was formed. Questions based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) were developed, deemed clinically relevant. These questions were answered based on the results of a recent systematic literature review (SLR), and the evidence's validity was assessed using the GRADE system, considered a standard for these purposes. Subsequently, the expert group reached consensus on the direction and strength of recommendations through a multi-stage voting process.

RESULTS

The updated guidelines for RA treatment stratify various therapeutic options, including different classes of DMARDs (conventional, biologicals, and JAK inhibitors), as well as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and analgesics. By consensus, it establishes the use of these in different subpopulations of interest among RA patients and addresses aspects related to vaccination, COVID-19, surgery, pregnancy and lactation, and others.

CONCLUSIONS

This update of the Mexican guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of RA provides reference points for evidence-based decision-making, recommending patient participation in joint decision-making to achieve the greatest benefit for our patients. It also establishes recommendations for managing a variety of relevant conditions affecting our patients.

Comparative effectiveness of abatacept versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are ACPA and shared epitope positive

BACKGROUND

The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) is a risk factor for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in RA patients. Our objective was to examine the real-world effectiveness of abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA who were SE and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP3) positive.

METHODS

Abatacept or TNFi initiators who were SE + and anti-CCP3+ (> 20 U/mL) at or prior to treatment and had moderate or high CDAI score (> 10) at initiation were identified. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI score over six months. Analyses were conducted in propensity score (PS)-trimmed and -matched populations overall and a biologic-experienced subgroup. Mixed-effects models were used.

RESULTS

In the overall PS-trimmed (abatacept, n = 170; TNFi, n = 157) and PS-matched cohorts (abatacept, n = 111; TNFi, n = 111), there were numerically greater improvements in mean change in CDAI between abatacept and TNFi but were not statistically significant. Similar trends were seen for biologic-experienced patients, except that statistical significance was reached for mean change in CDAI in the PS-trimmed cohort (abatacept, 12.22 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 10.13 to 14.31]; TNFi, 9.28 [95%CI 7.08 to 11.48]; p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

In this real world cohort, there were numerical improvements in efficacy outcomes with abatacept over TNFi in patients with RA who were SE + and ACPA+, similar to results from a clinical trial population The only statistically significant finding after adjusting for covariates was greater improvement in CDAI with abatacept versus TNFi in the bio-experienced PS-trimmed cohort..

A Review of Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail multiple biologic therapies are deemed to have "difficult-to-treat" (D2T) RA. In 2021, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force proposed a clinical definition of D2T RA. Here we review RA phenotypes and clinical assessment of RA, propose a different definition of D2T RA, discuss possible D2T RA risk factors, and summarize existing literature on the management of D2T RA.

RECENT FINDINGS

High disease activity at the time of diagnosis or prior to treatment with a biologic is associated with the development of D2T RA. Prolonged time from diagnosis to beginning treatment has been consistently associated with the development of D2T RA. Other clinical factors such as burden of disease, extraarticular disease, obesity, smoking, pain, fatigue, and psychological conditions have inconsistent associations with D2T RA according to current literature. D2T RA is a relatively new concept that represents an area of great need for research regarding the characterization of those with the disease as well as how best to treat the disease. With this gained knowledge, rheumatologists will be able to better identify patients at the time of diagnosis that are likely to develop D2T RA to help guide management.

The Clinical Impact of Seropositivity on Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept: A Real-World Iraqi Experience

Purpose

To assess the clinical impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)’s seropositivity on treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with RA registered in Baghdad Teaching Hospital Registry from May 2012 to August 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years, meeting the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, being treated with etanercept, and followed up at ≥1 year after etanercept initiation were included; patients who received any other biologics for RA were excluded. Patients were classified as seropositive (RF- and ACPA-positive), seronegative (RF- and ACPA-negative), RF-positive, RF-negative, ACPA-positive, and ACPA-negative. The primary outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) which were measured at one year after treatment initiation.

Results

At baseline, a total of 1318 (88.3%) patients were seropositive; 1122 (75.2%) and 1054 (70.6%) patients were RF- and ACPA-positive, respectively. Baseline mean CDAI scores were significantly (P = 0.001) higher among seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients. The baseline mean DAS28 score was also significantly higher in ACPA-positive group compared with the ACPA-negative group (P = 0.021). At baseline, the number of patients who had high CDAI scores was significantly higher among the seropositive, RF-positive, and ACPA-positive groups (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). After one year of treatment with etanercept, among seropositive versus seronegative and ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative groups, there was a significant improvement in terms of the mean CDAI score (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively) and CDAI response (P = 0.011 and P = 0.048, respectively). At one year, the proportion of patients among the seropositive versus seronegative group who reached remission were 566 (42.9%) versus 78 (44.6%) and 642 (47.3%) versus 83 (47.4%), for CDAI and DAS28 response, respectively.

Conclusion

The results imply that seropositivity and ACPA-positivity may influence the treatment response in patients with RA, who were treated with etanercept.

Effects of Biological/Targeted Therapies on Bone Mineral Density in Inflammatory Arthritis

Inflammatory arthritis has been reported to be associated with the development of osteoporosis. Recent research has investigated the mechanisms of bone metabolism in chronic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Progress in both animal and clinical studies has provided a better understanding of the osteoclastogenesis-related pathways regarding the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), and Wnt signaling and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (Dkk-1). The complex interplay between inflammatory cytokines and bone destruction has been elucidated, especially that in the interleukin-17/23 (IL-17/23) axis and Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling. Moreover, advances in biological and targeted therapies have achieved essential modifications to the bone metabolism of these inflammatory arthritis types. In this narrative review, we discuss recent findings on the pathogenic effects on bone in RA and SpA. Proinflammatory cytokines, autoantibodies, and multiple signaling pathways play an essential role in bone destruction in RA and SpA patients. We also reviewed the underlying pathomechanisms of bone structure in biological and targeted therapies of RA and SpA. The clinical implications of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, Janus kinase inhibitors, and inhibitors of the IL-17/23 axis are discussed. Since these novel therapeutics provide new options for disease improvement and symptom control in patients with RA and SpA, further rigorous evidence is warranted to provide a clinical reference for physicians and patients.

Baseline Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Status and Response to Abatacept or Non-TNFi Biologic/Targeted-Synthetic DMARDs: US Observational Study of Patients with RA

INTRODUCTION

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may respond to treatments differently based on their underlying serology and biomarker status, but real-world data comparing treatment responses to abatacept versus other non-TNFi biologic or targeted-synthetic DMARDs by anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status remain limited. We assessed the association between ACPA status and response to treatment in patients with RA.

METHODS

Adults from CorEvitas' RA Registry were identified who initiated abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib, and had ACPA measured at/prior to treatment initiation and at the 6-month follow-up visit. Three cohorts were included: abatacept/rituximab (2006-2019), abatacept/tocilizumab (2010-2019), and abatacept/tofacitinib (2012-2019). Patient characteristics at initiation were compared by ACPA status (positive [+], anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 [anti-CCP2] ≥ 20 U/ml; negative [-], anti-CCP2 < 20 U/ml). Outcomes over 6 months: changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), patient global assessment (PGA) scores, and proportion of patients achieving a clinical response. Adjusted mean differences and odds ratios were estimated using mixed-effects linear regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 982 abatacept, 246 rituximab, 404 tocilizumab, and 429 tofacitinib initiators were identified. ACPA+ (vs. ACPA-) patients had longer disease duration and more erosive disease. During most time periods adjusted mean changes in CDAI, mHAQ, and PGA scores and the proportion of patients achieving a clinical response were significantly higher for ACPA+ versus ACPA- patients initiating abatacept. Adjusted mean change in PGA score and patient fatigue were significantly higher for ACPA+ versus ACPA- patients initiating rituximab. No significant differences were seen by ACPA status for patients initiating tocilizumab or tofacitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who initiated abatacept or rituximab and were ACPA+ had a greater clinical response at 6-month follow-up post index compared to patients who were ACPA- treated with the same biologic.

Initial findings from a prospective, large scale patient reported outcomes program in patients with gynecologic malignancy

INTRODUCTION

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with improved overall survival in patients with metastatic malignancy; however, routine collection of PROMs is nascent. Little is known about PROs in women with gynecologic malignancy outside of a trial setting, limiting our understanding of how routine populations experience treatment, disease and morbidity. The goal of this study was to prospectively collect and describe disease-specific PROs in a non-trial population of women with gynecologic malignancy.

METHODS

PROMs were assigned electronically to all patients presenting for care in our gynecologic oncology clinic. Patients received a general oncology questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) a disease specific questionnaire (FACT V, EORTC EN24, EORTC OV28, EORTC Cx 24), and questionnaires assessing support at home. Responses were mapped to relevant clinical variables. Descriptive statistics were performed, and comparisons made with parametric and nonparametric analyses. The association between support at home and perioperative complications was assessed via logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the study period, 3239 unique patients were evaluated at new patient visits, post-operative visits, chemotherapy visits and surveillance visits with a PROMs completion rate of 78.1% (n = 2530 women with 4402 completions). There was no difference in completion rates based on age or self-identified race. The EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire was able to adequately discern differences between disease sites. Overall, scores were lower than those obtained in trial populations. PROMs responses were not associated with perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Systematic collection of PROMs is feasible and tech-enabled workflows result in high collection rates. Quality of life scores in our clinic population were lower than published data, indicating caution should be used when extrapolating quality of life data from clinical trials to counseling and decision making around routine patient populations.

Digital Disparities: Lessons learned from a Patient Reported Outcomes Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) allows us to incorporate the patient's voice within their care in a quantifiable, validated manner. Large scale collection of PROs is facilitated by the electronic health record (EHR) and its portal, though historically patients have eschewed the portal and completed patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in clinic via tablet. Furthermore, access to and use of the portal is associated with known racial inequities. Our institution oversees the largest clinical PRO program in the world, and has a long history of racially equitable PRO completion rates via tablet. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to remove tablets from clinics and rely exclusively on portal use for PRO completion, profound racial disparities resulted immediately. Our experience quantifiably demonstrates the magnitude of inequity that the portal, in its current configuration, generates and serves as a cautionary tale to other health care systems and EHRs.