1
|
Abud-Mendoza C, Aceves-Ávila FJ, Arce-Salinas CA, Álvarez Nemegyei J, Barile-Fabris L, Durán-Barragán S, Flores-Alvarado DE, Hernández-Núñez E, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Moctezuma-Ríos JF, Pascual-Ramos V, Portela-Hernández M, Silveira LH, Andrade-Ortega L, Barrera-Vargas A, Carrillo-Vázquez S, Castro-Colin Z, Cuevas-Orta E, Flores-Suárez LF, Guaracha-Basáñez GA, Hernández-Cabrera MF, de Jesús Hernández-Galarza I, Herrera-vanOostdam DA, Lobato-Belmonte AC, Martínez-Martínez LA, Martínez-Martínez MU, Medrano-Ramírez G, Merayo-Chalico FJ, Meza-López Y Olguín G, Olan F, Peña-Santos G, Ramos-Remus C, Reyes-Cordero G, Rivera-Terán V, Rojas-Serrano J, Serna-Peña G, Sicsik-Ayala S, Sifuentes-Cantú CA, Vega-Morales D, Villaseñor-Ovies P, Xibillé-Friedmann D, Pacheco-Tena C. Update of the guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the Mexican College of Rheumatology 2023. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA 2024; 20:263-280. [PMID: 38796394 DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A group of experts representative of different geographical regions and various medical services catering to the Mexican population with RA was formed. Questions based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) were developed, deemed clinically relevant. These questions were answered based on the results of a recent systematic literature review (SLR), and the evidence's validity was assessed using the GRADE system, considered a standard for these purposes. Subsequently, the expert group reached consensus on the direction and strength of recommendations through a multi-stage voting process. RESULTS The updated guidelines for RA treatment stratify various therapeutic options, including different classes of DMARDs (conventional, biologicals, and JAK inhibitors), as well as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and analgesics. By consensus, it establishes the use of these in different subpopulations of interest among RA patients and addresses aspects related to vaccination, COVID-19, surgery, pregnancy and lactation, and others. CONCLUSIONS This update of the Mexican guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of RA provides reference points for evidence-based decision-making, recommending patient participation in joint decision-making to achieve the greatest benefit for our patients. It also establishes recommendations for managing a variety of relevant conditions affecting our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Abud-Mendoza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Sergio Durán-Barragán
- Departamento de Clínicas Médicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Virginia Pascual-Ramos
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Margarita Portela-Hernández
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Humberto Silveira
- Departamento de Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lilia Andrade-Ortega
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico; Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital CMN 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ana Barrera-Vargas
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sandra Carrillo-Vázquez
- Hospital Regional 1.◦ de Octubre, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Zully Castro-Colin
- Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional La Raza «Antonio Fraga Mouret», IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Enrique Cuevas-Orta
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | - Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
- Clínica de Vasculitis Sistémicas Primarias, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Iván de Jesús Hernández-Galarza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - David Alejandro Herrera-vanOostdam
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier Merayo-Chalico
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Francisco Olan
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
| | | | - César Ramos-Remus
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, S.C. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Greta Reyes-Cordero
- Hospital Angeles Chihuahua, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
| | - Vijaya Rivera-Terán
- Registro Mexicano de Acotamientos Adversos de Terapias Biológicas en Enfermedades Reumatológicas (Biobadamex), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Griselda Serna-Peña
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Sandra Sicsik-Ayala
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
| | | | - David Vega-Morales
- Reumatología y Centro de Infusión, Hospital General de Zona No. 17, IMSS, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Pablo Villaseñor-Ovies
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
| | | | - César Pacheco-Tena
- Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrold LR, Wittstock K, Kelly S, Han X, Zhuo J, Schrader A, Middaugh N, Moore PC, Khaychuk V. Comparative effectiveness of abatacept versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are ACPA and shared epitope positive. Adv Rheumatol 2024; 64:10. [PMID: 38243281 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-024-00352-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) is a risk factor for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in RA patients. Our objective was to examine the real-world effectiveness of abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA who were SE and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP3) positive. METHODS Abatacept or TNFi initiators who were SE + and anti-CCP3+ (> 20 U/mL) at or prior to treatment and had moderate or high CDAI score (> 10) at initiation were identified. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI score over six months. Analyses were conducted in propensity score (PS)-trimmed and -matched populations overall and a biologic-experienced subgroup. Mixed-effects models were used. RESULTS In the overall PS-trimmed (abatacept, n = 170; TNFi, n = 157) and PS-matched cohorts (abatacept, n = 111; TNFi, n = 111), there were numerically greater improvements in mean change in CDAI between abatacept and TNFi but were not statistically significant. Similar trends were seen for biologic-experienced patients, except that statistical significance was reached for mean change in CDAI in the PS-trimmed cohort (abatacept, 12.22 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 10.13 to 14.31]; TNFi, 9.28 [95%CI 7.08 to 11.48]; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION In this real world cohort, there were numerical improvements in efficacy outcomes with abatacept over TNFi in patients with RA who were SE + and ACPA+, similar to results from a clinical trial population The only statistically significant finding after adjusting for covariates was greater improvement in CDAI with abatacept versus TNFi in the bio-experienced PS-trimmed cohort..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R Harrold
- CorEvitas, LLC, 350 5th Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | | | | | - Xue Han
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Joe Zhuo
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Schrader
- CorEvitas, LLC, 350 5th Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA
| | | | - Page C Moore
- CorEvitas, LLC, 350 5th Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Conran C, Kolfenbach J, Kuhn K, Striebich C, Moreland L. A Review of Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2023; 25:285-294. [PMID: 37776482 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-023-01117-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail multiple biologic therapies are deemed to have "difficult-to-treat" (D2T) RA. In 2021, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force proposed a clinical definition of D2T RA. Here we review RA phenotypes and clinical assessment of RA, propose a different definition of D2T RA, discuss possible D2T RA risk factors, and summarize existing literature on the management of D2T RA. RECENT FINDINGS High disease activity at the time of diagnosis or prior to treatment with a biologic is associated with the development of D2T RA. Prolonged time from diagnosis to beginning treatment has been consistently associated with the development of D2T RA. Other clinical factors such as burden of disease, extraarticular disease, obesity, smoking, pain, fatigue, and psychological conditions have inconsistent associations with D2T RA according to current literature. D2T RA is a relatively new concept that represents an area of great need for research regarding the characterization of those with the disease as well as how best to treat the disease. With this gained knowledge, rheumatologists will be able to better identify patients at the time of diagnosis that are likely to develop D2T RA to help guide management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Conran
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Jason Kolfenbach
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Kristine Kuhn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Christopher Striebich
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Larry Moreland
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ridha A, Hussein S, AlJabban A, Gunay LM, Gorial FI, Al Ani NA. The Clinical Impact of Seropositivity on Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept: A Real-World Iraqi Experience. Open Access Rheumatol 2022; 14:113-121. [PMID: 35756976 PMCID: PMC9215842 DOI: 10.2147/oarrr.s368190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the clinical impact of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)’s seropositivity on treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept. Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with RA registered in Baghdad Teaching Hospital Registry from May 2012 to August 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years, meeting the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA, being treated with etanercept, and followed up at ≥1 year after etanercept initiation were included; patients who received any other biologics for RA were excluded. Patients were classified as seropositive (RF- and ACPA-positive), seronegative (RF- and ACPA-negative), RF-positive, RF-negative, ACPA-positive, and ACPA-negative. The primary outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) which were measured at one year after treatment initiation. Results At baseline, a total of 1318 (88.3%) patients were seropositive; 1122 (75.2%) and 1054 (70.6%) patients were RF- and ACPA-positive, respectively. Baseline mean CDAI scores were significantly (P = 0.001) higher among seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients. The baseline mean DAS28 score was also significantly higher in ACPA-positive group compared with the ACPA-negative group (P = 0.021). At baseline, the number of patients who had high CDAI scores was significantly higher among the seropositive, RF-positive, and ACPA-positive groups (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). After one year of treatment with etanercept, among seropositive versus seronegative and ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative groups, there was a significant improvement in terms of the mean CDAI score (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively) and CDAI response (P = 0.011 and P = 0.048, respectively). At one year, the proportion of patients among the seropositive versus seronegative group who reached remission were 566 (42.9%) versus 78 (44.6%) and 642 (47.3%) versus 83 (47.4%), for CDAI and DAS28 response, respectively. Conclusion The results imply that seropositivity and ACPA-positivity may influence the treatment response in patients with RA, who were treated with etanercept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asal Ridha
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Saba Hussein
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Al-Kindy Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
| | | | - Levent Mert Gunay
- Emerging Markets Medical Affairs Department, Pfizer Turkiye, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Faiq I Gorial
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Nizar Abdulateef Al Ani
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Effects of Biological/Targeted Therapies on Bone Mineral Density in Inflammatory Arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23084111. [PMID: 35456929 PMCID: PMC9029148 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory arthritis has been reported to be associated with the development of osteoporosis. Recent research has investigated the mechanisms of bone metabolism in chronic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Progress in both animal and clinical studies has provided a better understanding of the osteoclastogenesis-related pathways regarding the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), and Wnt signaling and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (Dkk-1). The complex interplay between inflammatory cytokines and bone destruction has been elucidated, especially that in the interleukin-17/23 (IL-17/23) axis and Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling. Moreover, advances in biological and targeted therapies have achieved essential modifications to the bone metabolism of these inflammatory arthritis types. In this narrative review, we discuss recent findings on the pathogenic effects on bone in RA and SpA. Proinflammatory cytokines, autoantibodies, and multiple signaling pathways play an essential role in bone destruction in RA and SpA patients. We also reviewed the underlying pathomechanisms of bone structure in biological and targeted therapies of RA and SpA. The clinical implications of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, Janus kinase inhibitors, and inhibitors of the IL-17/23 axis are discussed. Since these novel therapeutics provide new options for disease improvement and symptom control in patients with RA and SpA, further rigorous evidence is warranted to provide a clinical reference for physicians and patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Harrold LR, Connolly SE, Wittstock K, Zhuo J, Kelly S, Lehman T, Shan Y, Rebello S, Guo L, Khaychuk V. Baseline Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Status and Response to Abatacept or Non-TNFi Biologic/Targeted-Synthetic DMARDs: US Observational Study of Patients with RA. Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9:465-480. [PMID: 34940957 PMCID: PMC8964884 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may respond to treatments differently based on their underlying serology and biomarker status, but real-world data comparing treatment responses to abatacept versus other non-TNFi biologic or targeted-synthetic DMARDs by anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status remain limited. We assessed the association between ACPA status and response to treatment in patients with RA. METHODS Adults from CorEvitas' RA Registry were identified who initiated abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib, and had ACPA measured at/prior to treatment initiation and at the 6-month follow-up visit. Three cohorts were included: abatacept/rituximab (2006-2019), abatacept/tocilizumab (2010-2019), and abatacept/tofacitinib (2012-2019). Patient characteristics at initiation were compared by ACPA status (positive [+], anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 [anti-CCP2] ≥ 20 U/ml; negative [-], anti-CCP2 < 20 U/ml). Outcomes over 6 months: changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), patient global assessment (PGA) scores, and proportion of patients achieving a clinical response. Adjusted mean differences and odds ratios were estimated using mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS Overall, 982 abatacept, 246 rituximab, 404 tocilizumab, and 429 tofacitinib initiators were identified. ACPA+ (vs. ACPA-) patients had longer disease duration and more erosive disease. During most time periods adjusted mean changes in CDAI, mHAQ, and PGA scores and the proportion of patients achieving a clinical response were significantly higher for ACPA+ versus ACPA- patients initiating abatacept. Adjusted mean change in PGA score and patient fatigue were significantly higher for ACPA+ versus ACPA- patients initiating rituximab. No significant differences were seen by ACPA status for patients initiating tocilizumab or tofacitinib. CONCLUSIONS Patients who initiated abatacept or rituximab and were ACPA+ had a greater clinical response at 6-month follow-up post index compared to patients who were ACPA- treated with the same biologic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R Harrold
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | | | | | - Joe Zhuo
- Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Ying Shan
- Department of Biostatistics, CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | - Lin Guo
- Department of Biostatistics, CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Vadim Khaychuk
- US Medical Immunology and Fibrosis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sisodia RC, Alimena S, Ferris W, Saini A, Philp L, Sullivan M, Dorney K, Bregar A, Eisenhauer E, Goodman A, Growdon W, Hubbell H, Del Carmen M. Initial findings from a prospective, large scale patient reported outcomes program in patients with gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:113-119. [PMID: 34763938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with improved overall survival in patients with metastatic malignancy; however, routine collection of PROMs is nascent. Little is known about PROs in women with gynecologic malignancy outside of a trial setting, limiting our understanding of how routine populations experience treatment, disease and morbidity. The goal of this study was to prospectively collect and describe disease-specific PROs in a non-trial population of women with gynecologic malignancy. METHODS PROMs were assigned electronically to all patients presenting for care in our gynecologic oncology clinic. Patients received a general oncology questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) a disease specific questionnaire (FACT V, EORTC EN24, EORTC OV28, EORTC Cx 24), and questionnaires assessing support at home. Responses were mapped to relevant clinical variables. Descriptive statistics were performed, and comparisons made with parametric and nonparametric analyses. The association between support at home and perioperative complications was assessed via logistic regression. RESULTS In the study period, 3239 unique patients were evaluated at new patient visits, post-operative visits, chemotherapy visits and surveillance visits with a PROMs completion rate of 78.1% (n = 2530 women with 4402 completions). There was no difference in completion rates based on age or self-identified race. The EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire was able to adequately discern differences between disease sites. Overall, scores were lower than those obtained in trial populations. PROMs responses were not associated with perioperative complications. CONCLUSION Systematic collection of PROMs is feasible and tech-enabled workflows result in high collection rates. Quality of life scores in our clinic population were lower than published data, indicating caution should be used when extrapolating quality of life data from clinical trials to counseling and decision making around routine patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Stephanie Alimena
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Winslow Ferris
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | - Lauren Philp
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mackenzie Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Katelyn Dorney
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Amy Bregar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Eric Eisenhauer
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Whitfield Growdon
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Harrison Hubbell
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| | - Marcela Del Carmen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard T.H.Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sisodia RC, Rodriguez JA, Sequist TD. Digital Disparities: Lessons learned from a Patient Reported Outcomes Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2265-2268. [PMID: 34244760 PMCID: PMC8344913 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) allows us to incorporate the patient's voice within their care in a quantifiable, validated manner. Large scale collection of PROs is facilitated by the electronic health record (EHR) and its portal, though historically patients have eschewed the portal and completed patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in clinic via tablet. Furthermore, access to and use of the portal is associated with known racial inequities. Our institution oversees the largest clinical PRO program in the world, and has a long history of racially equitable PRO completion rates via tablet. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to remove tablets from clinics and rely exclusively on portal use for PRO completion, profound racial disparities resulted immediately. Our experience quantifiably demonstrates the magnitude of inequity that the portal, in its current configuration, generates and serves as a cautionary tale to other health care systems and EHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Boston MA, 02114.,Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145
| | | | - Thomas D Sequist
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115
| |
Collapse
|