Sequential Tocilizumab and Tofacitinib Treatment for Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a Case Report

Tofacitinib for the treatment of severe rare skin diseases: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitis represent a group of severe rare skin diseases. While glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents serve as standard treatments for these diseases, their efficacy is limited due to adverse side effects, indicating the need for alternative approaches. Biologics have been used in the management of some rare skin diseases. However, the use of biologics is associated with concerns, such as infection risk and high costs, prompting the quest for efficacious and cost-effective alternatives. This study discusses the safety issues associated with tofacitinib and its potential in treating rare skin diseases.

METHODS

This narrative review focuses on the pharmacodynamic properties of tofacitinib and its impact on the JAK/STAT pathway. In addition, we present a comprehensive discussion of the effects and mechanism of action of tofacitinib for each severe rare skin disease.

RESULTS

This role of tofacitinib in treating severe rare skin diseases has been discussed, shedding light on its promising prospects as a treatment modality. Few reports of serious adverse events are available in patients treated with tofacitinib.

CONCLUSION

We explored the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety considerations of tofacitinib and found that it can be used as a treatment option for rare skin diseases. However, multicenter clinical studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors.

JAK inhibitors in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is characterized by excessive and inappropriate production of proinflammatory cytokines. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) can block the downstream pathway of many cytokines. The use of JAKi in SJIA or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) has only been described in a limited number of case reports. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and potential adverse effects of JAKi in SJIA patients.

Methods

Patients with SJIA who received JAKi and underwent at least one assessment of efficacy and safety after JAKi initiation were eligible for this study. Data were collected retrospectively from inpatient or outpatient medical records at JAKi initiation, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, after disease flare, after JAKi discontinuation, or at the last follow-up.

Results

Ten patients with SJIA were included in the study. At the start of JAKi treatment, all patients presented with active disease; five showed variable adverse effects secondary to glucocorticoids. Seven patients received tofacitinib (one later switched to ruxolitinib). Of these, only two patients showed a complete response of persistent arthritis associated with tocilizumab; tofacitinib was used without a biological DMARD only in two patients, together with MTX, showing a partial response; three patients were nonresponders. Four patients with SJIA-related MAS or persistent hyperferritinemia were treated with ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib allowed a good response on MAS parameters in three of them. All these four patients required an adjunction or switch to canakinumab later. The median decrease in the daily glucocorticoid dose between JAKi initiation and the last follow-up was 90.6% in patients with complete remission and 77.4% in other patients. Three patients discontinued glucocorticoid treatment after the introduction of JAKi. Severe adverse events, notably serious infection or thrombosis, were not observed during JAKi treatment.

Conclusion

JAKi may be an alternative or adjuvant agent for SJIA patients, especially in those with persistently active disease, glucocorticoid-related adverse reactions, or SJIA-MAS.