Evaluation of Osseointegration in Titanium and Zirconia-Based Dental Implants with Surface Modification in a Miniature Pig Model

Surface modification of zirconia ceramics through cold plasma treatment and the graft polymerization of biomolecules

Background/purpose

Although zirconia ceramics were highly versatile as dental implants, their long-term presence in the human body may slow down healing and impede cell growth in the past. To enhance the cytocompatibility of zirconia ceramics, surface activation modification was used to immobilize biopolymers such that a biomimetic environment was created.

Materials and methods

Hexamethyldisilazane thin films were deposited onto the surface of inorganic zirconia through cold plasma treatment under various power and deposition time settings to form an organosilane interface layer. Next, oxygen plasma treatment was performed to activate the free radicals on the surface. Subsequently, ultraviolet light was employed to graft and polymerize acrylic acid for generating carboxyl groups on the surface. This was followed by a condensation reaction with biopolymers (chitosan, chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid, and gelatin).

Results

Under a 20-min deposition time at 40 W and 150 mTorr, the thin films had a maximum graft density of 2.1 mg/cm². MG-63 cells (human osteosarcoma cells) were employed to evaluate cell compatibility. Chitosan and chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid promoted the compatibility of MG-63 cells (a human osteosarcoma cell line) with zirconia ceramics, whereas gelatin reduced this compatibility.

Conclusion

The findings confirm that cold plasma treatment and graft polymerization can promote the immobilization of biomolecules and improve the biocompatibility of zirconia ceramics. This approach can be applied to the modification of zirconia ceramic implants.

FEATURES OF BONE REMODELING AROUND SURFACE-MODIFIED TITANIUM AND TANTALUM IMPLANTS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To study the osseointegrative properties of titanium and tantalum implants with different surface structures in animal experiments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The histological and morphometric study was carried out on 60 male white rats after titanium implants with different surface structures made by 3D printed technology were inserted in the distal femur bone: presented by the multilayered layers of interlacing pores of 300 microns (series 1); rough (> 2 microns) (series 2); and tantalum implants with 300 microns pores and 80% porosity (series 3) as control material.

RESULTS

Results: On the 30 days we found statistically significant differences in the bone-implant contact rate between the 2nd experiment series (44.77 ± 1.86)% and 1st (59.91 ± 2.86)% (p=0.000047) and 3rd (53.89 ± 2.11)% (р=0.000065), on the 90 days between the 2nd experiment series (51.26 ± 2.7)% and 1st (66.84 ± 2.63)% (p=0.000187) and 3rd (70.35 ± 4.32)% (p=0.000349). There was a difference between the indices of the bone-implant volume at day 90 between the 1st (48.43 ± 2.2)% and 2nd (36.88 ± 2.56)% series (p=0.000919), between the 2nd and 3rd series (51.2 ± 3.06)% (p=0.000107). There were no significant differences between the studied indices in the 1st and 3rd series of the experiment.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Titanium implants with multilayered interlaced pore layers of 300 microns and tantalum with 300 microns pore size and 80% porosity may be promising. Rough-surface titanium also has osseointegrative qualities, but they are lower compared to other materials.

The minipig intraoral dental implant model: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this report was to provide a review of the minipig intraoral dental implant model including a meta-analysis to estimate osseointegration and crestal bone remodeling.

METHODS

A systematic review including PubMed and EMBASE databases through June 2021 was conducted. Two independent examiners screened titles/abstracts and selected full-text articles. Studies evaluating titanium dental implant osseointegration in native alveolar bone were included. A quality assessment of reporting was performed. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were produced for bone-implant contact (BIC), first BIC, and crestal bone level.

RESULTS

125 out of 249 full-text articles were reviewed, 55 original studies were included. Quality of reporting was generally low, omissions included animal characteristics, examiner masking/calibration, and sample size calculation. The typical minipig model protocol included surgical extraction of the mandibular premolars and first molar, 12±4 wks post-extraction healing, placement of three narrow regular length dental implants per jaw quadrant, submerged implant healing and 8 wks of osseointegration. Approximately 90% of studies reported undecalcified incandescent light microscopy histometrics. Overall, mean BIC was 59.88% (95%CI: 57.43-62.33). BIC increased significantly over time (p<0.001): 40.93 (95%CI: 34.95-46.90) at 2 wks, 58.37% (95%CI: 54.38-62.36) at 4 wks, and 66.33% (95%CI: 63.45-69.21) beyond 4 wks. Variability among studies was mainly explained by differences in observation interval post-extraction and post-implant placement, and implant surface. Heterogeneity was high for all studies (I2 > 90%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The minipig intraoral dental implant model appears to effectively demonstrate osseointegration and alveolar bone remodeling similar to that observed in humans and canine models.