Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behavior of Collar and Collarless Stems: Experimental Testing and Finite Element Modelling

Debulking of the Femoral Stem in a Primary Total Hip Joint Replacement: A Novel Method to Reduce Stress Shielding

In current-generation designs of total primary hip joint replacement, the prostheses are fabricated from alloys. The modulus of elasticity of the alloy is substantially higher than that of the surrounding bone. This discrepancy plays a role in a phenomenon known as stress shielding, in which the bone bears a reduced proportion of the applied load. Stress shielding has been implicated in aseptic loosening of the implant which, in turn, results in reduction in the in vivo life of the implant. Rigid implants shield surrounding bone from mechanical loading, and the reduction in skeletal stress necessary to maintain bone mass and density results in accelerated bone loss, the forerunner to implant loosening. Femoral stems of various geometries and surface modifications, materials and material distributions, and porous structures have been investigated to achieve mechanical properties of stems closer to those of bone to mitigate stress shielding. For improved load transfer from implant to femur, the proposed study investigated a strategic debulking effort to impart controlled flexibility while retaining sufficient strength and endurance properties. Using an iterative design process, debulked configurations based on an internal skeletal truss framework were evaluated using finite element analysis. The implant models analyzed were solid; hollow, with a proximal hollowed stem; FB-2A, with thin, curved trusses extending from the central spine; and FB-3B and FB-3C, with thick, flat trusses extending from the central spine in a balanced-truss and a hemi-truss configuration, respectively. As outlined in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7206 standards, implants were offset in natural femur for evaluation of load distribution or potted in testing cylinders for fatigue testing. The commonality across all debulked designs was the minimization of proximal stress shielding compared to conventional solid implants. Stem topography can influence performance, and the truss implants with or without the calcar collar were evaluated. Load sharing was equally effective irrespective of the collar; however, the collar was critical to reducing the stresses in the implant. Whether bonded directly to bone or cemented in the femur, the truss stem was effective at limiting stress shielding. However, a localized increase in maximum principal stress at the proximal lateral junction could adversely affect cement integrity. The controlled accommodation of deformation of the implant wall contributes to the load sharing capability of the truss implant, and for a superior biomechanical performance, the collared stem should be implanted in interference fit. Considering the results of all implant designs, the truss implant model FB-3C was the best model.

The assessment of implant shape-dependent failure mechanisms in primary total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis

The three mechanisms known to be responsible for the failure of uncemented femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the stress shielding, excessive bone-implant interface stress, and excessive initial micromotion. Since implant designers usually have to sacrifice two mechanisms to improve the other one, the aim of this study was to assess which of them plays a more important role in the failure of uncemented stems. Two hip implant stems which are widely used in the primary THA and their mid-term clinical outcomes are available, were selected. Then, the amount of the three failure mechanisms created by each stem during the normal walking gait cycle was determined for a 70 kg female patient using the finite element method. The results indicated that the stem with better clinical outcome induced an average of 36.6% less stress shielding in the proximal regions of femur bone compared with the other stem. However, the maximum bone-implant interface stress and maximum initial micromotion were, respectively, 30 and 155% higher for the stem with better clinical outcomes. It was therefore concluded that the stress shielding has a more significant impact on the mid-term life of uncemented stems. However, care must be taken to ensure that the other two failure mechanisms do not exceed a certain threshold. It was also observed that the thinner and shorter stem created a smaller amount of stress shielding in the femur bone. The outcomes of this study can be used to design new hip implant stems that can potentially last longer.

Using Finite Element Modeling in Bone Mechanoadaptation

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Bone adapts structure and material properties in response to its mechanical environment, a process called mechanoadpatation. For the past 50 years, finite element modeling has been used to investigate the relationships between bone geometry, material properties, and mechanical loading conditions. This review examines how we use finite element modeling in the context of bone mechanoadpatation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Finite element models estimate complex mechanical stimuli at the tissue and cellular levels, help explain experimental results, and inform the design of loading protocols and prosthetics. FE modeling is a powerful tool to study bone adaptation as it complements experimental approaches. Before using FE models, researchers should determine whether simulation results will provide complementary information to experimental or clinical observations and should establish the level of complexity required. As imaging technics and computational capacity continue increasing, we expect FE models to help in designing treatments of bone pathologies that take advantage of mechanoadaptation of bone.