1
|
Meng W, Xiong R, Zhao Z, Zeng H, Chen Y. Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate: a noticeable risk factor for inhaler concordance in patients with chronic airway diseases. BMJ Open Respir Res 2024; 11:e001981. [PMID: 38642917 PMCID: PMC11033634 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inhaler concordance and the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) are important determinants of treatment effects in patients with chronic airway diseases. Adequate PIFR is required for driving aerosol medication into the lower respiratory tract. However, the relationship between them has not been discussed previously. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of inhaler concordance and PIFR in Chinese patients with chronic airway diseases and discuss the associated variables and the relationship between them. METHODS In this single-centre, observational study, a total of 680 patients with chronic airway diseases were enrolled from July 2021 to April 2023. We collected data on the socio-demographic and clinical variables of inhaler concordance using the test of adherence to inhalers (TAI) and PIFR. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine variables related to inhaler concordance and PIFR. RESULTS A total of 49.4% of patients had low concordance. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were more concordant than patients with asthma (mean TAI score: 43.60 vs 41.20; p<0.01), while there was no difference in concordance between the asthma-COPD overlap group and the asthma or COPD group. Suboptimal PIFR (adjusted OR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.51) increased the risk of poor concordance among all patients, while triple therapy (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.86) reduced the risk. A total of 54.9% of patients had suboptimal PIFR. Older age, lower educational level, use of dry powder inhalers and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted were significantly correlated with insufficient PIFR. Subgroup analysis revealed a greater proportion of patients with insufficient PIFR during exacerbation than during the stable phase (61.7% vs 43.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Inhaler concordance was low, and suboptimal PIFR was a risk factor for poor concordance among Chinese patients with chronic airway diseases. In addition, current inhalation devices may not be suitable, and PIFR reassessment should be considered for patients with COPD during exacerbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The study was registered in chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052527) on 31 October 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Meng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ruoyan Xiong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhiqi Zhao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Huihui Zeng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dijk L, Kerkhof M, Driessen M, Gerritsma YH, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Correia-de-Sousa J, Dekhuijzen PNR, Leving M, Price DB, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Kerstjens HAM, Kocks JWH. Does mixing inhaler devices lead to unchecked inhaler technique errors in patients with COPD? Findings from the cross-sectional observational MISMATCH study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:e001821. [PMID: 38135462 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be prescribed multiple inhalers that require different techniques for optimal performance. Mixing devices has been associated with poorer COPD outcomes suggesting that it leads to inappropriate inhaler technique. However, empirical evidence is lacking. AIMS Compare the nature and frequency of dry powder inhaler (DPI) technique errors in patients with COPD using (1) a single DPI or (2) mixed-devices (a DPI and pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI)). METHODS Data from the PIFotal study-a cross-sectional study on Peak Inspiratory Flow in patients with COPD using a DPI as maintenance therapy, capturing data from 1434 patients on demographic characteristics, COPD health status and inhaler technique-were used to select 291 patients using mixed-devices. Frequency matching based on country of residence and DPI device type was used to select 291 patients using a DPI-only for comparison. Predetermined checklists were used for the evaluation of DPI video recordings and complemented with additional errors that were observed in ≥10%. Error proportions were calculated for the (1) individual and total number of errors, (2) number of critical errors and (3) number of pMDI-related errors. RESULTS The study sample contained 582 patients (mean (SD) age 69.6 (9.4) years, 47.1% female). DPI technique errors were common, but not significantly different between the groups. The majority of patients made at least one critical error (DPI-only: 90.7% vs mixed-devices: 92.8%). Proportions of total, 'pMDI-related' and critical errors did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION The nature and frequency of inhaler technique errors did not substantially differ between patients prescribed with a single DPI and mixed-devices. Currently, 'pMDI-related errors' in DPI use are not accounted for in existing checklists. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ENCEPP/EUPAS48776.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Kerkhof
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Merijn Driessen
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yoran H Gerritsma
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jaime Correia-de-Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | | | - Marika Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David B Price
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethimno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lavorini F, Usmani OS, Salvi S, Rote K, Gaur V, Gogtay J. A narrative review on the Synchrobreathe™: A novel breath-actuated pressurised metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases. Respir Med 2023; 219:107435. [PMID: 38652077 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), are widely used to deliver drugs for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Incorrect use of inhalers is one of the main obstacles to achieving better clinical control. Indeed, with pMDIs, patients fail to synchronise actuation with inhalation due to a lack of coordination and with DPIs insufficient inspiratory effort compromises drug deposition in lungs. More than 50% of patients desire to switch their pMDIs and DPIs for a better device. This led to the development of pressurised breath-actuated inhalers (BAIs) with the aim of combining the beneficial features of pMDIs and DPIs and mitigating their problems. BAIs, e.g., Synchrobreathe™, are designed such that they are activated by a low inhalation effort and mechanically actuate the dose in synchrony to inspiration, thereby resolving the need to coordinate actuation with inspiration. BAIs have advantages, including ease of use, high lung deposition of medication, and greater patient preference. We discussed the design features, operating procedure, and clinical evidence of the Synchrobreathe™ device (Cipla Ltd, India), a BAI available with a wide range of drug combinations. Studies have shown that a higher number of patients (68.19%) used the Synchrobreathe™ without any error than the pMDI (56.21%), and that the vast majority of them (92%) found it easy to understand and use. The Synchrobreathe™ is an innovative, easy-to-use inhaler that may overcome many limitations associated with pMDIs and DPIs, thus potentially improving management of obstructive airway diseases and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Omar S Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK
| | - Sundeep Salvi
- Pulmocare Research and Education (PURE) Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Faculty of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kiran Rote
- Integrated Product Development, Cipla Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vaibhav Gaur
- Global Medical Affairs, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Jaideep Gogtay
- Global Medical Affairs, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kocks J, Bosnic-Anticevich S, van Cooten J, Correia de Sousa J, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, Garcia Pardo M, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van der Ham I, Janse Y, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price D, Roman Rodriguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Voorham J, Leving MT. Identifying critical inhalation technique errors in Dry Powder Inhaler use in patients with COPD based on the association with health status and exacerbations: findings from the multi-country cross-sectional observational PIFotal study. BMC Pulm Med 2023; 23:302. [PMID: 37592263 PMCID: PMC10433653 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02566-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correct inhaler use depends on a complex interplay of factors, including device preparation and generating sufficient inspiratory flow. It is currently unknown which inhalation technique errors can be considered critical in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients on Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between inhalation technique errors and health status or exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, the association between the number of errors and COPD outcomes was determined. METHODS The PIFotal study is a cross-sectional multi-country observational study in a primary care setting, including 1434 COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years (50.1% female; mean age 69.2 yrs) using a DPI for their maintenance therapy. Inhalation technique was video recorded and scored by two independent researchers using inhaler-specific checklists. Health status was assessed with two questionnaires; the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). The number of moderate and severe exacerbations in the past 12 months was recorded. Critical errors were identified based on their association with health status or exacerbations through multi-level prediction models adjusted for identified confounding. RESULTS Errors in inhalation technique steps 'Breathe in', 'Hold breath', and 'Breathe out calmly after inhalation' were significantly associated with poorer CCQ and CAT outcomes and thus deemed critical. None of the errors were significantly associated with moderate exacerbations. Patients with errors 'Preparation', 'Hold inhaler in correct position during inhalation', and 'Breathe in' had significantly more severe exacerbations, and therefore these errors were also deemed critical. 81.3% of patients with COPD made at least one critical error. Specific combinations of errors were associated with worse outcomes. The more inhalation technique errors identified, the poorer the health status and the higher the exacerbation rate. CONCLUSION In this study, we identified multiple critical inhalation technique errors in COPD patients using DPIs each associated with poorer outcomes. Explorative analysis revealed that specific combinations of errors may be of clinical relevance, especially those related to the inhalation manoeuvre. COPD outcomes worsened with increasing error count. These results warrant further prospective longitudinal studies to establish the effect of correcting these errors on COPD control. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 (31/08/2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janwillem Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Garcia Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim Am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Iris van der Ham
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ymke Janse
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miguel Roman Rodriguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jaco Voorham
- Data to Insights Research Solutions, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marika T Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leving MT, Bosnic-Anticevich S, van Cooten J, de Sousa JC, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, Pardo MG, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van der Ham I, Janse Y, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price D, Roman-Rodriguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Emerson-Stadler R, Kocks JWH. Clinical recommendations for dry powder inhaler use in the management of COPD in primary care. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:59. [PMID: 36575175 PMCID: PMC9794707 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely - measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in' and 'breathing out calmly after inhalation'. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika T. Leving
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ,grid.410692.80000 0001 2105 7653Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- grid.10328.380000 0001 2159 175XLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Dekhuijzen
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lars Dijk
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Garcia Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- grid.420061.10000 0001 2171 7500Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- grid.411728.90000 0001 2198 0923Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Iris van der Ham
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ymke Janse
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- grid.24704.350000 0004 1759 9494Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- grid.500407.6Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.7107.10000 0004 1936 7291Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodriguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- grid.8127.c0000 0004 0576 3437Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Emerson-Stadler
- grid.420061.10000 0001 2171 7500Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Janwillem W. H. Kocks
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands ,grid.500407.6Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Dept. of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leving MT, van Boven JFM, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, van Cooten J, Correia de Sousa J, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, García Pardo M, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van der Ham I, Hartgers-Gubbels ES, Janse Y, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price DB, Roman-Rodríguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani OS, Kocks JH. Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow and Critical Inhalation Errors are Associated with Higher COPD-Related Healthcare Costs. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2401-2415. [PMID: 36185173 PMCID: PMC9521797 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s380736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the relationship between suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (sPIF), inhalation technique errors, and non-adherence, with Healthcare Resource Utilisation (HCRU) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients receiving maintenance therapy via a Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI). Patients and methods The cross-sectional, multi-country PIFotal study included 1434 COPD patients (≥40 years) using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured with the In-Check DIAL G16, and sPIF was defined as a typical PIF lower than required for the device. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings and grouped into 10 steps. Patients completed the “Test of Adherence to Inhalers” questionnaire. HCRU was operationalised as COPD-related costs for primary healthcare, secondary healthcare, medication, and total COPD-related costs in a 1-year period. Results Participants with sPIF had higher medication costs compared with those with optimal PIF (cost ratio [CR]: 1.07, 95% CI [1.01, 1.14]). Multiple inhalation technique errors were associated with increased HCRU. Specifically, “insufficient inspiratory effort” with higher secondary healthcare costs (CR: 2.20, 95% CI [1.37, 3.54]) and higher total COPD-related costs (CR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.31). “no breath-hold following the inhalation manoeuvre (<6 s)” with higher medication costs (CR: 1.08, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15]) and total COPD-related costs (CR 1.17, 95% CI [1.07, 1.28]), and “not breathing out calmly after inhalation” with higher medication costs (CR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.04, 1.37]). Non-adherence was not significantly associated with HCRU. Conclusion sPIF and inhalation technique errors were associated with higher COPD-related healthcare utilisation and costs in COPD patients on DPI maintenance therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika T Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Centre of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Z Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marina García Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Iris van der Ham
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ymke Janse
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David B Price
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodríguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar S Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janwillem H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Janwillem H Kocks, General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, Groningen, 9713 GH, the Netherlands, Tel +31 50 211 3898, Email
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gille T, Sivapalan P, Kaltsakas G, Kolekar SB, Armstrong M, Tuffnell R, Evans RA, Vagheggini G, Degani-Costa LH, Vicente C, Das N, Poberezhets V, Rolland-Debord C, Bayat S, Vogiatzis I, Franssen FME, Pinnock H, Vanfleteren LEGW. ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Respiratory Clinical Care and Physiology Assembly. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00710-2021. [PMID: 35615417 PMCID: PMC9125042 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00710-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
It is a challenge to keep abreast of all the clinical and scientific advances in the field of respiratory medicine. This article contains an overview of laboratory-based science, randomised controlled trials and qualitative research that were presented during the 2021 European Respiratory Society International Congress within the sessions from the five groups of the Assembly 1 - Respiratory clinical care and physiology. Selected presentations are summarised from a wide range of topics: clinical problems, rehabilitation and chronic care, general practice and primary care, electronic/mobile health (e-health/m-health), clinical respiratory physiology, exercise and functional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Gille
- Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France.,Inserm U1272 "Hypoxia and the Lung", UFR Santé - Médecine - Biologie Humaine Léonard de Vinci, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Georgios Kaltsakas
- Lane Fox Respiratory Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre of Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,1st Respiratory Medicine Dept, "Sotiria" Hospital for Diseases of the Chest, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Shailesh B Kolekar
- Dept of Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Matthew Armstrong
- Dept of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | - Rachel Tuffnell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachael A Evans
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,Dept of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Guido Vagheggini
- Dept of Medical Specialties, Chronic Respiratory Failure Care Pathway, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Volterra, Italy.,Fondazione Volterra Ricerche Onlus, Volterra, Italy
| | | | | | - Nilakash Das
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vitalii Poberezhets
- Dept of Propedeutics of Internal Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
| | - Camille Rolland-Debord
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sam Bayat
- Service de Pneumologie et de Physiologie, CS10217, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm UA07 STROBE, Grenoble, France
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Dept of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frits M E Franssen
- Dept of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, the Netherlands.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.,NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lowie E G W Vanfleteren
- COPD Center, Dept of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Dept of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
W H Kocks J, Wouters H, Bosnic-Anticevich S, van Cooten J, Correia de Sousa J, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, Dvortsin E, Garcia Pardo M, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van Geer-Postmus I, van der Ham I, Harbers M, de la Hoz A, Janse Y, Kerkhof M, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price D, Roman-Rodriguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Leving MT. Factors associated with health status and exacerbations in COPD maintenance therapy with dry powder inhalers. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:18. [PMID: 35618739 PMCID: PMC9135702 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00282-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the associations of Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF), inhalation technique and adherence with health status and exacerbations in participants with COPD using DPI maintenance therapy. This cross-sectional multi-country observational real-world study included COPD participants aged ≥40 years using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured three times with the In-Check DIAL G16: (1) typical PIF at resistance of participant’s inhaler, (2) maximal PIF at resistance of participant’s inhaler, (3) maximal PIF at low resistance. Suboptimal PIF (sPIF) was defined as PIF lower than required for the device. Participants completed questionnaires on health status (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)), adherence (Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI)) and exacerbations. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings. Complete data were available from 1434 participants (50.1% female, mean age 69.2 years). GOLD stage was available for 801 participants: GOLD stage I (23.6%), II (54.9%), III (17.4%) and IV (4.1%)). Of all participants, 29% had a sPIF, and 16% were shown able to generate an optimal PIF but failed to do so. sPIF was significantly associated with worse health status (0.226 (95% CI 0.107–0.346), worse units on CCQ; p = 0.001). The errors ‘teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece’, ‘breathe in’, and ‘breathe out calmly after inhalation’ were related to health status. Adherence was not associated with health status. After correcting for multiple testing, no significant association was found with moderate or severe exacerbations in the last 12 months. To conclude, sPIF is associated with poorer health status. This study demonstrates the importance of PIF assessment in DPI inhalation therapy. Healthcare professionals should consider selecting appropriate inhalers in cases of sPIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore. .,Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Wouters
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Evgeni Dvortsin
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Garcia Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Iris van der Ham
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marten Harbers
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto de la Hoz
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Ymke Janse
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Kerkhof
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodriguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marika T Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leving MT, Kocks J, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Dekhuijzen R, Usmani OS. Relationship between Peak Inspiratory Flow and Patient and Disease Characteristics in Individuals with COPD—A Systematic Scoping Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020458. [PMID: 35203667 PMCID: PMC8962311 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimal delivery of medication via dry powder inhalers, the most commonly prescribed inhaler type, is dependent on a patient achieving a minimum level of inspiratory flow during inhalation. However, measurement of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) against the simulated resistance of a dry powder inhaler is not frequently performed in clinical practice due to time or equipment limitations. Therefore, defining which patient characteristics are associated with lower PIF is critically important to help clinicians optimize their inhaler choice through a more personalized approach to prescribing. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically evaluate patient and disease characteristics determining PIF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies on PIF in patients with COPD published in English between January 2000 and May 2021. The quality of evidence was assessed using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation checklist. Of 3382 citations retrieved, 35 publications were included in the review (nine scored as high quality, 13 as moderate, nine as low, and four as very low). Factors correlating with PIF in >70% of papers included both patient characteristics (lower PIF correlated with increased age, female gender, shorter height, decreased handgrip and inspiratory muscle strength, and certain comorbidities) and disease characteristics (lower PIF correlated with markers of lung hyperinflation, lower peak expiratory flow [PEF] and increased disease severity). Other factors correlating with adequate/optimal or improved PIF included education/counseling and exercise/inspiratory muscle training; impaired physical function and errors in inhalation technique/non-adherence were associated with low/suboptimal PIF. In conclusion, clinicians should measure PIF against the simulated resistance of a particular device wherever possible. However, as this often cannot be done due to lack of resources or time, the patient and disease characteristics that influence PIF, as identified in this review, can help clinicians to choose the most appropriate inhaler type for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika T. Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, 9713 GH Groningen, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Janwillem Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, 9713 GH Groningen, The Netherlands;
- GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore 573969, Singapore
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2037, Australia;
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | | | - Omar S. Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London SW3 6LY, UK;
- Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peché R, Attar-Zadeh D, Scullion J, Kocks J. Matching the Inhaler to the Patient in COPD. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235683. [PMID: 34884385 PMCID: PMC8658339 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Selecting the most appropriate inhalation device from the wide range available is essential for the successful management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although choice is good for healthcare professionals, knowing which inhaler to prescribe is a complex consideration. Among the key factors to consider are quality of disease control, inhaler technique, inhaler resistance and inspiratory flow, inhaler design and mechanisms of drug delivery, insurance and reimbursement restrictions, and environmental impact. In this article, we offer a simple, practical tool that brings together all these factors and includes hyperlinks to other published resources from the United Kingdom, Belgium, and The Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudi Peché
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, 6042 Charleroi, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| | - Darush Attar-Zadeh
- North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), London N11 1GN, UK;
| | - Jane Scullion
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK;
| | - Janwillem Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, 9713 GH Groningen, The Netherlands;
- GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore 409051, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|