1
|
Godoi MM, Reis EM, Koepp J, Ferreira J. Perspective from developers: Tissue-engineered products for skin wound healing. Int J Pharm 2024; 660:124319. [PMID: 38866084 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Tissue-engineered products (TEPs) are at the forefront of developmental medicines, precisely where monoclonal antibodies and recombinant cytokines were 30 years ago. TEPs development for treating skin wounds has become a fast-growing field as it offers the potential to find novel therapeutic approaches for treating pathologies that currently have limited or no effective alternatives. This review aims to provide the reader with the process of translating an idea from the laboratory bench to clinical practice, specifically in the context of TEPs designing for skin wound healing. It encompasses historical perspectives, approved therapies, and offers a distinctive insight into the regulatory framework in Brazil. We explore the essential guidelines for quality testing, and nonclinical proof-of-concept considering the Brazilian Network of Experts in Advanced Therapies (RENETA) and International Standards and Guidelines (ICH e ISO). Adopting a multifaceted approach, our discussion incorporates scientific and industrial perspectives, addressing quality, biosafety, non-clinical viability, clinical trial and real-word data for pharmacovigilance demands. This comprehensive analysis presents a panoramic view of the development of skin TEPs, offering insights into the evolving landscape of this dynamic and promising field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuella Machado Godoi
- Graduate Program in Pharmacology, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina- UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
| | - Emily Marques Reis
- Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina- UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; Biocelltis Biotecnologia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
| | - Janice Koepp
- Biocelltis Biotecnologia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
| | - Juliano Ferreira
- Graduate Program in Pharmacology, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina- UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Sun H, Fu Y, Cheng W, Jin C, Shi H, Luo Y, Xu X, Wang H. A comprehensive value-based method for new nuclear medical service pricing: with case study of radium [223 Ra] bone metastases treatment. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:397. [PMID: 38553709 PMCID: PMC10981283 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10777-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Innovative nuclear medicine services offer substantial clinical value to patients. However, these advancements often come with high costs. Traditional payment strategies do not incentivize medical institutes to provide new services nor determine the fair price for payers. A shift towards a value-based pricing strategy is imperative to address these challenges. Such a strategy would reconcile the cost of innovation with incentives, foster transparent allocation of healthcare resources, and expedite the accessibility of essential medical services. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop and present a comprehensive, value-based pricing model for new nuclear medicine services, illustrated explicitly through a case study of the radium [223Ra] treatment for bone metastases. In constructing the pricing model, we have considered three primary value determinants: the cost of the new service, associated service risk, and the difficulty of the service provision. Our research can help healthcare leaders design an evidence-based Fee-For-Service (FFS) payment reference pricing with nuclear medicine services and price adjustments. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This multi-center study was conducted from March 2021 to February 2022 (including consultation meetings) and employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. We organized focus group consultations with physicians from nuclear medicine departments in Beijing, Chongqing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai to standardize the treatment process for radium [223Ra] bone metastases. We used a specially designed 'Radium Nuclide [223Ra] Bone Metastasis Data Collection Form' to gather nationwide resource consumption data to extract information from local databases. Four interviews with groups of experts were conducted to determine the add-up ratio, based on service risk and difficulty. The study organized consultation meeting with key stakeholders, including policymakers, service providers, clinical researchers, and health economists, to finalize the pricing equation and the pricing result of radium [223Ra] bone metastases service. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We developed and detailed a pricing equation tailored for innovative services in the nuclear medicine department, illustrating its application through a step-by-step guide. A standardized service process was established to ensure consistency and accuracy. Adhering to best practice guidelines for health cost data analysis, we emphasized the importance of cross-validation of data, where validated data demonstrated less variation. However, it required a more advanced health information system to manage and analyze the data inputs effectively. RESULTS The standardized service of radium [223Ra] bone metastases includes: pre-injection assessment, treatment plan, administration, post-administration monitoring, waste disposal and monitoring. The average duration for each stage is 104 min, 39 min, 25 min, 72 min and 56 min. A standardized monetary value for medical consumables is 54.94 yuan ($7.6), and the standardised monetary value (medical consumables cost plus human input) is 763.68 yuan ($109.9). Applying an agreed value add-up ratio of 1.065, the standardized value is 810.19 yuan ($116.9). Feedback from a consultation meeting with policymakers and health economics researchers indicates a consensus that the pricing equation developed was reasonable and well-grounded. CONCLUSION This research is the first study in the field of nuclear medicine department pricing methodology. We introduce a comprehensive value-based nuclear medical service pricing method and use radium[223Ra] bone metastases treatment pricing in China as a case study. This study establishes a novel pricing framework and provides practical instructions on its implementation in a real-world healthcare setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haode Wang
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Hui Sun
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yuyan Fu
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
| | - Wendi Cheng
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunlin Jin
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yashuang Luo
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinjie Xu
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250355, China
| | - Haiyin Wang
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Minhang District, No. 181 Xinbei Road, Shanghai, 201199, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bucciol G, Delafontaine S, Meyts I, Poli C. Inborn errors of immunity: A field without frontiers. Immunol Rev 2024; 322:15-27. [PMID: 38062988 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
The study of primary immunodeficiencies or inborn errors of immunity continues to drive our knowledge of the function of the human immune system. From the outset, the study of inborn errors has focused on unraveling genetic etiologies and molecular mechanisms. Aided by the continuous growth in genetic diagnostics, the field has moved from the study of an infection dominated phenotype to embrace and unravel diverse manifestations of autoinflammation, autoimmunity, malignancy, and severe allergy in all medical disciplines. It has now moved from the study of ultrarare presentations to producing meaningful impact in conditions as diverse as inflammatory bowel disease, neurological conditions, and hematology. Beyond offering immunogenetic diagnosis, the study of underlying inborn errors of immunity in these conditions points to targeted treatment which can be lifesaving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Bucciol
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Inborn Errors of Immunity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Selket Delafontaine
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Inborn Errors of Immunity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Meyts
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Inborn Errors of Immunity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cecilia Poli
- Facultad de Medicina Universidad del Desarrollo-Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
- Unidad de Inmunología y Reumatología, Hospital Roberto del Río, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiedmann L, Blumenau J, Carroll O, Cairns J. Using automated text classification to explore uncertainty in NICE appraisals for drugs for rare diseases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2024; 40:e5. [PMID: 38178720 PMCID: PMC10859832 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined the application, feasibility, and validity of supervised learning models for text classification in appraisals for rare disease treatments (RDTs) in relation to uncertainty, and analyzed differences between appraisals based on the classification results. METHODS We analyzed appraisals for RDTs (n = 94) published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) between January 2011 and May 2023. We used Naïve Bayes, Lasso, and Support Vector Machine models in a binary text classification task (classifying paragraphs as either referencing uncertainty in the evidence base or not). To illustrate the results, we tested hypotheses in relation to the appraisal guidance, advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) status, disease area, and age group. RESULTS The best performing (Lasso) model achieved 83.6 percent classification accuracy (sensitivity = 74.4 percent, specificity = 92.6 percent). Paragraphs classified as referencing uncertainty were significantly more likely to arise in highly specialized technology (HST) appraisals compared to appraisals from the technology appraisal (TA) guidance (adjusted odds ratio = 1.44, 95 percent CI 1.09, 1.90, p = 0.004). There was no significant association between paragraphs classified as referencing uncertainty and appraisals for ATMPs, non-oncology RDTs, and RDTs indicated for children only or adults and children. These results were robust to the threshold value used for classifying paragraphs but were sensitive to the choice of classification model. CONCLUSION Using supervised learning models for text classification in NICE appraisals for RDTs is feasible, but the results of downstream analyses may be sensitive to the choice of classification model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Wiedmann
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Jack Blumenau
- Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - Orlagh Carroll
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - John Cairns
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rzepiński T. In Defense of Expert Knowledge in Bioethical Discussions on Human Genome Editing. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:93-95. [PMID: 38010684 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2272919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
|
6
|
Iglesias-López C, Agustí A, Vallano A, Obach M. Financing and Reimbursement of Approved Advanced Therapies in Several European Countries. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:841-853. [PMID: 36646280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uncertainty in the cost-benefit of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) is a current challenge for their reimbursement in health systems. This study aimed to provide a comparative analysis of the National Health Authorities (NHAs) reimbursement recommendations issued in different European countries. METHODS The NHA reimbursement recommendations for the approved ATMPs were compared among 8 European Union (EU) Countries (EU8: Ireland, England/Wales, Scotland, The Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy). The search was carried out until December 31, 2021. RESULTS A total of 19 approved ATMPs and 76 appraisal reports were analyzed. The majority of the ATMPs were reimbursed, although with uncertainty in added therapeutic value. No relationship between the type of the European Medicines Agency approval and reimbursement was found. Managed entry agreements, such as payment by results, were necessary to ensure market access. The main issue during the evaluation was to base the cost-effectiveness analyses on assumptions because of the limited long-term data. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio among countries reveals high variability. Overall, the median time to NHA recommendation for the EU8 is in the range of 9 to 17 months. CONCLUSIONS Transparent, harmonized, and systematic assessments across the EU NHAs in terms of cost-effectiveness, added therapeutic value, and grade of innovativeness are needed. This could lead to a more aligned access, increasing the EU market attractiveness and raising public fairness in terms of patient access and pricing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Iglesias-López
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antònia Agustí
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Vallano
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Medicines Department, Catalan Healthcare Service, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mercè Obach
- Healthcare Planning Department, Catalan Healthcare Service, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Snow M, Mandalia V, Custers R, Emans PJ, Kon E, Niemeyer P, Verdonk R, Gaissmaier C, Roeder A, Weinand S, Zöllner Y, Schubert T. Cost-effectiveness of a new ACI technique for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee compared to regularly used ACI technique and microfracture. J Med Econ 2023; 26:537-546. [PMID: 36974460 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2194805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
AIMS For patients with cartilage defects of the knee, a new biocompatible and in situ cross-linkable albumin-hyaluronan-based hydrogel has been developed for matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI) - NOVOCART® Inject plus (NInject)1. We aimed to estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of NInject, that is not available on the market, yet compared to spheroids of human autologous matrix-associated chondrocytes (Spherox®)2 and microfracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS An early Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness in the United Kingdom (UK) from the payer perspective. Transition probabilities, response rates, utility values and costs were derived from literature. Since NInject has not yet been launched and no prices are available, its costs were assumed equal to those of Spherox®. Cycle length was set at one year and the time horizon chosen was notional patients' remaining lifetime. Model robustness was evaluated with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA; PSA) and value of information (VOI) analysis. The Markov model was built using TreeAge Pro Healthcare. RESULTS NInject was cost-effective compared to microfracture (ICER: ₤5,147) while Spherox® was extendedly dominated. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER exceeded conventional WTP threshold of ₤20,000 only when the utility value after successful first treatment with NInject was decreased by 20% (ICER: ₤69,620). PSA corroborated the cost-effectiveness findings of NInject, compared to both alternatives, with probabilities of 60% of NInject undercutting the aforementioned WTP threshold and being the most cost-effective alternative. The VOIA revealed that obtaining additional evidence on the new technology will likely not be cost-effective for the UK National Health Service. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION This early Markov model showed that NInject is cost-effective for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee, compared to Spherox and microfracture. However, as the final price of NInject has yet to be determined, the cost-effectiveness analysis performed in this study is provisional, assuming equal prices for NInject and Spherox.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyn Snow
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt, Oswestry, UK
| | | | - Roel Custers
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Emans
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elizaveta Kon
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Casa di Cura Toniolo, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - York Zöllner
- Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Menzel-Severing J, Spaniol K, Groeber-Becker F, Geerling G. [Regenerative medicine for the corneal epithelium : Cell therapy from bench to bedside]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2022; 119:891-901. [PMID: 35925345 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-022-01674-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In the case of thermal or caustic burns of the ocular surface, loss of limbal epithelial stem cells leads to compromised self-renewal of the corneal epithelium. This results in permanent loss of vision. In these situations, transplantation of cultured limbal epithelial cells on an amniotic membrane or fibrin gel as substrate (Holoclar®) can help to regenerate the corneal surface. The required cells are obtained from the healthy partner eye, if available. Adult stem cells from other parts of the body potentially serve as alternative cell sources: hair follicles, oral mucosa, mesenchymal stromal cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells (originally, e.g., skin fibroblasts). The reprogramming of such cells can be achieved with the help of transcription factors. In addition, work is being done on biosynthetic or synthetic matrices, which not only serve as substrate material for the transplantation but also support the functional properties of these cells (self-renewal, corneal epithelial-typical phenotype).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Menzel-Severing
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| | - Kristina Spaniol
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Florian Groeber-Becker
- Translationszentrum Regenerative Therapien | TLZ-RT, Leitung In-vitro-Testsysteme, Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung ISC, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Gerd Geerling
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hardy WAS, Hughes DA. Methods for Extrapolating Survival Analyses for the Economic Evaluation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. Hum Gene Ther 2022; 33:845-856. [PMID: 35435758 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2022.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There are two significant challenges for analysts conducting economic evaluations of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs): (i) estimating long-term treatment effects in the absence of mature clinical data, and (ii) capturing potentially complex hazard functions. This review identifies and critiques a variety of methods that can be used to overcome these challenges. The narrative review is informed by a rapid literature review of methods used for the extrapolation of survival analyses in the economic evaluation of ATMPs. There are several methods that are more suitable than traditional parametric survival modelling approaches for capturing complex hazard functions, including, cure-mixture models and restricted cubic spline models. In the absence of mature clinical data, analysts may augment clinical trial data with data from other sources to aid extrapolation, however, the relative merits of employing methods for including data from different sources is not well understood. Given the high and potentially irrecoverable costs of making incorrect decisions concerning the reimbursement or commissioning of ATMPs, it is important that economic evaluations are correctly specified, and that both parameter and structural uncertainty associated with survival extrapolations are considered. Value of information analyses allow for this uncertainty to be expressed explicitly, and in monetary terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will A S Hardy
- Bangor University College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, 151667, Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Dyfrig A Hughes
- Bangor University College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, 151667, Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, LL57 2PZ;
| |
Collapse
|