Emerging trends and prospects of electroconductive bioinks for cell-laden and functional 3D bioprinting

Nanostructured Biopolymer-Based Constructs for Cartilage Regeneration: Fabrication Techniques and Perspectives

The essential functions of cartilage, such as shock absorption and resilience, are hindered by its limited regenerative capacity. Although current therapies alleviate symptoms, novel strategies for cartilage regeneration are desperately needed. Recent developments in three-dimensional (3D) constructs aim to address this challenge by mimicking the intrinsic characteristics of native cartilage using biocompatible materials, with a significant emphasis on both functionality and stability. Through fabrication methods such as 3D printing and electrospinning, researchers are making progress in cartilage regeneration; nevertheless, it is still very difficult to translate these advances into clinical practice. The review emphasizes the importance of integrating various fabrication techniques to create stable 3D constructs. Meticulous design and material selection are required to achieve seamless cartilage integration and durability. The review outlines the need to address these challenges and focuses on the latest developments in the production of hybrid 3D constructs based on biodegradable and biocompatible polymers. Furthermore, the review acknowledges the limitations of current research and provides perspectives on potential avenues for effectively regenerating cartilage defects in the future.

In Situ Bioprinting: Process, Bioinks, and Applications

Traditional tissue engineering methods face challenges, such as fabrication, implantation of irregularly shaped scaffolds, and limited accessibility for immediate healthcare providers. In situ bioprinting, an alternate strategy, involves direct deposition of biomaterials, cells, and bioactive factors at the site, facilitating on-site fabrication of intricate tissue, which can offer a patient-specific personalized approach and align with the principles of precision medicine. It can be applied using a handled device and robotic arms to various tissues, including skin, bone, cartilage, muscle, and composite tissues. Bioinks, the critical components of bioprinting that support cell viability and tissue development, play a crucial role in the success of in situ bioprinting. This review discusses in situ bioprinting techniques, the materials used for bioinks, and their critical properties for successful applications. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future trends in accelerating in situ printing to translate this technology in a clinical settings for personalized regenerative medicine.

Biofabrication methods for reconstructing extracellular matrix mimetics

In the human body, almost all cells interact with extracellular matrices (ECMs), which have tissue and organ-specific compositions and architectures. These ECMs not only function as cellular scaffolds, providing structural support, but also play a crucial role in dynamically regulating various cellular functions. This comprehensive review delves into the examination of biofabrication strategies used to develop bioactive materials that accurately mimic one or more biophysical and biochemical properties of ECMs. We discuss the potential integration of these ECM-mimics into a range of physiological and pathological in vitro models, enhancing our understanding of cellular behavior and tissue organization. Lastly, we propose future research directions for ECM-mimics in the context of tissue engineering and organ-on-a-chip applications, offering potential advancements in therapeutic approaches and improved patient outcomes.

3D Prestress Bioprinting of Directed Tissues

Many mammalian tissues adopt a specific cellular arrangement under stress stimulus that enables their unique function. However, conventional 3D encapsulation often fails to recapitulate the complexities of these arrangements, thus motivating the need for advanced cellular arrangement approaches. Here, an original 3D prestress bioprinting approach of directed tissues under the synergistic effect of static sustained tensile stress and molecular chain orientation, with an aid of slow crosslinking in bioink, is developed. The semi-crosslinking state of the designed bioink exhibits excellent elasticity for applying stress on the cells during the sewing-like process. After bioprinting, the bioink gradually forms complete crosslinking and keeps the applied stress force to induce cell-orientated growth. More importantly, multiple cell types can be arranged directionally by this approach, while the internal stress of the hydrogel filament is also adjustable. In addition, compared with conventional bioprinted skin, the 3D prestress bioprinted skin results in a better wound healing effect due to promoting the angiogenesis of granulation tissue. This study provides a prospective strategy to engineer skeletal muscles, as well as tendons, ligaments, vascular networks, or combinations thereof in the future.

Classification, processing, and applications of bioink and 3D bioprinting: A detailed review

With the advancement in 3D bioprinting technology, cell culture methods can design 3D environments which are both, complex and physiologically relevant. The main component in 3D bioprinting, bioink, can be split into various categories depending on the criterion of categorization. Although the choice of bioink and bioprinting process will vary greatly depending on the application, general features such as material properties, biological interaction, gelation, and viscosity are always important to consider. The foundation of 3D bioprinting is the exact layer-by-layer implantation of biological elements, biochemicals, and living cells with the spatial control of the implantation of functional elements onto the biofabricated 3D structure. Three basic strategies underlie the 3D bioprinting process: autonomous self-assembly, micro tissue building blocks, and biomimicry or biomimetics. Tissue engineering can benefit from 3D bioprinting in many ways, but there are still numerous obstacles to overcome before functional tissues can be produced and used in clinical settings. A better comprehension of the physiological characteristics of bioink materials and a higher level of ability to reproduce the intricate biologically mimicked and physiologically relevant 3D structures would be a significant improvement for 3D bioprinting to overcome the limitations.

Inhibited astrocytic differentiation in neural stem cell-laden 3D bioprinted conductive composite hydrogel scaffolds for repair of spinal cord injury

The emergence of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has attracted ever-increasing attention in engineered tissue fabrication for stem cell-based tissue repair. However, the in vivo performance of transplanted stem cells in the tissue engineering scaffolds is still a major concern for regenerative medicine researches. Especially for neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation, the uncontrollable differentiation of the NSCs in host often leads to a poor therapeutic effect in nerve tissue repair, such as spinal cord injury (SCI) repair. To address this issue, we have fabricated a conductive composite hydrogel (CCH) scaffold loading with NSCs by 3D bioprinting, for delivering the NSCs to injured spinal cord and repairing the propriospinal nerve circuit. In our strategy, a novel conductive polymer (PEDOT:CSMA,TA) was synthesized and introduced into a photocrosslinkable gelatin/polyethylene glycol physical-gel matrix, thereby forming a composite bioink with well shear-thinning and self-healing properties. The composite bioink we prepared was then printed into the NSC-laden CCH scaffold with high shape fidelity and similar physicochemical properties to native spinal cord tissues. The NSCs encapsulated in the bioprinted CCH scaffold extended their neurites to form superior physical contact with the neighboring cells as well as the electroconductive matrix, and maintained a predominant in vivo neuronal differentiation, accompanying with few astrocytic production in the lesion area after transplantation into the SCI sites. As a result, the removal of glial scar tissues and the regeneration of well-developed nerve fibres sequentially happened, which not only facilitated nerve tissue development, but also accelerated locomotor function recovery in the SCI rats. By exploring the application of conductive biomaterials in stem cell-based SCI therapy, this work represents a feasible, new approach to precisely construct tissue engineering scaffolds for stem cell-based therapy in traumatic SCI and other nervous system diseases.