1
|
Russ D, Fitzpatrick CR, Teixeira PJPL, Dangl JL. Deep discovery informs difficult deployment in plant microbiome science. Cell 2023; 186:4496-4513. [PMID: 37832524 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Plant-associated microbiota can extend plant immune system function, improve nutrient acquisition and availability, and alleviate abiotic stresses. Thus, naturally beneficial microbial therapeutics are enticing tools to improve plant productivity. The basic definition of plant microbiota across species and ecosystems, combined with the development of reductionist experimental models and the manipulation of plant phenotypes with microbes, has fueled interest in its translation to agriculture. However, the great majority of microbes exhibiting plant-productivity traits in the lab and greenhouse fail in the field. Therapeutic microbes must reach détente, the establishment of uneasy homeostasis, with the plant immune system, invade heterogeneous pre-established plant-associated communities, and persist in a new and potentially remodeled community. Environmental conditions can alter community structure and thus impact the engraftment of therapeutic microbes. We survey recent breakthroughs, challenges, and opportunities in translating beneficial microbes from the lab to the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dor Russ
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Connor R Fitzpatrick
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paulo J P L Teixeira
- Department of Biological Sciences, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
| | - Jeffery L Dangl
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
da Cunha ET, Pedrolo AM, Arisi ACM. Effects of sublethal stress application on the survival of bacterial inoculants: a systematic review. Arch Microbiol 2023; 205:190. [PMID: 37055599 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03542-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
The use of commercial bacterial inoculants formulated with plant-growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) in agriculture has shown significant prominence in recent years due to growth-promotion benefits provided to plants through different mechanisms. However, the survival and viability of bacterial cells in inoculants are affected during use and may decrease their effectiveness. Physiological adaptation strategies have attracted attention to solve the viability problem. This review aims to provide an overview of research on selecting sublethal stress strategies to increase the effectiveness of bacterial inoculants. The searches were performed in November 2021 using Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Proquest databases. The keywords "nitrogen-fixing bacteria", "plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria", "azospirillum", "pseudomonas", "rhizobium", "stress pre-conditioning", "adaptation", "metabolic physiological adaptation", "cellular adaptation", "increasing survival", "protective agent" and "protective strategy" were used in the searches. A total of 2573 publications were found, and 34 studies were selected for a deeper study of the subject. Based on the studies analysis, gaps and potential applications related to sublethal stress were identified. The most used strategies included osmotic, thermal, oxidative, and nutritional stress, and the primary cell response mechanism to stress was the accumulation of osmolytes, phytohormones, and exopolysaccharides (EPS). Under sublethal stress, the inoculant survival showed positive increments after lyophilization, desiccation, and long-term storage processes. The effectiveness of inoculant-plants interaction also had positive increments after sublethal stress, improving plant development, disease control, and tolerance to environmental stresses compared to unappealed inoculants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisandra Triches da Cunha
- CAL CCA UFSC, Food Science and Technology Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 1346, Florianópolis, SC, 88034-001, Brazil
| | - Ana Marina Pedrolo
- CAL CCA UFSC, Food Science and Technology Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 1346, Florianópolis, SC, 88034-001, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Maisonnave Arisi
- CAL CCA UFSC, Food Science and Technology Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 1346, Florianópolis, SC, 88034-001, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Microbials for Agriculture: Why Do They Call Them Biostimulants When They Mean Probiotics? Microorganisms 2023; 11:microorganisms11010153. [PMID: 36677445 PMCID: PMC9867170 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing interest in using plant-beneficial microorganisms to partially replace chemicals and help reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. Formulated microbial products or inoculants for agriculture contain single strains or a consortium of live microbes, well characterized and biosafe, which can contribute to the growth, health, and development of a plant host. This concept conforms to the definition of probiotics. However, some plant-growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) have been considered a category of biostimulants since some years ago, despite the traditional concept of biostimulants involves substances or materials with no fertilizer value, which in minute amounts promote plant growth. The inclusion of PGPMs together with substances has also involved a significant distortion of the classical concept of biostimulants. Regulations such as the recent EU Fertilizing Products Regulation (EU No. 2019/1009) have incorporated the new definition of biostimulants and included microbials as a subcategory of biostimulants. We discuss that this regulation and the forthcoming European harmonized standards disregard some key features of microbial products, such as the live, true biological nature of their active principles. The factors that determine the complex functional compatibility of plant-microbe associations, and important biosafety issues that concern the intentional release of microbes into the environment, seem to be also ignored. We anticipate that by equating microbials to chemicals, the biological nature of microbial products and their specific requirements will be underestimated, with pernicious consequences for their future development and success.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bender FR, Nagamatsu ST, Delamuta JRM, Ribeiro RA, Nogueira MA, Hungria M. Genetic variation in symbiotic islands of natural variant strains of soybean Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens differing in competitiveness and in the efficiency of nitrogen fixation. Microb Genom 2022; 8:000795. [PMID: 35438622 PMCID: PMC9453064 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Soybean is the most important legume cropped worldwide and can highly benefit from the biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) process. Brazil is recognized for its leadership in the use of inoculants and two strains, Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 (=SEMIA 5079) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7 (=SEMIA 5080) compose the majority of the 70 million doses of soybean inoculants commercialized yearly in the country. We studied a collection of natural variants of these two strains, differing in properties of competitiveness and efficiency of BNF. We sequenced the genomes of the parental strain SEMIA 566 of B. japonicum, of three natural variants of this strain (S 204, S 340 and S 370), and compared with another variant of this group, strain CPAC 15. We also sequenced the genome of the parental strain SEMIA 586 of B. diazoefficiens, of three natural variants of this strain (CPAC 390, CPAC 392 and CPAC 394) and compared with the genome of another natural variant, strain CPAC 7. As the main genes responsible for nodulation (nod, noe, nol) and BNF (nif, fix) in soybean Bradyrhizobium are located in symbiotic islands, our objective was to identify genetic variations located in this region, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions and deletions (indels), that could be potentially related to their different symbiotic phenotypes. We detected 44 genetic variations in the B. japonicum strains and three in B. diazoefficiens. As the B. japonicum strains have gone through a longer period of adaptation to the soil, the higher number of genetic variations could be explained by survival strategies under the harsh environmental conditions of the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Genetic variations were detected in genes enconding proteins such as a dephospho-CoA kinase, related to the CoA biosynthesis; a glucosamine-fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase, key regulator of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway; a LysR family transcriptional regulator related to nodulation genes; and NifE and NifS proteins, directly related to the BNF process. We suggest potential genetic variations related to differences in the symbiotic phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Raquel Bender
- Department of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, C.P. 10011, 86057-970 Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
- Soil Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Soja, C.P. 4006, 86085-981, Londrina-PR, Brazil
| | - Sheila Tiemi Nagamatsu
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jakeline Renata Marçon Delamuta
- Soil Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Soja, C.P. 4006, 86085-981, Londrina-PR, Brazil
- CNPq, SHIS QI 1 Conjunto B, Blocos A, B, C e D, Lago Sul, 71605-001, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Renan Augusto Ribeiro
- CNPq, SHIS QI 1 Conjunto B, Blocos A, B, C e D, Lago Sul, 71605-001, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Marco Antonio Nogueira
- Soil Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Soja, C.P. 4006, 86085-981, Londrina-PR, Brazil
- CNPq, SHIS QI 1 Conjunto B, Blocos A, B, C e D, Lago Sul, 71605-001, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Mariangela Hungria
- Department of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, C.P. 10011, 86057-970 Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
- Soil Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Soja, C.P. 4006, 86085-981, Londrina-PR, Brazil
- CNPq, SHIS QI 1 Conjunto B, Blocos A, B, C e D, Lago Sul, 71605-001, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang Z, Zheng J, Zhou H, Chen S, Gao Z, Yang Y, Li X, Liao H. The soybean β-expansin gene GmINS1 contributes to nodule development in response to phosphate starvation. PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 2021; 172:2034-2047. [PMID: 33887063 DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Legume biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is the most important N source in agricultural ecosystems. Nodule organogenesis from the primordia to the development of mature nodules with the ability to fix N2 largely determines BNF capacity. However, nodule growth is often limited by low phosphorus (P) availability, while the mechanisms underlying nodule development responses to P deficiency remain largely unknown. In this study, we found that nodule enlargement is severely inhibited by P deficiency, as reflected by the smaller individual nodule size from a soybean core collection in the field. Wide-ranging natural diversity in nodule size was further identified in soybeans reared in low P soils, with the FC-1 genotype outperforming FC-2 in assessments of nodulation under low P conditions. Among β-expansin members, GmINS1 expression is most abundantly enhanced by P deficiency in FC-1 nodules, and its transcript level is further displayed to be tightly associated with nodule enlargement. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms discovered in the GmINS1 promoter distinguished the FC-1 and FC-2 genotypes and accounted for the differential expression levels of GmINS1 responses to P deficiency. GmINS1 overexpression led to increases in nodule size, infected cell abundance, and N2 fixation capacity and subsequently promoted increases in N and P content, soybean biomass, and yield. Our findings provide a candidate gene for optimizing BNF capacity responses to low P stress in soybean molecular breeding programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaojun Yang
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiakun Zheng
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Huiwen Zhou
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shengnan Chen
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhi Gao
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yongqing Yang
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xinxin Li
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Liao
- Root Biology Center, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|