A LexA-based yeast two-hybrid system for studying light-switchable interactions of phytochromes with their interacting partners

Gibberellin and cytokinin signaling antagonistically control female-germline cell specification in Arabidopsis

How do growth hormones interact to specify female-germline cell types in flowering plants and control production of the first female-germline cell? Here, we find that gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis and signaling are restricted in ovule primordia, with overexpression of receptors and biosynthetic enzymes resulting in multiple and enlarged megaspore mother cells (MMCs) in Arabidopsis. GA signaling machinery interacts with and promotes the degradation of cytokinin (CK) type-B Arabidopsis response regulators (ARR1/10/12), which also directly interact with DELLA proteins. CK biosynthesis and signaling components are expressed in both MMCs and sporophytic cells, with signaling negatively controlled by GA in ovule primordia, and perturbations leading to the induction of multiple, enlarged MMC-like cells. The vacuolar sorting protein SHRUBBY (SHBY) interacts with GA and CK signaling components to block GA-induced degradation. CK signaling restricts multiple sub-epidermal cells in distal ovule primordia from acquiring MMC identity. By balancing degradation activity, GA and CK signaling antagonistically control female-germline cell specification.

Phytochrome-interacting factors play shared and distinct roles in regulating shade avoidance responses in Populus trees

Plants adjust their growth and development in response to changing light caused by canopy shade. The molecular mechanisms underlying shade avoidance responses have been widely studied in Arabidopsis and annual crop species, yet the shade avoidance signalling in woody perennial trees remains poorly understood. Here, we first showed that PtophyB1/2 photoreceptors serve conserved roles in attenuating the shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) in poplars. Next, we conducted a systematic identification and characterization of eight PtoPIF genes in Populus tomentosa. Knocking out different PtoPIFs led to attenuated shade responses to varying extents, whereas overexpression of PtoPIFs, particularly PtoPIF3.1 and PtoPIF3.2, led to constitutive SAS phenotypes under normal light and enhanced SAS responses under simulated shade. Notably, our results revealed that distinct from Arabidopsis PIF4 and PIF5, which are major regulators of SAS, the Populus homologues PtoPIF4.1 and PtoPIF4.2 seem to play a minor role in controlling shade responses. Moreover, we showed that PtoPIF3.1/3.2 could directly activate the expression of the auxin biosynthetic gene PtoYUC8 in response to shade, suggesting a conserved PIF-YUC-auxin pathway in modulating SAS in tree. Overall, our study provides insights into shared and divergent functions of PtoPIF members in regulating various aspects of the SAS in Populus.

Liquid-liquid phase separation of TZP promotes PPK-mediated phosphorylation of the phytochrome A photoreceptor

Phytochrome A (phyA) is the plant far-red (FR) light photoreceptor and plays an essential role in regulating photomorphogenic development in FR-rich conditions, such as canopy shade. It has long been observed that phyA is a phosphoprotein in vivo; however, the protein kinases that could phosphorylate phyA remain largely unknown. Here we show that a small protein kinase family, consisting of four members named PHOTOREGULATORY PROTEIN KINASES (PPKs) (also known as MUT9-LIKE KINASES), directly phosphorylate phyA in vitro and in vivo. In addition, TANDEM ZINC-FINGER/PLUS3 (TZP), a recently characterized phyA-interacting protein required for in vivo phosphorylation of phyA, is also directly phosphorylated by PPKs. We reveal that TZP contains two intrinsically disordered regions in its amino-terminal domain that undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) upon light exposure. The LLPS of TZP promotes colocalization and interaction between PPKs and phyA, thus facilitating PPK-mediated phosphorylation of phyA in FR light. Our study identifies PPKs as a class of protein kinases mediating the phosphorylation of phyA and demonstrates that the LLPS of TZP contributes significantly to more production of the phosphorylated phyA form in FR light.

Assessing the Function of CBF1 in Modulating the Interaction Between Phytochrome B and PIF4

Phytochromes are red (R) and far-red (FR) light photoreceptors in plants. Upon light exposure, photoactivated phytochromes translocate into the nucleus, where they interact with their partner proteins to transduce light signals. The yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system is a powerful technique for rapidly identifying and verifying protein-protein interactions, and PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR3 (PIF3), the founding member of the PIF proteins, was initially identified in a Y2H screen for phytochrome B (phyB)-interacting proteins. Recently, we developed a yeast three-hybrid (Y3H) system by introducing an additional vector into this Y2H system, and thus a new regulator could be co-expressed and its role in modulating the interactions between phytochromes and their signaling partners could be examined. By employing this Y3H system, we recently showed that both MYB30 and CBF1, two negative regulators of seedlings photomorphogenesis, act to inhibit the interactions between phyB and PIF4/PIF5. In this chapter, we will use the CBF1-phyB-PIF4 module as an example and describe the detailed procedure for performing this Y3H assay. It will be intriguing and exciting to explore the potential usage of this Y3H system in future research.

Reconstitution of phytochrome A-mediated light modulation of the ABA signaling pathways in yeast

Abscisic acid (ABA), a classical plant hormone, plays an essential role in plant adaptation to environmental stresses. The ABA signaling mechanisms have been extensively investigated, and it was shown that the PYR1 (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1)/PYL (PYR1-LIKE)/RCAR (REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABA RECEPTOR) ABA receptors, the PP2C coreceptors, and the SnRK2 protein kinases constitute the core ABA signaling module responsible for ABA perception and initiation of downstream responses. We recently showed that ABA signaling is modulated by light signals, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely obscure. In this study, we established a system in yeast cells that was not only successful in reconstituting a complete ABA signaling pathway, from hormone perception to ABA-responsive gene expression, but also suitable for functionally characterizing the regulatory roles of additional factors of ABA signaling. Using this system, we analyzed the roles of several light signaling components, including the red and far-red light photoreceptors phytochrome A (phyA) and phyB, and the photomorphogenic central repressor COP1, in the regulation of ABA signaling. Our results showed that both phyA and phyB negatively regulated ABA signaling, whereas COP1 positively regulated ABA signaling in yeast cells. Further analyses showed that photoactivated phyA interacted with the ABA coreceptors ABI1 and ABI2 to decrease their interactions with the ABA receptor PYR1. Together, data from our reconstituted yeast ABA signaling system provide evidence that photoactivated photoreceptors attenuate ABA signaling by directly interacting with the key components of the core ABA signaling module, thus conferring enhanced ABA tolerance to light-grown plants.

SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE2 stabilizes phytochrome-interacting factors PIF4 and PIF5 to promote Arabidopsis shade avoidance

Sun-loving plants trigger the shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) to compete against their neighbors for sunlight. Phytochromes are plant red (R) and far-red (FR) light photoreceptors that play a major role in perceiving the shading signals and triggering SAS. Shade induces a reduction in the level of active phytochrome B (phyB), thus increasing the abundance of PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS (PIFs), a group of growth-promoting transcription factors. However, whether other factors are involved in modulating PIF activity in the shade remains largely obscure. Here, we show that SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE2 (SOS2), a protein kinase essential for salt tolerance, positively regulates SAS in Arabidopsis thaliana. SOS2 directly phosphorylates PIF4 and PIF5 at a serine residue close to their conserved motif for binding to active phyB. This phosphorylation thus decreases their interaction with phyB and posttranslationally promotes PIF4 and PIF5 protein accumulation. Notably, the role of SOS2 in regulating PIF4 and PIF5 protein abundance and SAS is more prominent under salt stress. Moreover, phyA and phyB physically interact with SOS2 and promote SOS2 kinase activity in the light. Collectively, our study uncovers an unexpected role of salt-activated SOS2 in promoting SAS by modulating the phyB-PIF module, providing insight into the coordinated response of plants to salt stress and shade.

Arabidopsis phytochromes A and B synergistically repress SPA1 under blue light

In Arabidopsis, although studies have demonstrated that phytochrome A (phyA) and phyB are involved in blue light signaling, how blue light-activated phytochromes modulate the activity of the CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1)-SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105 (SPA1) E3 complex remains largely unknown. Here, we show that phyA responds to early and weak blue light, whereas phyB responds to sustainable and strong blue light. Activation of both phyA and phyB by blue light inhibits SPA1 activity. Specifically, blue light irradiation promoted the nuclear import of both phytochromes to stimulate their binding to SPA1, abolishing SPA1's interaction with LONG HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) to release HY5, which promoted seedling photomorphogenesis.

14-3-3 proteins regulate photomorphogenesis by facilitating light-induced degradation of PIF3

14-3-3s are highly conserved phosphopeptide-binding proteins that play important roles in various developmental and signaling pathways in plants. However, although protein phosphorylation has been proven to be a key mechanism for regulating many pivotal components of the light signaling pathway, the role of 14-3-3 proteins in photomorphogenesis remains largely obscure. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR3 (PIF3) is an extensively studied transcription factor repressing photomorphogenesis, and it is well-established that upon red (R) light exposure, photo-activated phytochrome B (phyB) interacts with PIF3 and induces its rapid phosphorylation and degradation. PHOTOREGULATORY PROTEIN KINASES (PPKs), a family of nuclear protein kinases, interact with phyB and PIF3 in R light and mediate multisite phosphorylation of PIF3 in vivo. Here, we report that two members of the 14-3-3 protein family, 14-3-3λ and κ, bind to a serine residue in the bHLH domain of PIF3 that can be phosphorylated by PPKs, and act as key positive regulators of R light-induced photomorphogenesis. Moreover, 14-3-3λ and κ preferentially interact with photo-activated phyB and promote the phyB-PIF3-PPK complex formation, thereby facilitating phyB-induced phosphorylation and degradation of PIF3 upon R light exposure. Together, our data demonstrate that 14-3-3λ and κ work in close concert with the phyB-PIF3 module to regulate light signaling in Arabidopsis.

Novel and multifaceted regulations of photoperiodic flowering by phytochrome A in soybean

Photoperiod is an important environmental cue. Plants can distinguish the seasons and flower at the right time through sensing the photoperiod. Soybean is a sensitive short-day crop, and the timing of flowering varies greatly at different latitudes, thus affecting yields. Soybean cultivars in high latitudes adapt to the long day by the impairment of two phytochrome genes, PHYA3 and PHYA2, and the legume-specific flowering suppressor, E1. However, the regulating mechanism underlying phyA and E1 in soybean remains largely unknown. Here, we classified the regulation of the E1 family by phyA2 and phyA3 at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels, revealing that phyA2 and phyA3 regulate E1 by directly binding to LUX proteins, the critical component of the evening complex, to regulate the stability of LUX proteins. In addition, phyA2 and phyA3 can also directly associate with E1 and its homologs to stabilize the E1 proteins. Therefore, phyA homologs control the core flowering suppressor E1 at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels, to double ensure the E1 activity. Thus, our results disclose a photoperiod flowering mechanism in plants by which the phytochrome A regulates LUX and E1 activity.

WRKY2 and WRKY10 regulate the circadian expression of PIF4 during the day through interactions with CCA1/LHY and phyB

WRKY transcription factors are known mostly for their function in plant defense, abiotic stress responses, senescence, seed germination, and development of the pollen, embryo, and seed. Here, we report the regulatory functions of two WRKY proteins in photomorphogenesis and PIF4 expression. PIF4 is a critical signaling hub in light, temperature, and hormonal signaling pathways. Either its expression or its accumulation peaks in the morning and afternoon. WRKY2 and WRKY10 form heterodimers and recognize their target site in the PIF4 promoter near the MYB element that is bound by CCA1 and LHY under red and blue light. WRKY2 and WRKY10 interact directly with CCA1/LHY to enhance their targeting but interact indirectly with SHB1. The two WRKY proteins also interact with phyB, and their interaction enhances the targeting of CCA1 and LHY to the PIF4 promoter. SHB1 associates with the WRKY2 and WRKY10 loci and enhances their expression in parallel with the PIF4 expression peaks. This forward regulatory loop further sustains the accumulation of the two WRKY proteins and the targeting of CCA1/LHY to the PIF4 locus. In summary, interactions of two WRKY proteins with CCA1/LHY and phyB maintain an optimal expression level of PIF4 toward noon and afternoon, which is essential to sketch the circadian pattern of PIF4 expression.

Phytochrome B interacts with SWC6 and ARP6 to regulate H2A.Z deposition and photomorphogensis in Arabidopsis

Light serves as a crucial environmental cue which modulates plant growth and development, and which is controlled by multiple photoreceptors including the primary red light photoreceptor, phytochrome B (phyB). The signaling mechanism of phyB involves direct interactions with a group of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS (PIFs), and the negative regulators of photomorphogenesis, COP1 and SPAs. H2A.Z is an evolutionarily conserved H2A variant which plays essential roles in transcriptional regulation. The replacement of H2A with H2A.Z is catalyzed by the SWR1 complex. Here, we show that the Pfr form of phyB physically interacts with the SWR1 complex subunits SWC6 and ARP6. phyB and ARP6 co-regulate numerous genes in the same direction, some of which are associated with auxin biosynthesis and response including YUC9, which encodes a rate-limiting enzyme in the tryptophan-dependent auxin biosynthesis pathway. Moreover, phyB and HY5/HYH act to inhibit hypocotyl elongation partially through repression of auxin biosynthesis. Based on our findings and previous studies, we propose that phyB promotes H2A.Z deposition at YUC9 to inhibit its expression through direct phyB-SWC6/ARP6 interactions, leading to repression of auxin biosynthesis, and thus inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in red light.