Does Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Affect Embryo Euploidy Rates in Couples with High Sperm DNA Fragmentation?

A biomimetic sperm selection device for routine sperm selection

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can a biomimetic microfluidic sperm sorter isolate motile sperm while minimizing DNA damage in comparison with density gradient centrifugation (DGC)?

DESIGN

This was a two-phase study of 61 men, consisting of a proof-of-concept study with 21 donated semen samples in a university research laboratory, followed by a diagnostic andrology study with 40 consenting patients who presented at a fertility clinic for semen diagnostics. Each sample was split to perform DGC and microfluidic sperm selection (one-step sperm selection with 15 min of incubation) side-by-side. Outcomes evaluated included concentration, progressive motility, and DNA fragmentation index (DFI) of raw semen, and sperm isolated using DGC and the microfluidic device. Results were analysed using Friedman's test for non-parametric data (significant when P < 0.05). DFI values were assessed by sperm chromatin dispersion assay.

RESULTS

Sperm isolated using DGC and the microfluidic device showed improved DFI values and motility compared with the raw semen sample in both cohorts. However, the microfluidic device was significantly better than DGC at reducing DFI values in both the proof-of-concept study (P = 0.012) and the diagnostic andrology study (P < 0.001). Progressive motility was significantly higher for sperm isolated using the microfluidic device in the proof-of-concept study (P = 0.0061) but not the diagnostic andrology study. Sperm concentration was significantly lower for samples isolated using the microfluidic device compared with DGC for both cohorts (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Channel-based biomimetic sperm selection can passively select motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation. When compared with DGC, this method isolates fewer sperm but with a higher proportion of progressively motile cells and greater DNA integrity.

Microfluidics: The future of sperm selection in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Obtaining functional sperm cells is the first step to treat infertility. With the ever-increasing trend in male infertility, clinicians require access to effective solutions that are able to single out the most viable spermatozoa, which would max out the chance for a successful pregnancy. The new generation techniques for sperm selection involve microfluidics, which offers laminar flow and low Reynolds number within the platforms can provide unprecedented opportunities for sperm selection. Previous studies showed that microfluidic platforms can provide a novel approach to this challenge and since then researchers across the globe have attacked this problem from multiple angles.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we seek to provide a much-needed bridge between the technical and medical aspects of microfluidic sperm selection. Here, we provide an up-to-date list on microfluidic sperm selection procedures and its application in assisted reproductive technology laboratories.

SEARCH METHOD

A literature search was performed in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to select papers reporting microfluidic sperm selection using the keywords: microfluidic sperm selection, self-motility, non-motile sperm selection, boundary following, rheotaxis, chemotaxis, and thermotaxis. Papers published before March 31, 2023 were selected.

OUTCOMES

Our results show that most studies have used motility-based properties for sperm selection. However, microfluidic platforms are ripe for making use of other properties such as chemotaxis and especially rheotaxis. We have identified that low throughput is one of the major hurdles to current microfluidic sperm selection chips, which can be solved via parallelization.

CONCLUSION

Future work needs to be performed on numerical simulation of the microfluidics chip prior to fabrication as well as relevant clinical assessment after the selection procedure. This would require a close collaboration and understanding among engineers, biologists, and medical professionals. It is interesting that in spite of two decades of microfluidics sperm selection, numerical simulation and clinical studies are lagging behind. It is expected that microfluidic sperm selection platforms will play a major role in the development of fully integrated start-to-finish assisted reproductive technology systems.

The impact of mitochondrial impairments on sperm function and male fertility: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Besides adenine triphosphate (ATP) production for sustaining motility, the mitochondria of sperm also host other critical cellular functions during germ cell development and fertilization including calcium homeostasis, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptosis, and in some cases steroid hormone biosynthesis. Normal mitochondrial membrane potential with optimal mitochondrial performance is essential for sperm motility, capacitation, acrosome reaction, and DNA integrity.

RESULTS

Defects in the sperm mitochondrial function can severely harm the fertility potential of males. The role of sperm mitochondria in fertilization and its final fate after fertilization is still controversial. Here, we review the current knowledge on human sperm mitochondria characteristics and their physiological and pathological conditions, paying special attention to improvements in assistant reproductive technology and available treatments to ameliorate male infertility.

CONCLUSION

Although mitochondrial variants associated with male infertility have potential clinical use, research is limited. Further understanding is needed to determine how these characteristics lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes and affect male fertility potential.

Advanced Sperm Selection Techniques for Assisted Reproduction

Male infertility accounts for approximately 40% of infertility cases. There are many causes of male infertility, including environmental factors, age, lifestyle, infections, varicocele, and cancerous pathologies. Severe oligozoospermia, cryptozoospermia, and azoospermia (obstructive and non-obstructive) are identified as severe male factor infertility, once considered conditions of sterility. Today, in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques are the only treatment strategy in cases of male factor infertility for which new methodologies have been developed in the manipulation of spermatozoa to achieve fertilization and increase success rates. This review is an update of in vitro manipulation techniques, in particular sperm selection, emphasizing clinical case-specific methodology. The success of an IVF process is related to infertility diagnosis, appropriate choice of treatment, and effective sperm preparation and selection. In fact, selecting the best spermatozoa to guarantee an optimal paternal heritage means increasing the blastulation, implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates, resulting in the greater success of IVF techniques.

The impact of microfluidics sperm processing on blastocyst euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation: a sibling oocyte double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the euploidy rates among blastocysts created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation.

DESIGN

Sibling oocyte randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single university-affiliated infertility practice.

PATIENTS

A total of 106 patients aged 18-42 years undergoing fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles with preimplantation genetic testing between January 2021 and April 2022 contributed 1,442 mature oocytes, which were injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation.

INTERVENTION(S)

The sperm sample is divided and processed using a microfluidics device and density gradient centrifugation for injection into sibling oocytes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization, high-quality blastulation, and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

The blastocyst euploidy rate per mature oocyte was not significantly different in the study group compared with the control group (22.9% vs. 20.5%). The blastocyst euploidy rate per biopsied embryo was also similar between the 2 groups (53.0% vs. 45.7%). However, the fertilization rate per mature oocyte injected was found to be significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (76.0% vs. 69.9%). The high-quality blastulation rate per mature oocyte injected was similar between the 2 groups, as was the total number of embryos frozen. There were no differences in the number of participants with no blastocysts for biopsy or the number of participants with no euploid embryos between the 2 groups. Among the male factor infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss subgroups, there were no differences in euploidy rates, fertilization rates, blastulation rates, or total numbers of blastocysts frozen, although the study was underpowered to detect these differences. Seventy-seven patients underwent frozen embryo transfer; there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Microfluidics processing did not improve embryo euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation in this sibling oocyte study, although fertilization rates were significantly higher.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04744025.

Sperm Preparation with Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Chip May Improve Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes Compared to Density Gradient Centrifugation

Does sperm preparation using the FERTILE PLUS™ Sperm Sorting Chip improve fertilization rates, blastocyst formation, utilization, and euploidy rates in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), compared with density gradient centrifugation (DGC)? A single-cohort, retrospective data review including data from 53 couples who underwent ICSI cycles within a 12-month period. For each couple, the two closest, consecutive cycles were identified, where one used the standard technique of sperm preparation (DGC) and the subsequent used FERTILE PLUS™, therefore, couples acted as their own controls. Paired samples t-test was used to compare means for the outcomes (fertilization, blastocyst formation, utilization, and euploidy rates). Binary logistic regression analysis assessed the relationship between female age, the presence of male factor infertility, and euploidy rates. Blastocyst, utilization, and euploidy rates were significantly higher for cycles using FERTILE PLUS™ compared to DGC (76% vs 56%, p = 0.002; 60% vs 41%, p = 0.005, and 40% vs 20%, p = 0.001, respectively). Although there was an increase in fertilization rates for cycles using FERTILE PLUS™, this was not significant (72% vs 68%, p = 0.449). The euploidy rates of females ≤ 35 years were significantly increased when the FERTILE PLUS™ sperm preparation method was used, compared to the older age group (OR 2.31, p = 0.007). No significant association was found between the presence or absence of male factor infertility and euploidy rates between the two cycles. This study provides tentative evidence that the FERTILE PLUS™ microfluidic sorting device for sperm selection can improve blastocyst formation, utilization, and euploidy rates following ICSI in comparison to the DGC method.

Rationale and study design of a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing euploidy rates among embryos created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm processed by microfluidics or by density gradient centrifugation

BACKGROUND

During the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, sperm must be processed prior to insemination. While the most common method, density gradient centrifugation, can potentially damage sperm during centrifugation, a recent advancement in sperm processing uses a microfluidics system which selects for the most highly motile sperm. In selecting for these sperm which may be of higher quality, the euploidy rates of embryos created as a result may also be improved. The primary aim of this study is to compare the euploidy rates per mature oocyte between embryos created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm processed by microfluidics sorting or by density gradient centrifugation.

METHODS

This is a double-blinded prospective randomized sibling oocyte study including patients undergoing treatment with IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). After controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, oocytes from each patient will be separated into two groups. Each group will be randomized to sperm processed using either microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation and embryos biopsied for PGT to assess euploidy rates. A sample size of 686 oocytes in each group for a total of 1372 oocytes will provide 80% power to detect a significant difference in the euploidy rates per mature oocyte between the two groups. An ancillary study examining the relationship between sperm processing method and sperm DNA fragmentation will be assessed.

CONCLUSION

This study will offer insight into the sperm's contribution to embryo euploidy, and has the potential to provide an alternative method of improving euploidy rates in clinical practice.