Understanding the Reasons Why Men and Women Do Not Donate Gametes

Attitude of Belgian women towards enucleated egg donation for treatment of mitochondrial diseases and infertility

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the attitude of Belgian women of reproductive age towards enucleated egg donation? Does the willingness of women to donate differ when they would donate enucleated or whole eggs?

DESIGN

In 2022, an online survey was conducted among a representative sample of 1000 women in Belgium aged 18-50 years. The item on willingness to anonymously donate enucleated eggs was dichotomized into those willing to donate and those not willing to donate or uncertain.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the willingness to donate enucleated eggs and whole eggs (whether anonymously or identifiably). Anonymity, however, affected the willingness to donate, with considerably fewer women willing to donate identifiably. The respondents were divided about their parental status if they were to donate enucleated eggs, with less than one-half (44%) not considering themselves to be a genetic mother. Women willing to donate enucleated eggs anonymously were less likely to view themselves as a genetic mother of the child compared with others. Fewer than one in five considered the technique unacceptable because the resulting child would carry genetic material of three persons.

CONCLUSIONS

Women in the general population did not show a greater willingness to donate enucleated eggs than whole eggs. The fact that the respondents were strongly divided on whether or not they would consider themselves to be a genetic mother of the resulting child may explain this result. Other factors, such as the potential high risk for the child, may also have contributed to less willingness.

Oocyte donors' experience and expectations in a non-profit fertility care setting

PURPOSE

In this survey, we aimed to provide the description of previous oocyte donors' profile in a Belgian tertiary fertility hospital clinic. The research question is as follows: could certain aspects be changed or improved, according to previous oocyte donors? The final purpose is to boost adherence to future oocyte donation (OD) programs, given the large gap between supply and demand.

METHODS

We set up an observational cross-sectional study of oocyte donors who were recruited in a tertiary referral hospital. Participants were asked to join an anonymous online survey with questions about demographic and reproductive variables, reasons to start or discontinue OD, satisfaction rate, experience, and attitude towards presumed anonymity.

RESULTS

A total of 218 women were eligible to join the study, with a response rate of 49% (108/218). The emerging profile of the oocyte donor is a well-educated (102/108 with at least a high school degree), employed (86/108) woman in her thirties. Altruism and solidarity were the main drivers of their choice (105/108), and a general permissive attitude towards disclosure of their personal information to the recipient (60/108) was registered. In case of negative experience or discontinuation, concerns regarding pain management and specific long-lasting psychological support were expressed (8/20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest the need to improve pain relief and to offer psychological support even beyond ending the donation process. These interventions could improve both participation and adherence to OD programs, ensuring an autonomous and free choice while avoiding any risk of exploitation.

Storage trends, usage and disposition outcomes following egg freezing

RESEARCH QUESTION

What happens to eggs after egg freezing?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed spanning 2012-2022. Data were obtained from seven assisted reproductive technology clinics in Victoria, Australia. Aggregated, de-identified data were collected on cycles that resulted in egg freezing and the following outcomes, including treatment involving thawed eggs and disposition outcomes of surplus eggs.

RESULTS

The number of patients with eggs in storage grew rapidly from 144 in 2012 to 2015 in 2022. In 2022, 73% of patients had stored their eggs for <5 years, 25% for 5-10 years, and 2% for ≥10 years. Most thaw cycles (600/645, 93%) involved eggs that had been frozen for <5 years, of which 47% had been frozen for <6 months. Overall, the live birth rate per initiated thaw cycle was 12%. Across the study period, 2800 eggs from 286 patients were either discarded, donated or exported. Of the 128 patients who discarded their eggs, 32% had stored their eggs for <5 years, 32% for 5-10 years and 36% for >10 years. Of the 23 patients who donated their eggs to someone else, all but four had stored their eggs for <5 years. No eggs were donated to research over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that very few patients have made the decision to use or relinquish their eggs. Strategies may be needed to address the prolonged storage of surplus eggs, and ensure that patients are supported to make decisions regarding the fate of their eggs which align with their preferences and values.

Motivational stimuli to donate sperm among non-donor students

BACKGROUND

Sperm banks face a continuously evolving gap between the increasing demand for sperm donation (SD) vs. limited available reserve. To improve donors' recruitment and increase supply, motivations towards SD should be investigated specifically among young men who have the potential to become donors. Our aim was to evaluate factors which increase and decrease predisposition to donate sperm among non-donor students, who represent a "potential pool" for possible donors' recruitment.

RESULTS

Ninety-three men fulfilled the questionnaire with mean age of 28.2 ± 4.5 years. The most powerful incentive to donate sperm was financial reward followed by a willingness to help others to build a family (3.8 and 3.4, respectively). The most dominant consideration to decline donation was the fear of anonymity loss and future regret (4 and 3.8). While participants' willingness for anonymous SD was fair (2.8), the open-identity donation was rated significantly lower (1.75, p < 0.01). Familiarity with recipients and offspring had lower scores (1.9-2.2) as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Young single men represent a suitable cohort for anonymous donation. Financial reward and willingness to help others are important positive incentives while anonymity preservation is crucial to maintain their willingness towards SD. Regulatory shifting towards open-identity SD necessitates the establishment of an alternative "potential pool" population as a reliable source to recruit donors.