Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?

Evaluating compliance with the 2013 best practice guidelines for preventing surgical site infection in high-risk pediatric spine surgery

PURPOSE

Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) were published one decade ago to decrease surgical site infection (SSI) in pediatric spinal deformity. Successful implementation has not been established. This study evaluated surgeon compliance with items on the BPG. We hypothesized that BPG authors and surgeons with more experience, higher caseload, and awareness of the BPG would have higher compliance.

METHODS

We queried North American and European surgeons, authors and non-authors, and members of various spine study groups on adherence to BPGs using an anonymous survey. Mean compliance scores (MCSs) were developed by correlating Likert responses with MCSs ("None of the time" = no compliance = MCS 0, "Sometimes" = weak to moderate = MCS 1, "Most of the time" = high = MCS 2, "All the time" = perfect = MCS 3).

RESULTS

Of the 142 respondents, 73.7% reported high or perfect compliance. Average compliance scores for all guidelines was 2.2 ± 0.4. There were significantly different compliance scores between North American and European surgeons (2.3 vs 1.8, p < 0.001), authors and non-authors (2.5 vs. 2.2, p = 0.023), and surgeons with and without knowledge of the BPGs (2.3 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between BPG awareness and compliance (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) and no correlation between years in practice (r = 0.0, p = 0.37) or yearly caseload (r = 0.2, p = 0.78) with compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance among our cohort of surgeons surveyed was high. North American surgeons, authors of the BPGs and those aware of the guidelines had increased compliance. Participation in a spine study group, years in practice, and yearly caseload were not associated with compliance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V-expert opinion.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Spinal Deformity

The authors outline a review of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations surrounding adult spinal deformity. Preoperative management topics include imaging, hemoglobin A1c levels before spine surgery, osteoporotic management, and prehabilitation. Topics surrounding intraoperative management include the use of antibiotics, liposomal bupivacaine, and Foley catheters. The authors also discuss postoperative questions surrounding analgesia, nausea and vomiting, thromboembolic prophylaxis, and early mobilization. Throughout their discussion, the authors incorporate enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to hopefully lead to future discussions regarding optimizing complex spinal patients.

Intraoperative Antibiotic Use in Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis: Current Practices and Trends

BACKGROUND

Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients were published in September 2019. Recommendations included using intravenous cefazolin and topical vancomycin for all index procedures, plus gram-negative coverage for neuromuscular patients. Guideline adherence is unknown. This study aimed to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of index growth-friendly procedures and assess changes in practice patterns over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review of data collected through a multicenter study group included EOS patients undergoing index growth-friendly procedures between January 2018 and March 2021, excluding revisions, lengthenings, and tetherings. Demographics, clinical measurements, intraoperative antibiotics, and 90-day complications were recorded. Descriptive and univariate statistics were utilized. Antibiotic prophylaxis from April 2018 through September 2019 and October 2019 through March 2021 were compared with evaluate change after BPG publication.

RESULTS

A total of 562 patients undergoing growth-friendly procedures were included. The most common scoliosis types included neuromuscular (167, 29.7%), syndromic (134, 23.8%), and congenital (97, 17.3%). Most index procedures involved magnetically controlled growing rods (417, 74%) followed by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib or traditional growing rods (105, 19%). Most patients received cefazolin alone at index procedure (310, 55.2%) or cefazolin with an aminoglycoside (113, 20.1%). Topical antibiotics were used in 327 patients (58.2%), with most receiving vancomycin powder. There was increased use of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside after BPG publication (16% vs. 25%) ( P =0.01). Surgical site infections occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) within 90 days of index procedure, 10 pre-BPGs (3%), and 2 post-BPGs (0.9%), with no significant difference in surgical site infection rate by type of antibiotic administered ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Historical variability exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis during index growth-friendly procedures for EOS. There continues to be variability following BPG publication; however, this study found a significant increase in antibiotic prophylaxis against gram-negative bacteria after BPG publication. Overall, greater emphasis is needed to decrease variability in practice, improve compliance with consensus guidelines, and evaluate BPG efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective.

Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection

BACKGROUND

We have updated the guideline for preventing and managing perioperative infection in China, given the global issues with antimicrobial resistance and the need to optimize antimicrobial usage and improve hospital infection control levels.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for prevention and management of perioperative infection, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Revisions were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the experts.

RESULTS

There were 17 questions prepared, for which 37 recommendations were made. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the meta-analysis results, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides evidence to perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis that increased the rational use of prophylactic antimicrobial use, with substantial improvement in the risk-benefit trade-off.

Surgical site infection in pediatric spinal fusion surgery revisited: outcome and risk factors after preventive bundle implementation

Background

Surgical site infections (SSI) contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and financial burden. We sought to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following pediatric spinal fusion surgery in patients for whom standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies have been implemented.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of children aged <18 years who underwent spinal fusion surgery from January 2017 to November 2021 at a quaternary academic pediatric medical center. Univariable analysis was used to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and SSI.

Results

Of 1111 patients, 752 (67.6%) were female; median age was 14.2 years. SSI occurred in 14 patients (1.3%). Infections were superficial incisional (n=2; 14.3%), deep incisional (n=9; 64.3%), and organ/space (n=3; 21.4%). Median time to SSI was 14 days (range, 8 to 45 days). Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most frequently-isolated bacteria. Potential risk factors for SSIs included low body weight (Odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.99, p=0.026), ASA classification of ≥3 (OR 24.53, 95%CI 3.20-188.22, p=0.002), neuromuscular scoliosis (OR 3.83, 95%CI 3.82-78.32, p<0.001), prolonged operative time (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.28-1.92, p<0.001), prolonged anesthetic time (OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.35-2.00, p<0.001), administration of prophylactic antibiotic ≥60 minutes before skin incision (OR 11.52, 95%CI 2.34-56.60, p=0.003), and use of povidone-iodine alone for skin preparation (OR 5.97, 95%CI 1.27-28.06, p=0.024).

Conclusion

In the context of a robust bundle for SSI prevention; low body weight, ASA classification of ≥3, neuromuscular scoliosis, prolonged operative and anesthetic times, administration of prophylactic antibiotic ≥60 minutes before skin incision, and use of povidone-iodine alone for skin preparation increased the risk of SSI. Administration of prophylactic antibiotic within 60 minutes of skin incision, strict adherence to high-risk preventive protocol, and use of CHG-alcohol could potentially reduce the rate of SSI.