Is Propionibacterium acnes becoming the most common bacteria in delayed infections following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Implant-associated Infection After Pediatric Spine Deformity Surgery: Is Removal of Hardware Indicated?

BACKGROUND

Postoperative spinal implant infection following pediatric spinal surgery often presents a management dilemma. We aimed to characterize our experience in this cohort of patients, hoping to provide further insight when approaching these challenging cases.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was performed of all children who underwent spinal surgery from January 2015 to June 2021 in a tertiary pediatric spinal surgery referral center in Queensland, Australia. Records were reviewed to identify cases of postoperative surgical site infection, with particular focus on children with infection directly involving implants. Preoperative prophylaxis, microbiology, clinical course and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 580 children underwent 933 procedures during the study period. The most common pathology requiring surgery was idiopathic scoliosis in 257 children (44.3%) followed by neuromuscular scoliosis in 192 children (33.1%). There were 35 cases of surgical site infection (6.03%), and 9 were implant-associated (1.55%). Infection rate among children with neuromuscular spinal deformity was almost 3-fold higher (11.5%) than idiopathic (3.89%). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism (n = 15). Four implant-associated infections were successfully managed with retention of implant; all were diagnosed within 32 days (median = 20 days) and cultured either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Conversely, infections that necessitated implant removal had a more indolent onset (median = 175 days), and more often cultured Cutibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative Staphylococci .

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative spinal implant infection can be treated successfully with hardware retention in select cases. Earlier presentation and recognition appear to be associated with better rates of retention and are linked to certain organisms. Further exploration of specific preventative strategies may be key in preventing devastating late-onset infections.

Cutibacterium spp. Infections after Instrumented Spine Surgery Have a Good Prognosis Regardless of Rifampin Use: A Cross-Sectional Study

Infection after spinal instrumentation (IASI) by Cutibacterium spp. is being more frequently reported. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcome of a Cutibacterium spp. IASI (CG) compared with non-Cutibacterium IASI (NCG) infections, with an additional focus on the role of rifampin in the treatment. All patients from a multicentre, retrospective, observational study with a confirmed IASI between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into two groups: (CG and NCG) IASI. Baseline, medical, surgical, infection treatment, and follow-up data were compared for both groups. In total, 411 patients were included: 27 CG and 384 NCG. The CG patients were significantly younger. They had a longer median time to diagnosis (23 vs. 13 days) (p = 0.025), although 55.6% debuted within the first month after surgery. Cutibacterium patients were more likely to have the implant removed (29.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.014) and received shorter antibiotic regimens (p = 0.014). In 33% of Cutibacterium cases, rifampin was added to the baseline therapy. None of the 27 infections resulted in treatment failure during follow-up regardless of rifampin use. Cutibacterium spp. is associated with a younger age and may cause both early and late IASIs. In our experience, the use of rifampin to improve the outcome in the treatment of a Cutibacterium spp. IASI is not relevant since, in our series, none of the cases had therapeutic failure regardless of the use of rifampin.

Indolent Infection After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Under-recognized Cause of Pseudarthrosis, Which Can Be Successfully Treated With Anterior Revision Fusion

Introduction:

Methods:

Results:

Discussion: