In-hospital opioid usage following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Does methadone offer an advantage when used with an ERAS pathway?

A survey of practice in the anesthetic management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spine fusion by the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 2%-4% of the general pediatric population. While surgical correction remains one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed in pediatrics, limited consensus exists on the perioperative anesthetic management.

AIMS

To examine the current state of anesthetic management of typical AIS spine fusions at institutions which have a dedicated pediatric orthopedic spine surgeon.

METHODS

A web-based survey was sent to all members of the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists (NAPSA) Collaborative. This group included 34 anesthesiologists at 19 different institutions, each of whom has a Harms Study Group surgeon performing spine fusions at their hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 34 (91.2%) anesthesiologists completed the survey, with a missing response rate from 0% to 16.1% depending on the question. Most anesthesia practices (77.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7-93.4) do not have patients come for a preoperative visit prior to the day of surgery. Intravenous induction was the preferred method (74.2%; 95% CI 61.3-89.9), with the majority utilizing two peripheral IVs (93.5%; 95% CI 90.3-100) and an arterial line (100%; 95% CI 88.8-100). Paralytic administration for intubation and/or exposure was divided (51.6% rocuronium/vecuronium, 45.2% no paralytic, and 3.2% succinylcholine) amongst respondents. While tranexamic acid was consistently utilized for reducing blood loss, dosing regimens varied. When faced with neuromonitoring signal issues, 67.7% employ a formal protocol. Most anesthesiologists (93.5%; 95% CI 78.6-99.2) extubate immediately postoperatively with patients admitted to an inpatient floor bed (77.4%; 95% CI 67.7-93.3).

CONCLUSION

Most anesthesiologists (87.1%; 95% CI 80.6-99.9) report the use of some form of an anesthesia-based protocol for AIS fusions, but our survey results show there is considerable variation in all aspects of perioperative care. Areas of agreement on management comprise the typical vascular access required, utilization of tranexamic acid, immediate extubation, and disposition to a floor bed. By recognizing the diversity of anesthetic care, we can develop areas of research and improve the perioperative management of AIS.

Perioperative methadone for posterior spinal fusion in adolescents: Results from a double-blind randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Posterior spinal fusion is the most common surgical procedure performed for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the United States. Intraoperative methadone has been shown to improve pain control in adult patients undergoing complex spine surgery, and current pediatric studies show encouraging results; however, prospective randomized-controlled trials are lacking in the pediatric literature.

AIMS

We conducted a single-center double-blind randomized-controlled trial to compare intraoperative use of methadone to morphine in pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

METHODS

A total of 47 adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion were randomized (stratified by sex) to either a methadone (n = 25) or morphine (n = 22) group. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain severity, opioid-related side effects, and ratio of patient-controlled analgesia injections: attempts as a behavioral index of uncontrolled pain.

RESULTS

Patients in the methadone group consumed less total opioid postoperatively (median [interquartile range], 0.3 mg/kg [0.1, 0.5]) than patients in the morphine group (0.3 mg/kg [0.2, 0.6]), median difference [95% confidence interval] -0.07 [-0.2 to 0.02]; (p = .026). Despite the lower amount of opioid used postoperatively, pain scores for the methadone group (3.5 [3.0, 4.3]) were not significantly different from those in the morphine group (4.0 [3.2, 5.0]; p = .250). Groups did not differ on opioid-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-dose intraoperative methadone regimen resulted in decreased opioid consumption compared to morphine. Although the clinical significance of these results may be limited, the analgesic equipoise without increased opioid-related side effects and potential for a lower incidence of chronic pain may tip the balance in favor of routine methadone use for adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

The Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Multimodal Pain Management Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Faster and Farther With Less Opioids

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective controlled cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration on postsurgical pain management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients by analyzing postoperative opioid consumption, ambulation, and length of stay (LOS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Optimal postoperative pain control for AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is challenging. Multimodal pain management protocols provide adequate analgesia while decreasing opioid consumption. LB was recently approved for pediatric patients; however, use in AIS patients is understudied.

METHODS

119 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who received LB as erector spinae block in addition to the standard postoperative pain management protocol (Group A), and patients who received only the standard postoperative pain protocol (Group B). Oral morphine equivalents, intravenous opioid and valium consumption, pain scores (VAS), nausea/vomiting, ambulation distance and LOS were assessed.

RESULTS

Group A experienced significantly lower total opioid consumption compared to Group B (44.5 mg vs. 70.2 mg). Morphine use was lower in Group A on postoperative day (POD) 0, and oxycodone use was lower in Group A on PODs 1 and 2. There was a higher proportion of patients who used only oral opioids in Group A (81% vs. 41%). Of patients requiring any intravenous opioids, 79% did not receive LB. A significantly higher proportion of LB patients were discharged on POD 2 (55% vs. 27%); therefore, LOS was shorter for Group A. Group A ambulated further postoperatively. There were no differences in pain scores, valium requirements or nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

LB was associated with decreased total opioid use, shorter LOS, and improved ambulation in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Including LB in multimodal pain management protocols proved effective in reducing opioid use while increasing mobilization in the immediate postoperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Pain Medication Use Two Years After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Observational case control.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of opioid use two years after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its association with preoperative mental health.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Studies of opiate use have reported that up to 80% of users began their addiction with misuse of prescription opioids. Identifying opioid use and those at risk in the AIS population is critical for optimal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A query of a multicenter prospective AIS surgical fusion registry was performed to identify patients of all curve types with responses to question 11 on the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire at two years postoperative. Question 11 asks about pain medication usage for the patient's back with five specific responses: narcotics daily, narcotics weekly or less, non-narcotics daily, non-narcotics weekly/less, or none. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the association between preoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 Mental Health (MH) domain scores and two-year postoperative pain medication usage.

RESULTS

A total of 2595 patients who underwent surgery from 2002 to 2019 met inclusion. The average primary curve was 56±12°, average age 14.7±3 years, and 81.5% were female. Forty (1.5%) patients reported utilizing opioids two years after surgery, and a significant difference in preoperative MH scores was observed. Patients taking daily opioids postoperatively had the lowest median preoperative MH score (3.75), followed by non-narcotic group (4), and no medication (4.2, P <0.001). Three patients reporting opioid use postoperatively reported preoperative usage. The rate of two-year postoperative medication use based on the year of surgery demonstrated a small linear decrease in opioid use over time, with a slight increase in nonopioid daily use.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 2% of patients reported taking opioids for back pain two years after surgical correction of AIS. A lower MH score before surgery may place a patient at increased risk for opioid use two years after surgery. An analysis of the year of surgery suggests that changes in prescription practices over time may be occurring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Fast-track is an evidence-based multidisciplinary strategy for pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of patients during major surgery. To date, fast-track has not been recognized or accepted in all surgical areas, particularly in orthopedic spine surgery where it still represents a relatively new paradigm.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was provided an evidenced-based assessment of specific interventions, measurement, and associated outcomes linked to enhanced recovery pathways in spine surgery field.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in three databases from February 2012 to August 2022 to assess the pre-, intra-, and postoperative key elements and the clinical evidence of fast-track protocols as well as specific interventions and associated outcomes, in patients undergoing to spine surgery.

RESULTS

We included 57 full-text articles of which most were retrospective. Most common fast-track elements included patient's education, multimodal analgesia, thrombo- and antibiotic prophylaxis, tranexamic acid use, urinary catheter and drainage removal within 24 hours after surgery, and early mobilization and nutrition. All studies demonstrated that these interventions were able to reduce patients' length of stay (LOS) and opioid use. Comparative studies between fast-track and non-fast-track protocols also showed improved pain scores without increasing complication or readmission rates, thus improving patient's satisfaction and functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the review results, fast-track seems to be a successful tool to reduce LOS, accelerate return of function, minimize postoperative pain, and save costs in spine surgery. However, current studies are mainly on degenerative spine diseases and largely restricted to retrospective studies with non-randomized data, thus multicenter randomized trials comparing fast-track outcomes and implementation are mandatory to confirm its benefit in spine surgery.

Key Components, Current Practice and Clinical Outcomes of ERAS Programs in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have led to improvements in outcomes in several surgical fields, through multimodal optimization of patient pathways, reductions in complications, improved patient experiences and reductions in the length of stay. However, their use has not been uniformly recognized in all orthopedic fields, and there is still no consensus on the best implementation process. Here, we evaluated pre-, peri-, and post-operative key elements and clinical evidence of ERAS protocols, measurements, and associated outcomes in patients undergoing different orthopedic surgical procedures. A systematic literature search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases was conducted to identify clinical studies, from 2012 to 2022. Out of the 1154 studies retrieved, 174 (25 on spine surgery, 4 on thorax surgery, 2 on elbow surgery and 143 on hip and/or knee surgery) were considered eligible for this review. Results showed that ERAS protocols improve the recovery from orthopedic surgery, decreasing the length of hospital stays (LOS) and the readmission rates. Comparative studies between ERAS and non-ERAS protocols also showed improvement in patient pain scores, satisfaction, and range of motion. Although ERAS protocols in orthopedic surgery are safe and effective, future studies focusing on specific ERAS elements, in particular for elbow, thorax and spine, are mandatory to optimize the protocols.