Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an endobutton device: A narrative review

Since the recognition of MPFL as the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral displacement of the patella, its reconstruction gained popularity either alone or in combination with other procedures. Today, although there are plenty of techniques described in the literature, there is no consensus regarding which one is better. MPFL reconstruction using an endobutton device has been proved to be a reliable option with satisfying clinical results. Single or dual tunnel can be done depending on surgeon's preference. For safer outcomes more randomized controlled trials should be done while authors should be more meticulous when it comes to surgical technique.

Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Part 3: Recommendation on surgical treatment

PURPOSE

The aim of this consensus project was to give recommendations regarding surgical treatment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patient.

METHODS

For this consensus process, an expert, steering and rating group was formed. In an initial online meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which multiple questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement.

RESULTS

During this consensus process, 30 topics regarding the surgical management and technique of ACL reconstruction were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 30 final statements. Of these 30 final statements, all achieved consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus process has shown that surgical treatment of ACL injury is a complex process. Various surgical factors influence patient outcomes. The proposed treatment algorithm can be used as a decision aid for the surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis with Indirect Femoral Fixation Using an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Suspensory Device

BACKGROUND

The lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be considered in selected patients to diminish the risk of persistent rotatory instability and achieve a protective effect on the graft. Several techniques have been described in the literature to treat rotatory instability. Usually, a strip of the iliotibial band (ITB) is harvested from its middle while leaving the distal insertion, then passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament and fixed on the lateral aspect of the distal femur with various fixation methods such as staples, screws, anchors or extracortical suspensory devices. Despite their effectiveness, these fixation methods may be associated with complications such as lateral pain, over-constraint and tunnel convergence.

METHODS

This study presents a detailed surgical description of a new technique to perform an LET during ACL reconstruction with any type of graft fixing the ITB strip with the sutures of the ACL femoral button, comparing its pros and cons in relation to similar techniques found in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique represents a reproducible, easy to learn and inexpensive solution to perform a lateral extra-articular tenodesis associated with an ACL reconstruction using the high-resistance sutures of the femoral button.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed Loop All-Inside (FLAI) Technique

The aim of this surgical technical note is to provide a more secure option to prevent possible graft loosening with all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A triple strategy is used. First, a fixed loop cortical device is used on the femoral side. Second, an internal brace augmentation for ACL graft is employed to prevent graft loosening during early postoperative period. Lastly, tying off the sutures of tibial adjustable loop after retensioning to secure its locking mechanism from slippage.

Comparison of the mechanical properties and mechanical damages to tendon tissue in three suspensory fixation techniques

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common traumatic injury to the knee joint. Suspensory fixation has become popular in ACL reconstruction because of its high primary stability, less invasiveness, and surgical convenience. There are two common types of suspensory fixation devices: those with fixed-length and those with adjustable-length loops. Owing to structural differences and differences in initial tensioning techniques, it is expected that mechanical property and damage to the tendons will vary from device to device; however, no literature has examined this so far. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the damage caused to the tendon by three different suspensory fixation devices. An effective mechanical test was carried out as a prerequisite.

Methods

First, the mechanical properties of simple loop device (SLD) as fixed-length loop device, first-generation, and second-generation adjustable devices (AD1 and AD2) as adjustable-length loop devices were tested (isolated device testing). Second, each device was tested using bovine extensor tendons (specimen testing). Cyclic testing included 2000 cycles; the devices were subsequently displaced until failure, and the ultimate tensile strength was determined using isolated device testing. Six samples of 3 devices were used in each testing experiment. After specimen testing, the surface structure of the tendon was evaluated quantitatively using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and our original histological scoring system.

Results

During isolated device testing, SLD demonstrated the least cyclic displacement, followed by AD1 and AD2. The highest ultimate tensile strength was observed in AD2, followed by SLD and AD1. In specimen testing, the least cyclic displacement was observed in SLD, followed by AD1 and AD2. Histologically, AD1 demonstrated a significantly lower score, with damaged surface morphology, than SLD and AD2. OCT values were significantly higher, with a more disturbing tendon surface structure, in AD1 than in SLD and AD2.

Conclusions

The first-generation adjustable loop device exhibited greatest graft tissue damage at the suspensory site in a clinically relevant setting. The thinner adjustable loop mechanism may have elevated graft damage by frictional stresses during loop adjustment or by repetitive tensioning stresses.

Biomechanical and Histological Results of Dual-Suspensory Reconstruction Using Banded Tendon Graft to Bridge Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in a Chronic Rabbit Model

BACKGROUND

Bridging rotator cuff tendon defects with a patch is a reasonable treatment for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). However, the poor outcomes associated with routine patch repair have prompted exploration into superior bridging techniques and graft structures.

PURPOSE

To detect whether dual-suspensory reconstruction using a banded graft would be superior to routine bridging using a patch graft to treat MRCTs and to detect the comparative effectiveness of patellar tendon (PT) and fascia lata (FL) grafts in dual-suspensory reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Unilateral chronic MRCTs were created in 72 mature male New Zealand White rabbits, which were randomly divided into 3 groups: (1) patch bridging repair using rectangular FL autograft (PR-FL), (2) dual-suspensory bridging reconstruction using banded FL autograft (DSR-FL), and (3) dual-suspensory bridging reconstruction using banded PT autograft (DSR-PT). In each group, the mean failure load and stiffness of the cuff-graft-humerus (C-G-H) complexes of 6-week and 12-week specimens were recorded, with the failure modes and sites noted. Moreover, cuff-to-graft and graft-to-bone interface healing and graft substance remodeling of the complexes were histologically evaluated (via hematoxylin and eosin, Picrosirius red, Masson trichrome, and Safranin O/fast green staining) at 6 and 12 weeks to assess integrations between the bridging constructs and the native bone or rotator cuff tendons.

RESULTS

The DSR-PT group had the greatest mean failure loads and stiffness of the C-G-H complexes at 6 and 12 weeks (41.81 ± 7.00 N, 10.34 ± 2.68 N/mm; 87.62 ± 9.20 N, 17.98 ± 1.57 N/mm, respectively), followed by the DSR-FL group (32.04 ± 5.49 N, 8.20 ± 2.27 N/mm; 75.30 ± 7.31 N, 14.39 ± 3.29 N/mm, respectively). In the DSR-PT and DSR-FL groups, fewer specimens failed at the graft-to-bone junction and more failed at the cuff-to-graft junction, but both groups had higher median failure loads at 6 and 12 weeks (DSR-PT: cuff-to-graft junction, 37.80 and 83.76 N; graft-to-bone junction, 45.46 and 95.86 N) (DSR-FL: cuff-to-graft junction, 28.52 and 67.68 N; graft-to-bone junction, 37.92 and 82.18 N) compared with PR-FL (cuff-to-graft junction, 27.17 and 60.04 N; graft-to-bone junction, 30.12 and 55.95 N). At 12 weeks, the DSR-FL group had higher median failure loads at graft substance (72.26 N) than the PR-FL group (61.27 N). Moreover, the PR-FL group showed more inflammatory responses at the 2 healing interfaces and the graft substance in the 6-week specimens and subsequently displayed poorer interface healing (assessed via collagen organization, collagen maturity, and fibrocartilage regeneration) and graft substance remodeling (assessed via collagen organization and maturity) in 12-week specimens compared with the DSR-PT and DSR-FL groups. Superior interface healing and substance remodeling processes were observed in the DSR-PT group compared with the DSR-FL group.

CONCLUSION

When compared with routine patch repair, the dual-suspensory reconstructions optimized biomechanical properties and improved interface healing and graft substance remodeling for bridging MRCTs. Furthermore, the dual-suspensory technique using the PT graft presented superior histological and biomechanical characteristics than that using FL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The dual-suspensory reconstruction technique using banded tendon grafts may enhance bridging constructs for MRCTs in humans, warranting further investigations of clinical outcomes.

Does an Adjustable-Loop Device Loosen following ACL Reconstruction with a Hamstring Graft? A Retrospective Study with a Follow-Up of Two Years

Arthroscopic anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the gold standard treatment for an ACL tear and requires the use of fixed or adjustable-loop devices to fix a femoral-side graft. Although the adjustable mechanism is designed to provide one-way tensioning, there is a concern that the adjustable loop will loosen and lengthen during cyclic loads, creating graft laxity. The present paper is a retrospective study of patients who underwent ACLR with the fixation of a hamstring graft with an adjustable loop on the femoral side from November 2016 to October 2018. The knee’s functional outcome was evaluated using an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, and pivot shift test. The patients were assessed preoperatively and finally postoperatively after two years of surgery. Thirty-two patients were analyzed. Significant improvement was obtained in the final clinical outcome of the patients. Twenty-seven patients (84.4%) were Lachman negative, and twenty-eight patients (87.5%) were pivot shift test negative, the mean Lysholm score was 96.91, and the IKDC score was 91.47 (p < 0.001). There was no infection, graft failure, or flexion restriction. Arthroscopic ACLR with an adjustable-loop suspensory device is a successful fixation method for femoral-side graft fixation and offers a similar functional outcome as with fixed-loop devices.

No Difference in Outcomes Between Suspensory (Fixed-Loop Cortical Button) Versus Expandable Anteromedial Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Tendons: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study in Male Patients

Purpose

To compare anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autograft reconstruction using fixed-looped suspensory versus expandable femoral fixation through the anteromedial portal.

Methods

After we performed prospective power analysis and obtained institutional review board, 70 patients with ACL rupture were block randomized to the expandable or suspensory femoral fixation group (35 in each group). All patients received autologous hamstring autograft through the anteromedial portal and fixed with a sheath-screw system in the tibia. The primary outcome measures were anteroposterior knee stability at 2 years’ follow-up measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer and the degree of femoral and tibial tunnels’ widening measured by the use of computed tomography imaging performed immediately postoperative and 12 months postsurgery. Secondary outcome measures included pain score on a visual analog scale, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 assessment form, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity scale at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

Twenty-four patients were excluded from further analysis, leaving a total of 48 patients (24 in each group) for the final evaluation. The anteroposterior knee stability (KT-1000) showed no difference between groups at 24 months’ follow-up (P = .31). The percentile widening (%) of femoral and tibial tunnel at 1-year follow-up showed no difference also, except for greater values at the tibial coronal point T2 (P = .065) and tibial sagittal point T1 (P = .033) in the group of cortical buttons. Secondary clinical outcomes showed no statistical differences between groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months’ postoperatively. Numerical pain scale (visual analog scale) was similar in both groups except for postoperative day 7, where the AperFix group showed better results (P = .014). There were no major intraoperative and late postoperative complications in any of the groups.

Conclusions

Our results showed no significant differences in knee anteroposterior stability, tunnel enlargement or other clinical outcomes comparing expandable versus cortical button fixation in anteromedial hamstrings ACL reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

Level II, randomized controlled trial.

A survey on prognosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgeries following fixed loop and adjustable loop methods

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is an important disease in the younger population and especially professional athletes followed by trauma. There are different surgical methods for repairing ACL rupture each having their own prognosis rates. Here in this study, we investigated and compared results of ACL reconstruction after the fixed loop and adjustable loop surgical procedure in patients with ACL rupture.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated 60 patients with ACL rupture and divided them into two groups each containing 30 patients. Fixed loop and adjustable loop ACL repair were performed for each group. Data regarding knee society score, static laxity, and joint range of motion (ROM), patient's satisfaction and returning to normal daily activities were collected and compared between two groups after 6 months follow up using SPSS software.

RESULTS

We showed that there was no significant difference between two groups of patients regarding investigated factors (P>0.05). No surgical site infections were also observed during the study.

CONCLUSION

Both fixed loop and adjustable loop grafting procedures for ACL repair indicate beneficial results and are effective in patients with ACL rupture. We suggest that orthopedic surgeons could use each of these methods according to their own experience and the patient's condition. There are no significant differences between these two methods in the prognosis of patients.