Recombinant bovine and porcine somatotropin: safety and benefits of these biotechnologies

Instability studies of porcine somatotropin in aqueous solutions and the possible reagents for its stabilization

The instability of porcine somatotropin (pST) in various solutions and possible stabilization of the hormone by sugars and mild detergents were studied. Aggregation and decomposition of the hormone molecules in various pH solutions and under presence of sugar or detergent were monitored by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) or ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV). The pST is a very unstable hormone in an aqueous environment. It was found in this project that the peptide hormone underwent aggregation or decomposition quickly in acidic and alkaline solutions but slowly in neutral pH solutions. High losses of pST monomers were seen in concentrated solutions of the hormone. On the other hand, pST monomers were stabilized to a certain degree in glucose solutions and at a low concentration of urea. These results should facilitate the development of efficient controlled-release systems which are essential for commercializing porcine somatotropin.

Somatotropin delivery to farmed animals

Bovine somatotropin (bST) is marketed worldwide for increased milk production in cows while porcine somatotropin (pST) is approved in one country for increasing growth in swine. Somatotropin physicochemical properties, animal production method limitations and the need for cost effectiveness each contribute to the type of formulation developed. Various somatotropin physicochemical properties made formulation design difficult: heat and enzyme lability, tendency to aggregate, pH dependent solubility and stability, complicated degradation pathways and rapid in vivo clearance. The main problem of improving chemical and physical stability has been partially solved using certain excipients and vehicles. Formulations design to prolong somatotropin release include implants (matrix, osmotic), oleaginous suspensions and microparticles. This article presents the current status of somatotropin delivery in farmed animals, reviews the challenges encountered with formulation development, summarizes formulation approaches and discusses future somatotropin uses.

Molecular interaction of growth hormone with two monoclonal antibodies recognizing distinct epitopes

Two monoclonal antibodies (mAb), designated PS-7.6 and PS-11.2, were generated against recombinant porcine growth hormone (pGH) and shown to enhance the hormonal activity in promoting the growth of animals. The mAb were compared and their functional relationship investigated. It was demonstrated by radioimmunoassay that PS-11.2 did not compete, but rather enhanced binding of 125I-pGH tracer to PS-7.6, suggesting that both mAb recognized distinct epitopes and also were additive in their antigen bindings. Surface plasmon resonance analysis using optical BIAcore technology (Pharmacia Biosensor, Piscataway NJ, USA) provided additional data to support this idea because pGH, after being captured by PS-11.2, remained capable of interacting with PS-7.6. An anti-idiotypic mAb was employed and shown to interact with PS-7.6 but not PS-11.2, implying that the differences in the Fab variable regions of these two mAb might contribute to their epitope specificity. Binding kinetics were determined by the BIAcore and the individual affinities of PS-7.6 and PS-11.2 to pGH were 6.8 x 10(-8) and 1.2 x 10(-9) mol/L, respectively. When these mAb were sequentially subjected to the BIAcore, however, their affinities decreased by approximately 100-fold. Therefore, binding of pGH with one mAb significantly impaired a subsequent interaction with another mAb despite the fact that both mAb targeted different epitopes. Hypophysectomized rats were used for functional analysis and pGH was active in promoting growth of these GH-deficient animals. The hormonal effect was further improved by incubating pGH with either PS-7.6 or PS-11.2 prior to administration. However, enhancement by individual mAb was completely abolished when pGH was treated with both mAb together, indicating their unpredictable biological interference with each other. Therefore, the present findings clearly demonstrate that although PS-7.6 and PS-11.2 recognize separate epitopes, their individual interactions with pGH are closely interrelated both immunologically and biologically.