Nutrition support for glutaric acidemia type I

Two novel compound heterozygous variants of the GCDH gene in two Chinese families with glutaric acidaemia type I identified by high-throughput sequencing and a literature review

Autosomal recessive glutaric acidaemia type I (GA-I) is a rare hereditary metabolic disease characterized by increased organic acids and neurologic symptoms. Although numerous variants in the GCDH gene have been identified to be connected with the pathogenesis of GA-I, the relationship between genotype and phenotype remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated genetic data for two GA-I patients from Hubei, China, and we reviewed the previous research findings to clarify the genetic heterogeneity of GA-I and identify the potential causative variants. After we extracted genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples obtained from two unrelated Chinese families, we used target capture high-throughput sequencing combined with Sanger sequencing to determine likely pathogenic variants in the two probands. Electronic databases were also searched for the literature review. The genetic analysis revealed two compound heterozygous variants in the GCDH gene expected to lead to GA-I in the two probands (P1 and P2), with P1 carrying two known variants (c.892G > A/p. A298T and c.1244-2A > C/IVS10-2A > C) and P2 harbouring two novel variants (c.370G > T/p.G124W and c.473A > G/p.E158G). In the literature review, the most common alleles in low excretors (i.e., individuals with low excretion of GA) were R227P, V400M, M405V, and A298T, with variation in the severity of clinical phenotypes. Overall, we identified two novel GCDH gene candidate pathogenic variants in a Chinese patient, enriching the GCDH gene mutational spectrum and providing a solid foundation for the early diagnosis of GA-I patients with low excretion.

Recommendations for diagnosing and managing individuals with glutaric aciduria type 1: Third revision

Glutaric aciduria type 1 is a rare inherited neurometabolic disorder of lysine metabolism caused by pathogenic gene variations in GCDH (cytogenic location: 19p13.13), resulting in deficiency of mitochondrial glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH) and, consequently, accumulation of glutaric acid, 3-hydroxyglutaric acid, glutaconic acid and glutarylcarnitine detectable by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (organic acids) and tandem mass spectrometry (acylcarnitines). Depending on residual GCDH activity, biochemical high and low excreting phenotypes have been defined. Most untreated individuals present with acute onset of striatal damage before age 3 (to 6) years, precipitated by infectious diseases, fever or surgery, resulting in irreversible, mostly dystonic movement disorder with limited life expectancy. In some patients, striatal damage develops insidiously. In recent years, the clinical phenotype has been extended by the finding of extrastriatal abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction, preferably in the high excreter group, as well as chronic kidney failure. Newborn screening is the prerequisite for pre-symptomatic start of metabolic treatment with low lysine diet, carnitine supplementation and intensified emergency treatment during catabolic episodes, which, in combination, have substantially improved neurologic outcome. In contrast, start of treatment after onset of symptoms cannot reverse existing motor dysfunction caused by striatal damage. Dietary treatment can be relaxed after the vulnerable period for striatal damage, that is, age 6 years. However, impact of dietary relaxation on long-term outcomes is still unclear. This third revision of evidence-based recommendations aims to re-evaluate previous recommendations (Boy et al., J Inherit Metab Dis, 2017;40(1):75-101; Kolker et al., J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34(3):677-694; Kolker et al., J Inherit Metab Dis, 2007;30(1):5-22) and to implement new research findings on the evolving phenotypic diversity as well as the impact of non-interventional variables and treatment quality on clinical outcomes.

The Challenge of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Does Medical Food Alone Suffice?

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA-1) is a treatable inborn error of metabolism caused by glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. This enzyme deficiency leads to accumulation of glutaric acid, 3-hydroxy glutaric acid, and glutaconic acid which are potentially neurotoxic. Patients with GA-1 have characteristic clinical and neuroimaging features that help us to clinch the diagnosis. Early diagnosis by newborn screening helps us to prevent the motor problems such as dystonia and spasticity. Treatment includes low-protein diet along with carnitine supplementation which may lead to deficiency of essential amino acids and hence malnutrition. Managing malnutrition in a child with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) is challenging. Here, we describe a patient, a case of GA-1 on medical food, presenting with severe acute malnutrition, who improved with a combination of medical and home-made foods along with lysine-free, tryptophan-reduced amino acid supplements.

Inconsistencies in the Nutrition Management of Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: An International Survey

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA-1) is a cerebral organic aciduria characterized by striatal injury and progressive movement disorder. Nutrition management shifted from a general restriction of intact protein to targeted restriction of lysine and tryptophan. Recent guidelines advocate for a low-lysine diet using lysine-free, tryptophan-reduced medical foods. GA-1 guideline recommendations for dietary management of patients over the age of six are unclear, ranging from avoiding excessive intake of intact protein to counting milligrams of lysine intake. A 22–question survey on the nutrition management of GA-1 was developed with the goal of understanding approaches to diet management for patients identified by newborn screening under age six years compared to management after diet liberalization, as well as to gain insight into how clinicians define diet liberalization. Seventy-six responses (25% of possible responses) to the survey were received. Nutrition management with GA-1 is divergent among surveyed clinicians. There was congruency among survey responses to the guidelines, but there is still uncertainty about how to counsel patients on diet optimization and when diet liberalization should occur. Ongoing clinical research and better understanding of the natural history of this disease will help establish stronger recommendations from which clinicians can best counsel families.

Proposed recommendations for diagnosing and managing individuals with glutaric aciduria type I: second revision

Glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I; synonym, glutaric acidemia type I) is a rare inherited metabolic disease caused by deficiency of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase located in the catabolic pathways of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine, and L-tryptophan. The enzymatic defect results in elevated concentrations of glutaric acid, 3-hydroxyglutaric acid, glutaconic acid, and glutaryl carnitine in body tissues, which can be reliably detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (organic acids) and tandem mass spectrometry (acylcarnitines). Most untreated individuals with GA-I experience acute encephalopathic crises during the first 6 years of life that are triggered by infectious diseases, febrile reaction to vaccinations, and surgery. These crises result in striatal injury and consequent dystonic movement disorder; thus, significant mortality and morbidity results. In some patients, neurologic disease may also develop without clinically apparent crises at any age. Neonatal screening for GA-I us being used in a growing number of countries worldwide and is cost effective. Metabolic treatment, consisting of low lysine diet, carnitine supplementation, and intensified emergency treatment during catabolism, is effective treatment and improves neurologic outcome in those individuals diagnosed early; treatment after symptom onset, however, is less effective. Dietary treatment is relaxed after age 6 years and should be supervised by specialized metabolic centers. The major aim of this second revision of proposed recommendations is to re-evaluate the previous recommendations (Kölker et al. J Inherit Metab Dis 30:5-22, 2007b; J Inherit Metab Dis 34:677-694, 2011) and add new research findings, relevant clinical aspects, and the perspective of affected individuals.

Low lysine diet in glutaric aciduria type I--effect on anthropometric and biochemical follow-up parameters

BACKGROUND

Metabolic treatment in glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I) including a low lysine diet with lysine-free, tryptophan-reduced amino acid supplements (AAS), carnitine supplementation and early start of emergency treatment during putatively threatening episodes of intermittent febrile illness dramatically improves the outcome and thus has been recommended by an international guideline group (Kölker et al, J Inherit Metab Dis 30:5-22, 2007). However, possible affection of linear growth, weight gain and biochemical follow-up monitoring has not been studied systematically.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients (n = 29 asymptomatic, n = 4 dystonic) with GA-I who have been identified by newborn screening in Germany from 1999 to 2009 were followed prospectively during the first six years of life. Dietary treatment protocols, anthropometrical and biochemical parameters were longitudinally evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean daily intake as percentage of guideline recommendations was excellent for lysine (asymptomatic patients: 101 %; dystonic patients: 103 %), lysine-free, tryptophan-reduced AAS (108 %; 104 %), energy (106 %; 110 %), and carnitine (92 %; 102 %). Low lysine diet did not affect weight gain (mean SDS 0.05) but mildly impaired linear growth in asymptomatic patients (mean SDS -0.38), while dystonic patients showed significantly reduced weight gain (mean SDS -1.32) and a tendency towards linear growth retardation (mean SDS -1.03). Patients treated in accordance with recent recommendations did not show relevant abnormalities of routine biochemical follow-up parameters.

INTERPRETATION

Low lysine diet promotes sufficient intake of essential nutrients and anthropometric development in asymptomatic children up to age 6 year, whereas individualized nutritional concepts are required for dystonic patients. Revised recommendations for biochemical monitoring might be required for asymptomatic patients.

Diagnosis and management of glutaric aciduria type I--revised recommendations

Glutaric aciduria type I (synonym, glutaric acidemia type I) is a rare organic aciduria. Untreated patients characteristically develop dystonia during infancy resulting in a high morbidity and mortality. The neuropathological correlate is striatal injury which results from encephalopathic crises precipitated by infectious diseases, immunizations and surgery during a finite period of brain development, or develops insidiously without clinically apparent crises. Glutaric aciduria type I is caused by inherited deficiency of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase which is involved in the catabolic pathways of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine and L-tryptophan. This defect gives rise to elevated glutaric acid, 3-hydroxyglutaric acid, glutaconic acid, and glutarylcarnitine which can be detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (organic acids) or tandem mass spectrometry (acylcarnitines). Glutaric aciduria type I is included in the panel of diseases that are identified by expanded newborn screening in some countries. It has been shown that in the majority of neonatally diagnosed patients striatal injury can be prevented by combined metabolic treatment. Metabolic treatment that includes a low lysine diet, carnitine supplementation and intensified emergency treatment during acute episodes of intercurrent illness should be introduced and monitored by an experienced interdisciplinary team. However, initiation of treatment after the onset of symptoms is generally not effective in preventing permanent damage. Secondary dystonia is often difficult to treat, and the efficacy of available drugs cannot be predicted precisely in individual patients. The major aim of this revision is to re-evaluate the previous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for patients with this disease and incorporate new research findings into the guideline.

Role of carnitine in disease

Carnitine is a conditionally essential nutrient that plays a vital role in energy production and fatty acid metabolism. Vegetarians possess a greater bioavailability than meat eaters. Distinct deficiencies arise either from genetic mutation of carnitine transporters or in association with other disorders such as liver or kidney disease. Carnitine deficiency occurs in aberrations of carnitine regulation in disorders such as diabetes, sepsis, cardiomyopathy, malnutrition, cirrhosis, endocrine disorders and with aging. Nutritional supplementation of L-carnitine, the biologically active form of carnitine, is ameliorative for uremic patients, and can improve nerve conduction, neuropathic pain and immune function in diabetes patients while it is life-saving for patients suffering primary carnitine deficiency. Clinical application of carnitine holds much promise in a range of neural disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, hepatic encephalopathy and other painful neuropathies. Topical application in dry eye offers osmoprotection and modulates immune and inflammatory responses. Carnitine has been recognized as a nutritional supplement in cardiovascular disease and there is increasing evidence that carnitine supplementation may be beneficial in treating obesity, improving glucose intolerance and total energy expenditure.

Glutaric acidemia type I: a neurosurgical perspective. Report of two cases

Glutaric acidemia type I (GA-I) is a rare, autosomal recessive metabolic disorder that leads to severe dystonia, basal ganglia degeneration, and bilaterally enlarged anterior middle cranial fossae. The current management of this disease includes early diagnosis with newborn screening, prevention of catabolism, carnitine supplementation, and a strict dietary protein restriction. Neurosurgical evaluation and intervention may be necessary in patients with structural lesions associated with this disease. In this report, the authors present two pediatric patients with GA-I and discuss the neurosurgical aspects of this rare medical disorder.

Guideline for the diagnosis and management of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (glutaric aciduria type I)

Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disease with an estimated overall prevalence of 1 in 100 000 newborns. Biochemically, the disease is characterized by accumulation of glutaric acid, 3-hydroxyglutaric acid, glutaconic acid, and glutarylcarnitine, which can be detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of organic acids or tandem mass spectrometry of acylcarnitines. Clinically, the disease course is usually determined by acute encephalopathic crises precipitated by infectious diseases, immunizations, and surgery during infancy or childhood. The characteristic neurological sequel is acute striatal injury and, subsequently, dystonia. During the last three decades attempts have been made to establish and optimize therapy for GCDH deficiency. Maintenance treatment consisting of a diet combined with oral supplementation of L: -carnitine, and an intensified emergency treatment during acute episodes of intercurrent illness have been applied to the majority of patients. This treatment strategy has significantly reduced the frequency of acute encephalopathic crises in early-diagnosed patients. Therefore, GCDH deficiency is now considered to be a treatable condition. However, significant differences exist in the diagnostic procedure and management of affected patients so that there is a wide variation of the outcome, in particular of pre-symptomatically diagnosed patients. At this time of rapid expansion of neonatal screening for GCDH deficiency, the major aim of this guideline is to re-assess the common practice and to formulate recommendations for diagnosis and management of GCDH deficiency based on the best available evidence.

Challenges for basic research in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency

During the last decades, efforts have been made to elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying neuronal damage in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. A combination of in vitro and in vivo investigations have facilitated the development of several hypotheses, including the probable pathogenic role of accumulating glutaric acid and 3-hydroxyglutaric acid. However, there are still many shortcomings that limit an evidence-based approach to treating this inborn error of metabolism. Major future goals should include generation of a suitable animal model for acute striatal necrosis, investigation of the formation, distribution and exact intra- and extracellular concentrations of accumulating metabolites, a deeper understanding of striatal vulnerability, and systematic investigation of effects on cerebral gene expression during development and of the modulatory role of inflammatory cytokines.

Looking forward--an evidence-based approach to glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency

Three decades after the first description of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, major progress has been achieved in the prevention of acute striatal necrosis and neurological sequelae in affected children, if diagnosis is made early and treatment is started before manifestation of acute encephalopathic crises. However, all concepts for diagnostic work-up, monitoring, and treatment are solely experience-based, and 10-35% of early-diagnosed children do not or only incompletely benefit from the current management. They still develop neurological deterioration and sequelae despite early implementation of dietary treatment, carnitine supplementation and emergency treatment during acute intercurrent illnesses. International efforts should be made to move management of affected children from experience-based to evidence-based medicine. Major tools for this optimization are the establishment of an international patients' database, the implementation of an international prospective clinical study, and the development of international guidelines for diagnostic work-up, monitoring and therapy.

Reduction of lysine intake while avoiding malnutrition--major goals and major problems in dietary treatment of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency

Treatment in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, an inborn error of metabolism of lysine and tryptophan, is mainly based on restriction of lysine intake, supplementation of carnitine, and an intensification of therapy during intercurrent illnesses. The major principle of dietary treatment is to reduce the production of glutaric acid and 3-hydroxyglutaric acid by restriction of natural protein in general and of lysine in particular. In parallel to development, the growing child learns to utilize different protein sources, shifting the primarily milk-based diet to a mixed diet. The changes in nutritional demands and food composition during the first years of life greatly influence nutritional support for affected patients at different ages. This article highlights frequent pitfalls of dietary treatment for this disease and focuses on particular risks of malnutrition in terms of essential amino acids and micronutrients and/or excess intake of lysine between age 3 months and age 6 years. We conclude from the examples given that restriction of natural protein intake plus application of lysine-free amino acid mixtures minimizes the risk of malnutrition and allows a reliable control of protein and lysine intake and, thus, seems particularly recommendable during the vulnerable period for acute encephalopathic crises. The efficacy of these theoretical and experience-based approaches to dietary treatment of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency should be investigated in detail in prospective clinical studies.

Age at symptom onset predicts severity of motor impairment and clinical outcome of glutaric acidemia type 1

OBJECTIVES

In patients with glutaric acidemia type 1 (GAI), biochemical and molecular markers fail to predict the course of individual patients; therefore we sought to identify nonbiochemical variables that correlate with severity of motor deficits or overall clinical outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Archival data was collected from 42 published articles describing 115 patients with GA1. A forward, stepwise, multiple regression analysis was used to find predictors for outcome.

RESULTS

Analyses show that in patients who did not have a precipitating illness before the first appearance of motor symptoms, the age at onset was significantly associated with the severity of motor impairments and overall clinical outcome. In patients who had a precipitating illness, the age at onset did not predict the outcome. In both groups of patients, basal ganglia degeneration, enlargement of spaces containing cerebrospinal fluid, and white matter abnormalities were indicative of a poorer prognosis. Treatment given after the appearance of symptoms was not associated with a better clinical outcome or fewer motor deficits.

CONCLUSION

Because the age at symptom onset can significantly predict the severity of motor deficits and the overall outcome, it is important to identify patients with GA1 as early as possible. Several studies suggest that presymptomatic treatment may prevent or postpone the onset of symptoms.

A review of physiological and metabolic effects of essential amino acids

The authors review ten essential amino acids with regard to their metabolic, physiologic and therapeutic effects throughout the human body. Physical properties of these biologically active compounds are discussed as a foundation for their diverse roles in special nitrogen containing products, neurotransmitters, and as alternative energy sources. Both normal and abnormal amino acid metabolism are considered in the areas of digestion, elimination of metabolic products, metabolic intermediates, and defects in these systems. Recent developments in therapeutic applications are further examined for clinical utility and as an economical alternative to traditional clinical treatment modalities.

[Glutaric aciduria type 1: phenotypic variability. Report of 6 patients]

We report six patients with glutaric aciduria type 1 in four families. The patients had marked clinical variability, even within families. Three of the patients studied were normal until the onset of neurologic abnormalities, that presented as an encephalitis-like illness in the first year of age. One patient had an early and important developmental delay, but never suffered an encephalopathic crisis. Two patients have intellectual preservation; one of them has a mild tremor and choreoathetosis since the first year of age, and the other had only two afebrile seizures in infancy and no other neurologic signs. Three patients are severely handicapped, with a severe dystonic-dyskinetic disorder and unable to even sit. All the six patients have macrocephaly and in all the computed tomography showed enlarged CSF spaces and sulcal separation over the frontal and temporal lobes. Urine organic acids study of all patients showed large quantities of glutaric acid.

Diagnosis and management of glutaric aciduria type I

Glutaric aciduria type I (GA1) is a preventable cause of acute brain damage in early childhood, leading to a severe dystonic-dyskinetic disorder that is similar to cerebral palsy and ranges from extreme hypotonia to choreoathetosis to rigidity with spasticity. Degeneration of the putamen and caudate typically occurs between 6 and 18 months of age and is probably linked to changes in metabolic demand caused by normal maturational changes and superimposed catabolic stress. Recognition of this biochemical disorder before the brain has been injured is essential to outcome. Diagnosis depends upon the recognition of relatively non-specific physical findings such as hypotonia, irritability and macrocephaly, and on performance of urine organic acid quantification by gas chromatography--mass spectrometry or selective searches of urine or blood specimens by tandem mass spectrometry for glutarylcarnitine. The diagnosis may also be suggested by characteristic findings on neuroimaging. In selected patients diagnosis can only be reached by enzyme assay. Specific current management by the authors of this paper includes pharmacological doses of L-carnitine, as well as dietary protein restriction. Metabolic decompensation must be treated aggressively to avoid permanent brain damage. Multicentre studies are needed to establish best methods of diagnosis and optimal therapy of this disorder.