The diagnostic contribution of exercise testing in left bundle branch block

Accuracy of non-invasive techniques for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and prediction of cardiac events in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has limitations inherent to different tests, and the relative merits of these tests are unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the accuracy of the frequently used non-invasive techniques, including exercise electrocardiography (ECG), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and stress echocardiography (SE), for detection of CAD and prediction of cardiac events in patients with LBBB.

METHODS

A review was conducted of all reports on detection of CAD and prediction of cardiac events in patients with LBBB (published between January 1970 and December 2004), and revealed 55 diagnostic and nine prognostic reports with sufficient details to calculate test accuracy. Weighted (by sample size) sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary relative risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was higher for exercise ECG and (quantitatively analysed) MPI than for SE (83.4% and 88.5% versus 74.6% respectively, p<0.0001). SE had a higher specificity (88.7%) than MPI (41.2%) and exercise ECG (60.1%) (p<0.0001). Based on analysis of eight reports, the relative risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with an abnormal SE and MPI was elevated more than sevenfold, but it did not differ by imaging modality (p=0.9).

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of non-invasive CAD assessment in LBBB patients revealed that exercise ECG and MPI had the highest sensitivity, while SE had the highest specificity. The prognostic accuracy of MPI and SE appeared similar.

The use of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease: an overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress echocardiography has a high accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Additionally, it provides clinically useful prognostic information, such as resting left ventricular function, myocardial viability, stress-induced ischemia, vascular extent of wall motion abnormalities, and changes in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction with stress.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The timing, extent, and severity of the stress-induced wall motion abnormalities are important determinants of long-term prognosis. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of stress echocardiography in predicting long-term cardiac events in mixed patient groups and the value of this test in selected patient subsets.

SUMMARY

This review attempts to define the role of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease, pointing out the ability of this technique to identify low-risk and high-risk subsets among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and thus guide patient management decisions.

Detecting exercise-induced ischemia in left bundle branch block using the electrocardiogram

We compared 12-lead electrocardiographic changes during exercise in 41 patients with left bundle branch block; 7 were nonischemic and 34 had coronary artery obstruction > or =70% as detected by angiogram. ST depression of > or =0.5 mm from baseline when measured at the J point in leads II and AVF (p=0.004) and an increase of R-wave amplitude in lead II (p=0.05) significantly identified ischemia.

The effect of baseline electrocardiographic abnormalities on the diagnostic accuracy of exercise-induced ST segment changes

Although exercise-induced ST segment depression is thought to be unreliable marker of myocardial ischemia in the presence of resting electrocardiographic changes, this conclusion is based on limited and disparate data from studies often lacking acceptable measures of ischemia. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ST segment response in a blinded prospective protocol, we compared ST deviation to thallium201 SPECT scintigraphy in 95 patients during exercise. Diagnostic accuracy was poor in the 95 patients with resting abnormalities: left bundle branch block (LBBB) = 70%, complete right bundle branch block (cRBBB) = 75%, incomplete right bundle branch block (incRBBB) = 79%, intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) = 44%, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) = 59%, digitalis = 53%, compared with a diagnostic accuracy of 90% in 29 patients without resting changes. There were 20 false negative and 17 false positive ST segment responses. The extent and direction of resting ST deviation varied substantially and had no influence on diagnostic accuracy. The extent of change in ST deviation with exercise required for a positive response did not alter diagnostic accuracy: -1.0 mm = 61%, -1.5 mm = 63%, and -2.0 = 61%. While the location of regional ischemia did not influence the accuracy of ST segment analysis, a QRS duration less than 120 msec did improve diagnostic accuracy. Our data confirm that ST segment analysis with exercise testing is not reliable in patients with resting electrocardiographic abnormalities and demonstrates that accuracy is not improved by adjusting for either resting or exercise-induced ST segment changes or for location of the ischemic region.

Body surface maps in left bundle branch block uncomplicated or complicated by myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy or myocardial ischemia

We provided a topographic and quantitative description of body surface maps (BSM) during the entire QRST interval in seven uncomplicated LBBBs and 31 LBBBs complicated by: myocardial infarction (MI, seven cases), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, eight cases), myocardial ischemia (IS, seven cases), MI + LVH (six cases) and LVH + IS (three cases). In all patients we observed abnormal map configurations attributable to the LBBB. We were unable to identify consistent effects of the complicating heart condition(s) on the general pattern of chest potentials. Conversely, the surface voltages were generally decreased by MI and IS and increased by LVH. By considering the 38 patients as a preliminary learning set we applied a stepwise discriminant analysis to 77 voltage-related variables derived from BSM to produce a model for discriminating between LBBBs with and without MI. We properly allocated more than 90% of the patients. We also attempted to classify the patients into four groups: pure LBBB, LBBB + MI, LBBB + LVH and LBBB + IS, with a percentage of correct classification of about 80%. The two classifying procedures were applied to ten new LBBB patients with results similar to those obtained in the 38 of the study group.

Ability of the R-wave change during stress testing to accurately detect coronary disease in the presence of left bundle branch block at rest

The treadmill stress test and antiographic records of 18 patients with left bundle block on resting ECG were reviewed retrospectively. Thirteen of the patients had significant coronary artery disease defined as greater than or equal to 70% cross-sectional narrowing of one or more vessels, while 5 patients were hemodynamically and angiographically normal. The R-wave and ST-segment response to exercise were determined in each case and compared. A positive R-wave response was an exercise-induced increase or no change in amplitude over the baseline level, while a positive ST-segment response was greater than or equal to 2 mm of excerise-induced depression over the baseline level. The sensitivity for the R-wave response was 69% (9 of 13), the specificity was 100% (5 of 5), and the predictive value was 100% (9 of 9). For ST depression these values were 46% (6 of 13), 40% (2 of 5)8 and 67% (6 of 9). Although the number of patients in this study is small--a reflection of the fact that ST depression in the presence of left bundle branch block with exercise is associated with many false positive responses and hence less referral for stress testing--it appears that the R-wave response to exercise in the presence of left bundle branch block can accurately detect coronary artery disease.

Analysis of exercise-induced R wave amplitude changes in detection of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic men with left bundle branch block

The exercise electrocardiograms of 44 asymptomatic men with acquired left bundle branch block were analyzed for changes in R wave amplitude. Results were correlated with findings on selective coronary angiography. There were two subgroups: 7 men with significant angiographic coronary artery disease (Group I) and 37 with normal coronary angiograms (Group II). Exercise induced an increase in R wave amplitude in all seven men with coronary artery disease but in only 10 of the 37 men without significant coronary artery disease. This criterion thus had a sensitivity of 100 percent but a poor specificity of 73 percent, a predictive value of 41 percent and an accuracy rate of 77 percent for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The greater the increase in R wave amplitude the greater was the likelihood of some degree of left ventricular dysfunction as measured by wall motion abnormalities and elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. The increase in R wave amplitude with exercise appears to be a sensitive test in identifying coronary artery disease in asymptomatic men with acquired left bundle branch block.

Value of treadmill exercise testing in patients with complete bundle branch block

Exercise electrocardiography and selective coronary arteriography was performed in 24 consecutive patients with complete bundle branch block. The criteria for a positive exercise electrocardiogram (E-ECG) were a 1 mm depression or elevation in the J point from the control state, as well as in the ST-segment measured at 0.04 seconds from the J point. Eleven of 12 patients with complete left bundle branch block had a positive E-ECG. Nine of them had normal coronary arteriograms, except one with less than 50% lesions in two arteries. Two patients had severe three-vessel disease. Only one patient had a true negative exercise test. No patient had a false negative test. Nine of 12 patients with complete right bundle branch block had a positive E-ECG. One of these 9 had minimal nonobstructive disease, while the other 8 had severe two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease. Three of the 12 right bundle branch block patients had a negative E-ECG. Two of them had a true negative exercise test, and one a false negative test. Because of a high incidence of probably false positive results, E-ECG appears to be unreliable in detecting coronary artery disease in patients with complete left bundle branch block. But it can provide useful information in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with complete right bundle branch block.

Is the treadmill exercise test useful for evaluating coronary artery disease in patients with complete left bundle branch block?

To aid in the study of coronary artery disease, 57 patients with complete left bundle branch block underwent clinical evaluation, treadmill exercise testing and cardiac catheterization. The patients were classified into two groups according to coronary angiographic findings: 30 patients with significant stenosis (70 percent or greater luminal narrowing) of at least one major vessel and 27 with no significant coronary artery disease. There was no difference in age, presenting symptoms or previous medical treatment between the two groups. There were more men in the group with coronary artery disease. Exercise-induced S-T changes were similar in the two groups; the sensitivity and specificity of these changes for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease were unacceptable irrespective of the criterion chosen. With additional S-T depression of either 1 or 2 mm below the baseline value, the predictive accuracy was only 53 percent. Combined exertional chest pain and 1 mm S-T depression increased the predictive accuracy of exercise testing to 71 percent. These data indicate that exercise-induced electrocardiographic changes do not facilitate detection of coronary artery disease in patients with complete left bundle branch block.

Exercise testing for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with abnormal electrocardiograms at rest

This review consists of two parts: (1) discussion of the electrophysiologic mechanisms that are believed to produce ventricular repolarization changes during the electrocardiographic stress test, and (2) clinical assessment of the electrocardiographic changes with stress in patients with an abnormal electrocardiogram at rest. In the first part, the mechanisms of S-T segment elevation, S-T segment depression, T wave changes and linked S-T and T wave changes are reviewed. In the second part, all electrocardiographic abnormalities at rest are grouped into four categories: (1) changes that mask the manifestations of ischemia, (2) changes that stimulate or exaggerate the manifestations of ischemia, (3) changes that have no important effect on the manifestations of ischemia, and (4) changes that reproduce the patterns of acute myocardial infarction after an apparent healing. The reported studies of electrocardiographic stress testing in patients who have abnormal electrocardiogram at rest are summarized.

The electrocardiographic response to maximal treadmill exercise of asymptomatic men with left bundle branch block

This study presents the results of maximal treadmill testing and coronary angiography in 31 asymptomatic USAF aircrewmen with acquired left bundle branch block. There were two subgroups: 26 men with normal coronary angiography and five men with significant angiographic coronary angiography and five men with significant angiographic coronary artery disease. The mean amount of maximal ST-segment depression induced by treadmill exercise was --0.5 mv. for both groups and the range in the normal subgroup was --0.3 to --1.0 mv. No significant differences were found between the groups. We concluded that apparently healthy, asymptomatic men with acquired left bundle branch block can have considerable ST-segment depression in response to maximal treadmill testing and that their ST-segment response cannot be used to make diagnostic decisions about them.

Value of exercise testing for screening asymptomatic men for latent coronary artery disease

Treadmill exercise testing identifies a group of men at high risk for coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. However, the predictive value and sensitivity limitations are obvious. An abnormal electrocardiographic response does not absolutely predict the presence of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, and a normal response does not rule out this possibility. Thus in appropriate instances when the minimal risk of coronary angiography is justified this procedure can be used to determine the anatomic correlation of exercise-induced functional ST-segment changes.