Digoxin disposition in obesity: clinical pharmacokinetic investigation

Effect of Obesity on the Use of Antiarrhythmics in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and obesity coexist in approximately 37.6 million and 650 million people globally, respectively. The anatomical and physiological changes in individuals with obesity may influence the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs.

AIM

This review aimed to describe the evidence of the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of antiarrhythmics in people with AF.

METHODS

Three databases were searched from inception to June 2023. Original studies that addressed the use of antiarrhythmics in adults with AF and concomitant obesity were included.

RESULTS

A total of 4549 de-duplicated articles were screened, and 114 articles underwent full-text review. Ten studies were included in this narrative synthesis: seven cohort studies, two pharmacokinetic studies, and a single case report. Samples ranged from 1 to 371 participants, predominately males (41%-85%), aged 59-75 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 23-66 kg/m2. The two most frequently investigated antiarrhythmics were amiodarone and dofetilide. Other drugs investigated included diltiazem, flecainide, disopyramide, propafenone, dronedarone, sotalol, vernakalant, and ibutilide. Findings indicate that obesity may affect the pharmacokinetics of amiodarone and sodium channel blockers (e.g., flecainide, disopyramide, and propafenone). Factors such as drug lipophilicity may also influence the pharmacokinetics of the drug and the need for dose modification.

DISCUSSION

Antiarrhythmics are not uniformly affected by obesity. This observation is based on heterogeneous studies of participants with an average BMI and poorly controlled confounding factors such as multimorbidity, concomitant medications, varying routes of administration, and assessment of obesity. Controlled trials with stratification at the time of recruitment for obesity are necessary to determine the significance of these findings.

Determining the Risk of Elevated Digoxin Concentrations Following Loading Dose in Patients With Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

The optimal loading dose of digoxin in patients with reduced kidney function is unknown. Tertiary references recommend reduced loading doses; however, these recommendations are based on immunoassays that are falsely elevated by the presence of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances, a problem that is minimized in modern assays.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations after a digoxin loading dose.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on patients who received an intravenous loading dose of digoxin with a digoxin concentration collected 6 to 24 hours after the end of the dose. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: AKI, CKD, and non-AKI/CKD (NKI) based on glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine. The primary outcome was frequency of supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations (>2 ng/mL) and secondary outcomes included frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 146 digoxin concentrations were included (AKI = 59, CKD = 16, NKI = 71). Frequencies of supratherapeutic concentrations were similar between groups (AKI: 10.2%, CKD: 18.8%, NKI: 11.3%; P = 0.61). Pre-planned logistic regression demonstrated no significant relationship between kidney function group and the development of a supratherapeutic concentration (AKI: odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-4.5; CKD: OR 4.3, 95% CI: 0.7-23).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This is the first study in routine clinical practice evaluating the relationship between kidney function and digoxin peak concentrations that differentiates AKI from CKD. We did not find a relationship between kidney function and peak concentrations; however, the group with CKD was underpowered.

Digoxin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Obesity Before and After a Gastric Bypass or a Strict Diet Compared with Normal Weight Individuals

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several drugs on the market are substrates for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux transporter highly expressed in barrier tissues such as the intestine. Body weight, weight loss, and a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may influence P-gp expression and activity, leading to variability in the drug response. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate digoxin pharmacokinetics as a measure of the P-gp phenotype in patients with obesity before and after weight loss induced by an RYGB or a strict diet and in normal weight individuals.

METHODS

This study included patients with severe obesity preparing for an RYGB (n = 40) or diet-induced weight loss (n = 40) and mainly normal weight individuals scheduled for a cholecystectomy (n = 18). Both weight loss groups underwent a 3-week low-energy diet (<1200 kcal/day) followed by an additional 6 weeks of <800 kcal/day induced by an RYGB (performed at week 3) or a very-low-energy diet. Follow-up time was 2 years, with four digoxin pharmacokinetic investigations at weeks 0, 3, and 9, and year 2. Hepatic and jejunal P-gp levels were determined in biopsies obtained from the patients undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

The RYGB group and the diet group had a comparable weight loss in the first 9 weeks (13 ± 2.3% and 11 ± 3.6%, respectively). During this period, we observed a minor increase (16%) in the digoxin area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity in both groups: RYGB: 2.7 µg h/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67, 4.7], diet: 2.5 µg h/L [95% CI 0.49, 4.4]. In the RYGB group, we also observed that the time to reach maximum concentration decreased after surgery: from 1.0 ± 0.33 hours at week 3 to 0.77 ± 0.08 hours at week 9 (-0.26 hours [95% CI -0.47, -0.05]), corresponding to a 25% reduction. Area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity did not change long term (week 0 to year 2) in either the RYGB (1.1 µg h/L [-0.94, 3.2]) or the diet group (0.94 µg h/L [-1.2, 3.0]), despite a considerable difference in weight loss from baseline (RYGB: 30 ± 7%, diet: 3 ± 6%). At baseline, the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity was -5.5 µg h/L [95% CI -8.5, -2.5] (-26%) lower in patients with obesity (RYGB plus diet) than in normal weight individuals scheduled for a cholecystectomy. Further, patients undergoing an RYGB had a 0.05 fmol/µg [95% CI 0.00, 0.10] (29%) higher hepatic P-gp level than the normal weight individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics following weight loss induced by a pre-operative low-energy diet and an RYGB or a strict diet (a low-energy diet plus a very-low-energy diet) were minor and unlikely to be clinically relevant. The lower systemic exposure of digoxin in patients with obesity suggests that these patients may have increased biliary excretion of digoxin possibly owing to a higher expression of P-gp in the liver.

Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anticancer Agents

An objective of the Precision Medicine Initiative, launched in 2015 by the US Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health, is to optimize and individualize dosing of drugs, especially anticancer agents, with high pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recently reported that 40% of obese patients receive insufficient chemotherapy doses and exposures, which may lead to reduced efficacy, and recommended pharmacokinetic studies to guide appropriate dosing in these patients. These issues will only increase in importance as the incidence of obesity in the population increases. This publication reviews the effects of obesity on (1) tumor biology, development of cancer, and antitumor response; (2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of small-molecule anticancer drugs; and (3) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of complex anticancer drugs, such as carrier-mediated agents and biologics. These topics are not only important from a scientific research perspective but also from a drug development and regulator perspective. Thus, it is important to evaluate the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents in all categories of body habitus and especially in patients who are obese and morbidly obese. As the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents may be highly variable across drug types, the optimal dosing metric and algorithm for difference classes of drugs may be widely different. Thus, studies are needed to evaluate current and novel metrics and methods for measuring body habitus as related to optimizing the dose and reducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of anticancer agents in patients who are obese and morbidly obese.

Model-Informed Approaches to Support Drug Development for Patients With Obesity: A Regulatory Perspective

Obesity, which is defined as having a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater, has been recognized as a serious health problem that increases the risk of many comorbidities (eg, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes) and mortality. The high prevalence of individuals who are classified as obese calls for additional considerations in clinical trial design. Nevertheless, gaining a comprehensive understanding of how obesity affects the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of drugs proves challenging, primarily as obese patients are seldom selected for enrollment at the early stages of drug development. Over the past decade, model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have been increasingly used in drug development programs for obesity and its related diseases as they use and integrate all available sources and knowledge to inform and facilitate clinical drug development. This review summarizes the impact of obesity on PK, PD, and the efficacy of drugs and, more importantly, provides an overview of the use of MIDD approaches in drug development and regulatory decision making for patients with obesity: estimating PK, PD, and efficacy in specific dosing scenarios, optimizing dose regimen, and providing evidence for seeking new indication(s). Recent review cases using MIDD approaches to support dose selection and provide confirmatory evidence for effectiveness for patients with obesity, including pediatric patients, are discussed. These examples demonstrate the promise of MIDD as a valuable tool in supporting clinical trial design during drug development and facilitating regulatory decision-making processes for the benefit of patients with obesity.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Digoxin Loading Doses Based on Ideal Body Weight

BACKGROUND

Intravenous digoxin loading dose recommendations differ between clinical guidelines and Food and Drug Administration packaging for acute rate control.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous digoxin loading in patients who received ≤12 µg/kg and >12 µg/kg of digoxin using ideal body weight (IBW).

METHODS

This single center retrospective cohort study with exempt status from the local Institutional Review Board included patients who received intravenous digoxin and had a serum digoxin concentration (SDC) drawn. Digoxin doses >36 hours after the first dose were excluded. Patients who received a total of >12 µg/kg and ≤12 µg/kg IBW were compared. The primary endpoint was frequency of SDCs ≥1.2 ng/mL, which have been shown to be associated with increased mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients were included (144 receiving >12 µg/kg and 100 receiving ≤12 µg/kg). There were significantly more SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL in the >12 µg/kg group than the ≤12 µg/kg group (50.6% vs. 30.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-5.84), with no difference in rate control failure. Major limitations of the study include retrospective nature and possible selection bias.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Compared to patients who received digoxin doses ≤12 µg/kg IBW, patients who received >12 µg/kg IBW had higher rates of SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL. This suggests that appropriate weight-based dosing with 8 to 12 µg/kg IBW has the potential to be a safer approach to digoxin loading, rather than frequently used dosing strategies that result in doses >12 µg/kg.

Pharmacokinetics of obese adults: Not only an increase in weight

Obesity is a pathophysiological state defined by a body mass index > 30 kg/m2 and characterized by an adipose tissue accumulation leading to an important weight increased. Several pathologies named comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer make obesity the fifth cause of death in the world. Physiological changes impact the four main phases of pharmacokinetics of some drugs and leads to an inappropriate drug-dose. For absorption, the gastrointestinal transit is accelerated, and the gastric empty time is shortened, that can reduce the solubilization and absorption of some oral drugs. The drug distribution is probably the most impacted by the obesity-related changes because the fat mass (FM) increases at the expense of the lean body weight (LBW), leading to an important increase of the volume of distribution for lipophilic drugs and a low or moderately increase of this parameter for hydrophilic drugs. This modification of the distribution may require drug-dose adjustments. By various mechanisms, the metabolism and elimination of drugs are impacted by obesity and should be considered as similar or lower than that non-obese patients. To better understand the necessary drug-dose adjustments in obese patients, a narrative review of the literature was conducted to highlight the main elements to consider in the therapeutic management of adult obese patients.

Considerations for Intravenous Anesthesia Dose in Obese Children: Understanding PKPD

The intravenous induction or loading dose in children is commonly prescribed per kilogram. That dose recognizes the linear relationship between volume of distribution and total body weight. Total body weight comprises both fat and fat-free mass. Fat mass influences the volume of distribution and the use of total body weight fails to recognize the impact of fat mass on pharmacokinetics in children. Size metrics alternative to total body mass (e.g., fat-free and normal fat mass, ideal body weight and lean body weight) have been proposed to scale pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, volume of distribution) for size. Clearance is the key parameter used to calculate infusion rates or maintenance dosing at steady state. Dosing schedules recognize the curvilinear relationship, described using allometric theory, between clearance and size. Fat mass also has an indirect influence on clearance through both metabolic and renal function that is independent of its effects due to increased body mass. Fat-free mass, lean body mass and ideal body mass are not drug specific and fail to recognize the variable impact of fat mass contributing to body composition in children, both lean and obese. Normal fat mass, used in conjunction with allometry, may prove a useful size metric but computation by clinicians for the individual child is not facile. Dosing is further complicated by the need for multicompartment models to describe intravenous drug pharmacokinetics and the concentration effect relationship, both beneficial and adverse, is often poorly understood. Obesity is also associated with other morbidity that may also influence pharmacokinetics. Dose is best determined using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models that account for these varied factors. These models, along with covariates (age, weight, body composition), can be incorporated into programmable target-controlled infusion pumps. The use of target-controlled infusion pumps, assuming practitioners have a sound understanding of the PKPD within programs, provide the best available guide to intravenous dose in obese children.

Impact of guided weight-based medication dosing in pediatric patients with obesity

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a common disease state within pediatrics, with 19.7% of children in the United States classified as obese. Medication dosing in this population is a challenge not commonly examined in clinical drug trials. Dosing based on total body weight may not always be appropriate; therefore, ideal body weight (IBW) and adjusted body weight (AdjBW) may provide more effective dosing.

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to implement a dosing protocol for pediatric patients with obesity to improve adherence. The primary endpoint was to evaluate adherence to evidence-based dosing recommendations and the secondary endpoints included cost saving analysis for immune globulin and accurate charting of IBW and AdjBW.

METHODS

This was a single center, quality improvement project composed of pre- and post-implementation groups. An IBW and AdjBW calculator were implemented in our electronic health record, as customized enhancements, along with specific weight ordering options. A literature search of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dosing recommendations based on IBW and AdjBW was conducted. For both groups, patients were included if they were 3-18 years old, had a body mass index greater than or equal to the 95th percentile, and if they received a specified medication.

RESULTS

A total of 618 patients were identified with 24 and 56 patients included for the pre- and post-implementation groups. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics of the comparator groups. The usage of correct body weight increased from 1.2% to 24.2% after implementation and education (P < 0.001). Cost savings was analyzed for immune globulin with the potential for a net savings of $9423 ± 3626.92.

CONCLUSION

Dosing medications for our pediatric patients with obesity improved with the implementation of calculated dosing weights in the electronic health record, provision of an evidence-based dosing chart, and education of providers.

Drug pharmacokinetics in the obese population: challenging common assumptions on predictors of obesity-related parameter changes

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with many physiological changes. We review available evidence regarding five commonly accepted assumptions to a priori predict the impact of obesity on drug pharmacokinetics (PK).

AREAS COVERED

The investigated assumptions are: 1) lean body weight is the preferred descriptor of clearance and dose adjustments; 2) volume of distribution increases for lipophilic, but not for hydrophilic drugs; 3) CYP-3A4 activity is suppressed and UGT activity is increased, implying decreased and increased dose requirements for substrates of these enzyme systems, respectively; 4) glomerular filtration rate is enhanced, necessitating higher doses for drugs cleared through glomerular filtration; 5) drug dosing information from obese adults can be extrapolated to obese adolescents.

EXPERT OPINION

Available literature contradicts, or at least limits the generalizability, of all five assumptions. Clinical studies should focus on quantifying the impact of duration and severity of obesity on drug PK in adults and adolescents, and also include oral bioavailability and pharmacodynamics in these studies. Physiologically-based PK approaches can be used to predict PK changes for individual drugs, but can also be used to define in general terms based on patient characteristics and drug properties, when certain assumptions can or cannot be expected to be systematically accurate.

Pitfalls and pearls with drug dosing in the critically ill obese patient: 10 statements to guide ICU practitioners

Obesity is highly prevalent in ICU patients presenting a number of challenges, one of which is drug dosing. There are limited high-quality data describing drug dosing in obesity, which can lead to dosing strategies that are suboptimal. For example, inappropriately using the wrong weight for weight-based dosing can lead to supratherapeutic drug concentrations and an adverse drug event or subtherapeutic drug concentrations and treatment failure. A generalized framework for decision making specific for obese patients is available that describes a step-by-step approach for constructing dosing regimens. This manuscript will build on that framework by providing pitfalls and pearls for clinicians to consider when making dosing decisions in critically ill patients with severe obesity.

Drug Disposition in Subjects with Obesity: The Research Work of Darrell R. Abernethy

In 1979, the late Dr. Darrell R. Abernethy and colleagues began a series of clinical studies aimed at understanding the pertinent determinants of drug distribution, elimination, and clearance in obesity, and how those variables are interconnected. The studies confirmed that volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance are the principal independent biological variables, which conjointly determine elimination half-life as a dependent variable. For drugs distributed by passive diffusion, their pharmacokinetic Vd - after correcting for plasma protein binding - was increased in obesity, depending in part on the physicochemical lipophilicity of the individual drugs, and the quantitative extent of obesity in overweight individuals. Across all studies, the ratio of mean clearance in obese divided by control groups had an overall median value of 1.21 (range: 0.75 to 3.11), indicating a small and variable effect of obesity on clearance, without clear directionality. Since drug clearance was not clearly related to lipophilicity or degree of obesity, the prolonged half-life of lipophilic drugs in obese patients was largely explained by the increased Vd. Dr. Abernethy further identified delayed attainment of steady-state after initiation of multiple-dose treatment, and delayed washout after termination of dosage, as potential clinical consequences of the extended half-life in obese persons. These consequences for specific drugs have been recently emphasized in contemporary studies of chronic dosage in subjects with obesity. Without data identifying an obesity-related change in clearance for a specific drug, maintenance doses (in milligrams) should be based on ideal weight rather than adjusted upward based on total weight. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cardiac glycosides cause cytotoxicity in human macrophages and ameliorate white adipose tissue homeostasis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cardiac glycosides inhibit Na+ /K+ -ATPase and are used to treat heart failure and arrhythmias. They can induce inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in macrophages, suggesting cytotoxicity, which remains to be elucidated in human tissues.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

To determine the cell-type specificity of this cytotoxicity, we used human monocyte-derived macrophages and non-adherent peripheral blood cells from healthy donors, plus omental white adipose tissue, stromal vascular fraction-derived pre-adipocytes and adipocytes from obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. All these cells/tissues were treated with nanomolar concentrations of ouabain (50, 100, 500 nM) to investigate the level of cytotoxicity and the mechanisms leading to cell death. In white adipose tissue, we investigated ouabain-mediated cytotoxicity by measuring insulin sensitivity, adipose tissue function and extracellular matrix deposition ex vivo.

KEY RESULTS

Ouabain induced cell death through pyroptosis and apoptosis, and was more effective in monocyte-derived macrophages compared to non-adherent peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations. This cytotoxicity is dependent on K+ flux, as ouabain causes intracellular depletion of K+ and accumulation of Na+ and Ca2+ . Consistently, the cell death caused by these ion imbalances can be rescued by addition of potassium chloride to human monocyte-derived macrophages. Remarkably, when white adipose tissue explants from obese patients are cultured with nanomolar concentrations of ouabain, this causes depletion of macrophages, down-regulation of type VI collagen levels and amelioration of insulin sensitivity ex vivo.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The use of nanomolar concentration of cardiac glycosides could be an attractive therapeutic treatment for metabolic syndrome, characterized by pathogenic infiltration and activation of macrophages.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Inflammation, Repair and Ageing. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.9/issuetoc.

Pharmacokinetic determinants for the right dose of antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) show a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), which may lead to inappropriate dosing and drug toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present review is to describe PK properties of AADs, discussing the main changes in different clinical scenarios, such as the elderly and patients with obese, chronic kidney, liver, and cardiac disease, in order to guide their right prescription in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

There are few data about PK properties of AADs in a special population or challenging clinical setting. The use and dose of AADs is commonly based on physicians' clinical experience observing the clinical effects rather than being personalized on the individual patients PK profiles. More and updated studies are needed to validate a patient centered approach in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias based on patients' clinical features, including pharmacogenomics, and AAD pharmacokinetics.

Effect of lipophilicity on drug distribution and elimination: Influence of obesity

AIMS

For a given passively-distributed lipophilic drug, the extent of in vivo distribution (pharmacokinetic volume of distribution, V_d ) in obese individuals increases in relation to the degree of obesity. The present study had the objective of evaluating drug distribution in relation to in vitro lipophilicity, and the relative increase in V_d associated with obesity across a series of drugs.

METHODS

Cohorts of normal-weight control and obese subjects received single doses of drugs ranging from hydrophilic (acetaminophen, salicylate) to lipophilic (imipramine, verapamil). Lipid solubility was measured by the log-transformed values of the high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) retention index (Log₁₀ (HPLC)), and the octanol-water partition coefficient (LogP).

RESULTS

Among normal-weight controls, V_d normalized for protein binding was highly correlated with Log₁₀ (HPLC) (R² = .65) and with LogP (R² = .78). V_d of all drugs was increased in the obese cohort, but the relative increase (compared to controls) for individual drugs was disproportionately greater as lipid solubility increased. Since clearance was unrelated to lipophilicity, the increased V_d produced a parallel disproportionate increase in elimination half-life in the obese cohort that was associated with Log₁₀ (HPLC) (R² = .62).

CONCLUSION

Lipophilicity is a principal correlate of in vivo V_d , as well as the increased V_d of drugs in obese patients. The consequent prolongation of half-life in obesity has clinical safety implications in terms of delayed drug accumulation and washout during and after chronic dosage. The magnitude and importance of this effect for a given drug depends on the degree of obesity, as well as the lipid-solubility of the specific drug.

PBPK modeling of CYP3A and P-gp substrates to predict drug-drug interactions in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGBS) is an effective surgical intervention to reduce mortality in morbidly obese patients. Following RYGBS, the disposition of drugs may be affected by anatomical alterations and changes in intestinal and hepatic drug metabolizing enzyme activity. The aim of this study was to better understand the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of CYP3A and P-gp inhibitors. The impacts of RYGBS on the absorption and metabolism of midazolam, acetaminophen, digoxin, and their major metabolites were simulated using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. PBPK models for verapamil and posaconazole were built to evaluate CYP3A- and P-gp-mediated DDIs pre- and post-RYGBS. The simulations suggest that for highly soluble drugs, such as verapamil, the predicted bioavailability was comparable pre- and post-RYGBS. For verapamil inhibition, RYGBS did not affect the fold-change of the predicted inhibited-to-control plasma AUC ratio or predicted inhibited-to-control peak plasma concentration ratio for either midazolam or digoxin. In contrast, the predicted bioavailability of posaconazole, a poorly soluble drug, decreased from 12% pre-RYGBS to 5% post-RYGBS. Compared to control, the predicted posaconazole-inhibited midazolam plasma AUC increased by 2.0-fold pre-RYGBS, but only increased by 1.6-fold post-RYGBS. A similar trend was predicted for pre- and post-RYGBS inhibited-to-control midazolam peak plasma concentration ratios (2.0- and 1.6-fold, respectively) following posaconazole inhibition. Absorption of highly soluble drugs was more rapid post-RYGBS, resulting in higher predicted midazolam peak plasma concentrations, which was further increased following inhibition by verapamil or posaconazole. To reduce the risk of a drug-drug interaction in patients post-RYGBS, the dose or frequency of object drugs may need to be decreased when administered with highly soluble inhibitor drugs, especially if toxicities are associated with plasma peak concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in Obese Pediatric Patients: How to Map Uncharted Clinical Territories

Clinicians are increasingly faced with challenges regarding the pharmacological treatment of obese pediatric patients. To provide guidance for these treatments, a better understanding of the impact of obesity on pharmacological processes in children is needed. Results on pharmacological studies in adults show however ambiguous patterns regarding the impact of obesity on ADME processes or on drug pharmacodynamics. Additionally, based on the limited research performed in obese pediatric patients, it becomes clear that findings from obese adults cannot be expected to always translate directly to similar findings in obese children. To improve knowledge on drug pharmacology in obese pediatric patients, studies should focus on quantifying the impact of maturation, obesity, and other relevant variables on primary pharmacological parameters and on disentangling systemic (renal and/or hepatic) and presystemic (gut and/or first-pass hepatic) clearance. For this, data is required from well-designed clinical trials that include patients with not only a wide range in age but also a range in excess body weight, upon oral and intravenous dosing. Population modelling approaches are ideally suitable for this purpose and can also be used to link the pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics and to derive drug dosing regimens. Generalizability of research findings can be achieved by including mechanistic aspects in the data analysis, for instance, using either extrapolation approaches in population modelling or by applying physiologically based modelling principles. It is imperative that more and smarter studies are performed in obese pediatric patients to provide safe and effective treatment for this special patient population.

Obesity and drug pharmacology: a review of the influence of obesity on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters

INTRODUCTION

The rising prevalence of obesity confronts clinicians with dosing problems in the (extreme) overweight population. Obesity has a great impact on key organs that play a role in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of drugs, however the ultimate impact of these changes on how to adapt the dose may not always be known. Areas covered: In this review, physiological changes associated with obesity are discussed. An overview is provided on the alterations in absorption, distribution, drug metabolism and clearance in (morbid) obesity focusing on general principles that can be extracted from pharmacokinetic studies. Also, relevant pharmacodynamic considerations in obesity are discussed. Expert opinion: Over the last two decades, increased knowledge is generated on PK and PD in obesity. Future research should focus on filling in the knowledge gaps that remain, especially in connecting obesity-related physiological changes with changes in PK and/or PD and vice versa. Ultimately, this knowledge can be used to develop physiologically based PK and PD models on the basis of quantitative systems pharmacology principles. Moreover, efforts should focus on thorough prospective evaluation of developed model-based doses with subsequent implementation of these dosing recommendations in clinical practice.

What is the best size predictor for dose in the obese child?

Lean body mass is commonly proposed for anesthesia maintenance drug dosing calculations. However, total body mass used with allometric scaling has been shown to be better for propofol in obese adults and children. Fat-free mass has also been used instead of lean body mass. Fat-free mass is essentially the same as lean body mass but excludes a small percentage of mass of lipids in cell membranes, CNS, and bone marrow. Normal fat mass is a size descriptor that partitions total body mass into fat-free mass and fat mass calculated from total body mass minus fat-free mass. The relative influence of fat mass compared with fat-free mass is described by the fraction of fat mass that makes fat equivalent to fat-free mass in terms of allometric size. This fraction (Ffat) will differ for each drug and each parameter affected by body size (eg, clearance and volume of distribution). This fraction is based on the concept of theory-based allometric size. The normal fat mass based on allometric theory and partition of body mass into fat and fat-free components provides a principle-based approach explaining size and body composition effects on pharmacokinetics of all drugs in children and in adults.

Anesthetic Considerations in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Review Article

Context

This article discusses the anesthetic considerations in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of surgery.

Evidence Acquisition

This review includes studies involving obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Searches have been conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Review using the terms obese, obesity, bariatric, anesthesia, perioperative, preoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and their combinations.

Results

Obesity is a major worldwide health problem associated with many comorbidities. Bariatric surgery has been proposed as the best alternative treatment for extreme obese patients when all other therapeutic options have failed.

Conclusions

Anesthetists must completely assess the patients before the surgery to identify anesthesia- related potential risk factors and prepare for management during the surgery.

No role for patient body weight on renal function assessment for drug dosing

Objectives

To evaluate the ability of body-weight-driven renal function assessment (RFA) formulae to predict on-target elimination rate ranges for gentamicin in patients with varying degrees of renal function.

Methods

A 6 year retrospective pharmacokinetic study was conducted at a university teaching hospital.

Results

A total of 85 patients met the inclusion criteria and 127 pharmacokinetic files were analysed from patients on medical-surgical wards (53%) and medical-surgical ICUs (13%) receiving intravenous gentamicin for treatment, as well as those for patients receiving it for surgical prophylaxis (34%). Each RFA formula was examined against standard dosing tables for gentamicin. A table of acceptable elimination rates was generated using a traditional peak of 8 mg/L and trough between 0.5 and 2 mg/L associated with each of the dosing interval extensions. The ability of each RFA formula to select on-target elimination rates was evaluated. The RFA formula assuming a normalized body weight of 72 kg and a modified creatinine reagent adjustment factor of 90% provided the most accurate on-target elimination rate selection. This method was superior to dosing interval selection based on the Modification in Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, Sanford's guide method, as well as the Cockcroft-Gault formulae using total body weight, ideal body weight or lean body weight ( P  <   0.0001).

Conclusions

Based on the use of gentamicin as a surrogate guide for renally adjusted drugs, these results support dosing interval selection based on a normalized body weight method and a formula reagent adjustment factor of 90% within the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children

The prevalence of obesity in adults and children is rapidly increasing across the world. Several general (patho)physiological alterations associated with obesity have been described, but the specific impact of these alterations on drug metabolism and elimination and its consequences for drug dosing remains largely unknown. In order to broaden our knowledge of this area, we have reviewed and summarized clinical studies that reported clearance values of drugs in both obese and non-obese patients. Studies were classified according to their most important metabolic or elimination pathway. This resulted in a structured review of the impact of obesity on metabolic and elimination processes, including phase I metabolism, phase II metabolism, liver blood flow, glomerular filtration and tubular processes. This literature study shows that the influence of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination greatly differs per specific metabolic or elimination pathway. Clearance of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrates is lower in obese as compared with non-obese patients. In contrast, clearance of drugs primarily metabolized by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), glomerular filtration and/or tubular-mediated mechanisms, xanthine oxidase, N-acetyltransferase or CYP2E1 appears higher in obese versus non-obese patients. Additionally, in obese patients, trends indicating higher clearance values were seen for drugs metabolized via CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, while studies on high-extraction-ratio drugs showed somewhat inconclusive results. Very limited information is available in obese children, which prevents a direct comparison between data obtained in obese children and obese adults. Future clinical studies, especially in children, adolescents and morbidly obese individuals, are needed to extend our knowledge in this clinically important area of adult and paediatric clinical pharmacology.

Lean body mass-adjusted Cockcroft and Gault formula improves the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in subjects with normal-range serum creatinine

BACKGROUND

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in individuals with normal-range serum creatinine is important in certain clinical situations, such as in potential living kidney donors. Accurate measurements of GFR invariably involve using an invasive method (e.g. inulin clearances), but is inconvenient. The aim of the present study was to determine whether serum creatinine-based prediction formulae adjusted for lean body mass (LBM) could improve the accuracy of GFR estimation in these subjects.

METHODS

Glomerular filtration rate was determined by the clearance of technetium-99m-labelled diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid ((99m)Tc DTPA) from plasma in 56 subjects with normal serum creatinine. For each subject, GFR was estimated using prediction formulae +/- LBM adjustment and compared with measured GFR. Formulae analysed include Cockcroft-Gault, Levey, Gates, Mawer, Hull, Toto, Jellife and Bjornsson.

RESULTS

All formulae +/- LBM adjustment underestimated measured GFR, with poor precision, poor agreement and correlation (r (2) <or= 0.25). Between 69% and 95% of the estimated GFR determined by the formulae correctly classified those with a normal measured GFR. LBM-adjusted formulae significantly improved the accuracy of GFR estimation compared with unadjusted formulae.

CONCLUSION

The lean body mass-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault formula was the closest to measured GFR but is not accurate enough to replace radionuclide GFR measurement. Prediction formulae should be adjusted for LBM to improve GFR estimation.

Evaluation of a Sex-Based Difference in the Pharmacokinetics of Digoxin

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a sex-based difference in digoxin pharmacokinetics exists in patients receiving long-term digoxin therapy for chronic heart failure or atrial fibrillation.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective review of medical records.

SETTING

University-based teaching hospital and outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

Sixty-seven adults (32 men, 35 women) with chronic heart failure or atrial fibrillation who were receiving digoxin therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serum digoxin concentrations and daily digoxin doses were obtained from patients' medical records. Daily doses were adjusted for patients' actual and ideal body weight and body mass index (BMI). The ratio between the serum digoxin concentration and each of the adjusted daily doses of digoxin was compared between men and women. The mean +/- SD serum digoxin concentration was 0.85 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for men compared with 1.02 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for women. Mean +/- SD unadjusted doses of digoxin were 0.180 +/- 0.063 and 0.164 +/- 0.059 mg/day for men and women, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. Ratios of serum digoxin concentration to daily digoxin doses did not differ by sex when doses were estimated with actual or ideal weight. Only the ratio of the digoxin concentration to the BMI-adjusted dose was significantly different between men and women (0.14 +/- 0.09 and 0.19 +/- 0.11, respectively, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sex-based differences in digoxin pharmacokinetics were absent when actual or ideal body weight was used. However, the ratio of serum digoxin concentration to daily digoxin dose adjusted for BMI differed by sex. Because digoxin is distributed to lean body mass, use of the BMI could have overadjusted body weight, leading to inaccurate pharmacokinetic assumptions and calculations. The pharmacokinetics of digoxin do not appear to differ by sex.

Various Dosing Weights and Correction to Serum Digoxin Assays in Hemodialysis Patients

Background:

Digoxin is distributed in skeletal muscles in high concentrations. The most reliable parameter to measure the distribution of digoxin in patients undergoing hemodialysis is not known.

Objective:

To estimate which distribution parameter—estimated lean body mass (E-LBM) calculated by subtracting the fat mass from the dry weight, lean body mass, dry weight, and ideal body weight—is the most reliable predictor for assessing the accuracy of a digoxin dosing regimen in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate 21 patients undergoing hemodialysis who were administered digoxin. The patients were divided into 2 groups: digoxin 0.125 mg administered twice a week (low-dose group) or 3 times per week (high-dose group). The differences between E-LBM, lean body mass, dry weight, and ideal body weight for the low- and high-dose groups were determined. The relationships between serum digoxin concentrations and the weekly digoxin dose per E-LBM, lean body mass, dry weight, and ideal body weight were also determined.

Results:

E-LBM, lean body mass, dry weight, and ideal body weight in the high-dose group were significantly larger than those in the low-dose group (p = 0.021, 0.015, 0.024, and 0.0029, respectively), although no significant difference in serum digoxin concentrations was evident. Significant correlation was found between serum digoxin concentrations and the weekly digoxin dosage per E-LBM, dry weight, lean body mass, and ideal body weight (r = 0.746, p < 0.0001; r = 0.638, p = 0.0014; r = 0.645, p < 0.0011; r = 0.553, p = 0.0083, respectively).

Conclusions:

E-LBM appears to reflect the best parameter for predicting serum digoxin concentrations. The use of the dry weight parameter could be generally useful for adjusting the dosage of digoxin in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Resuscitation of the morbidly obese patient

Obesity is a major health care problem in the United States. The body mass index (BMI) is the standard measure of obesity. A BMI >25 kg/m2 is defined as overweight and obesity as a BMI > 30 kg/m2. Recent surveys indicate that 54% of adults, or roughly 97 million people, are overweight. Given the incidence of obesity in the general population, it is likely that EM physicians will be involved in the emergency care of critically ill or injured obese patients. The objective of this article is to present the clinical problems associated with the resuscitation of the critically ill or injured obese patient and their potential solutions.

Dosing of medications in morbidly obese patients in the intensive care unit setting

OBJECTIVE

To derive recommendations for the dosing of commonly used medications in the morbidly obese patient in the ICU.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained through computerized searches involving MEDLINE. The bibliographies of retrieved publications and textbooks were reviewed for additional references.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies involving the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of medications in obese subjects or patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

The emphasis was on studies involving morbidly obese patients but, in the absence of such data, investigations involving lesser forms of obesity were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There is a paucity of data upon which to make recommendations for dosing commonly used medications in the morbidly obese patient in the ICU, although recommendations were provided based on the available information.

CONCLUSIONS

There is clearly a need for more investigations involving dosing regimens of medications in the morbidly obese population. Until such studies are available, the clinician must try to derive the best dosing regimens for medications based on the limited pharmacokinetic data available for some agents and clinical judgement.

Dosing of medications in morbidly obese patients in the intensive care unit setting

OBJECTIVE

To derive recommendations for the dosing of commonly used medications in the morbidly obese patient in the ICU.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained through computerized searches involving MEDLINE. The bibliographies of retrieved publications and textbooks were reviewed for additional references.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies involving the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of medications in obese subjects or patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

The emphasis was on studies involving morbidly obese patients but, in the absence of such data, investigations involving lesser forms of obesity were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There is a paucity of data upon which to make recommendations for dosing commonly used medications in the morbidly obese patient in the ICU, although recommendations were provided based on the available information.

CONCLUSIONS

There is clearly a need for more investigations involving dosing regimens of medications in the morbidly obese population. Until such studies are available, the clinician must try to derive the best dosing regimens for medications based on the limited pharmacokinetic data available for some agents and clinical judgement.

Classification and pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

Despite the emergence of several forms of nonpharmacologic therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs continue to play an important role in the management of patients with this common clinical problem. The key to the proper use of antiarrhythmic drugs is a thorough knowledge of their mode of action and pharmacology. The pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs is particularly important because patients with cardiac arrhythmias frequently have multiorgan disease, which may influence the metabolism and elimination of antiarrhythmic drugs. The accumulation of toxic amounts of these agents can lead to dire effects including, but not limited to, ventricular proarrhythmia and malignant bradycardia. The goals of pharmacologic therapy of cardiac arrhythmia are to provide the maximum benefit in terms of arrhythmia suppression while maintaining patient safety. To accomplish these goals, a knowledge of the pharmacology of several antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which prolongs cardiac repolarisation independently of its antiadrenergic action (class III antiarrhythmic properties). The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol appears to arise predominantly from its class III properties, and the drug exhibits a broader antiarrhythmic profile than the conventional beta-blockers. Sotalol is effective in controlling paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and in preventing initiation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol shows promise in the control of nonmalignant and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly those associated with ischaemic heart disease. It is effective in suppressing complex forms of ventricular ectopy, displaying superior antiectopic activity to propranolol and metoprolol. The acute efficacy of sotalol in preventing reinduction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and suppressing spontaneous episodes of these arrhythmias on Holter monitoring is translated into long term prophylactic efficacy against arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 55 to 85% of patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, sotalol offers the advantage over the class I agents of reducing cardiac and all-cause mortality in the high risk population with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The adverse effects of sotalol are primarily related to its beta-blocking activity and its class III property of prolonging cardiac repolarisation. Sotalol is devoid of overt cardiodepressant activity in patients with mild or moderate left ventricular dysfunction. The overall arrhythmogenic potential is moderately low, but torsade de pointes may develop in conjunction with excessive prolongation of the QT interval due to bradycardia, hypokalaemia or high plasma concentrations of the drug. In summary, sotalol displays a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic activity, is haemodynamically well tolerated, and confers a relatively low proarrhythmic risk. It is likely to prove particularly appropriate in the treatment and prophylaxis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in morbidly obese women

The pharmacokinetics of a single dose of ranitidine 50 mg iv were determined in ten normal-weight and ten morbidly obese (greater than 90 percent ideal body weight) age-matched female subjects. No significant difference between normal and obese subjects was found in ranitidine peak serum concentration, volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination rate constant. Ranitidine volume of distribution and clearance were significantly smaller in the obese subjects per kilogram of total body weight (1.45 vs. 0.80 L/kg and 0.59 vs. 0.33 L/h/kg, respectively; p less than 0.001) but not when normalized to ideal body weight (1.65 vs. 1.45 L/kg and 0.68 vs. 0.59 L/h/kg). We conclude that obese patients receiving ranitidine therapy should be treated with standard dosages or dosages based on ideal body weight.

Comparison of propranolol and sotalol pharmacokinetics in obese subjects

Six obese subjects (mean +/- s.d. : 145.1 +/- 16.7% of ideal body weight) were randomly assigned to a single i.v. dose either of (+/-)-propranolol base (0.108 mg kg-1 of ideal body weight) or of (+/-)-sotalol base (1.06 mg kg-1 of ideal body weight). Each subject received the other drug 7 days later. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with those obtained previously in non-obese control subjects. In obese subjects, the pharmacokinetic data calculated for sotalol were comparable with those measured in controls (total body clearance = 9.4 +/- 2.9 L h-1; volume of distribution during the terminal phase = 79.8 +/- 19.8 L or 0.9 +/- 0.2 L kg-1; terminal half-life = 6.2 +/- 1.6 h). For propranolol, total clearance (44.3 +/- 15.9 L h-1) and volume of distribution (230.5 +/- 48.2 L or 2.7 +/- 0.7 L kg-1) were significantly less than control values. The terminal half-life (3.9 +/- 1.1 h), was not significantly increased. These results could be explained by altered tissue blood flow and a decreased metabolic capacity of the liver in obese subjects.

Cefotiam disposition in markedly obese athlete patients, Japanese sumo wrestlers

Markedly obese athletes like Japanese sumo wrestlers may frequently suffer various traumas which result in the prophylaxis or treatment of posttraumatic infection with antibiotics. However, appropriate dosage regimens in this group of patients have not been fully known for many antibiotics. Therefore, we studied the kinetic disposition of cefotiam, a parenteral, broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against gram-positive and -negative bacteria, after an intravenous dose (2 g) infused over 30 min into 15 sumo wrestler patients with an excess body weight (130 to 220% of ideal body weight) and 10 control patients with a normal weight (90 to 102% of ideal body weight). Mean (+/- standard deviation) clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were significantly greater in the sumo wrestler than in the control group (38.3 +/- 9.4 versus 23.5 +/- 6.0 liters/h, P less than 0.001, and 30.2 +/- 8.0 versus 17.9 +/- 6.1 liters, P less than 0.001). Mean elimination half-life was slightly but significantly longer in the sumo wrestler than in the control group (0.91 +/- 0.14 versus 0.74 +/- 0.20 h, P less than 0.05). However, mean residence time did not differ between the two groups (0.79 +/- 0.10 versus 0.75 +/- 0.14 h). The statistical differences in clearance and volume of distribution between the two groups disappeared when these kinetic parameters were corrected for body surface area, but not for total body weight or ideal body weight. The results suggest that the dosage calculation of cefotiam, a hydrophilic antibiotic, should be made on the basis of body surface area in morbidly obese athlete or sumo wrestler patients. However, whether this recommendation should extend to other nonathlete obese subjects remains to be determined.

Predicting creatinine clearance and renal drug clearance in obese patients from estimated fat-free body mass

Existing methods for predicting creatinine clearance provide accurate estimates for normal-weight patients but not for patients who are obese. Studies into this problem began with an animal model of obesity, the obese overfed rat. Mean creatinine clearance was found to vary in direct proportion to fat-free body mass, determined in both obese and normal animals. The relevance of this observation to renal function in humans was evaluated by analyzing published studies reporting creatinine clearance and creatinine excretion rates in obese and normal persons. Measured creatinine clearance correlated well with estimated fat-free body mass (r = 0.772, p less than 0.02), and urinary excretion of creatinine normalized to fat-free mass correlated impressively with age (r = 0.960). Formulas derived from these observations allow for the prediction of creatinine clearance at steady state: (formula; see text) In initial tests of these formulas, their predictions appeared to be as accurate as existing methods for the normal-weight population and far superior to these methods when applied to the obese population. Therefore, when creatinine clearance is not measured in obese patients, the estimation of this parameter with the proposed formulas should improve the ability to select the appropriate dose for drugs that are cleared principally by renal filtration.

Drug pharmacokinetics in the obese

In the obese, modifications in body constitution (higher percentage of fat and lower percentage of lean tissue and water) can affect drug distribution in the tissues. For slightly liposoluble molecules (e.g., digoxin, antipyrine), the equilibrium distribution volume (V), total and per kilogram weight, is significantly less than that of control subjects. With lipophilic drugs (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines), this parameter is significantly increased, explaining the prolongation of the plasma elimination half-life. For drugs that are almost equally soluble in water and oil (methyl xanthines, aminoglycosides), the V is slightly increased in the obese. The other main factors involved in drug diffusion in the tissues are binding to plasma and tissue proteins, and regional blood flow. In the obese the binding of drugs to albumin does not seem to be altered. A marked increase in plasma alpha-glycoprotein acid and in propranolol binding has been reported in some studies; this has not been corroborated by other authors. Although the cardiac output and total blood volume are increased in the obese, the blood flow per gram of fat is less than in nonobese subjects. This could limit diffusion in the tissues of some lipophilic drugs. Studies on hepatic clearance of drugs are not available in the obese, but hepatic histological alterations have been described. In most publications concerning drugs with biotransformation as the principal elimination route, the total plasma clearance is not reduced. Up to the present, there are no reports of any impairment involving renal elimination of drugs in the obese. Dose-adjustment of hydrophilic drugs is assessed according to the ideal weight of the individual obese subject; with lipophilic drugs the loading dose can be fixed according to the total weight; calculation of the maintenance dose depends on possible changes in the total clearance.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of intravenous propranolol in obese and normal volunteers

Plasma pharmacokinetics of a single IV dl-propranolol dose (8 mg) were investigated in 12 obese subjects (mean +/- SD: 110.3 +/- 20.4 kg; 198.7 +/- 32.5% of ideal body weight) and compared with those of 12 healthy subjects (66.7 +/- 6.8 kg; 94.5 +/- 7.8% of ideal body weight). In obese subjects plasma alpha-1 glycoprotein acid concentrations and propranolol protein binding capacity did not differ significantly from control subjects. When compared with controls, obese subjects showed a significant increase (P less than .01) in AUC (161.0 +/- 67.0 vs 109.6 +/- 23.1 hr.micrograms/L), and significant decreases (P less than .01) in Vss (208.9 +/- 71.9 vs 318.6 +/- 91.8 L), V beta (234.3 +/- 70.4 vs 340.7 +/- 89.1 L), and total clearance (57.5 +/- 18.3 vs 75.9 +/- 15.4 L/hr). Elimination half-life was similar for the two populations (3.5 +/- 0.9 hr in obese subjects vs 3.1 +/- 0.9 hr in controls). Therefore, neither lipophilicity of propranolol nor drug plasma protein binding can explain these data. Altered hepatic function and tissue blood flow in obese subjects are proposed as an explanation for the decrease in total clearance and volume of distribution.

Digitalis for congestive heart disease in the elderly. A family practice view of the efficacy of long-term therapy

The long-term efficacy of digoxin maintenance therapy must be determined individually for patients with normal sinus rhythm who have a history of congestive heart failure but no remaining signs or symptoms. Predictive factors for successful discontinuation of the agent in the elderly include normal mental status (including absence of depression), ability to adequately perform activities of daily living, general feelings of well-being, absence of multiple organic disease, absence of multiple drug use, and no evidence of existing congestive heart failure or atrial fibrillation. Our findings indicate that physicians and patients need to reexamine the concept that congestive heart failure is necessarily a chronic disease. Certainly, evidence exists that continuing digitalis therapy indefinitely is inappropriate and may be harmful. Further investigation may prove that congestive heart failure in the elderly, like pneumonia, is a common acute occurrence and in many cases not a chronic state for which patients are destined to receive medication indefinitely. We hope that the findings from our small sample will stimulate other investigators to question the indiscriminate long-term use of digitalis in the elderly.